ammonia preparation in the tailpipe: spray/wall ...€¦ · urea biuret cyanuric acid ammelide 1 2...

25
KIT The Research University in the Helmholtz Association KIT - Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry (ITCP) www.kit.edu Courtesy of Bosch www.dieselforum.org Ammonia preparation in the tailpipe: Spray/wall interaction and deposit formation M. Börnhorst, C. Kuntz, S. Tischer, O. Deutschmann Cross-Cut Lean Exhaust Emissions Reduction Simulations (CLEERS) Workshop, Sept. 18-20, 2018, Ann Arbor

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association

    KIT - Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry (ITCP)

    www.kit.edu

    Courtesy of Bosch

    www.dieselforum.org

    Ammonia preparation in the tailpipe: Spray/wall interaction and

    deposit formation

    M. Börnhorst, C. Kuntz, S. Tischer, O. Deutschmann

    Cross-Cut Lean Exhaust Emissions Reduction Simulations (CLEERS) Workshop, Sept. 18-20, 2018, Ann Arbor

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry2

    Ammonia preparation in the tailpipe

    Marion BörnhorstSept. 20, 2018

    Injection of a 32.5 wt.-% urea solution

    (AdBlue®) used as precursor for ammonia

    Formation of liquid and solid deposits by

    incomplete evaporation and urea conversion

    Serious loss of NOx reduction efficiency

    Diesel oxidation catalyst and

    particel filter

    Selective catalytic

    reductionSource: BMW

    ASCDOC & DPF SCR

    AdBlue

    injection

    2 NH3 + NO + NO2 2 N2 + 3 H2O

    (NH2)2CO (l) NH3 (g) + HNCO (g)

    HNCO (g) + H2O (g) NH3 (g) + CO2 (g)

    Robert Bosch GmbH

    [1] Brack, W., Untersuchung der Ablagerungsbildung durch Harnstofffolgeprodukte im Abgasstrang, PhD thesis (2015), 1-175

    Endoscopic records from a hot gas test rig [1]

    Urea

    thermolysis &

    hydrolysis

    SCR reaction

    Ammonia slip

    catalyst

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry3

    Liquid and solid deposits in SCR systems

    Marion Börnhorst

    SCR

    Spray:

    pinj, Tinj, minj

    Gas:

    Tg, pg, ug

    Liquid Film:

    Af, hf, Tf

    Wall:

    Θ, Ra, Tw

    Evaporation

    Thermolysis &

    Hydrolysis

    Solid deposit

    Drops:

    ud, dd, Td

    Sept. 20, 2018

    Solid by-products:

    Biuret

    Triuret

    Cyanuric acid

    Ammelide

    Ammeline

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry4

    Outline

    Urea decomposition

    • Deposit formation at a hot gas test rig

    • Deposit characterization

    Kinetic modeling

    • Kinetic measurements on urea decomposition

    • DETCHEMMPTR model

    Integration toCFD

    • Coupling of kinetic model with StarCCM+ simulation

    Marion BörnhorstSept. 20, 2018

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry5

    Laboratory test rig

    Hot gas test rig with integrated urea dosing system

    Marion Börnhorst

    Vertical compressor

    FlowmeterDiffusor Contraction

    Control unit

    Measuring section

    UWS tank

    Injection/measurement cell designed

    for undisturbed flow and optical access

    TABELLE

    Parameter Unit Operating range

    Gas flow L/min 50 - 3000

    Gas velocity m/s 0.5 - 25

    Reynolds number - 1200 - 50000

    Gas temperature °C 100 – 350

    Injection mass flow kg/h 0.03 – 5.3

    Injection pressure bar 5

    Injection angle ° 33

    Sept. 20, 2018

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry6

    Deposit formation in lab test benchInjection

    Marion Börnhorst

    OP: Tgas= 300°C, Vgas= 1200 L/min, ugas = 11 m/s,

    murea = 1 g/min, 3 x 40 min injection

    Film formation during

    injection

    Evaporation leaves solid

    deposits

    Dissolution of existing

    deposits

    Deposit build-up over time

    Sept. 20, 2018

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry7

    Deposit sampling

    OP Tgas / °C Vgas / L/min ugas / m/s

    1 150 866 8.0

    2 190 916 8.5

    3 280 1030 9.5

    4 320 870 8.0

    Marion Börnhorst

    1 2

    43

    - Three injection periods of 40 min

    - UWS mass flow of 1 g/min

    Sept. 20, 2018

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry8

    Deposit Characterization

    Marion Börnhorst

    High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

    Deposit composition

    3D-Structure analysis

    Surface profile of deposits

    Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)

    Decomposition kinetics

    Keyence LJ-V7200

    Laser profile sensor

    Sept. 20, 2018

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry9

    Deposit analysis by HPLC

    Method development for qualitative and quantitative deposit analysis based on

    Koebel et al. (1995) and Bernhard et al. (2011)

    Separation and quantification of components by adsorption potential

    Na2HPO4 buffer as solvent and eluent

    Anion exchange column

    Photodiode-array detector (UV/VIS)

    Ure

    a

    Biu

    ret

    Me

    lam

    ine

    Am

    me

    line

    Am

    me

    lid

    Cya

    nu

    ric

    acid

    Method validation and calibration by

    standard solutions

    Strong pH sensitivity affects

    measurement accuracy

    Marion BörnhorstSept. 20, 2018

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry10

    TGA procedure

    Thermogravimetric analysis of

    decomposition kinetics

    Grinded, representative sample of deposit

    TG Setup: Netzsch STA 409, TASC 414/2

    Initial sample mass of 15 – 20 mg

    Gas flow of 100 ml/min synthetic air

    Temperature programm: heating rate

    of 2K/min, from 40 to 700°C

    Marion BörnhorstSept. 20, 2018

    Sample

    crucible

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry11

    TGA of urea and by-product decomposition

    Marion Börnhorst

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

    sam

    ple

    mass [%

    ]

    Temperature [°C]

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

    sam

    ple

    mass [

    %]

    Temperature [°C]

    Urea

    Biuret

    Cyanuric acid

    Ammelide

    1

    2

    3

    Sept. 20, 2018

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry12

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    Mass lo

    ss / %

    Temperature / °C

    OP 1

    urea

    Characterization of OP 1 deposit

    Marion Börnhorst

    Deposit volume cm³ 16.87

    Max. height mm 19.25

    Mean height mm 5.24

    Substance Urea Biu Triu CyA Amd Amn Mel Rest

    Portion

    [wt.-%]

    65.6 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 34.2

    Sept. 20, 2018

    OP Tgas / °C Vgas / L/min ugas / m/s

    1 150 866 8.0

    Characterization of solid deposits from urea water solution injected into a hot gas test rig, Börnhorst et al. (2018)

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry13

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    Mass lo

    ss / %

    Temperature / °C

    OP 2

    urea

    Characterization of OP 2 deposit

    Marion BörnhorstSept. 20, 2018

    OP Tgas / °C Vgas / L/min ugas / m/s

    2 190 916 8.5

    Deposit volume cm³ 0.13

    Max. height mm 0.80

    Mean height mm 0.47

    Substance Urea Biu Triu CyA Amd Amn Mel Rest

    Portion

    [wt.-%]

    57.0 9.7 2.2 0.4 0 0 0 30.7

    Characterization of solid deposits from urea water solution injected into a hot gas test rig, Börnhorst et al. (2018)

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry14

    Characterization of OP 3 deposit

    Marion Börnhorst

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    Mass lo

    ss / %

    Temperature / °C

    OP3

    cyanuric acid

    OP3

    Sept. 20, 2018

    OP Tgas / °C Vgas / L/min ugas / m/s

    3 280 1030 9.5

    Deposit volume cm³ 0.83

    Max. height mm 2.55

    Mean height mm 0.57

    Substance Urea Biu Triu CyA Amd Amn Mel Rest

    Portion

    [wt.-%]

    19.4 2.3 0 53.1 5.8 0.9 0 18.5

    Characterization of solid deposits from urea water solution injected into a hot gas test rig, Börnhorst et al. (2018)

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry15

    Characterization of OP 4 deposit

    Marion Börnhorst

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    mass l

    oss /

    %

    Temperature / °C

    OP4

    cyanuric acid

    OP4

    Sept. 20, 2018

    OP Tgas / °C Vgas / L/min ugas / m/s

    4 320 870 8.0

    Deposit volume cm³ 0.35

    Max. height mm 2.46

    Mean height mm 0.99

    Substance Urea Biu Triu CyA Amd Amn Mel Rest

    Portion

    [wt.-%]

    1.6 0 0 68.1 5.9 1.2 0 23,2

    Characterization of solid deposits from urea water solution injected into a hot gas test rig, Börnhorst et al. (2018)

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry16

    Deposit composition

    Marion Börnhorst

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

    sam

    ple

    mass [%

    ]

    Temperature [°C]

    Urea

    Sept. 20, 2018

    OP 1

    OP 2OP 3

    OP 4

    Similar deposit composition for similar operating temperatures

    Prediction of deposit composition by characteristic urea decomposition kinetics

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry17

    DETCHEMMPTR

    Multiple Phase Tank Reactor

    0D batch type reactor model

    Solves for species balances in multiple phases and heat balance

    Homogeneous and inter-phase reactions

    ni,g,Vg

    ni,l,VlHomogeneous

    Reactions

    Inter-phase

    Reactions

    ni,aq,VaqHomogeneous

    Reactions

    ni,in

    ni,s,Vs

    Inter-phase

    Reactions

    Homogeneous

    Reactions

    Marion BörnhorstSept. 20, 2018

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry18

    Kinetic model

    Marion Börnhorst

    Consumption

    Production

    Water

    Carbon dioxide

    Isocyanic acid

    Ammonia

    Urea

    Biuret

    Triuret

    Melamine

    Ammeline

    Ammelide

    Cyanuric Acid

    Sept. 20, 2018

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry19

    Decomposition of urea in DETCHEMMPTR

    Marion Börnhorst

    100 200 300 400 500 600 7000

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10 total

    urea(l)

    urea(s)

    biu(l)

    biu(s)

    triu(l)

    triu(s)

    cya(s)

    ammd(s)Mass / %

    Temperature / °C

    Validation of overall mass loss by experimental data

    Evolution of different species in liquid and solid phase during decomposition

    Sept. 20, 2018

    mg

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry20

    Simulation of chemical decomposition

    Marion Börnhorst

    urea biuret

    cyanuric acid triuret

    Sept. 20, 2018

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry21

    CFD-Simulation of thermogravimetric

    decomposition in StarCCM+

    Mesh with ~30000 cells

    Timestep of 20 ms

    Segregated flow model

    k-ε-turbulence model

    Evaporation/condensation model

    Rohsenow boiling model

    Complex Chemistry CVODE model

    Marion BörnhorstSept. 20, 2018

    MPTR algorithm C-code

    Implementation by user coding

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry22

    Coupling of DETCHEMMPTR with Star-CCM+

    (l)

    (aq)

    (s)

    User CodeMPTR

    StarCCM+

    Calculation of reaction rates in different phases (aq, l, s)and at interfaces

    Calculation ofconcentrations in gas phase and liquid film, gas-liquid equilibrium, heat balance

    (l)

    (g)

    ci, film, Tfilm, tri

    Sept. 20, 2018 Marion Börnhorst

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry23

    Simulation of by-product decomposition

    Excellent agreement with simulation in

    DETCHEMMPTR

    Continuous improvement of kinetic model

    for better agreement with experiments

    Marion BörnhorstSept. 20, 2018

    biuret

    cyanuric acid

    triuret

  • Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry24

    Conclusion

    Systematic study on deposit formation in a hot gas test rig

    Characterization of derived solid deposits

    Kinetic modeling of urea decomposition and simulation in DETCHEMMPTR

    Integration of DETCHEMMPTR algorithm into a CFD simulation by user coding

    Marion Börnhorst

    Outlook

    Comprehensive simulation of entire test rig

    Flow field

    Spray injection

    Spray/wall interaction

    Wall heat transfer

    Liquid film formation and flow

    Urea decomposition and by-product

    formation

    Sept. 20, 2018

  • KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association

    KIT - Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry (ITCP)

    www.kit.edu

    Courtesy of Bosch

    www.dieselforum.org

    Thank you for your attention.

    Contact: [email protected]

    We acknowledge financial support by

    Research Association for

    Combustion Engines