1 reaction mechanisms. 2 ionic reactions 3 4 5

1

Reaction mechanisms

2

Ionic Reactions

3

Ionic Reactions

4

Ionic Reactions

5

Ionic Reactions

6

Bond PolarityPartial charges

7

Nucleophiles and Electrophiles

8

Leaving Groups

9

Radical Reactions

10

Type of Reactions

11

Nucleophilic reactions: nucleophilic substitution (SN)

Nucleophilic substitution: -> reagent is nucleophil

-> nucleophil replaces leaving group

-> competing reaction (elimination + rearrangements)

nucleophilicsubstitution

Nucleophile

++ C NuC XNu - X-

leavinggroup

• in the following general reaction, substitution takes place on an sp3 hybridized (tetrahedral) carbon

12

Nucleophilic Substitution

• Some nucleophilic substitution reactions

CH3-I

HO -

Nu -

RO -

HS -

RS -

I -

NH3

HOH

CH3-SH

CH3-SR

CH3-OH

CH3-OR

H

CH3-O-H

CH3-NH3+

CH3X CH3Nu X-

+An alcohol (after proton transfer)

An alkylammonium ion

An alkyl iodide

A sulfide (a thioether)

A thiol (a mercaptan)

An ether

An alcohol

Reaction: + +

13

Mechanism

• Chemists propose two limiting mechanisms for nucleophilic displacement– a fundamental difference between them is the timing of bond breaking and

bond forming steps

• At one extreme, the two processes take place simultaneously; designated SSNN22

– S = substitution– N = nucleophilic– 2 = bimolecular (two species are involved in the rate-determining step)– rate = k[haloalkane][nucleophile]

• In the other limiting mechanism, bond breaking between carbon and the leaving group is entirely completed before bond forming with the nucleophile begins. This mechanism is designated SSNN11 where

– S = substitution– N = nucleophilic– 1 = unimolecular (only one species is involved in the rate-determining

step)– rate = k[haloalkane]

14

SN2 reaction: bimolecular nucleophilic substitution

C Br

H

HH

HO + C

H

H H

HO Br

- -

Transition state withsimultaneous bond breaking

and bond forming

C

H

HH

HO + Br -

– both reactants are involved in the transition state of the rate-determining step

– the nucleophile attacks the reactive center from the side opposite the leaving group

15

SN2

• An energy diagram for an SN 2 reaction

– there is one transition state and no reactive intermediate

16

• SN1 is illustrated by the solvolysis of tert-butyl bromide

– Step 1: ionization of the C-X bond gives a carbocation intermediate

C

CH3

CH3H3C

+C

H3C

H3C

Br

H3C

slow, ratedetermining

A carbocation intermediate; carbon is trigonal planar

+ Br

SN1 reaction: unimolecular nucleophilic substitution

17

SN1

– Step 2: reaction of the carbocation (an electrophile) with methanol (a nucleophile) gives an oxonium ion

– Step 3: proton transfer completes the reaction

CH3O

H H3C

C

CH3

CH3

OCH3

H

C

CH3

CH3

CH3

O

H3C

HH3C

H3C

C

H3C

O

CH3

H

fast ++ ++

++++ fastC

H3CH3C

O

H3C

OCH3

HOHO

CH3CH3

H

H

CH3

H3C

CH3C

H3C

18

SN1

• An energy diagram for an SN1 reaction

19

SN1

• For an SN1 reaction at a stereocenter, the product is a racemic mixture

• the nucleophile attacks with equal probability from either face of the planar carbocation intermediate

(R)-EnantiomerPlanar carbocation (achiral)

C

H

Cl

C6H5

Cl

C+

C6H5

H

Cl

CH3OH-Cl-

-H+

+

A racemic mixture

Cl

C6H5 C6H5

C OCH3

H

CH3O CH

Cl(R)-Enantiomer(S)-Enantiomer

20

Effect of variables on SN Reactions

– the nature of substituents bonded to the atom attacked

by nucleophile

– the nature of the nucleophile

– the nature of the leaving group

– the solvent effect

21

Effect of substituents on SN2

22

Effect of substituents on SN1

23

• SN1 reactions

– governed by electronic factorselectronic factors, namely the relative stabilities of carbocation intermediates

– relative rates: 3° > 2° > 1° > methyl

• SN2 reactions

– governed by steric factorssteric factors, namely the relative ease of approach of the nucleophile to the site of reaction

– relative rates: methyl > 1° > 2° > 3°

Effect of substituents on SN reactions

24

Effect of substituents on SN reactions

• Effect of electronic and steric factors in competition between SN1 and SN2 reactions

25

Nucleophilicity

• NucleophilicityNucleophilicity: a kinetic property measured by the rate at which a Nu attacks a reference compound under a standard set of experimental conditions– for example, the rate at which a set of nucleophiles

displaces bromide ion from bromoethane

CH3CH2Br NH3 CH3CH2NH3+ Br

-++

Two important features:

- An anion is a better nucleophile than a uncharged conjugated acid

- strong bases are good nucleophiles

26

Nucleophilicity

good

poor

Br-, I -

HO-, CH3O-, RO-

CH3S-, RS-

H2O

CH3OH, ROH

CH3COH, RCOH

O O

NH3, RNH2, R2NH, R3N

CH3SH, RSH, R2S

Effectiveness Nucleophile

moderateCH3CO-, RCO-

O O

27

Nucleophilicity

28

Leaving Group

29

Leaving Group

30

The Leaving Group

– the best leaving groups in this series are the halogens I-, Br-, and Cl-

– OH-, RO-, and NH2- are such poor leaving groups that

they are rarely if ever displaced in nucleophilic substitution reactions

I- > Br- > Cl- >> F- > CH3CO- > HO- > CH3O- > NH2-

Greater ability as leaving group

Greater stability of anion; greater strength of conjugate acid

Rarely act as leaving groups in nucleophilic substitution and -elimination reactions

O

31

Solvent Effect

• Protic solventProtic solvent: a solvent that contains an -OH group

– these solvents favor SN1 reactions; the greater the polarity of the solvent, the easier it is to form carbocations in it

CH3COOHCH3CH2OHCH3OHHCOOH

H2OStructure

Acetic acid

Formic acid

EthanolMethanol

Water

ProticSolvent

Polarity of Solvent

32

Solvent Effect

• Aprotic solventAprotic solvent: does not contain an -OH group – it is more difficult to form carbocations in aprotic

solvents

– aprotic solvents favor SN2 reactions

(CH3CH2)2O

CH2Cl2

OCH3CCH3

OCH3SCH3

Diethyl ether

Dichloromethane

AproticSolvent Structure

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)

Acetone

Polarity ofSolvent

33

Summary of SN1 and SN2

CH3X

RCH2X

R2CHX

R3CX

Type of Haloalkane

Methyl

Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

SN2 SN1

Substitutionat a stereocenter

SN2 is favored. SN1 does not occur. The methylcation is so unstable that it is never observed in solution.

SN1 does not occur. Primary carbocations are so unstable thatthey are never observed in solution.

SN1 is favored in protic solventswith poor nucleophiles.

SN2 is favored in aproticsolvents with goodnucleophiles.

SN2 does not occur becauseof steric hindrance aroundthe substitution center.

SN1 is favored because of the ease of formation of tertiary carbocations.

Inversion of configuration.The nucleophile attacksthe stereocenter from theside opposite the leavinggroup.

Racemization. The carbocationintermediate is planar, and attack bythe nucleophile occurs with equalprobability from either side.

SN2 is favored.

34

Competing Reaction: Elimination

--EliminationElimination: removal of atoms or groups of atoms from adjacent carbons to form a carbon-carbon double bond– we study a type of -elimination called

dehydrohalogenationdehydrohalogenation (the elimination of HX)

C CH X

CH3CH2O-Na+

C C

CH3CH2OH

CH3CH2OH Na+X -+

+

+

An alkyl halide

Base

An alkene

35

-Elimination

• There are two limiting mechanisms for β-elimination reactions

• E1 mechanism:E1 mechanism: at one extreme, breaking of the C-X bond is complete before reaction with base breaks the C-H bond– only R-X is involved in the rate-determining step

• E2 mechanism:E2 mechanism: at the other extreme, breaking of the C-X and C-H bonds is concerted– both R-X and base are involved in the rate-determining

step

36

E2 Mechanism

• A one-step mechanism; all bond-breaking and bond-forming steps are concerted

37

E1 Mechanism

– Step 1: ionization of C-X gives a carbocation intermediate

– Step 2: proton transfer from the carbocation intermediate to a base (in this case, the solvent) gives the alkene

CH2-C-CH3

Br

CH3

CH3-C-CH3

CH3

Br –slow, rate

determining

+(A carbocation intermediate)

+

HO

H3CH-CH2-C-CH3

CH3

HOH

H3CCH2=C-CH3

CH3fast+

+ ++

Nucleophile

-> acting as a strong base

38

Elimination

• Saytzeff rule:Saytzeff rule: the major product of a elimination is the more stable (the more highly substituted) alkene

Br CH3CH2O-Na+

CH3CH2OH2-Methyl-2-butene (major product)

2-Bromo-2-methylbutane

2-Methyl-1-butene

+

Br CH3O-Na+

CH3OH+

1-Methyl-cyclopentene

(major product)

1-Bromo-1-methyl-cyclopentane

Methylene-cyclopentane

39

Elimination Reactions

• Summary of E1 versus E2 Reactions for Haloalkanes

RCH2X

R2CHX

R3CX

Haloalkane E1 E2

Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

E1 does not occur.Primary carbocations areso unstable that they are never observed in solution.

E2 is favored.

Main reaction with strong bases such as OH- and OR-.

Main reaction with weak bases such as H2O and ROH.

Main reaction with strong bases such as OH- and OR-.

Main reaction with weak bases such as H2O and ROH.

40

Substitution vs Elimination

• Many nucleophiles are also strong bases (OH- and RO-) and SN and E reactions often compete

– the ratio of SN/E products depends on the relative rates of the two reactions

nucleophilicsubstitution

-eliminationC CH X + Nu-

C CH Nu +

C C H-Nu+ +

X-

X-

What favors Elimination reactions:

- attacking nucleophil is a strong and large base

- steric crowding in the substrate

- High temperatures and low polarity of solvent

41

SN1 versus E1

• Reactions of 2° and 3° haloalkanes in polar protic solvents give mixtures of substitution and elimination products

CH3

CH3

ICCH3 -I-

CH3 C

CH3 SN1

CH3-Cl-H2O

CH3OH

SN1ClCH3

CH3

CH3C

CH2

CH3

CH3

C

C

CH3

CH3

CH3

CCH3

CH3

CH3

OH

OCH3

H+

H+

H+

E1

+

+

+

+

42

SN2 versus E2

• It is considerably easier to predict the ratio of SN2 to E2 products

leaving groupC

C

RR

H

RRAttack of base on a -hydrogen by E2 is only slightly affected by branching at the -carbon; alkene formation is accelerated

SN2 attack of a nucleophile isimpeded by branching at the- and -carbons

43

Summary of S vs E for Haloalkanes

– for methyl and 1°haloalkanes

RCH2X

CH3X

SN1 and E1 reactions of primary halides are never observed.

SN2

SN1 reactions of methyl halides are never observed.The methyl cation is so unstable that it is never formed in solution.

SN2

E2 The main reaction with strong, bulky bases, such as potassium tert-butoxide.

Primary cations are never formed in solution; therefore,

Methyl

Primary

SN1/E1

SN1

The only substitution reactions observed

The main reaction with strong bases such as OH- andEtO-. Also, the main reaction with good nucleophiles/weak bases, such as I- and CH3COO-.

44

Summary of S vs E for Haloalkanes

– for 2° and 3° haloalkanes

The main reaction with strong bases/good nucleophiles

R3CX

such as I- and CH3COO-.R2CHX

Main reaction with strong bases, such as HO- and RO-.

Main reactions with poor nucleophiles/weak bases.

The main reaction with weak bases/good nucleophiles,

E2

SN2

E2

SN2 reactions of tertiary halides are never observed

SN1/ E1

Secondary

Tertiarybecause of the extreme crowding around the 3° carbon.

SN1/ E1 Common in reactions with weak nucleophiles in polarprotic solvents, such as water, methanol, and ethanol.

such as OH- and CH3CH2O-.

SN2

45

Summary of S vs E for Haloalkanes

– Examples: predict the major product and the mechanism for each reaction

ClNaOH 80°C

H2O+1.

Br(C2H5)3N

30°CCH2Cl2

+2.

BrCH3O

- Na

+

methanol3. +

Cl

Na+

I-4. + acetone

Elimination, strong base, high temp.

SN2, weak base, good nucleophil

SN1 (+Elimination), strong base, good nucleophil, protic solvent

No reaction, I is a weak base (SN2)I better leaving group than Cl

46

Carbocation rearrangements

Also 1,3- and other shifts are possible

The driving force of rearrangements is -> to form a more stable carbocation !!!

Happens often with secondary carbocations -> more stable tertiary carbocation

47

Carbocation rearrangements in SN + E reactions

Rearrangement

48

Carbocation rearrangements in SN + E reactions -> Wagner – Meerwein

rearrangements

Rearrangement of a secondary carbocations -> more stable tertiary carbocation

Plays an important role in biosynthesis of molecules, i.e. Cholesterol -> (Biochemistry)

49

Carbocation rearrangements in Electrophilic addition reactions