1 trends in child outcomes (c-3 / b-7) and family outcomes (c-4) analysis and summary report of all...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
Trends inChild Outcomes (C-3 / B-7)and Family Outcomes (C-4)
Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ 2008-2009Annual Performance Reports
Christina Kasprzak,Robin Rooney, Siobhan ColganLynne Kahn, Kathy Hebbeler (NECTAC / ECO)
November 30, 20104:00 PM EST
2
1. National data on child and family outcomes (C3/B7 and C4)
2. Challenges related to collecting and reporting on this indicator
3. Improvement activities
Webinar Focus
Quick Poll 1
Who is joining uson the call today?
4
Child Outcomes Data
Summary of 2010 APR Data
5
Part C State Approaches (n=56) to Measuring Child Outcomes
• Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
– 41 (73%) states
• Single assessment statewide
– 7 (13%) states
• Publishers’ online assessment systems
– 3 (5%) states
• Other approaches
– 5 (9%) states
6
HI
GU
AS
MP
Legend: COSF Publishers’ on-line systems One tool statewide Other
State Approaches to Child Outcomes Measurement Part C Program
Early Childhood Outcomes Center –August 2010
7
7
619 State Approaches (n=59)to Measuring Child Outcomes
• Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)– 36 (61%) states
• Single assessment statewide– 9 (15%) states
• Publishers’ online assessment systems– 6 (10%) states
• Other approaches– 7 (12%) states
8
MH
HI
GU
PWFM
AS
MP
Legend: COSF Publishers’ on-line systems One tool statewide Other
State Approaches to Child Outcomes Measurement Section 619 Programs
Early Childhood Outcomes Center –August 2010
9
The number of Part C childrenwith outcome data is increasing!
Part C Total Number of Children States Included in Progress Data
# of children reported
# of StatesFFY07
# of StatesFFY08
99 or less 13 6
100-499 25 16
500-999 6 13
1000-1999 9 11
2000+ 3 10
Range = 5-6452 Range = 11-7998
10
The number of 619 childrenwith outcome data is increasing!
619 Total Number of Children States Included in Progress Data
# of children reported
# of StatesFFY07
# of StatesFFY08
99 or less 12 8
100-499 14 6
500-999 10 12
1000-1999 8 7
2000-2999 5 10
3000+ 9 15
Range= 3-10,157 Range= 3-9,967
Quick Poll 2
Number of childrenin the data
12
Missing Data
• ECO additional analysis
• State efforts to identify missing data
• State efforts to reduce missing data
13
National Conference Callon Data Quality – Coming Soon
• What do you know the quality of your state’s outcomes data?
• Do you know how much missing data you have? How much is reasonable?
Missing data is still a major problem for many states. Join us to learn about how much progress has been made and how your state compares to the national numbers.
14
15
16
Part C Progress data trends FFY07FFY08
17
619 Progress data trends
FFY07FFY08
Quick Poll 3
ProgressData Trends
19
Part C - Category ‘e’ by % served
20
FFY2008 Summary Statements
Baseline FFY08Part C 619
SS1 SS2 SS1 SS2Outcome 1
63% 63% 76% 61%
Outcome 2
68% 54% 76% 53%
Outcome 3
69% 62% 75% 65%
21
Part C - Summary Statement 2 by % Served
22
What States are Doingfor Improvement
• Continuing training and TA on data collection system
• Enhancing data systems• Developing data analysis • Identifying and addressing
data quality issues• Identifying areas for program
improvement
Open Discussion
Questions?Comments?
24
Family Outcomes Data
Summary of 2010 APR Data
25
State Approaches to Family Outcomes Measurement Part C Program
Legend: ECO Family Outcomes Survey State-developed survey NCSEAM survey
HI
GU
AS
MP
Early Childhood Outcomes Center – August 2010
26
Survey timing and family population
Timing
Family Population
TotalAll familiesFamilies with ≥6
months*
Point in time (or time period) 25 12 37
Based on child participation 8 9
17
-at exit (3) (6)
-at IFSP meeting(s) (3) (2)
-IFSP and/or exit (2) (1)
Total 33 21 54
*One State used ≥9 months, and one State used ≥12 months
Quick Poll 4
Surveydistribution
28
Response rate variables
29
Response rate by state size
30
Representativeness: Comparison data
• Thirty-nine states (70%) reported the source of data used: – Part C population/ 618 data: 31
states– Program population data: 3 states – Target population: 3 states
– State data (not specified): 2 states
• Remaining 17 states did not specify
Quick Poll 5
Addressingrepresentativeness
32
Criteria used for evaluating representativeness
• Forty-six states (89%) reported the criteria they used for determining representativeness – Race/ ethnicity: 73% (41 states)– Geography (district, county, region): 50% (28 states)– Sex: 21% (12 states)– Child’s age: 20% (11 states)– Disability/ eligibility category: 9% (5 states) – Length of time in services: 9% (5 states)– Program size : 9% (5 states)
• Previous years: 2009: 44/56 (78.6%) and 2008: 37/56 (66.1%) reported criteria used
• Mean number of criteria used this year: 2.7 Previous years: 2009: 2.6 criteria and 2008: 2 criteria.
33
Performance and trends
Early intervention has helped…
A. Families know their rights: 84% +3% from last year
B. Families effectively communicate children’s needs: 85%
+2% from last year
C. Families help their children develop and learn: 90% +2% from last year
34
Performance by Survey Type
35
Performance by scoring criteria
36
Performance by state size
37
Performance by percent served
38
Were data representative?
• Forty-four states reported whether their data were representative (79%) – Yes, some data provided: 36% (20
states)– Yes, no data provided: 14% (8 states)– No: 11% (6 states)– Varied results: 18% (10 states)
• No conclusions re: representativeness reported among the remaining 12 states (21%)
39
State Highlights
• Analyzing and reporting outcomes among subgroups
• Improvement activities based on detailed analysis (e.g. by subgroups of families)
• Data collection improvement activities
• Partnering w/parent organizations
40
Suggested Formats for February 2011 APR Reporting
http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/pages/ fed_req.cfm#ECOSuggestedFormats
(this link is also available from
the webinar series page)
Open Discussion
Questions?Comments?
42
Full APR analysis Reportsare Available Online
• Part C:• http://www.nectac.org/~pdfs/calls/2010/
partcapr/2010_spp_partc_report.pdf
• Part B:• http://www.nectac.org/~pdfs/calls/2010/
partcapr/2010_spp_partc_report.pdf
(these links are also available from the webinar series page)
43
Thank you for participating.
Presentations from this series and their related resources are made available on the NECTAC website at:
http://www.nectac.org/~calls/2010/partcapr/partcapr.asp
Trends inChild Outcomes (C-3 / B-7)and Family Outcomes (C-4)
top related