an analysis on duke’s flouting conversational...
Post on 10-Apr-2019
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
AN ANALYSIS ON DUKE’S FLOUTING CONVERSATIONAL
MAXIMS ON “G.I JOE” FILM
THESIS
Written By:
DENNY BUDIKUSUMA
08360202
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG
2014
AN ANALYSIS ON DUKE’S FLOUTING CONVERSATIONAL
MAXIMS ON “G.I JOE” FILM
THESIS
Written By:
DENNY BUDIKUSUMA
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG
2014
AN ANALYSIS ON DUKE’S FLOUTING CONVERSATIONAL
MAXIMS ON “G.I JOE” FILM
THESIS
This thesis is submitted to meet one of the requirements to achieve
Sarjana Degree in English Education
Written By:
DENNY BUDIKUSUMA
08360202
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG
2014
MOTTO AND DEDICATION
Barangsiapa bersungguh-sungguh, sesungguhnya kesungguhannya itu adalah untuk
dirinya sendiri
(QS: Al-Ankabut [29]: 6)
Tuhan menciptakan kedua mata kita di depan karena kita harus terus melihat ke
depan, bukan kebelakang dan terpaku pada masa lalu
(Mario Teguh)
DEDICATION:
I dedicated this thesis to:
My beloved parents
My lovely wife
My whole big family
My best friends
My lovely second family “tralala and syalala”
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPROVAL ............................................................................................................ iii
LEGALISATION .................................................................................................... iv
MOTTO AND DEDICATION ............................................................................... v
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................. vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................... vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ viii
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1
1.1 Background of the Study ............................................................................ 1
1.2 Statement of Problems ................................................................................ 5
1.3 Purpose of the Study ................................................................................... 5
1.4 Significance of Study.................................................................................. 6
1.5 Scope and Limitations ................................................................................ 6
1.6 Definition of Key Terms ............................................................................. 6
CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE .................................. 9
2.1 Film ............................................................................................................. 9
2.2 Genre of Film............................................................................................... 11
2.3 Element of Film .......................................................................................... 13
2.4 Cooperative Principle and The Maxims ..................................................... 20
2.4.1 Maxim of Quantity ......................................................................... 21
2.4.2 Maxim of Quality ........................................................................... 22
2.4.3 Maxim of Relevance ....................................................................... .22
2.4.4 Maxim of Manner ........................................................................... .23
2.5 Flouting the Maxims ................................................................................... 24
2.5.1 Flouting the Maxim of Quantity ..................................................... 25
2.5.2 Flouting the Maxim of Quality ....................................................... 26
2.5.3 Flouting the Maxim of Relevance .................................................. 26
2.5.4 Flouting the Maxim of Manner ...................................................... 27
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ............................................... 29
3.1 Research Design ......................................................................................... 29
3.2 Object of the Study ..................................................................................... 30
3.3 Data Collection ........................................................................................... 31
3.4 Data Analysis .............................................................................................. 31
CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ......................... 33
4.1 Reasearch Findings ..................................................................................... 33
4.1.1 Kinds of Flouting Maxims by Duke .......................................... 33
4.1.2 The Maxims that Flouted the Most by Duke .............................. 40
4.1.3 The Reason of Duke Flouts Conversational Maxims ................. 40
4.2 Discussion .................................................................................................. 41
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ............................................. 47
5.1 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 47
5.2 Suggestion ................................................................................................. 48
5.2.1 Suggestion for The Lecturer ....................................................... 48
5.2.2 Suggestion for Engslish Department Students ........................... 49
5.2.3 Suggestion for Further Researcher ............................................. 49
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
REFERENCES
Ary, Donald. 2002. Introduction to Research in Education. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Barsam, Richard. 2010. An Introduction to Film. W.W Norton and Company: New
York, London
Beattie, Stuart., John Lee Hancock, Brian Koppelman and David Levien. 2007. G.I.
JOE: The Rise of Cobra Script. < http://www.imsdb.com/scripts/G.I.-Joe-
The-Rise-of-Cobra.html>.
Brown, G. and George Yule. 1983, Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Cook, Guy. 1989. Discourse. England: Oxford University Press.
Creswell, John W. 2009. Third Edition Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and
Mixed Methods approaches. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Dowling, Laura. 1998. Mrs. Dowling’s Literature Terms.
<http://www.dowlingcentral.com/MrsD/area/literature/Terms/conflict.html>.
(accessed on September 18, 2014)
Khosravizadeh, Parvaneh and Nikan Sadeh Vandi.(2011). International Conference on
Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 26, 122.
Soumya, Shashwati.(2013). Text, Context and The Theory of Relevance. The Criterion
An International Journal in English, IV, 2.
Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. University of California, Berkeley.
Grice, H.P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press
Klerer, Mario. 2004. An Introduction to Literary Studies. London and New York
Koesnosoebroto, B.S. 1988. The Anatomy of Prose Fiction. Jakarta: Depdikbud
Littlejohn, Stephen, 2009. Encyclopedia of Human Communications. SAGE Publications
Macmillan. 1987. Understanding Literature. Advision of Macmillar Company, Mission
Hills, California.
Meyer, Michael. 1990. Introduction to Literature 2nd edition. Australia
Schmidt, Jan Zlotnik; C. R Bogarad and L. Crokett. 2006. Legacies Fiction, Poetry,
Drama, Nonfiction. Thomson Wadsworth
Vassiliou, Andrew. 2006. Analysing Film Content: A text-Based Approach. University
of Surrey
top related