appendix g - wordpress.com · appendix g | state route 885/second avenue multimodal corridor study...

Appendix G Additional Performance Measures

Appendix G | State Route 885/Second Avenue Multimodal Corridor Study p. G-1

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

This Appendix compiles additional performance measurement details that were developed and

referenced throughout the establishment of existing conditions and the review and assessment

of proposed improvement scenarios. Specific content includes:

• Attachment G1: System-wide Delay Comparison

• Attachment G2: Level of Traffic Stress Research

• Attachment G3: Level of Service Comparison

Appendix G | State Route 885/Second Avenue Multimodal Corridor Study

ATTACHMENT G1

SYSTEM-WIDE DELAY COMPARISON

Delay – AM Low Growth – No Build

40%

16%

9%

35%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM Low Growth – Fill in the Gaps

42%

14%

11%

33%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM Low Growth – Moderate Investment

42%

17%

9%

32%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM Low Growth – Heavy Investment

48%

17%

9%

26%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM Medium Growth – No Build

39%

16%10%

35%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM Medium Growth – Fill in the Gaps

40%

16%

11%

33%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM Medium Growth – Moderate Investment

42%

18%

8%

32%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM Medium Growth – Heavy Investment

47%

16%

10%

27%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM High Growth – No Build

33%

16%

7%

44%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM High Growth – Fill in the Gaps

35%

14%

6%

45%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM High Growth – Moderate Infrastructure

34%

17%

6%

43%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – AM High Growth – Heavy Investment

42%

16%

10%

32%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM Low Growth – No Build

39%

18%

10%

33%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM Low Growth – Fill in the Gaps

39%

20%

10%

31%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM Low Growth – Moderate Investment

42%

16%

11%

31%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM Low Growth – Heavy Investment

46%

13%

12%

28%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM Medium Growth – No Build

36%

17%12%

35%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM Medium Growth – Fill in the Gaps

37%

20%

12%

32%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM Medium Growth – Moderate Investment

38%

17%13%

33%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM Medium Growth – Heavy Investment

42%

18%

9%

31%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM High Growth – No Build

27%

16%

10%

47%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM High Growth – Fill in the Gaps

27%

19%

10%

44%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM High Growth – Moderate Investment

29%

18%

11%

42%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Delay – PM High Growth – Heavy Investment

33%

19%10%

38%

Vehicle Miles Traveled by Delay (minutes)

0-5 5-10 10-15 >15

Appendix G | State Route 885/Second Avenue Multimodal Corridor Study

ATTACHMENT G2

LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS RESEARCH

Appendix G | State Route 885/Second Avenue Multimodal Corridor Study

ATTACHMENT G3

LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARISON

LOS – No Build Scenario– AM

LOS – Interim Hybrid Scenario – AM

LOS – Long Term Hybrid Scenario – AM

LOS – Long Term Hybrid Scenario – AM Hays Interchange

LOS – Long Term Hybrid Scenario – AM Greenfield Intersection

LOS – No Build Scenario – PM

LOS – Interim Hybrid Scenario – PM

LOS – Long Term Hybrid Scenario – PM

LOS – Long Term Hybrid Scenario – PM Hays Interchange

LOS – Long Term Hybrid Scenario – PM Greenfield Intersection