appreciation to ndt 3.1.ppt
Post on 09-Oct-2015
78 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
1/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
NDT
Tr
aining
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
2/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Appreciationto NDT
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
3/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
NDT Methods
Penetrant Testing Magnetic Particle
Testing
Eddy Current Testing
Ultrasonic Testing
Radiographic Testing
Magnetic Flux Leakage
Acoustic Emission
Infrared Testing Visual Testing Other methods
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
4/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
NDT
Which method is the best ?Depends on many factors andconditions
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
5/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING
NDT
Definition:
A procedure, which covers the inspection and/or testing of any
mater ial, component or assembly by means, which do not affect
i ts ultimate serviceabil i ty.
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
6/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
NDT
Industries involved with NDT:
Oil and Gas
Construction
Metal Fabrication
Chemical
Aerospace
Power Generation
Transportation
Medical
Electronic
Metal Manufacturing
Composite Manufacturing
Inspection and Testing
Research and Development
Training and Certification
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
7/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
CERTIFICATIONS ANDQUALIFICATIONS
NDT personnels should posses high credibilityand integrity
Proper training and certification required
Training : By qualified training personnels andaccredited training centres
International Certification Schemes available:
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
8/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Surface Testing method
For detecting surface breaking defects (opened tosurface)
Applicable to all materials -except for excessivelyporous (absorbing) materials
Also known asDye Penetrant Inspection (DPI)
Penetrant Flaw Detection (PFD)
Liquid Penetrant Inspection (LPI)
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
9/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing:SurfaceTesting
OPEN TO SURFACE/
SURFACE BREAKING
SUBSURFACE
INTERNAL
Penetrant Testing can only detect surface breaking defects
Penetrant must be able to enter the defect to form indication
Cannot be detected by
Penetrant Testing
Maybe detected by Penetrant Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
10/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Not suitable for porous or very absorbentmaterials
Examples:Wood
Cloth
Unglazed ceramic /pottery
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
11/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Basic Steps
Penetrant application
Removal of excess
penetrant
Pre-cleaning
Application of
Developer
Inspection
Post-cleaning
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
12/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Penetrating fluid (penetrant) applied tocomponent
Aerosol Spraying Immersion Brushing Electrostatic
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
13/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Penetrating fluid (penetrant) applied tocomponent and drawn into defect by
capillary action
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
14/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Principle : Capillary Action
Interaction of adhesive and cohesiveforces
meniscus
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
15/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Capillarity
The ability of a material to enteropening examples: tube or defects
The formula= 2S Cos
W
= Capillary pressure
S = Surface tension
= Contact angle
W = Width of opening
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
16/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Removal of excess penetrant
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
17/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Removal of excess penetrant
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
18/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Application of developer
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
19/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
20/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Penetrant drawn back out of the defect by
reverse capillary action
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
21/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Penetrant which pulled out from the defect by the
developer forms indication of the defect
Indications
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
22/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
23/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Advantages of PT
Applicable to non-ferromagnetics
Able to test large parts with a portablekit
Batch testing Applicable to small parts with complex
geometry
Simple,cheap easy to interpret Sensitivity
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
24/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Disadvantages of PT
Will only detect defects open to thesurface
Careful surface preparation required
Not applicable to porous materials Temperature dependant
Cannot retest indefinitely
Compatibility of chemicals
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
25/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
System classification
PENETRANT
Colour Contrast
Fluorescent
Dual sensitivity
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
26/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Colour Contrast Penetrant
Also known as Visible Dye Penetrant
Uses white light : Daylight or artificial white light
Bright coloured dye : usually RED
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
27/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Fluorescent v Colour Contrast
Fluorescent moresensitive
Less operator fatiguewith fluorescent
More difficulty inmonitoringfluorescentpenetrant removal
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
28/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Water Washable Penetrant
Also known as SELF-EMULSIFIED PENETRANT
Pre-mixed penetrant and emulsifier
Easily washed by water rinse
Oily
Penetrant
Emulsifier
+=
Water
Washable
Penetrant
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
29/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Water WashablePenetrant
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
30/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
PENETRANT
WATER
SPRAY
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
31/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant been washed off
Shallow wide defectsDeep or gross defects
shows
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
32/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Water Washable Penetrant
ADVANTAGES Ideal for rough
surfaces
Suitable for batch
testing Cheaper than other
methods
DISADVANTAGES Susceptible to over
washing
Least sensitive
method Requirement for a
water source
Corrosion problems
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
33/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Solvent Removable
ADVANTAGES Portability
No water supplyneeded
DISADVANTAGES Not suited to batch
testing
Requires hand wiping
so time consuming More expensive than
water washable
Potentially hazardous
chemicals
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
34/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Solvent Removable
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
35/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Post Emulsifiable Penetrant
StagesImmerse component in penetrant
Immerse component in emulsifier
Emulsifier diffuses into the penetrant making
it water washable
Water wash removes excess penetrantmixed with emulsifier
Penetrant in defects left unaffected
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
36/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Post emulsifiable
Post Emulsifiable
Penetrant
Emulsifier
Now the surfacepenetrant is
water washable
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
37/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Post emulsifiable
Penetrant
EmulsifierPenetrant mixed with emulsifier
Water
Spray
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
38/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant in defect not mixed with emulsifier :
NOT REMOVED
Only penetrant on the surface removed
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
39/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Post emulsifiable
ADVANTAGES
High Sensitivity
Maximumpenetrating ability
Greater control overpenetrant removal
DISADVANTAGES
Not suitable forrough surfaces
More expensive
More timeconsuming
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
40/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Developer Sensitivity
Dry powder 100 - 140 % Aqueous solution 110 - 150 %
Aqueous suspension 120 - 200%
Non-Aqueous 120 - 240%
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
41/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Systems
PENETRANT
Colourcontrast
Fluorescent
Dual
REMOVAL
Solvent
Waterwashable
Postemulsifiable
DEVELOPERS
Dry powder
Aqueous
Non-Aqueous
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
42/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Selection of System
Nature of discontinuities (size and type) Geometry and intricacy
Surface condition
Component material
Size and position
Equipment and expertise available Cost
Number of components to be tested
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
43/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Selection of System
Inspection of a large number of
threaded components
Fluorescent for mass inspections
Water washable more suited than solvents tobatch inspections
Post emulsifiable difficult to remove fromthreads
What method will you select and why ?
Fluorescent water washable with drypowder developer
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
44/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Selection of System
Inspection of turbine blades for fatigue
cracks
Fluorescent more sensitive than colour contrast Post emulsifiable more sensitive than water
washable
Non-aqueous developer most sensitive
What method will you select and why ?
Fluorescent post emulsifiable with non-aqueous developer
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
45/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Penetrant Testing of large aircraft components
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
46/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Fluorescent Penetrant Testing of small components
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
47/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Penetrant Testing
Penetrant Testing of various small components
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
48/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Magnetic Particle Testing
Part 2
NDT Training & Certification
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
49/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Magnetic Particle Testing
M i
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
50/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Magnetism
The phenomenon of certain materials which attract
certain other materials e.g.. pieces of iron to themselves
NS NS
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
51/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Test method for the detection of
surface and sub-surfacedefects
in ferromagnetic materials
Magnetic Particle Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
52/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Ferromagnetic Material
Surface Defect Subsurface Internal
MT MTCANNOT BE
DETECTED BY
Magnetic Particle
Testing
Magnetic Particle Testing
M ti P ti l T ti
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
53/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Magnetic Particle Testing
Basic Steps
Magnetic field inducedin component
Defects disrupt themagnetic flux
Defects revealed byapplyingferromagneticparticles
Li f f
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
54/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Lines of force
By convention they flow from North toSouth outside and South to North inside
Form closed loops
Never cross
Field is strongest where most numerous
Follow path of least resistance
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
55/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
N S
Definitions
Magnetic field : Region in whichmagnetic forcesexist
D fi iti
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
56/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Definitions
Flux : line of magnetic force existing
in a magnetic circuit
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
57/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Flux Density : Magnetic flux perunit cross-section area
(measured in Teslas)
Definitions
High Flux Density:
More Flux per unit
area
Low Flux Density: LessFlux per unit area
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
58/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Definitions
1 cm
1 cm
1 Tesla = 10 000 gauss
How many line of force are there in an 1 cm area with a
Flux Density of 1 Tesla?
10 000 = 10 lines
BS 6072
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
59/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
BS 6072
The FLUX DENSITY on the surface of thecomponent must be at lease 0.72 T
Below that the indication will be too
weak
Below 0.72 TESLA Above 0.72 TESLA
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
60/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
AMMETER
000001000500
In General:
Increasing the Magnetising Force
will increase the Magnetic FieldMeasured inAmpere per meter ( A/m)
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
61/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Permeability
The ease with which a material can bemagnetised
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
62/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Permeability
A B
Magnetised using 100 amps Magnetised using 100 amps
High Permeability:
Easy to be magnetised
Low Permeability:
Difficult to be magnetised
Materials Behaviours in
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
63/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Materials Behaviours inMagnetic Field
Diamagnetic: Slightly repelled by magneticfield
Examples Gold, Copper, Water andmost non-metal
DIAMAGNETIC
Unable to be Magnetically tested
Materials Behaviours in
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
64/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Paramagnetic: Weakly attracted by magneticfield
Examples Aluminium, Tungsten andmost metals
PARAMAGNETIC
Unable to be Magnetically tested
Materials Behaviours inMagnetic Field
Materials Behaviours in
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
65/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Ferromagnetic: Strongly attracted by magneticfield
Examples Iron, Cobalt, Nickelandtheir alloys
FERROMAGNETIC
Suitable to be Magnetically tested
Materials Behaviours inMagnetic Field
Permeability
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
66/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Permeability
A unit of comparison: compared tofree space
Examples:
Air 1 Iron 560 Steel 1000 Mu Metal 80 000 Paramagnetics Slightly > 1 Diamagnetics Slightly < 1 Ferromagnetics 240 +
Oth F f M t
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
67/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Other Forms of Magnet
N S
HorseshoeMagnet
Ring
Magnet
Equipment
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
68/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Equipment
Electromagnetism
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
69/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Electromagnetism
A current flows through a conductor and
sets up a magnetic field around it
Field is at 90oto the direction of theelectrical current
Directionof current
flow
Direction of magnetic field
Coil Magnetisation
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
70/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Coil Magnetisation
Changes circular filed into longitudinal
Increases the strength of the field
Coil Magnetisation
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
71/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Coil Magnetisation
Longitudinal Magnetic Field
Detect transverse defects
Principle of MT : Flux Leakage
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
72/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Principle of MT : Flux Leakage
Ring Magnet Ring Magnet
Magnetic field is Fullycontained: No Poles
Flux Leakage occurs:Poles created
Flux
LeakageN
S
Ferromagnetic
Particles
Attractedat poles
Principle of MPI : Flux
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
73/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
pLeakage
N S
No Defect Defect
The change in permeability causes flux leakage
N SFlux Leakage
Principle of MPI : Flux
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
74/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
pLeakage
N S
No Flux Leakage because No change in
permeability
STEEL = 1000
Principle of MPI : Flux
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
75/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
pLeakage
The change in permeability causes flux leakage
Flux LeakageN S
STEEL = 1000
AIR = 1
N S
Factors Affecting Flux Leakage
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
76/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Factors Affecting Flux Leakage
Depth of defect
Orientation of defect shape of defect
Size of defect
Permeability of material Amount of flux available
Depth below surface
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
77/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Depth below surface
SN SN
Defect Orientation
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
78/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Defect Orientation
Defect at 90 degrees to flux : maximum
indication
Defect Orientation
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
79/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Defect Orientation
>45 Degrees to Flux: Acceptable
indication
Defect Orientation
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
80/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Defect Orientation
How to detect the ones missed?
All surface defects form indications
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
81/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
But not all indications are
caused by defects
Non-relevantindications
Due to flux leakage but
arising from design features orgeometry
Changes in section
Changes inpermeability
Furring
Splines
Keyway
Rivet
Toe of welds
Rough
Surface
Chisel
Furring
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
82/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Furring
Caused by:
Sharp change of contour
FurringFurring
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
83/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Furring
Caused by:
Excessive flux on the surface or ends of
component
Furring
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
84/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Magnetic Writing
Caused by:
Localised polarization when magnetised object
induced the magnetic field into another object
Sp rio s / F lse Indic tions
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
85/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Spurious / False Indications
Indications caused by operator errorsNot due to flux leakage
Lint
Dirt Hairs
Relevant/ True Indications
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
86/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Relevant/ True Indications
Indications caused by defects
Magnetic Particle Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
87/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Magnetic Particle Testing
Cracks indications by Fluorescent Ink
Inks and Powders
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
88/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Inks and Powders
MT Inks
Black and
Fluorescent
MT Powders
Colour
contrast and
Fluorescent
Particles in Inks or Powders
Magnetic Particle Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
89/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Magnetic Particle Testing
Usage of Fluorescent Ink on weld
Magnetic Particle Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
90/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Magnetic Particle Testing
Usage of Ultraviolet Light with
Fluorescent Ink in weld testing
Magnetic Particle Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
91/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Magnetic Particle Testing
Cracks indications by Fluorescent Ink
Magnetic Particle Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
92/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
ag et c a t c e est g
Usage of a.c. Electromagnetic Yoke with Black Ink
Magnetic Particle Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
93/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
g g
Usage of MT Bench Unit with Fluorescent Ink
Magnetic Particle Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
94/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
g g
Component under test with currentflow and fluorescent ink
Magnetic Particle Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
95/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
g g
Usage of Prods with black ink on weld
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
96/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Eddy Current Testing
NDT Training & Certification
Eddy Current Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
97/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
y g
An alternating
current is passedthrough a coil
Eddy Current Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
98/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Eddy Current Testing
An alternating current is
passed through a coil A.C. generates an
alternating field
Alternating fieldgenerates eddycurrents in conductors
Eddy Current Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
99/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Eddy Current Testing
An alternating current is
passed through a coil A.C. generates an
alternating field
Alternating fieldgenerates eddycurrents in conductors
Eddy currents generateopposing field whichmodifies current in coil
Eddy Current Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
100/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
y g
Defects will interrupt the eddy current
Interruption in the coil current is displayed on the set
Eddy Current Testingi
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
101/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
y gEquipment
Eddy Current
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
102/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
y
Electrical currents induced in metals byalternating magnetic fields
The size of the current is affected by
Electrical conductivity
Stand off distance
Flaws
Permeability
Specimen dimensions
Advantages of ET
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
103/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
g
Sensitive to surface defects Can detect through several layers
Can detect through surface coatings
Accurate conductivity measurements Can be automated
Little pre-cleaning required
Portability
Disadvantages of ET
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
104/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Very susceptible to permeability changes
Only on conductive materials
Will not detect defects parallel to surface
Not suitable for large areas and/orcomplex geometry's
Signal interpretation required
No permanent record (unless automated)
Expensive equipment
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
105/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Ultrasonic Testing
NDT Training & Certification
Ultrasonic Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
106/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
High frequencysound sound wavesare introduced into amaterial
Reflected soundgives information onthe material undertest and signalsdisplayed on a CRT
Principle
Basic Principles of Ultrasonic Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
107/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Sound is transmitted in the material to be testedThe sound reflected back to the
probe is displayed on
the Flaw Detector
Basic Principles of Ultrasonic Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
108/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
The distance the sound traveled can be displayed on the Flaw Detector
The screen can be calibrated to give accurate readings of the distance
Bottom / Backwall
Signal from the backwall
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
109/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Basic Principles of Ultrasonic Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
110/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
The presence of a Defect in the material shows up on the screen of
the flaw detector with a less distance than the bottom of the material
The BWE signal
Defect signal
Defect
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
111/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
The depth of the defect can be read with reference
to the marker on the screen
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
60 mm
Thickness / depth measurement
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
112/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
A
A
B
B
C
C
The THINNER the material
the less distance the sound
travel
The closerthe reflectorto the surface, the
signal will be more to
the leftof the screen
The thickness is read from the screen
684630
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
113/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
114/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Ultrasonic Testing Applications
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
115/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Probes
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
116/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Probe Design
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
117/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Compression Probe
Normal probe
0
Damping
Transducer
Electricalconnectors
Housing
Probe Design
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
118/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Shear Probe
Angle probe
DampingTransducer
Perspex wedge
Backing
medium
ProbeShoe
Probe Design
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
119/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Twin Crystal
Advantages
Can be focused Measure thin plate
Near surfaceresolution
Disadvantages
Difficult to use oncurved surfaces
Sizing small defects Signal amplitude /
focal spot length
Transmitter Receiver
Focusing
lensSeparator /
Insulator
Gap Scanning
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
120/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Probe held a fixed
distance above thesurface (1 or 2mm)
Couplant is fed intothe gap
Immersion Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
121/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Component is placed
in a water filled tank Item is scanned with
a probe at a fixeddistance above the
surface
Immersion Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
122/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Waterpath
distance
Water path distance
Front surface Back surface
Defect
AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC TESTING SYSTEM
C Scan Presentation
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
123/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
C-Scan Presentation
AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC TESTING SYSTEM
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
124/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
P-Scan Scanner
AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC TESTING SYSTEM
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
125/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
P-Scan Image Presentation
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
126/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
T-Scan Image Presentation
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
127/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
TOFD Time of Flight Diffraction
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
128/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
TOFD Images
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
129/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
rea Monitoring
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
130/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
May 1999: tmin = 29.6 mm Dec. 1999: tmin = 29.6 mm
June 2000: tmin = 29.4 mm April 2001: tmin = 29.2 mm
Methods of Setting Sensitivity
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
131/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
g y
Smallest defect at maximum test range Back wall echo
Disc equivalent
Grass levels Notches
Side Drilled Holes, DAC Curves
Scanning Procedure
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
132/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Parent Material
0 degree both sides
To maximum range for angle probes
Full skip distance for 60 or 70 probes
Scanning Procedure
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
133/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Scanning Procedure
Weld RootHalf skip from both sides
For PCN exams :
70 degree probe at half skip from both sides
Scanning ProcedureWeld Fusion Faces
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
134/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Weld Fusion Faces
Half to full skip from both sides
A probe which strikes fusion faces at 90 degrees
Probe angle = 90 - (1/2 Root angle)
Scanning Procedure
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
135/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Weld Body
Half skip to full skip from both sides
Full Skip 1/2 Skip
Scanning Procedure
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
136/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Transverse
70 degree
Nozzle Welds
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
137/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Scanning procedure
Tee butt welds
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
138/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Pulse Echo Technique
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
139/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Single probe sends
and receives sound Gives an indication
of defect depth anddimensions
Not fail safe
Defect Position
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
140/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
No indication from defect A (wrong orientation)
AB
B
Through Transmission Technique
T
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
141/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Transmitting and
receiving probes
on opposite sidesof the specimen
Tx Rx
Presence of defect
indicated by
reduction intransmission signal
No indication of
defect location
Fail safe method
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
142/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Through Transmission Technique
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
143/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Advantages
Less attenuation
No probe ringing
No dead zone Orientation does not
matter
Disadvantages
Defect not located
Defect cant be
identified Vertical defects dont
show
Must be automated
Need access to bothsurfaces
Transmission with Reflection
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
144/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
RT
Also known as:
Tandem Techniqueor
Pitch and Catch Technique
Advantages of UT
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
145/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Sensitive to cracks at various
orientations Portability
Safety
Able to penetrate thick sections Measures depth and through wall
extent
Disadvantages
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
146/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
No permanent record (unless automated)
Not easily applied to complex geometriesand rough surfaces.
Unsuited to course grained materials
Requires highly skilled and experiencedtechnicians
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
147/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Radiographic Testing
NDT Training & Certification
Radiographic Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
148/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Electromagnetic radiation is imposedupon a test object
Radiation is transmitted to varyingdegrees dependant upon the density ofthe material through which it istravelling
Variations in transmission detected by
photographic film or fluorescent screens Applicable to metals,non-metals and
composites
Radiographic Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
149/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Lower
density
Higher
density
Radiation Source
Film
Specimen
Radiographic Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
150/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
PlacingFilm to be radiographed
Radiation Sources
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
151/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Isotopes produce Gamma rays
Examples: Co60, Ir192, Yb169
X-Ray Tube
Radiographic Image
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
152/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
TechniquesPanoramic
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
153/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Panoramic
Single Wall Single Image
Double Wall Double Image
Gamma Rays vs X-Rays
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
154/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Safety
X-ray machines is normally safer: can be switched off/onGamma source: constant emission
CapabilitiesGamma source have very high penetrating power
X-ray: intensity and wavelength can be adjusted
Quality of imagesIn general: x-ray produces better quality
HandlingGamma sources are easier to handle
X-ray machine are bulky, fragile and requires electricity
CostGamma source are cheaper
Radiographic Variables
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
155/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Density
The degree of film darkness Contrast
The differences in density between theregions of the film
Advantages of Radiography
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
156/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Permanent record Detection of Internal flaws
Can be used on most materials
Direct image of flaws
Real - time imaging
Disadvantages of Radiography Health hazard
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
157/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Sensitive to defect
orientation Limited ability to detect fine
cracks
Access to both sides
required Limited by material
thickness
Skilled interpretation
required Relatively slow
High capital outlay andrunning costs
Acoustic Emission
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
158/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Transient stress waves from micro
structural changes detected by sensors
Stress waves
Stress
Vacuum Box Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
159/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Vacuum created within a perspex box
Soapy liquid applied to surface
Vacuum Box Testing
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
160/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Bubbles indicate through thicknessdefect
Vacuum created within a perspex box
Soapy liquid applied to surface
Training & Certification
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
161/162
Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology
Any Questions Please ?
Training & Certification
-
5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt
162/162
top related