arjen.wals@wur.nl desd we can? learning our way out of unsustainability arjen e.j. wals

Post on 03-Jan-2016

216 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

arjen.wals@wur.nl

DESD we can? Learning our way out of unsustainability

Arjen E.J. Wals

arjen.wals@wur.nl

arjen.wals@wur.nlwww.chrisjordan.com426.000/day

arjen.wals@wur.nl

arjen.wals@wur.nl

arjen.wals@wur.nl

arjen.wals@wur.nl

A Very Brief History• Nature Conservation Education

(1900 - 1970) green focus, primary schools – connecting with, appreciating, valuing, protecting nature

• Nature & Environmental Education (1970 - 1992) green and ‘grey’ focus, primary & secondary, adults – changing citizens’ environmental behaviour

• Education for Sustainable Development (1992 - present) sustainability focus, teacher training, vocational, higher education, life-long learning, non-formal, social learning) – capacity building for sustainability

arjen.wals@wur.nl

Question:

Is ESD able to turn the tide, and how can we know?

arjen.wals@wur.nl

We need ‘a radical change in the ways we think and act in particular in terms of education and training’ (Koïchiro Matsuura)

arjen.wals@wur.nl

arjen.wals@wur.nl

An ESD Lens (2)

Integrative – not only the ecological and the environmental, not only the present, not only the local, not only the human world

Critical - questioning continuous economic growth and consumerism and associated lifestyles

Transformative – exploration of alternative lifestyles (e.g. ‘voluntary simplicity’), values and systems that break from existing ones that are inherently unsustainable

arjen.wals@wur.nl

How do we know?

“Not everything that can be measured counts, and not everything that counts can be measured” (A. Einstein)

“If your only tool is a hammer, everything starts looking like a nail” (A. Maslow)

arjen.wals@wur.nl

Use of indicators for ESD implementation - purpose

To set benchmarks for assessing current and future progress;

To promote learning from each other in and in-between countries (rather than to promote ranking and comparing)

arjen.wals@wur.nl

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

       

  Sample key finding DESD

review

ESD National Coordinating Bodies

• Established in most countries reporting (79 out of 97).

• Some variance between regions.

• Little information available about their effectiveness/functioning.

Sample key finding DESD review

ESD National Coordinating Bodies

• Established in most countries reporting (79 out of 97).

• Some variance between regions.

• Little information available about their effectiveness/functioning.

arjen.wals@wur.nl

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

       

  Sample key finding DESD

review

Meaning matters

• Contextual differences, lead to different interpretations of ESD

• Relationship ESD and other ‘educations’ needs to be articulated

• Public awareness of ESD appears low

Sample key finding DESD review

Meaning matters

• Contextual differences, lead to different interpretations of ESD

• Relationship ESD and other ‘educations’ needs to be articulated

• Public awareness of ESD appears low

arjen.wals@wur.nl

Issues

Need for adaptation to local circumstances and realities

Process leading up to the reporting is crucial Value of the reporting highly depends on the

quality of the data Learning and reflexivity are more important

than ranking and accountability The importance of meaning and meaning-

making

arjen.wals@wur.nl

Emphasis on universal use

Emphasis on contextual

development & use

Indicators are emerging (dynamic)

Indicators set in advance

(static)Outcome-based assessment

Comparing

Ranking

Evidence

Process-oriented

Collaborative learning

Reflexivity

arjen.wals@wur.nl

Closing thoughts

ESD ≠ SD Insights from post-normal science needed Towards post-normal governance Avoiding disjointed learning Capacity building for learning-based M&E

arjen.wals@wur.nl

top related