assessment guidance for mentors ... - downloads.opito.com
Post on 12-May-2022
4 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 1 of 50 ©OPITO
Assessment Guidance for Mentors,
Expert Witnesses (EW),
Assessors and Internal Verifiers
OIL & GAS TECHNICAL
PROGRAMME (OGTAP)
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 2 of 50 ©OPITO
Amendments Register
Page Amendment
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 3 of 50 ©OPITO
Contents
1.0 Introduction 5
1.1 General Information 5
1.2 Key Assessment Approaches 6
2.0 Roles of Key Personnel 7
2.1 Mentor 7
2.2 Expert Witness (EW) 8
2.2.1 Briefing Guidelines for Expert Witnesses 9
2.3 Assessor 10
2.4 Internal Verifier 11
2.5 Assessor/Internal Verifier Qualifications and CPD Requirements 13
2.6 OPITO Reviewers 13
3.0 Assessment Organisational Chart 15
4.0 Assessment Materials 16
5.0 Planning the Training 17
6.0 Delivering the Training 18
7.0 Assessing Competence 19
7.1 Observation 19
7.2 Product Evaluation 19
7.3 Questions 19
7.4 Personal Statements 20
7.5 Witness Testimonies 20
7.6 Simulation 21
7.7 Final Summary Reports 21
8 Guidance on Requirements for Contents of Trainee Maintenance Technician Portfolios 22
8.1 Process Engineering Maintenance Activity Items and Unit Selection 22
8.2. Training and PEM SVQ Portfolio Folders 22
9 Guidance on Requirements for Contents of Trainee Process Technician Portfolios 25
9.1 Process Operations Hydrocarbons (POH) Award Structure 25
9.2. Training and POH SVQ Portfolio Folders 27
Appendix 1 - Trainee Technician Assessment and IV Process 29
Appendix 2 - Assessor Information Form 30
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 4 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 3 - Expert Witness Registration Form 31
Appendix 4 - Internal Verifier Information Form 32
Appendix 5- Exemplar Assessment Plan 33
Appendix 6 - Exemplar Trainee Personal Statement 34
Appendix 7 - Exemplar Expert Witness Observation Report 36
Appendix 8 - Exemplar Expert Witness Summary Feedback Report 37
Appendix 9 - Exemplar Assessor Observation Report 38
Appendix 10 - Exemplar Assessor Final Summary Report 39
Appendix 11 – Exemplar Interim Internal Verifier Report 40
Appendix 12 - Exemplar Internal Verifier Final Summary Report 42
Appendix 13- Exemplar Witness Testimony 44
Appendix 14 - Exemplar Records of Questions & Answers 45
Appendix 15 – OPITO Reviewers Checklist for POH Portfolios 47
Appendix 16 – OPITO Reviewers Checklist for PEM Portfolios 48
Appendix 17 – Assessor Feedback Report 48
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 5 of 50 ©OPITO
1.0 Introduction
1.1 General Information
Throughout the two year work placement of the Trainee Technician Training Programme, trainees are
required to gain experience of the various work activities which occur within their specific discipline
(Mechanical/Electrical/Instrument/Production) on the Installation. During this time, trainees must
record the activities that they have been involved in and build an evidence portfolio of work experience.
This ensures that trainees follow their training plans and provide the necessary evidence to assist
Assessors make a decision as to the competence of the trainee.
Assessment is about making judgements of a candidate’s competence against a national standard and
collecting evidence to confirm that the standard has been met.
As a Mentor, Expert Witness (EW), Assessor or Internal Verifier, you have a key role in the training and
assessment process, and the purpose of this document is to help you understand how you can
maximise your contribution to the process.
The workplace is a new experience for most Trainees and they may initially be overwhelmed by the
complexity of the working environment. The role of experienced colleagues in the workplace is to
ensure that the transition from training centre to the workplace is as smooth as possible, allowing
trainees to settle quickly in to this new environment. In this way trainees will feel at ease with more
experienced colleagues and be able to achieve their full potential in the workplace.
It is important that Mentors, Expert Witnesses, Assessors and Internal Verifiers understand the
requirements of the Training and Assessment Programme and the specific SVQ Standards that
competences will be assessed against.
Trainees are provided with a handbook entitled ‘Programme Operation’. This handbook provides
detailed information of the Training and Assessment Programme and gives guidance on how the
evidence of competence should be generated and presented to an Assessor. Mentors, EWs, Assessors
and Internal Verifiers should refer to the trainee’s copy of this handbook as necessary. Trainees are also
provided with a CD which contains the ‘Unit Standards’ for either the Process Engineering Maintenance
(PEM) or Process Operations: Hydrocarbons (POH) Level 3 SVQs
Assessors have to interpret standards and judge candidate performance competently and consistently.
They must be involved at all stages of the assessment process. The assessment process will cover
planning and timing discussions that take place in the early stage of the assessment process, reviewing
of evidence which is generated as part of that process, through to the feedback that is given to
candidates after their assessment has been completed. Assessors must ensure that there is sufficient
evidence to fully cover performance and knowledge statements for all units.
Assessors will require support and input from Mentors and in some cases, Expert Witnesses (EWs) to
assist them make appropriate assessment decisions. This document will provide detailed guidance on
the roles and responsibilities of Mentors, Expert Witnesses, Assessors and Internal Verifiers.
Internal verification is necessary to ensure the integrity and quality assurance of the assessment
process. Internal verifiers ensure consistency of the assessment process by the assessor for different
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 6 of 50 ©OPITO
types of candidate and ensure standardisation of assessment decisions between assessors. Internal
Verifiers must be entirely familiar with the standards against which assessments are to be carried out,
awarding bodies systems and criteria for qualifications.
OPITO reviewers are also involved in providing guidance and support to trainees as they progress
through their training and assessment programme.
1.2 Key Assessment Approaches
To meet the requirements of the OPITO Assessment and Verification Strategy the following key
assessment approaches must be adhered to:
The main means of assessment should be direct observation by competent Assessors while
Candidates perform tasks in the workplace. (Where this is not feasible an Expert Witness
can be utilised. Refer to Section 2.2)
Safe working practices and effective working relationships should form part of assessment
checklists when assessing Candidates’ performance
Observation should be supported by questioning to ensure that Candidates have the
required knowledge and understanding
Product evidence (e.g. workplace documents and job records) can be used to provide
evidence of work carried out – this could include work already completed
Additional supporting evidence could include witness testimony from individuals who can
provide informed feedback on the performance of Candidates
Assessments should reflect normal work activities, wherever possible
Assessments can be integrated across different Units, Elements and Performance Criteria
Simulation must only be used when it is not practical and/or safe to obtain direct evidence
of Candidates’ performance and when expressly indicated by individual POH or PEM
Standards
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 7 of 50 ©OPITO
2.0 Roles of Key Personnel
2.1 Mentor
MENTORS must be allocated to trainees and will have a key role in the training process acting as the
direct training supervisor for trainees.
Mentors must have extensive knowledge and experience of the tasks and equipment that trainees will
be working on and be able to provide advice and guidance as they progress through their training and
assessment programme. Mentors must meet regularly with their trainees to discuss any issues arising
and to review their progress against the agreed plan.
One of the initial tasks of Mentors is to help their trainees produce a Training Plan. The plan will include
time allocations and its purpose is to allow comparison of the trainee’s actual progress over the training
period against the agreed planned schedule and achievement targets. Mentors must work with the
trainee’s assessor, especially in the latter stages of the training period, to carry out regular reviews of
the training plan and make appropriate adjustments where necessary.
Mentors are also required to sign off the ‘Personal Statements’ written by the Trainee after a training or
assessment activity has taken place. These ‘Personal Statements’ are written accounts of the activity
with which the Trainee has been involved and provide details of the nature of the activity and the
extent and level of involvement of the Trainee. Trainees are also required to provide copies of any
documentary evidence such as logs, permits, risk assessments, isolation certificates, etc. that support
their specific involvement in the activity.
By signing a trainee’s personal statement, Mentors are confirming that it is an accurate account of the
trainee’s involvement in the activity. Mentors are also confirming that the Trainee has completed the
relevant task to the required standard and has gained the experience stated in the ‘Personal
Statement’.
Mentors must also liaise with the trainee’s assessor to advise when they consider that a trainee has
demonstrated sufficient skill and experience to be assessed against specific units.
In summary, the key responsibilities of Mentors are to:
Ensure that trainees have undergone site safety induction and relevant emergency response
training
Ensure that trainees have knowledge of the general rules and practices applying to the site
Understand the requirements of the SVQ
Plan with the Trainee a programme of training to cover an appropriate range of tasks,
processes and equipment
Ensure that appropriate tasks are assigned to trainees
Ensure that trainees are given instruction in the skills and knowledge applying to the tasks,
processes and equipment in question
Supervise the work of trainees and provide support and feedback
Provide guidance to trainees on the content and accuracy of ‘Personal Statements’ and sign
them off when complete
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 8 of 50 ©OPITO
Be responsible for deciding when trainees are able to carry out tasks independently and be
formally assessed in them
Maintain a close and effective working relationship with the trainee’s assessor and EW
where applicable
Ensure that the site welfare needs of trainees are met throughout the placement period
Provide OPITO with information on progress of trainees as and when required
Trainees will meet regularly with a Training Reviewer appointed by OPITO (Refer to section 2.5). These
meetings are essential and provide opportunities for the progress of training to be reviewed by a
person external to the workplace. Mentors should be encouraged to participate in these review
meetings and to contribute to the discussions on the progress of trainees. The option of conference call
or similar facility should be considered to allow the mentor to participate in these review meetings.
2.2 Expert Witness (EW)
In exceptional circumstances, where it is not possible or practical to have a qualified Assessor in the
same location as a Candidate for all required observations, it may be possible for the qualified Assessor
to use an Expert Witness to support the assessment process by carrying out required on-the-job
observations on the Assessor’s behalf.
Sponsoring organisations are required to provide Expert Witnesses (EW) who are occupationally
competent and who will work with the trainee and assist with the process of observing the trainee in
the work place. Mentors may also act as Expert Witnesses.
The following extract from the OPITO SVQ Competence Assessment and Verification Strategy document
provides a summary of the minimum requirements for an EW and the assessment process with EW
involvement.
An Expert Witness must have demonstrable relevant experience in the discipline area in
which the Candidate is being assessed and have a minimum of two years post qualification
experience
An Expert Witness must be registered and details of relevant experience must be available
for review by External Verifiers/Auditors at External Verification Visits/Audits
An Expert Witness must participate in a briefing session with a qualified Assessor/IV to
ensure that they are familiar with the Assessment Plan, Standard being assessed and the
role of an Expert Witness – evidence of the briefing processes must be available for review
by External Verifiers/Auditors at External Verification Visits/Audits
An Expert Witness will carry out observations on behalf of and coordinated by a trained Assessor. An
Expert Witness’s main responsibilities are to:
participate in a briefing session with a qualified Assessor/IV to ensure that they are familiar
with the Assessment Plan, Standard being assessed and the role of an Expert Witness
agree a time with the Candidate for the observation to take place and advise the Assessor,
where possible
observe the Candidate carrying out normal work tasks/activities
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 9 of 50 ©OPITO
record details of each task/activity observed and confirm its completion according to the
required Standard
authenticate any supporting documentation/job paperwork
record any questions asked during the observation to support or authenticate the
Candidate’s work
comment on the Candidate’s technical ability, knowledge of equipment, team work, safe
working practices, etc.
make a recommendation to the Assessor on the Candidate’s ability to carry out the
task/activity
Where on-the-job observations are carried out by an Expert Witness, a qualified Assessor must continue
to be responsible for all other assessment activities, including assessment planning, providing feedback,
review of product evidence and questioning to confirm that all knowledge requirements have been
met.
The Assessor must review all the evidence provided by the Candidate, including the observation by the
Expert Witness, and make a judgement on the competence of the Candidate. It is the responsibility of
the Assessor to make sure that any testimony from an Expert Witness is reliable and technically valid.
2.2.1 Briefing Guidelines for Expert Witnesses
All Expert Witnesses must participate in a face to face briefing/coaching session to ensure that they are
familiar with the Standard(s) being assessed and that they understand their role to observe the
Candidate and record observations and comments.
Briefings for Expert Witnesses should be conducted by an experienced Assessor or Internal Verifier.
As a minimum, the following key points must be covered in briefing/coaching sessions with Expert
Witnesses.
Assessing competence against occupational standards
What does competence mean?
What is a Standard?
An overview of the specific standards against which the Expert Witness will conduct
observations
How does assessment relate to the Standard?
What are the specific requirements for observing on-the-job competences for the
Standard(s) the Candidate is being assessed against?
Carrying out observations
What can be assessed by observation?
How to prepare for observation
Good practice during observations
Recording observations and providing supporting evidence
Recording observations and comments
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 10 of 50 ©OPITO
Confirming that job paperwork is available and confirms the activities and that the
paperwork can be attributed to the Candidate
Providing a clear recommendation to the Assessor on the Candidate’s performance and
ability to carry out the task/activity
2.3 Assessor
Assessors’ responsibilities are to:
plan and manage the assessment process
carry out assessments of Candidates’ performance against the relevant Standard
ensure that Candidates’ evidence is relevant, valid, authentic, reliable, current, equitable,
fair and sufficient
make a judgement as to the competence of the Candidates
record assessment decisions and give candidate feedback (see appendix 17)
Submit portfolios for interim and final internal verification reviews. (For POH and PEM SVQs,
assessors should use the OPITO Reviewers Checklists (Appendices 15 & 16) prior to
submitting portfolios for internal verification)
Conduct and record face to face briefings/coaching sessions with Expert Witnesses (where
utilised) to ensure that they are familiar with the Standard(s) being assessed and that they
understand their role to observe the Candidate and record observations and comments.
Assessors must be competent and qualified to carry out the assessment process – they must meet the
following minimum requirements:
be technically competent in the discipline area of the Standards they are assessing against.
This could be demonstrated in a number of ways:
they are an experienced practitioner or supervisor in the same discipline
they have been assessed as competent for the relevant Standard(s) and/or have achieved an equivalent qualification
they have previously performed or supervised the activities defined in the Standard(s) and can demonstrate that they have maintained their technical expertise and knowledge of current processes and practices;
hold a recognised Assessor qualification (e.g. L&D9DI, A1, D32, D33) and be operating to the
requirements of the current Standards for trained Assessors
fully understand the requirements defined in the Standard(s) for which they are carrying out
the assessment process
comply with the required assessment and internal verification processes and quality
procedures for the Standard
comply with the requirements for recording assessment decisions for the Standard
liaise with other Assessors and Internal Verifier(s) to ensure a consistent approach to
assessment is maintained
have a minimum of 2 years post qualification experience.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 11 of 50 ©OPITO
Details of Assessor competence and experience must be available for review by Awarding Bodies/Audit
Organisations, as relevant
Assessors must maintain the currency of their skills:
Assessors must participate in regular updates / training / Continuous Professional
Development (CPD) activities relating to their technical discipline, standards assessed and
assessment practices – typically, as a minimum, on an annual basis
Assessors who have not carried out any assessments for a period of 2 years or more for the
standards against which they will be assessing Candidates, must undertake refresher
training before carrying out any assessment activities. This refresher training must ensure
that they are fully conversant with the criteria defined in the Standards they will be
assessing against and, where relevant, the current version of the Assessor qualification
Additional notes on the requirements for Assessors:
Assessors will be required to demonstrate technical competence for the specific POH or
PEM qualification being assessed
should an Assessor also act as an Internal Verifier, the Assessor cannot take any part in the
verification of the Candidates that they have assessed – this must be done by a different
Internal Verifier
Assessors who are in training can undertake assessments but all assessments against POH
and PEM Standards must be reviewed by a qualified Assessor or an Internal Verifier acting
as an Assessor. Where an Internal Verifier is performing the Assessor role, that Internal
Verifier cannot take any part in the internal verification process relating to that candidate.
This must be carried out by a different Internal Verifier. Assessors in training would be
expected to complete their own Assessor qualification within a year of their involvement in
the assessment process
Where an EW is utilised, the assessor or Internal Verifier must deliver a face to face
briefing/coaching session to ensure that the EW is familiar with the Standard(s) being
assessed and that they understand their role to observe the Candidate and record
observations and comments.( Refer to section 2.2.1)
2.4 Internal Verifier
Internal Verifiers’ main responsibilities are to:
ensure the quality and consistency of assessment decisions made by the Assessors, it is an
SQA requirement that there is evidence of interim and final verification and recorded on
appropriate forms (see appendices 11 and 12)
ensure that the assessment process complies with required quality assurance systems
provide feedback to Assessors on the judgements they have made about Candidates’
competence
Internal Verifiers must be competent and qualified to carry out the verification process – they must
meet the following minimum requirements:
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 12 of 50 ©OPITO
have sufficient occupational expertise in the broad discipline area covered by the relevant
Standard(s) to permit valid judgements about assessments and appeal decisions – typically
this would be demonstrated by the Internal Verifier having worked at either operational or
supervisory level in the broad discipline area
hold a recognised Internal Verifier’s qualification (e.g. L&D11, V1, D34) and be operating to
the requirements of the current Standards for trained Internal Verifiers
fully understand the content of, and the assessment requirements for, the Standard(s) for
which they have responsibility for verifying
fully internally verify the assessment process in line with the Approved Centre’s IV Sampling
Strategy – including interim verification; (Refer to example Interim and Final Verification
Reports in Appendices 11 &12. Also refer to OPITO Reviewers Checklists for POH and PEM
Portfolios in Appendices 15 & 16)
provide feedback, advice and support to Assessors
comply with the internal verification processes and quality procedures for the Standard(s);
maintain records of internal verification activities for the Standards
conduct and/or participate in standardisation activities to ensure a consistent approach to
assessment is maintained
participate in, and support, their organisation’s internal quality systems and ensure that any
corrective actions and recommendations required following internal audits are carried out
in a timely manner
Details of Internal Verifier competence and experience must be available for review by Awarding
Bodies/Audit Organisations, as relevant.
The Internal Verifier may also carry out the following additional activities, in accordance with their
organisation’s and, where relevant, the Awarding Body/Audit Organisation’s quality systems:
implement an appeals procedure to settle any disputes between Candidates and Assessors
facilitate, or contribute to, the induction, training and development of Assessors
participate in, and support, external quality audits and ensure that any corrective actions
and recommendations required following the audits are carried out in a timely manner
Internal Verifiers must maintain the currency of their skills:
Internal Verifiers must participate in regular updates / training / Continuous Professional
Development (CPD) activities – typically on a minimum of an annual basis, CPD records
should be submitted to OPITO on an annual basis.
Internal Verifiers who have not carried out any verification for a period of 2 year or more
must undertake refresher training before carrying out any internal verification activities.
This refresher training must ensure that they are fully conversant with the Standards they
will be internally verifying and, if relevant, the current version of the Internal Verifier
qualification
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 13 of 50 ©OPITO
Additional notes on the deployment of Internal Verifiers:
Internal Verifiers would normally be expected to complete an Assessor qualification and
have been carrying out assessments for a minimum of 6 months before going on to become
an Internal Verifier
should an Internal Verifier also act as an Assessor, the Internal Verifier cannot take any part
in the verification of the Candidate that they have assessed – this must be done by a
different Internal Verifier
should Internal Verifiers undertake Candidate assessments, they must meet all the
requirements outlined above for an Assessor
should an Internal Verifier with sufficient occupational expertise in the broad discipline area
not be available, internal verification could be carried out by an experienced Internal
Verifier from a related discipline (e.g. another maintenance or process related discipline).
Alternatively, specific approval could be sought from an Awarding Body/Organisation and/or
External Verifier/Auditor for the use of an experienced Internal Verifier from a related
discipline
NOTE: There is no requirement for IVs to carry out internal verification of any assessment material held
in Section 2 of the maintenance trainee technicians Training Portfolio. The focus for internal verification
must be on the evidence contained in the trainees’ SVQ Portfolios.
2.5 Assessor/Internal Verifier Qualifications and CPD Requirements
It is an essential requirement of SQA that all assessors and internal verifiers involved in the delivery of
SVQs are occupationally competent and have appropriate assessor/IV qualifications.
All assessors and IVs involved in the SVQs for trainee technicians must be registered with OPITO by
completing the Assessor or IV Information Forms as appropriate. Refer to Appendices 2 & 4 for copies
of these forms.
It is also a requirement from SQA that all assessors and IVs involved in the delivery of SVQs submit
CPD Records annually. OPITO hold a register of current CPD records for all assessors and IVs involved
with trainee technicians assessments and will require that updated records are submitted annually.
2.6 OPITO Reviewers
OPITO utilise their own reviewers to support trainees and review trainees’ portfolios as they have been
doing since the Technician Training Scheme was introduced. Where reviewers identify discrepancies in
Training or SVQ portfolios, they will in the first instance communicate with the sponsoring
organisation’s OGTAP Focal Point. The Focal Point may then advise that the reviewer communicates
direct with the assessor and EW to resolve these issues. In certain circumstances it may also be decided
that the reviewer should communicate directly to the trainee’s mentor or supervisor on other issues
not necessarily related to the SVQ portfolio.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 14 of 50 ©OPITO
Mentors should be encouraged to participate in these review meetings and to contribute to the
discussions on the progress of trainees. The option of conference call or similar facility should be
considered to allow the mentor to participate in these meetings.
OPITO Reviewers should endeavour to provide Mentors with notice of planned review meetings.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 15 of 50 ©OPITO
3.0 Assessment Organisational Chart
It is essential that the Sponsor organisations document the actual training and assessment process to be
followed for individual trainees. This can be done utilising the document titled ‘Programme Operation
Handbook’ issued to trainees.
The following simplified organisation chart illustrates the interfaces and communication lines between
the different roles in the assessment process and can be used by Sponsor organisations as a model for
creating their own location specific version.
EW/Mentor
EW/Mentor
Candidate
C
Candidate
D
Assessor
Assessor
Candidate
B
Candidate
A
Internal Verifier
OPITO Reviewer
OPITO Reviewer
Mentor
Mentor
Candidates in some locations may not have regular, direct access to an assessor therefore they will be
assigned an Expert Witness (EW) who will provide an interface between the candidate and the assessor.
(Refer to Section 2.2 for more detail on the EW role). It is likely that the Mentor and the EW will be the
same person and this is reflected in the diagram. This diagram also illustrates that assessors may work
with more than one candidate.
Coaching sessions should be held wherever necessary involving all parties concerned including trainees,
mentors, EWs, Assessors, Internal Verifiers and OPITO Reviewers. These coaching sessions should be
specific to each sponsoring organisation so that local issues around communication between OPITO
reviewers, assessors, EW, supervisors, mentors, trainees and Internal Verifiers can be explored and
addressed. These sessions can be run using conference calls, video conferencing or Net Meeting as
appropriate.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 16 of 50 ©OPITO
4.0 Assessment Materials
OPITO will provide the trainees with templates for all of the forms and reports that require to be
generated as part of the assessment process. Examples of some of the wider used reports are provided
in the Appendices to this document as follows:
Appendix 2 Assessor Information Form
Appendix 3 Expert Witness Registration Form
Appendix 4 Internal Verifier Information Form
Appendix 5 Exemplar Assessment Plan
Appendix 6 Exemplar Trainee Personal Statement
Appendix 7 Exemplar Expert Witness Observation Report
Appendix 8 Exemplar Expert Witness Summary Feedback Report
Appendix 9 Exemplar Assessor Observation Report
Appendix 10 Exemplar Assessor Final Summary Report
Appendix 11 Exemplar Interim Internal Verifier Report
Appendix 12 Exemplar IV Final Summary Report
Appendix 13 Exemplar Witness Testimony (For use by witness’ other than the EW)
Appendix 14 Exemplar Record of Questions & Answers
Appendix 15 OPITO Checklist PEM
Appendix 16 OPITO Checklist POH
Appendix 17 Exemplar assessor feedback record
NOTE: These examples are provided in this document for information only. Forms from the trainee
technicians work books should always be used to ensure that the latest version is used.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 17 of 50 ©OPITO
5.0 Planning the Training
This section is a summary of the detailed information contained in the following Sections in this
document:
Section 8 - Guidance on Requirements for Contents of Trainee Maintenance Technician Portfolios
Section 9 - Guidance on Requirements for Contents of Trainee Process Technician Portfolios
Trainees will arrive at the workplace with suitable PPE, Programme Operation Handbook, a CD
containing the Unit Standards, report forms etc. Trainees will be provided with evidence folders to be
used as follows:
1 Training Portfolio to be used to retain copies of all relevant training evidence including activity
reports not referenced in the SVQ Portfolio
2 SVQ Portfolio to be used to retain all relevant SVQ documentation and evidence. All evidence
retained in this portfolio must be cross referenced to the appropriate SVQ standards.
Following site induction, the Mentor and the Trainee will meet together to commence planning the
Training Programme. The plan must be structured and flexible, and reviewed regularly to ensure that
trainees achieve the required outcomes of the OGTAP scheme.
At these meetings, Trainees will inform their Mentors of their training/education to date and the
Training Plan will be drawn up. The activities listed on the Plan must conform to the requirements of
the scheme and will depend on the facilities/ plant/equipment/systems & processes available on-site
and the tasks likely to be undertaken. Examples of the Proforma to be used in the production of the
Training Plan are included in the Programme Operation Handbook provided to the trainees.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 18 of 50 ©OPITO
6.0 Delivering the Training
Mentors and other appropriately experienced personnel involved in delivering the training must
demonstrate support to the Trainees and be able to communicate effectively with them. They should
establish a rapport with the Trainee and be approachable at all times. The Trainee must be able to ask
questions of a technical nature and expect to be given relevant and meaningful answers.
The training being delivered should reflect the activities agreed in the Training Plan and the nature and
scope of the work must ensure that the Trainee has opportunities to gather evidence relevant to the
competences required by the SVQ Standards.
The Mentor must monitor the delivery of training against the Training Plan activities to ensure that the
Plan is being achieved. Where it is proving difficult for a planned activity to be carried out, this should
be identified at an early stage in the training and the Training Plan should be amended accordingly.
It should be noted that the time allocations presented on the Training Plan are the Mentor’s
recommendations of the amount of time the Trainee needs to be exposed to an activity to achieve
competence. This time period need not be delivered in one block but may be spread throughout the
training period as relevant tasks present themselves.
Trainees must be given clear instructions relating to each task including:
An explanation of the purpose and the operation of the item of plant/equipment/system
A demonstration of how to operate and/or maintain the item
A step-by-step instruction on how to execute the task
Have access to sources of relevant underpinning knowledge
In addition to this the Mentor must question the Trainee to ensure that they know and understand the
process and must confirm by observation that the Trainee is able to perform the task to the required
standard of competence.
The tasks allocated to the Trainee should increase in complexity and demand over time.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 19 of 50 ©OPITO
7.0 Assessing Competence
Competence can only be judged from evidence provided by trainees that meets the standards defined
in the relevant Level 3 SVQ. Although assessors will review material from additional activities carried
out by process and maintenance technician trainees, it may well be that there is insufficient evidence of
competence arising from some of the ‘training activities’. Assessors must ensure that the evidence
provided reflects the trainee’s competence and not just the achievement of a training programme.
Various methods may be used by assessors to assess competence over the range of ‘Processes’ and
‘Activity Items’ trainees have listed in their Training Plan. Some of the most commonly used methods
are:
Direct Observation
Product evaluation
Questioning
Personal statements
Witness testimony
Simulation
7.1 Observation
Direct observation is considered to be the most valid and reliable method of assessment. It must be
undertaken by the Assessor:
Working alongside the Trainee OR
Arranging to visit the Trainee when work activities occur naturally OR
If necessary, arranging for work activities to take place with an EW carrying out the
observations
NOTE: Refer to Appendix 9 for an example of an Observation Report
7.2 Product Evaluation
Product Evaluation may be used as an assessment method where evidence in the form of products of
work is available for inspection. The nature of this evidence can vary widely depending on what the
task entails, but examples of product evidence include Risk Assessments, Work Permits, Isolation
Certificates, Maintenance History Records, Daily logs, Reports, Hand-over documents etc. To be valid,
products of work must include reference to the candidate’s participation in the task.
7.3 Questions
The Assessor will use Questioning as an essential part of the assessment process to show that the
Trainee can meet the knowledge specifications for the SVQs. The required knowledge and
understanding is specified for each Unit.
Much of the Trainee’s knowledge and understanding will be apparent from what is done or produced as
part of the work activities, but this will not always be the case, and questioning can be a useful way of
confirming knowledge and understanding.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 20 of 50 ©OPITO
The Assessor may ask questions in a variety of ways, such as oral questions, short answer written
questions, and multiple-choice questions.
The questions asked by an Assessor and the answers given by the Trainee should be recorded on the
Proforma provided in the ‘Programme Operations Handbook’.
NOTE: Refer to Appendix 14 for examples of question and answer formats.
7.4 Personal Statements
Personal Statements or Activity Reports are reports produced by the Trainees giving a detailed
description of each activity they complete as they gain experience towards competence on a particular
Unit.
Personal Statements should record what was done, how it was carried it out and why it was decided to
do the work in this particular way.
Personal Statements must be written in such a way that it is obvious which parts refer to each
Performance Statement for each specific Unit being covered.
It is not necessary for a Personal Statement to cover the whole task from start to finish, as evidence
may have already been provided for part of the activity in another ‘Statement’ e.g. for maintenance
units, the preparation work (Units 13, 69 and 70). For instance, if the task involves the removal and
replacement of components (Units 72 and 73), then the report should only follow the guidelines given
for these Units. Great detail about the preparatory work carried out is not required in this instance
since this will be covered when writing ‘Statements’ for the tasks used to satisfy Units 13, 69, 70. The
report should only detail information relevant to the Unit/s it is intended to cover.
A Proforma for Personal Statements is provided in the ‘Programme Operations Handbook’ issued to all
trainees.
NOTE: Refer to Appendix 6 for an example of a personal statement
7.5 Witness Testimonies
Witness Testimonies are reports produced by technically competent persons who have observed the
Trainee undertake a particular activity. These accounts may be used to support the Trainee’s ‘Personal
Statement’.
The value placed on a Witness Testimony by an Assessor will depend on the knowledge, expertise and
credibility of the person providing the testimony.
A Witness Testimony alone is unlikely to be sufficient in itself for a competency decision to be made,
and the Assessor would normally supplement this by asking questions of the Trainee.
Witness Testimonies must be capable of being authenticated. To authenticate a Witness Testimony, a
record must be available showing clearly the name and status of the Witness, their relationship to the
Trainee, (e.g. supervisor, client) their contact details and the date.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 21 of 50 ©OPITO
A Proforma for Witness Testimonies is provided in the ‘Programme Operations Handbook’ issued to all
trainees.
NOTE: Refer to Appendix 13 for an example of a witness testimony.
7.6 Simulation
Simulation is any structured assessment exercise involving a specific task which reproduces real-life
situations. The Assessor must ensure that any ‘Simulated’ assessment exercise is carried out under
conditions which reflect a ‘realistic work environment’ and activity characteristics as closely as possible.
Assessors should refer to the OPITO Assessment and Verification Strategy for more information on the
use of simulation.
7.7 Final Summary Reports
The final action of EWs, Assessors and Internal Verifiers will be to provide written final summary
reports.
EW Summary Feedback Reports should outline how the observations etc have been carried out, provide
an overview of the trainee’s development and state the EW’s recommendations to the assessor.
(Appendix 8)
Assessor Reports should provide an overview of the trainee’s development during the training period
and of the assessment process used, i.e. direct observation, inspection of work etc. The reports should
also state the Assessor’s final conclusion on the trainee’s competence (Appendix 10)
Internal Verifier Reports should provide an overview of how the assessment process was carried out
throughout. The IV will also comment on the content of the Evidence Portfolio in relation to the
referencing of evidence, the organisation and labelling of the document itself and the ease with which
evidence is traceable. It should also state whether or not the IV agrees with the assessor’s judgement.
(Appendix 11 & 12)
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 22 of 50 ©OPITO
8 Guidance on Requirements for Contents of Trainee Maintenance Technician
Portfolios
8.1 Process Engineering Maintenance Activity Items and Unit Selection
During the ‘Work Placement’ phase of the trainee technician programme, maintenance technician
trainees undertaking the Level 3 PEM SVQ are required to produce a Training and Assessment Plan
aligned to:
The seven selected ‘Activity Items’ specific to their maintenance discipline which relate to
the systems and equipment available within their placement facility. These will be selected
and agreed between the trainee and the mentor
The 8 mandatory and 4 optional Units from the Level 3 PEM SVQ Standards. The 4 optional
Units will also be selected and agreed between the trainee and the mentor
NOTE 1: Mandatory units 10, 11 & 12 are common to all three disciplines and are categorised as the ‘Three Generic Units’. The remaining five mandatory units and the four optional units for each discipline are categorised as the ‘Nine Technical Units’.
Over the entire two year training period, OGTAP trainees will be required to produce evidence of
carrying out maintenance activities on all seven selected Activity Items fully covering each of the 9
Technical Units selected by the candidate. A maximum of 4 Units can be covered by any one
maintenance activity.
NOTE 2: Detailed information on the Activity Items and Units for each discipline is available in the Programme Operation Handbook issued by OPITO to trainees.
The SVQ requirements are that evidence is provided from a minimum of three separate assessment
activities for each of the 9 Technical Units selected. The three assessment activities for each unit must
be from three different Activity Items from the seven selected. Again, a maximum of 4 Units can be
covered by any one maintenance activity report.
8.2. Training and PEM SVQ Portfolio Folders
Two portfolios will require to be maintained in two separate folders to document training progress and
SVQ assessment progress as follows:
Folder 1 - Training Portfolio
Should be compiled as follows:
SECTION 1:
All training related documents and material
Safety Reports for the 3 Safety Assignments completed by the trainee
SECTION 2:
Personal Reports covering all Performance Criteria for all 12 units across each of the 7
Activity areas and the relevant supporting evidence.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 23 of 50 ©OPITO
NOTE 1: Section 2 shall be assessed to the same standard as the SVQ with the EW and Assessor signing off the assessment material to confirm trainee competence as appropriate.
NOTE 2: It is not necessary for internal verification to be carried on the contents of Folder 1. The focus for internal verification should be on the SVQ evidence contained in Folder 2.
Folder 2 – SVQ Portfolio
Should be compiled as follows:
SECTION 1:
All relevant candidate information, signature sheets, EW, Assessor and IV information
forms, copies of Assessor and IV’s relevant qualifications, record of EWA briefing, Unit
Progress Record, Unit Achievement Records, Assessor and IV Final Statements, etc.
SECTION 2:
Copies of all assessment material and evidence produced by trainees for the appropriate
PEM Level 3 SVQ. Examples of assessment material in the form of reports, testimonies and
supporting evidence are:
Assessment Plans
Observation Reports (written by EW or assessor)
Personal Reports (activity reports written by trainee)
Witness Testimonies
Risk Assessments (trainee involvement in producing or using RA must be obvious)
Work Permits (trainee involvement in permit raising/issue/revalidation/cancelling/etc. must be obvious)
Isolation Certificates (trainee involvement in either creating or using isolation certificates must be obvious)
Daily and handover logs (trainee involvement in providing input must be obvious)
Assessor/EW Feedback Reports (including summary feedback report from EW/Assessor where used)
Underpinning knowledge questionnaires specific to the selected activity items
NOTE 1: Assessment material and evidence must meet the SVQ requirements for a minimum of 3 assessment occasions for each of the 9 technical units selected by the candidate. The 3 assessment occasions for each unit must be drawn across the range of the 7 activity items that candidates selected from three Activity Groups (A/B/C).
NOTE 2: To ensure that SQA internal verification requirements are met, the Internal Verifier should provide 100% verification of the SVQ assessment material and evidence contained in Folder 2.
Once trainees commence their SVQ, the assessor may review evidence from Folder 1 -
Training Portfolio to determine if it can be utilised as evidence for the SVQ
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 24 of 50 ©OPITO
NOTE 3: Evidence produced from group or team activities is only valid when it clearly relates to the trainee’s specific and individual contribution to the activity, and not to the general outcome.
Any evidence in Folder 1 identified as meeting the SVQ standards can be transferred into
Folder 2 – SVQ Portfolio ensuring that it is cross referenced to the SVQ Standards as
appropriate
Where evidence is removed from Folder 1 to Folder 2 it should be clearly referenced in
Folder 1 where this evidence is now located
Only evidence directly referenced to the SVQ standards should be retained in the SVQ
Portfolio
Any evidence or documents that are not cross referenced to the SVQ Standards must be
removed and retained in the Training Portfolio if appropriate
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 25 of 50 ©OPITO
9 Guidance on Requirements for Contents of Trainee Process Technician Portfolios
9.1 Process Operations Hydrocarbons (POH) Award Structure
During the ‘Work Placement’ phase of the trainee technician programme, process technician trainees
undertaking the Level 3 POH SVQ are required to produce a Training and Assessment Plan aligned to the
Units and Process Groups that form the Award Structure.
NOTE 1: Full detailed description of the Award Structure is provided in the Programme Operations Handbook issued by OPITO to trainee process technicians.
The following extract from the Programme Operations Handbook provides a brief overview of how the
Level 3 POH SVQ is structured.
The following tables provide details of the Unit titles and Process Groupings for the SVQ POH Level 3.
Each of the 30 individual processes listed in the table are effectively a Unit from the POH Standards.
All Units have five Elements with the same titles, each of which define the performance and knowledge
requirements which are specific to the particular Unit. The five Elements are:
Element 1 Start up the process
Element 2 Operate and monitor the process
Element 3 Shut down the process
Element 4 Isolate and reinstate the process
Element 5 Comply with HSE and safe systems of work
A minimum of EIGHT Units is required to achieve the full Process Operations: Hydrocarbons award.
Options on the qualification route selecting Unit processes from Groups A & B are provided in the
Programme Operations Handbook.
The 30 processes are listed in two Groups which indicate the range of Units that trainees must complete
to achieve the award.
To gain the Award trainees must prove their competence in a total of EIGHT Units which will include a
minimum of FIVE from Group A and a further THREE units from either Group A or B.
Trainees must discuss options with their Mentor/EW and Assessor for assistance in choosing the most
appropriate Units covering processes available in their specific work place location.
Group A
Unit No Unit Title
1.1 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Tanker Loading - Oil)
1.2 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Storage Tank -Oil)
1.3 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Tanker Loading -Liquefied Gas)
1.4 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Storage Tank - Liquefied Gas)
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 26 of 50 ©OPITO
1.5 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Gas Compression)
1.6 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Gas Fractionation)
1.7 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (NGL Systems)
1.8 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Gas Treatment)
1.9 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Gas and Liquid Inlet Facilities)
1.10 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Produced Water Treatment)
1.11 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Vent and Flare System)
1.12 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Pigging and Sphering Operations)
1.13 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Crude Oil Stabilisation)
1.14 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Well Products Separation)
Group B
Unit No Unit Title
2.1 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Wellheads)
2.2 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Well Integrity)
2.3 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Water Injection)
2.4 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Metering Systems)
2.5 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Drain Systems)
2.6 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Nitrogen Generation)
2.7 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Chemical Injection)
2.8 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Fuel Gas Supply)
2.9 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Diesel Distribution)
2.10 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) (HVAC)
2.11 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Instrument and Service Air Supply)
2.12 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Water Systems)
2.13 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Hydraulic Control Systems)
2.14 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Heating Medium Supply)
2.15 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Power Generation)
2.16 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Testing Emergency Safety Systems)
To meet the requirements of the SVQ and the OPITO assessment strategy the following assessment
conditions must be met:
A minimum of one Observation must be carried out for each unit
Over the (minimum) of 8 Observation, each of the 4 main elements: E1,E2,E3&E4 must be
assessed at least once with observation included
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 27 of 50 ©OPITO
It is expected that E5- HSE & Safe Systems of Work will be assessed and recorded within
each of the 8 Observations
It is expected that S3- Working Relationships will be observed where possible over the 8
Observations but a minimum of 3 times would be required
A minimum of a third of Knowledge Points should be covered by Knowledge Questions and
those not covered by Knowledge Questions must have other evidence referenced to it.
Evidence must confirm that the unit processes selected have been operated on a minimum
of 3 times over a time period of a minimum of 3 months
9.2. Training and POH SVQ Portfolio Folders
Folder 1 - Training Portfolio
Should be compiled as follows:
SECTION 1:
All training related documents and material
Safety Reports for the 3 Safety Assignments completed by the trainee
SECTION 2:
Personal Reports covering all Units in the selected Process Groups not required for the SVQ
Portfolio
NOTE 1: Section 2 shall be assessed to the same standard as the SVQ with the EW and Assessor signing off the assessment material to confirm trainee competence as appropriate.
NOTE 2: It is not necessary for internal verification to be carried on the contents of Folder 1. The focus for internal verification should be on the SVQ evidence contained in Folder 2.
Folder 2 – SVQ Portfolio
Should be compiled as follows:
SECTION 1:
All relevant candidate information, signature sheets, EW, Assessor and IV information
forms, copies of Assessor and IV’s relevant qualifications, record of EWA briefing (if
relevant), Unit Progress Record, Unit Achievement Records, Assessor and IV Final
Statements, etc.
SECTION 2:
Copies of all assessment material and evidence produced by trainees for the appropriate
POH Level 3 SVQ. Examples of assessment material in the form of reports, testimonies and
supporting evidence are:
Assessment Plans
Observation Reports (written by EW or assessor)
Personal Reports (activity reports written by trainee)
Witness Testimonies
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 28 of 50 ©OPITO
Risk Assessments (trainee involvement in producing or using RA must be obvious)
Work Permits (trainee involvement in permit raising/issue/revalidation/cancelling/etc. must be obvious)
Isolation Certificates (trainee involvement in either creating or using isolation certificates must be obvious)
NOTE 1: Evidence must ensure that all the required types of isolations and reinstatements have been successfully carried out
Daily and handover logs (trainee involvement in providing input must be obvious)
Assessor/EW Feedback Reports (including summary feedback report from EW/Assessor
where used)
Records of Underpinning knowledge questionnaires specific to the selected activity items
NOTE 2: Assessment material and evidence must meet the SVQ requirements for a sufficient number of assessment occasions to cover each of the 8 units selected by the candidate. The assessment occasions for the 8 units must be drawn across the range of a minimum of FIVE to be taken from Group A and a further THREE units from either Group A or B.
NOTE 3: To ensure that SQA internal verification requirements are met, the Internal Verifier should provide 100% verification of the SVQ assessment material and evidence contained in Folder 2.
Once trainees commence their SVQ, the assessor may review evidence from Folder 1 - Training Portfolio
to determine if it can be utilised as evidence for the SVQ.
NOTE 4: Evidence produced from group or team activities is only valid when it clearly relates to the trainee’s specific and individual contribution to the activity, and not to the general outcome.
Any evidence in Folder 1 identified as meeting the SVQ standards can be transferred into Folder 2 – SVQ
Portfolio ensuring that it is cross referenced to the SVQ Standards as appropriate.
Where evidence is removed from Folder 1 to Folder 2 it should be clearly referenced in Folder 1 where
this evidence is now located.
Only evidence directly referenced to the SVQ standards should be retained in the SVQ Portfolio.
Any evidence or documents that are not cross referenced to the SVQ Standards must be removed and
retained in the Training Portfolio if appropriate.
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 29 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 1 - Trainee Technician Assessment and IV Process
1. Assessor Briefs EW/
Mentor and TraineeSTART
2. Assessor Conducts
Briefing with Trainee
3A. Assessor Agrees
Assessment Plans with EW/
Mentor and Trainee
3B. EW/Mentor Agree
Assessment Plans with
Trainee and Assessor
3C. Trainee Agrees
Assessment Plans with EW/
Mentor and Assessor
4 Trainee Gathers Evidence
with Observations by EW
5. EW Writes up Observation
Reports for Trainee’s
Portfolio
6. Trainee Writes up
Personal Statements and
Builds Portfolio
7. Assessor Provides Interim
Review of Portfolio
8. IV Carries out Interim
Review of Portfolio9. IV Provides Feedback to
Assessor
10. Assessor Provides
Feedback to Candidate and
EW/Mentor
11. EW Carries out any
Further Observations Arising
from Assessor Feedback
12. Trainee Updates
Portfolio as Identified by
Assessor Feedback
13 Trainee Gathers
Remaining Evidence with
Observations by EW
14. Assessor Meets with
Trainee and Completes
Final Assessment of
Portfolio
Trainee Submits Portfolio to
OPITO Reviewer for Review
Prior to Submission for Final
Assessment by Assessor
15. Assessor Signs off
Assessment
16. Assessor Submits
portfolio for Internal
verification
17. IV Carries out Final
Internal verification of
Portfolio
18. OPITO Reviewer
Carries out Final Check
FINISH
Trainee Technician Assessment & IV Process
Trainee Submits Portfolio to
OPITO Reviewer for Quarterly
Reviews
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 30 of 50
©OPITO
Appendix 2 - Assessor Information Form
Full Name
Date of Birth
Current Employer
Assessor Qualifications
Centre to see proof of certificates
Other Relevant Qualifications
Details of Occupational Competence as required by the Assessment Strategy
Details of Continuous Professional Development (CPD)
If you hold previous versions of Assessor qualifications such as A1 or D32/D33 please show CPD in relation to achieving knowledge/ experience of current Assessor Standards
Occupational areas(s) you will be assessing
Assessor: I am satisfied that the information I have provided on this form is correct and I submit my relevant certificates with this form
Signed: ______________________ Printed: __________________ Dated: _________
OPITO Representative: I have checked that the information given on this form is accurate
Signed: _____________________ Printed: ___________________ Dated: __________
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 31 of 50
©OPITO
Appendix 3 - Expert Witness Registration Form
Full Name
Date of Birth
Current Employer
Discipline you will be Witnessing
Final Assessment will be carried out
A B
In-House Assessor
External Assessor (Please State)
Discipline Relevant Qualifications
Other Relevant Qualifications
Details of Occupational Competence
Details of Continuous Professional Development (CPD)
Occupational Areas in which you have worked
I am satisfied that the information I have provided on this form is correct and I submit my relevant certificates with this form Signed: ______________________ Printed: __________________ Dated: _________ OPITO Representative: I have checked that the information given on this form is accurate Signed: _____________________ Printed: ___________________ Dated: __________
Discipline Approved: Mechanical, Electrical, Instrument, Process
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 32 of 50
©OPITO
Appendix 4 - Internal Verifier Information Form
Internal Verifier Information Form
Full Name
Date of Birth
Current Employer
Verifier Qualification(s) Centre to see proof of certificates
Other Relevant Qualifications
Details of Occupational Competence as required by the Assessment Strategy
Details of Continuous Professional Development (CPD)
If you hold previous versions of IV qualifications such as V1or D34 please show CPD in relation to achieving knowledge/ experience of current IV Standards
Occupational areas(s) you will be verifying
Verifier: I am satisfied that the information I have provided on this form is correct and I submit my relevant certificates with this form Signed: ______________________ Printed: __________________ Dated: _________ OPITO Representative: I have checked that the information given on this form is accurate Signed: ______________________ Printed: __________________ Date: _________
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 33 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 5- Exemplar Assessment Plan
Units: 13, 69 & 70
Elements:
Activities Performance Criteria Method of
Assessment/Sources
Of evidence
Date of
assessment
Evidence already
available
Links to other
Performance Criteria
Preparing the work area,
equipment and materials
in order to carry out the
maintenance of plant
and equipment
13 (2), (3), (4), (7)
13 (1)
13 (1), (5), (6)
Observation
Witness Testimony
Work Permit
24/10/2016
Ref 66 (1)
Ref 68 (2)
69 (1), (2), (3), (6), 70 (1),
(2), (3, (4)
69 (1), a, 70 (1)
69 (1), (4), (5), 70 (1), (5)
Questioning for
knowledge and
understanding not
apparent from
performance to be
identified from 2nd
review
13 (1), (6) Questions 26/10/2016 69 (1), (6); 70 (1), (6)
Assessor/EW
Name(s)
David White (Assessor) Assessor/EW
Signature(s) David White 1ST Review Date 22/10/2016
Trainee’s
Name
Duncan Campbell Trainee’s Signature Duncan Campbell 2ND Review Date N/A
Date of
agreement
20/10/2016 Date of completion 26/10/2016
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 34 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 6 - Exemplar Trainee Personal Statement
Evidence Ref No. A1-1
Plant/Equipment Activity Item No: A1 Title: Diesel Engines
Date of
Activity
Evidence
Index
number
Details of statement
Check and Adjust Speed Control of Emergency
Generator
Links to other
Evidence
(enter
numbers)
Unit,
Performance
Criteria
covered
21/10/16 A1-1 This statement provides evidence of my
Competence to ‘Adjust mechanical plant and
Equipment to meet operational requirements’. This
was achieved by carrying out the task of adjusting
the speed control on an emergency generator diesel
engine.
I carried out a task risk assessment which was
reviewed by the Area Authority following discussions
with myself. The risk assessment highlighted the
hazards of working with heavy mechanical plant and
the need to prepare the work site and to wear
personal protective clothing
A work permit was then issued
I obtained specifications from the Vendor’s
maintenance manual for this engine, to ensure that I
had the correct information and settings for this task
including the manufacturer’s recommended speed.
Since I am not yet considered competent to carry
out detailed maintenance work on the plant, my
only task here was to check the speed control
mechanism and adjust it as required. To do this I
started the engine and allowed it to run for five
minutes before checking the idling speed. This is the
procedure stated in the Vendor’s Manual. I noted
that the speed was about 100 rpm faster than the
recommended 1000 rpm, so I adjusted the throttle
control mechanism until the speed was at the
correct 1000 rpm. As requested in the maintenance
manual, I allowed the engine to run for another 5
minutes before checking the speed again to ensure
that the adjustment was correct.
During this 5 minute period, the speed crept back up
to the original 1100 rpm; therefore I attempted to
adjust the throttle mechanism once again. During
this operation I noticed that the threads on the
adjusting screw were worn this being the likely
reason that the adjustment was slipping. I replaced
the adjusting screw, adjusted the speed to 1000 rpm
and observed over a further 5 minute test period.
The speed was held constant at 1000rpm.
A1.1a (Risk
Assessment),
A1-1b (Work
Permit)
A1.1c (Page
from Vendor
manual)
A1.1d (Job
Card)
A1.1c (Page
from vendor
manual)
71
71 (1)
71 (1)
71 (2)
71 (3)
71 (4)
71 (5)
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 35 of 50 ©OPITO
Exemplar Personal Statement (cont)
Plant/Equipment Activity Item No: A1 Title: Diesel Engines Date of
Activity
Evidence
Index
number
Details of statement Links to other
Evidence
(enter
numbers)
Unit,
Performance
Criteria
covered
21/10/16 A1-1 After completing the task, I made sure that the
work site was tidy and that no tools or materials
were left in the area.
I also cancelled the work permit
I outlined the task in the daily log and recorded my
findings and the test results in the maintenance
history records.
I made mention in both these documents that I had
problems with the adjusting screw and had to
replace it and that this resolved the problem
A1.1e (Copy of
maintenance
history report)
A1.1f (Copy of
daily log)
71 (1)
71 (6/7)
71 (6/7)
Signed: (Trainee) Duncan Campbell Signed: (Mentor) David Gannon
Date: 23/10/2016 Date: 23/10/2016
Assessment Statements:
a. I confirm that I observed this activity and that this is an accurate report.
ASSESSOR
Sig/Date
EW
Sig/Date
MENTOR
Sig/ Date
George Black
23/10/2016
(b) I did not observe this
activity, however I am
satisfied that this is an
accurate account.
David White David Gannon 24/11/2016 23/10/2016
Note: If the Mentors are also the EW or Assessor, then it is only necessary for them to sign in the EW
or Assessor box as appropriate.
Evidence Ref No. A1-1
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 36 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 7 - Exemplar Expert Witness Observation Report
N/SVQ title and level: Process Engineering Maintenance Level 3
Trainee’s name: Duncan Campbell
Activity Area: A2. (a.c. Motors)
Index no. of other evidence which this
report relates to (if any):
Units(s): 26/27 (Remove and Replace Components)
Date of evidence 18 November 2016
Name of Expert Witness: James White
Designation/relationship to Trainee: Maintenance Supervisor
Details of report:
I observed Duncan undertaking the maintenance task of dismantling, inspecting and reassembling a three
phase squirrel cage motor on.18 Nov 2016
Duncan prepared the worksite for the maintenance activities by assembling all the tools and equipment the he
would require to carry out the maintenance task and by ensuring that the work area was free from all hazards
as identified by the risk assessment previously carried out. He ensured that any potential dangers were
minimised and that he was fully equipped for the task (26 (1/27 (1)).
Duncan used various diagrams to establish how the motor was constructed and the layout of its component
parts. He took great care in establishing the alignment of the motor frame in order to that it might be
reassembled in its original orientation (26 (2)).
Duncan looked for the inclusion of capacitors, springs or other energy storing devices and was aware of the
need to discharge these before progressing with the work. He determined that no energy storing devices were
present (26 (3)).
Using the correct tools, equipment and techniques, Duncan dismantled the motor. (26 (4)/(5)) He inspected the
rotor, the fan blade, the bearings, the wiring connections and the terminal block (26 (6)) and noted that the
terminal block had split into two sections, one of which was loose within the terminal box. He obtained a
replacement block from the stores and fitted it within the terminal box. (27 (2)/(3)) He reinstated the wiring to
the motor terminals as required and disposed of the damaged block in accordance with operating
instructions.(26 (8) After a final inspection, he reinstated all components using the correct tools, equipment
and techniques.(27 (5)) He made the necessary adjustments and tested the motor before finally re-
commissioning it (27 (6).
Duncan wrote up the task in the maintenance history record and the daily maintenance log(26 (9)/27 (8))
I can confirm the candidate’s evidence is authentic and accurate and recommend to the Assessor that he is
competent in the elements covered by this report
Signed by Expert Witness: James White Date: 18/11/2016
Expert Witness (please tick the appropriate box):
Holds SQA approved assessor qualification
Is familiar with the SVQ standards to which the candidate is working
OPITO Approved
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 37 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 8 - Exemplar Expert Witness Summary Feedback Report
The EW should use this summary feedback report to make recommendations to the Assessor
N/SVQ title and level: Process Engineering Maintenance Level 3
Trainee’s name: Duncan Campbell
Activity Area(s): A2. (AC Motors); B2. (Electrical Dist Systems; B4.
(Lighting Equipment)
Index no. of other evidence which
this report relates to (if any):
Unit(s): 26/27 (Remove and Replace Components)
Date of evidence 18 November 2016
Name of Expert Witness: James White
Designation/relationship to
Trainee:
Maintenance Supervisor
Details/recommendations of feedback:
I have observed Duncan carrying out three tasks involving the removal and replacement of
components on an AC motor, electrical distribution system and lighting equipment.
I have reviewed Duncan’s personal statements and all supporting evidence he has provided and I
am satisfied that he has met the required standard to perform this type of activity unsupervised.
Duncan has carried out three separate tasks to complete Units 26 and 27 and has consistently
demonstrated that he has the capability to do this type of work.
Authenticity Statement
I confirm that all the evidence provided for these Units is authentic and traceable to the
candidate.
Signed by Expert Witness: James White Date: 18/11/2016
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 38 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 9 - Exemplar Assessor Observation Report
Unit(s):13
Assessor: David White
Trainee: Duncan Campbell Date of observation: 31/10/2016
Evidence index number: B 3.1
Skills/activities observed: Performance
Criteria
Candidate preparing the work area for the maintenance of gas compressor CX0301A The candidate ensured that the work environment was suitable for the work activities to be undertaken by inspecting the work site and discussing the task with the Area Authority. A risk assessment was conducted by the candidate and control measures recommended included that the area be barriered off to ensure that there were no other conflicting activities being carried out at this time. It was also identified by the candidate that the work could not commence until access scaffolding was erected; therefore a request was made to the Area Authority to have this done. These control measures were reviewed by the candidate and discussed and agreed with the Area Authority prior to a work permit being issued to him. Completion of the preparations was recorded in the Daily Log and referenced in the work permit. The candidate ensured that temporary lighting facilities were available and that the plant air system was operational in the work location. The candidate worked safely at all times and wore the appropriate PPE for the task. He also complied with appropriate health and safety procedures and adhered to regulations regarding risk assessment and work permit requirements. This observation was supported by a witness testimony from the candidate’s supervisor who testified that the candidate maintained this approach to working safely on all occasions.
(2), (4), (5) (7) (6) (3) (1)
Knowledge and understanding apparent from this observation:
The candidate’s knowledge of the PTW system, Risk Assessment procedure and Operational Work Instructions were apparent from the way that he used them. His awareness of other health and safety requirements and issues demonstrated his knowledge and understanding of relevant regulations and guidelines Other Units to which this evidence may contribute:
11, 69,70
Assessor’s comments and feedback to candidate:
Sufficient performance evidence was provided during this observation to meet all the assessment criteria for this Element. Although some knowledge evidence was demonstrated during this observation, it will be necessary to conduct a questioning session to obtain further knowledge evidence.
Assessor’s signature: David White Date: 31/10/2016
Trainee’s signature: Duncan Campbell Date: 31/10/2016
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 39 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 10 - Exemplar Assessor Final Summary Report
N/SVQ title and level: Process Engineering Maintenance Level 3
Trainee’s name: James Jack
Work Discipline Electrical
Work Site: Charlie Alpha
Date of Report 18 November 2010
Assessor: George Ferguson
OPITO Approved (date) 15/01/2006
Assessment Summary:
During his 24 months as an electrical trainee on ‘Charlie Alpha’, James followed the ‘Award Route’
A1, A2, A4, B2, B3, C1 and C2.
These work activities were assessed by a range of means, the majority being by direct observation
by myself. The Award Route activities are used as a vehicle to assess the Unit Standards of the
programme and the requirements of these Standards were rigorously observed.
Unit 11: ‘Work safely, minimize risk and comply with emergency procedures’ provides an example
of a Unit which cannot be assessed by direct observation since it refers to Shut-down and
Evacuation procedures. This Unit was assessed by ‘Simulation’.
The Expert Witness provided valuable reports in assessment areas where I personally was not able
to attend and I was able to make good use of these in making assessment judgments.
I am satisfied that James Jack, Electrical Trainee, Charlie Alpha installation, has satisfied ALL the
assessment requirements of his training programme and is, in my opinion deemed to be competent
as a Process Engineering Maintenance Technician: Electrical at Level 3
Assessor Signature: George Ferguson Print: GEORGE FERGUSON Date: 18/11/2016
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 40 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 11 – Exemplar Interim Internal Verifier Report
INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FEEDBACK REPORT
Information on personnel and standards
Internal Verifier Name Roy Graham IV Qualification D34
Assessor Name Steven Laurence Assessor Qualification
Registered with OPITO?
L&D11
Yes/No/NA
EW Name Matt Cox Registered with OPITO? Yes/No/NA
Candidate Name Euan Craigie SQA Registration No 040115848
Interim or Final
Review?
Interim Review Date 16 September 2016
Award/
Standards
SVQ Processing Operations : Hydrocarbons – Level 3
Units Unit 1.5 Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Gas Compression)
Unit 1.14 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Well Products Separation)
Unit 2.4 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Metering Systems)
Unit 2.12 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Water Systems)
IQA Checklist (Only covers assessment activities for above processes)
If answer to any of the following topics is NO, then details must be provided in the
IQA Report Details
YES NO N/A
1. Is there evidence that the Assessors/EWs are occupationally competent
2. Assessment plans produced and signed by candidate and assessor
3. Assessor feedback provided and signed by candidate and assessor
4. All assessment documentation completed correctly and signed
5. All assessment tools (checklists, questionnaires, witness testimonies, etc.)
valid, authentic, reliable and current
6. Sufficient evidence provided to meet the standards
7. All performance criteria met
8. All knowledge criteria met
9. The Scope or Range has been covered where this is a requirement
10. All evidence clearly cross referenced to the standards
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 41 of 50 ©OPITO
Assessment Methods/Evidence Utilised
Observations Personal Statements/Reports Witness testimonies
Q&A Professional Discussions Products of work
Simulation Accredited prior
learning/experience
Other (provide details)
IQA Report Details
All evidence produced by the candidate during this review was 100% verified against OPITO Checklist
requirements.
The assessment process for the 4 Units covered so far is fairly good, however, there are a few areas to be
addressed and these are categorised and identified as follows:
Knowledge Assessment Checklists for each Unit should ideally be completed before performance
assessments are carried out, or at the same time. Only Unit 2.12 has knowledge assessment completed
at this time.
Registers of Supporting Evidence only list evidence related to the Personal Statements. They should also
list all other evidence produced for an assessment activity against the stated Process Reference. The
register should include Assessor Observation Reports, Witness Testimonies, Knowledge Questionnaires,
etc.
All Personal Statements should be signed by the assessor to state whether or not he observed the
activity. If the activity was not observed by the assessor, he should sign that he is satisfied that it is an
accurate report of the activity.
Reference Item 6 in the OPITO Checklist, the following ISSOW documents need to be authenticated by
the assessor or other appropriate persons to confirm that the candidate participated in the activity.
Personal Statement 1.5.1 Evidence 1.2.1a
Personal Statement 2.4.1 Evidence 2.2.1c & 2.2.1h
Feedback/Actions
In general the quality of the portfolio contents is very good, however, the actions identified above should be
addressed for the assessments to date and taken into consideration for the remaining assessment activities.
Please contact me if you require to discuss any of this report further, or require further assistance.
Signatures
IV Signature: Roy Graham Date: 16/09/2016
Assessor Signature: Steven Laurence Date: 29/09/2016
Close Out
This section to be completed if any actions assigned from IQA Report
I confirm that all actions as detailed in this interim report have been addressed and closed out.
IV Signature: Roy Graham Date: 28/07/2016
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 42 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 12 - Exemplar Internal Verifier Final Summary Report
INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FEEDBACK REPORT
Information on personnel and standards
Internal Verifier Name Roy Graham IV Qualification D34
Assessor Name Steven Laurence Assessor Qualification
Registered with OPITO?
L&D11
Yes/No/NA
EW Name Matt Cox Registered with OPITO? Yes/No/NA
Candidate Name Euan Craigie SQA Registration No 040115848
Interim or Final
Review?
Final Review Date 28 July 2016
Award/Standards
Process Operations: Hydrocarbons Level 3
Units Unit 2.1 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Wellheads)
Unit 2.2 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Well Integrity)
Unit 1.5 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Gas Compression)
Unit 1.8 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Gas Treatment)
Unit 1.10 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Produced Water Treatment)
Unit 1.14 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Well Products Separation)
Unit 1.11 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Vent and Flare Systems)
Unit 2.12 - Operate an Oil and Gas Process (Water Systems)
IQA Checklist
If answer to any of the following topics is NO, then details must be provided in the
IQA Report Details
YES NO N/A
1. Is there evidence that the Assessors/EWs are occupationally competent
2. Assessment plans produced and signed by candidate and assessor
3. Assessor feedback provided and signed by candidate and assessor
4. All assessment documentation completed correctly and signed
5. All assessment tools (checklists, questionnaires, witness testimonies, etc.)
valid, authentic, reliable and current
6. Sufficient evidence provided to meet the standards
7. All performance criteria met
8. All knowledge criteria met
9. The Scope or Range has been covered where this is a requirement
10. All evidence clearly cross referenced to the standards
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 43 of 50 ©OPITO
Assessment Methods/Evidence Utilised
Observations Personal Statements/Reports Witness testimonies
Q&A Professional Discussions Products of work
Simulation Accredited prior
learning/experience
Other (provide details)
IQA Report Details
Comments:
Euan Craigie has just completed his 24 months training as a Production Technician trainee on ‘Galway Alpha’. Euan followed the ‘Award Route’ by choosing six Units from Group 1 and two Units from Group 2.
The assessments were thorough and were carried out by an authorised and qualified Assessor. Good use was made of the Expert Witness Advisor who contributed significantly to a number of the assessment exercises. I am confident that the Assessments are authentic and reflect accurately the competence levels of this trainee.
With regard to his ‘Evidence Portfolio’, two folders were submitted for scrutiny and these were correctly labelled on both the side panel and the front of each folder.
The folders were well organised, with all evidence reports and supporting documentation clearly referenced using an easy-to-follow system.
Evidence was submitted for each of the Unit Standards and Work Activities and these were found to be entirely relevant to the work being carried out. The evidence references were clearly traceable and authentic.
I am completely satisfied that all the requirements of the OPITO Internal Verification system have been met by this candidate and that his Evidence Portfolio is passed to the next stage in the documentation process.
Feedback/Actions
Comments:
Signatures
IV Signature: Roy Graham Date: 28/07/2016
Assessor Signature: Steven Laurence Date: 31/07/2016
Close Out
This section to be completed if any actions assigned from IQA Report
I confirm that all actions as detailed in this report have been addressed and closed out.
IV Signature: Date:
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 44 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 13- Exemplar Witness Testimony
This form is not for use by the EW who would normally use an EW Observation Report
N/SVQ title and level: Process Engineering Maintenance Level 3
Trainee’s name: Duncan Campbell
Evidence index no: A2. (a.c.Motors)
Index no. of other evidence
which this testimony relates to (if
any):
Unit(s): 26/27 (Remove and Replace Components)
Date of evidence 18 November 2016
Name of witness: William Hood
Designation/relationship to
Trainee:
Maintenance Team Leader (Immediate line Supervisor)
Details of testimony:
I have worked with Duncan as his Maintenance Team Leader for over one and a half years, and can testify to all
the following statements: I myself have over 20 years working in electrical maintenance in the offshore industry.
Duncan is a conscientious worker who understands the technical aspects of his role and is always keen to learn the
correct techniques and maintenance methods.
Health and safety is a key feature of all his work and this was evident during this maintenance exercise on
dismantling, inspecting and rebuilding a three phase squirrel cage induction motor (26 (1)/27 (1)).
During this maintenance activity, Duncan used the Vendor’s manual and exploded view diagrams to establish the
layout of the component parts of the motor. He was also able to make alignment marks on the frame of the
machine in order that it is put back together in its original orientation (26 (2))
Duncan was aware of the inclusion of capacitors and springs in certain types of motor and paid particular
attention to the possible inclusion of such items when dismantling this machine. He determined that no energy
storing devices were present.(26 (3))
Duncan dismantled the motor using the correct tools and equipment. (26 (4/5)) He inspected the Rotor, the fan
blade, the bearings, the wiring connections and the terminal block (26 (6)). It was noted that the terminal block
had split into two sections, one of which was loose within the terminal box. A replacement block was obtained
from the stores and fitted. (27 (2)/(3)) The wiring was reinstated to the motor terminals as required. The damaged
block was disposed of in accordance with standing instructions.(26 (8)) After a final inspection, all components
were reinstated using the correct tools and techniques.(27 (5)) All necessary adjustments were made and the
motor tested before finally being re-commissioned (27 (6))
The work was written up in the maintenance history record and the daily maintenance log (26 (9)/27 (8))
I can confirm the candidate’s evidence is authentic and accurate.
Signed by witness: William Hood Date: 18/11/2016
Witness (please tick the appropriate box):
Holds SQA approved assessor qualification
Is familiar with the SVQ standards to which the candidate is working
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 45 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 14 - Exemplar Records of Questions & Answers
PEM Unit (Maintenance) Unit 10 - Minimise Risks to Life, Property and the Environment
Element(s)
Evidence index number 21
Circumstances of assessment
Candidate was being assessed whilst carrying out planned maintenance procedures (Unit 66) on a gas compressor. The
opportunity was also taken to assess the candidate for Unit 10. However it was not obvious from observation that there was
sufficient evidence of the candidate’s knowledge and understanding of how to ‘identify hazards, assess the risks involved,
minimise the risks by implementing control measures and providing on-going monitoring’. The candidate gave oral answers to
the following questions which were asked at the time of the assessment. Appropriate Performance Criteria are indicated
against each question.
List of questions and candidate’s responses
Q What formally recorded procedures/systems are available to assist you to identify hazards and assess risks in the
workplace? (Performance Criteria 1, 5)
A The Safe Systems of Work procedures provide a formal ‘electronic’ risk assessment procedure which must be
completed prior to any task commencing.
Q Explain how this procedure is utilised to identify hazards and assess risks associated with carrying out a maintenance
procedure on a gas compressor. (Performance Criteria 2, 3, 6)
A I would first of all complete a ‘Jobsite Check sheet’ by visiting the worksite to identify any hazards. I would then use
this information to assess the risks associated with these hazards and identify and implement appropriate
precautions and control measures. I would use the information provided on the Risk Assessment document to ensure
that all precautions and control measures were applied prior to commencement and maintained throughout the task.
Q What particular hazards are associated with using electrically-powered tools for this task and what control measures
would be implemented to reduce risks? (Performance Criteria 2, 3)
A Hazards: Sparks from non-intrinsically safe equipment could be an ignition source if gas were present.
Poorly maintained equipment could have a potential for causing electrical shock.
Control Measures: A portable gas monitor would need to be at the worksite at all times.
All tools and equipment to be examined daily/before use and defects rectified immediately.
Refer to Safe Operating Procedure 504: Portable electrically-operated equipment.
Equipment to be isolated when left unattended.
Q How would you inform all those who are affected of the risk control measures in place and clarify any implications for
them as required? (Performance Criteria 4, 5)
A Discuss the Risk Assessment at the ‘tool box talk’ and have all relevant personnel read and sign the risk assessment .
Assessor’s signature George Ferguson
Date 31/08/2016
Candidate’s signature Keith Campbell Date 31/08/2016
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 46 of 50 ©OPITO
RECORD OF QUESTIONS AND CANDIDATE’S ANSWERS
POH Unit: 1.5 Element(s) 1.5.4 & 1.5.5
Evidence index number: 1.5KQ
Circumstances of assessment:
Candidate was being assessed whilst Isolating a process (Gas Compression) (Element 1.5.4) by isolating an export gas compressor in preparation for maintenance. The opportunity was also taken to assess the candidate on Element 1.5.5 however it was not obvious from observation that there was sufficient evidence of the candidate’s knowledge and understanding of K3 ‘Safe Systems of Work. The candidate gave oral answers to the following questions which were asked at the time of the assessment. Appropriate Knowledge Criteria references are indicated against each question.
List of questions and candidate’s responses: Y N
Q1:
A:
With regard to ‘the implications of health, safety and environmental legislation’, provide some examples of control measures regarding the hazards associated with hazardous materials you might consider in your risk assessment/procedure for isolating a gas compressor. (K3.1)
I would consider the need for COSHH Assessments to be available; containment of hazardous materials released when depressurising and draining hydrocarbon liquids and seal/lube oil; implementing segregation of waste procedures when dealing with any spillages; and requirements for PPE.
Q2:
A:
What formally recorded procedures/systems are available to assist you identify hazards and assess risks in the workplace? (K3.2; K3.3)
The Safe Systems of Work (SSOW) procedures provide a formal ‘electronic’ risk assessment and permit to work procedure which must be completed prior to any task commencing.
Q3:
A:
Explain how the SSOW procedure is utilised to identify hazards and assess risks associated with carrying out isolations on a gas compressor. ( K3.2; K3.3)
I would first of all carry out a ‘Pre-job Inspection’ by visiting the worksite to identify any hazards. I would then use this information to assess the risks associated with these hazards and identify and implement appropriate precautions and control measures. I would use the information provided on the Risk Assessment document to ensure that all precautions and control measures were applied prior to commencement and maintained throughout the task.
Q4:
A:
What potential environmental hazards could occur during the operation of isolating a gas compressor? (K4)
Potential environmental hazards would be identified as part of the risk assessment process. These would include the potential for unplanned release of hydrocarbons into the atmosphere whilst carrying out venting & purging operations. Also the potential for release of lube or seal oil during the isolation and preparation for maintenance.
Assessor’s signature: Steven LaurenceDate: 31/03/2016
Trainee’s signature: Euan Craigie Date: 31/03/2016
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 47 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 15 – OPITO Reviewers Checklist for POH Portfolios
Please make sure that you can check off all points below you must take the appropriate steps to make sure that all items are checked off.
Tick when complete
1 Trainee details form completed fully and accurately and must have SQA number.
2 Trainee to insert copies of assessor, IV and EWA (if used) information forms and copies of assessor and internal verifier certificates. Assessor, IV and EW (if used) must be registered with OPITO. Assessor D32 + D33, A1, or L&D9DI. Verifier D34, V1, L&D11.
3 Completion of training plan, highlighting performance and knowledge assessed areas. To be signed by both trainee and mentor. Training period to add up to 24 months.
4 Authenticity statement form signed and dated by trainee and assessor
5 Unit Progress Record to be completed and signed by assessor and internal verifier
6 Personal Statements and overview reports. Mentor’s signature and trainee’s signature and dates. Dates to correspond with report date. Ensure that personal statements and evidence etc. justify the performance standards of the units. If trainees name is not on the evidence, mentor to write statement “I can confirm that xxxxxxxx did participate in this activity” then sign and date. Date to correspond with date task was completed. Assessor/EW must authenticate evidence. Highlight your name on evidence.
7 Performance assessment checklists to be referenced and signed and dated by the Assessor and Internal Verifier. Assessor and IV numbers to be on checklists.
8 Register of supporting evidence to be completed for activity reports.
9 Knowledge Questions – There must be indication the assessor has checked each question; this can be by an individual tick or an initial at the bottom of each page with the final page having the assessors’ signature and date. Trainee name must also be shown on question paper. At least a third of Knowledge points to be covered by Q & A. All K & U areas to be covered at least once and be specific to knowledge statements.
10 Sample Signatures - Ensure that the Assessor, EW and Internal Verifier signs sample signatures page and provide contact details. (email/phone)
11 Performance matrix must be completed accurately.
12 Evidence of assessor feedback
13 Assessor’s observation records and assessment plans to be included for fully assessed processes and they must be signed and dated by the trainee, assessor and EW if used. Observation reports should show performance standards assessed.
14 Assessor’s Final Summary Report and EW Final Summary Report (if used) is included, signed and dated. (Final Report)
15 Internal Verifier’s Final Summary Report, ensure this is included, signed and dated. (Summary Statement) Note: Interim Internal Verification must be carried out as the trainee progresses with his portfolio, as required by SQA.
16 Folder’(s) to be labelled, with Name, Qualification, site and company and Numbering i.e. Joe Blogs’, SVQ Level 3 Process Operations, Folder 1 of 2, 2 of 2 etc. both on front cover and spine of folder(s)
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 48 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 16 – OPITO Reviewers Checklist for PEM Portfolios
Please make sure that you can check off all points below you must take the appropriate steps to make sure that all items are checked off.
Tick when complete
1 Trainee details form completed fully and accurately and must have your SQA number.
2 Trainee to insert copies of assessor, IV and EW (if used) Registration forms and copies of assessor and internal verifier certificates. Assessor, IV and EW (if used) must be registered with OPITO. Assessor D32 + D33, A1, or L&D9DI. Verifier D34, V1, L&D11.
3 ISSOW permit, statement from mentor if a trainee has not signed on permit. i.e. “I can confirm that xxxxxxxxx did participate in this activity” Then statement signed and dated by mentor. Highlight your name as it appears on evidence. Ensure that Assessor/Mentor has authenticated evidence.
4 Completion of Training Plan signed and dated by both Trainee and Mentor. Training period to add up to 24 months,
5 Authenticity statement form signed and dated by trainee and assessor
6 Unit Progress Record – all units must be signed off by assessor showing date completed.
7 Assessment Unit Activity Reference Record – completed to show 3 pieces of evidence for each unit.
8 Evidence Index, must be completed. Ideally 1 per activity. Internal Verifier to sign and date each section for each piece of evidence.
9 Personal Statements, Mentor’s signature and Trainee’s signature and dates. Dates to correspond with report date. Ensure that personal statements, evidence etc. justify the performance statement/knowledge points. All personal statements in assessment folder to be signed and dated by assessor.
10 Unit Achievement Records, Ensure the Unit Achievement Record Confirmation Sheet of each UAR is signed and dated by Trainee, Assessor and EW if required. Ensure that Personal Statements, evidence etc., justify the performance statement/knowledge points.
11 Knowledge Questions – There must be indication the assessor has checked each question; this can be by an individual tick or an initial at the bottom of each page with the final page having the assessors’ signature and date. Trainee name must also be shown on question paper. At least a third of Knowledge points to be covered by Q & A. All K & U areas to be covered at least once and be specific to knowledge statements.
12 Sample Signatures - Ensure that the Assessor, EW and Internal Verifier signs sample signatures page and provide contact details. (email/phone)
13 Assessment plans completed and signed by assessor, trainee and EW if used, Observations Reports should show performance statements observed. Record of assessor feedback
14 Assessor’s Final Summary Report and EW Final Summary Report (if used) is included, signed and dated. (Final Report)
15 Internal Verifier’s Final Summary Report, ensure this is included, signed and dated. (Summary Statement) Note: Interim Internal Verification must be carried out as the trainee progresses with his portfolio, as required by SQA.
16 EW’s, Assessors (must be of the same discipline as trainee) and Internal Verifiers must be registered with OPITO
17 Folder(s), to be labelled as follows on both the front cover and spine. Name, Qualification, Discipline and numbering. Also state the Sponsoring Company and Worksite Location, i.e. Joe Blogs’, SVQ Level 3 Engineering Maintenance (Electrical) Folder 1 of 2 Sponsoring Company Name, and Worksite Location
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 49 of 50 ©OPITO
Appendix 17 – Assessor Feedback
Assessor Feedback Report Number Assessor Name: Candidate Name:
Qualification:
Reference Number of Evidence Checked
Evidence is: Valid: Y/N Authentic: Y/N Reliable: Y/N Equitable: Y/N Practicable: Y/N Current: Y/N Fair: Y/N
Underpinning Knowledge Completed: Y/N Observation Completed: Y/N Evidence Cross Referenced to SQA Standards: Y/N
Feedback/Further Action Required
Assessor Signature: Date
Candidate Signature: Date
Valid – Appropriate assessment methods/instruments have been applied. Reliable - Clearly defined standards of performance were use during the assessment. Equitable – Assessment is accessible to all candidates who have the potential to achieve. Fair - Assessments have been objectively devised/selected and are free for barriers to achievement. Assessment practice must ensure that all candidates have equal opportunities to succeed. Practicable – Assessments have been carried out effectively and efficiently. Authentic - evidence
Revision 3 – February 2017 Page 50 of 50 ©OPITO
top related