atrial fibrillation · 2019-04-09 · eg – nsaids, aspirin 1 or 2 . rate control bisoprolol...

Post on 27-Jul-2020

3 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Dr Shaba Nabi Cardiovascular Lead Bristol CCG

OBJECTIVES FOR THE DAY

Overview of AF and oral anticoagulants

Your experiences/feedback of the project

Evaluation of project

Challenging cases with group discussion

How to sustain improvements

Have fun!

AF leads to a FIVE fold

increase in stroke risk

AF related stroke has double the mortality

An estimated 20% of all

strokes are caused by

AF

1 in 4 adults over 40

develops AF over their lifetime

Barry Manilow has AF

AF – WHAT ARE THE PRIORITIES?

Haemodynamic stability

Anticoagulation

Rate Control

Rhythm Control

DECREASING IMPORTANCE

WHO IS AT RISK OF STROKE?

WHO IS AT RISK OF BLEEDING? CONDITION

POINTS

H Hypertension (BP> 160) 1

A Abnormal renal function (Cr > 200 or transplant) Abnormal liver function (Bil > x2ULN, ALT/ALP >x3ULN, cirrhosis)

1

1

S Stroke 1

B Bleeding (previous major bleed or predisposition)

1

L Labile INRs (TTR < 60%) 1

E Elderly (age > 65) 1

D Drugs/Alcohol ( ≥ 8 units) Eg – NSAIDs, aspirin

1 or 2

RATE CONTROL

Bisoprolol

(Diltiazem or Verapamil if

contraindicated)

2 out of 3 of:

Bisoprolol

CCB

Digoxin

Refer

Digoxin if sedentary

1st Line 2nd Line

Aim for HR

80-90

RHYTHM CONTROL

WHICH ANTICOAGULANT?

War

fari

n Dabigatran

Rivaroxaban

Apixaban

Edoxaban

PROS AND CONS OF WARFARIN ADVANTAGES

• Well established

• Reversible

• GFR < 15

• Significant valve disease

• INR checks compliance

• Long half life means less embolic risk if forget to take

• Once daily

DISADVANTAGES

• Frequent blood tests

• Many drug/alcohol /food interactions

• Overall inferior to NOACS

• Higher bleeding risks

• Poor TTR

• Changing dose so not suitable for blister packs

ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines: Fuster V et al. Circulation 2006;114:e257–354

1

International normalized ratio (INR)

Od

ds r

ati

o

2

15

8

10

5

0

1

3 4 5 6 7

Intracranial bleed

Therapeutic range

20

Stroke

WARFARIN AND THERAPEUTIC RANGE

WHY IS TTR IMPORTANT?

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Survival to stroke (days)

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Cu

mu

lati

ve

su

rviv

al

71–100%

Warfarin group

61–70%

51–60%

41–50%

31–40%

<30%

Non-warfarin

Morgan CL et al. Thrombosis Research 2009;124:37–41

DABIGATRAN 150/110 mg

RIVAROXABAN

20/15 mg

APIXABAN 5/2.5 mg

EDOXABAN 60/30 mg

STROKE RISK

↓↓ (D150) ↓ (D110)

↓ ↓ ↓

INTRACRANIAL HAEMORRHAGE

↓↓ ↓ ↓ ↓

MAJOR BLEEDING

= (D150) ↓(D110)

= ↓↓ ↓

GI BLEEDING

↑ ↑ = ↑(E60)

DYSPEPSIA

↑ - - -

top related