cassie ali-fracking in colorado
Post on 14-Apr-2017
122 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
Hydraulic Fracturing in Colorado:
Fracking’s History and Importance to The Centennial State Cassie Ali
BannerID: 872556478
Geography Independent Study
Spring 2015
May 15, 2015
2
Table of Contents
Introduction
Colorado’s Natural Resource History
Fracking: Process & Procedures
Fracking: Regulations
Natural Gas Statistics
Disadvantages and Controversy
Conclusion
Appendix
3
Introduction
Fracking is an issue that is dripping with controversy. It crosses economic,
environmental and societal spheres and is polarized by avid supporters and angered
foes. Energy companies support fracking due to its high output of natural gas and oil
production; however, environmental organizations are opposed to the practice
because of the damage and pollution it leaves behind. The purpose of this report is
to inform the reader on the history, procedures, statistics and concerns associated
with fracking in Colorado. It explores The Centennial State’s natural resource
extraction history, outlines the logistics of fracking, and presents the statistics and
development of a practice that has been used in Colorado for over forty years. This
report is based on research gathered from a variety of sources including the United
States and Colorado State Government, energy companies, educational institutions,
and news outlets on the city and county level. Even though fracking is a highly
controversial issue, this report is not rooted in any bias, but rather presents the
facts and history to provide one with the information and interest to form one’s own
opinion.
Colorado’s Natural Resource History
In the 1800’s people flocked to Colorado with hopes of profiting from the rich
mineral resources found in the undiscovered west. In 1859, gold was found in gravel
deposits in Denver’s Cherry Creek and the Black Hawk-‐Central City area. Gold;
however, was just the beginning and people began to discover the state’s precious
minerals and gemstones such as silver, zinc, lead, aquamarine and rhodochrosite
(Cappa). As the United States became more industrialized, Colorado’s rock
4
materials: sand, gravel, gypsum and limestone, became essential to supporting
infrastructure and factory production. Around this time, coal also became an
essential need for the increasing energy demand. While the majority of Colorado’s
mining history occurs in its mountains, most of the hot spots for energy resources
like coal, oil and natural gas are found on the western slope near the Utah border as
well as on the eastern plains, an area known as the Denver-‐Julesburg Basin.
The Denver-‐Julesburg Basin stretches from Crowely County in the
southeastern part of Colorado up through Nebraska, Wyoming and the
southwestern tip of South Dakota. The basin’s geologic material consists of
Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic sedimentary rock layers that make up the
Niobrara Shale Formation. These rocks can be dated back 300 million years ago—an
uplifting period known as the Colorado Orogeny that created the Ancestral Rockies
(Lilis Energy).
The Niobrara Shale Formation has more than 20,000 wells that drill 3,000-‐
14,000 feet below the earth’s surface to reach oil and natural gas reserves (Oil & Gas
Financial Journal). The typical image of these wells is the pumpjack drill, a technique
that has been used for over one hundred years. The pumpjack drill is a hammer like
beam that pounds a piston into the earth to release oil and gas. Another technique of
drilling is hydraulic fracturing or as it is referred to in basic terms—fracking.
Fracking uses a mixture of water and chemicals to create fissures in shale
rock to release the embedded oil and gas. Fracking is more powerful than pumpjack
drilling and thus has a higher production level; however, the processes and
environmental affects associated with fracking put the practice into question.
5
Fracking: Process & Procedures
Society presents itself as either pro or anti fracking and there is little
discussion about the actual process. As defined by Energy and Capital, fracking is the
process of injecting water mixed with sand and chemicals into horizontal wells
within shale formations. The high-‐pressure injection creates fissures in the rock,
held open by the grains of sand, which release the natural gas trapped inside
(Brommely). As stated in a report by the Colorado Oil and Natural Gas Producers,
this liquid mixture is 99.5 percent water and sand and .5 percent chemically based
additives. By regulation of rule 205A of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation
Commission, all oil and natural gas production companies are required to disclose
the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluid, as well as the amount of water used
in the process (America’s Natural Gas Alliance). All of this information is public
record and can be accessed online; however, few people seek out the facts.
The fracturing activity happens thousands of feet underground in a fracking well.
The drilling well begins at 2,500-‐7,500 feet (1,000 feet below the water table) and
the fracturing of the shale occurs at 7,000-‐8,000 feet beneath the earth’s surface
(America's Natural Gas Alliance). Once the drill is at the appropriate depth, it takes a
ninety-‐degree turn into the shale to release the natural gas trapped in the sediments.
Several casings of steel and cement contain the drill to ensure its power remains
directed at the targeted shale. It also protects the ground water from interference
and contamination. From the surface, fracking wells appear as large cement slabs
with steel structures supporting the drill and are often un-‐amusing to any one
passing them by.
6
Once the oil and gas are released from the shale, it is pumped back to the surface.
The oil and gas are separated to storage tanks where they are processed, refined
and shipped off for sale. The water mixture, often called “flowback water” is sent to
waste water plants to be treated and filtered. The wastewater is regulated like any
other waste in the state, and is overseen by several different agencies and regulators.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Ground Water Protection Council
(comprised of multi-‐state water pollution control officials), and The Colorado Oil
and Natural Gas Conservation Commission all oversee the treatment and disposition
of the flowback water (Clean Water Action).
Oil and natural gas are sometimes used interchangeably in discussions and
statistics of hydraulic fracturing. However, natural gas is the primary resource that
is desired and marketed from the fracking process. In the earth’s surface, oil floats
on water and natural gas floats on oil; because of this contrasting density they are
found together in “traps,” which is where fracking wells drill. In most cases, gas is
always found with oil, but natural gas can also be found without oil (Colorado
Geological Survey). Fracking has allowed a powerful way for energy companies to
access this natural resource that is often considered more advanced and “cleaner”
than other fossils fuels like coal and oil.
Regulations
Laws and regulations surrounding oil and natural gas are found under the
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Act that was passed in 1951 and amended in
2014. It regulates all aspects of energy production from public and private land
rights, waste treatment, economic production and environmental protection. The
7
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission is the responsible agency for
enforcing the statues of the law and monitoring all oil and gas production sites. Both
the act and the commission strive to “manage oil and gas operations in a manner
that balances development with wildlife conservation in recognition of the state's
obligation to protect wildlife resources and the hunting, fishing, and recreation
traditions they support, which are an important part of Colorado's economy and
culture” (COGCC). The commissions website provides a place for the public to
communicate concerns and gain knowledge of the state’s oil and gas industry. Oil
and gas statistics, drilling locations and regional staff contact information are all
public record for Colorado citizens.
The hope is that this accessible information will allow more people to
become educated on the oil and gas industry and work with the Colorado Oil and
Gas Conservation Commission to advance together in energy industry.
Natural Gas Statistics
As political tensions continue to increase surrounding oil, and coal productions
decrease, The United States is relying more on natural gas for its energy needs.
Natural gas is second to coal in Colorado’s energy consumption, but it is first in
production (U.S. Energy Information Administration). When hydraulic fracturing
technology was applied to the Niobrara Shale Formation’s rich natural gas reserve,
natural gas became essential to Colorado’s economy and energy use. From 1990 to
2010, the state’s natural gas production tripled— ranking Colorado sixth in the
nation (Colorado Geological Survey). Natural Gas is measured in thousand cubic feet,
or abbreviated by Mcf. In applicable terms, one Mcf of natural gas can supply the
8
average American home with its energy needs (ventilation, water-‐heating, cooking,
etc) for four days (Coon Rapids Municipal Utilities). This may not seem to be an
efficient energy use; however, Colorado’s natural gas production statistics show just
how profitable natural gas can be for both the economy and energy consumers.
As reported by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, in 2005
Colorado produced 1,154,424,767 Mcf of natural gas, which is enough to supply
many households and businesses with energy needs for an impressive amount of
time—much longer than four days. La Plata County was the highest in production
with 457,912,820 Mcf for the 2005 calendar year, followed by Garfield County with
270,784,334 Mcf and Weld County with 188,606,614 Mcf (Colorado Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission). In 2014, Colorado produced 1,633,959,995 Mcf of
natural gas with Garfield County jumping ahead in production, followed by Weld
and La Plata County (Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission).
The increase Colorado has experienced within the past nine years has allowed
several rural counties to experience a great boost in economic activity and wealth.
Garfield County, the leader in natural gas production, is located in the northwestern
part of the state including the mountain towns of Glenwood Springs and Carbondale.
Energy has surpassed tourism and agriculture for the county’s top industries
boosting the median household income to $63,929 as reported in 2014 (Garfield
County). This is higher than both Denver County and the state’s median household
income, which were $50,313 and $58,433 as reported by the 2013 United States
Census. Both Weld County and La Plata County had median household incomes that
were equitable with Garfield’s County, surpassing several of their neighboring rural
9
counties. It is clear that the fracking industry has allowed counties to be competitive
with the Front Range’s economic hotspots like Fort Collins, Denver, and Colorado
Springs. Natural gas seems to have replaced gold in Colorado’s attractive resources;
however, thankfully it is under much more regulation than the mining booms the
state experienced during the Wild West.
Disadvantages and Controversy
A Google search of “fracking in Colorado,” displays 1,270,000 results from
various energy companies, political organizations and news outlets. There is an
abundance of information about fracking on the Internet; however, these webpage
titles are polarized in two distinct categories—pro or anti fracking. Energy
companies present the facts and benefits of fracking while environmental
organizations reveal the disadvantages of fracking and hope to gain supporters to
ban the practice.
Fracking’s controversy is centered on the potential pollution of ground and
surface water from the well’s flowback water. Energy companies abide by the strict
structural and waste treatment regulations set in place by state and federal
governments; however, sometimes these protective casings and treatment systems
fail. According to Clean Water Action, fracking removes millions of gallons of
freshwater from the earth and disturbs the water cycle. Each well uses two to five
million gallons of local water in the fracking process that turns into contaminated
water. Efforts are made to contain this toxic liquid; however, as in the case of sludge
from landfills, some of it makes its way back into the water supply (Clean Water
10
Action). Colorado is among eight states have reported ground, surface and drinking
water contamination due to fracking.
Several Colorado towns have made headlines over the past decade because
their drinking water was contaminated with fracking fluid or natural gas. These
instances attracted high publicity and are known to many as “Fraccidents.”
Water protection campaigns lead the march to expose these fraccidents and
gain lobbyists to outlaw fracking all together. One of the most well known
fraccidents happened in February of 2009 in the rural town of Fort Lupton,
Colorado. Strange smells were coming from one resident’s tap water and when he
held a lighter next to the water stream it ignited into a flame (Earthjustice). Two
years later, a family residing in the town of Silt Mesa, located in Garfield County,
experienced severe nosebleeds, blackouts and body rashes that were linked to air
and water pollution from a nearby gas development. They sought medical help and
were advised by doctors to leave their home (Colson). Other Colorado fraccidents
include the discovery of toxic chemicals in streams and well explosions causing fire
and infrastructure damage.
These events make headline news because of their severity; however, they
should not be overlooked. Fracking’s air and water pollution present energy
companies and law officials with a serious problem. One may ask: Why are people so
concerned with fracking pollution if coal and other types of mining result in the
same degree of pollution? Pollution from mining has been around since the early
1900’s and is monitored and regulated on several different levels of government.
Fracking is a newer practice and due to its rapid boom in the past decade,
11
responsible companies and agencies have not perfected the exact infrastructure and
regulations to accommodate its high production.
Fracking presents Colorado with several environmental and societal issues
as well as economic and energy benefits. Both sides of the argument need to be
considered in order to maintain a healthy and prosperous living environment.
Conclusion
Through my research I have learned that hydraulic fracking has beneficial
and harmful affects in Colorado. Like any other human interference with the earth,
there are repercussions from disturbing the environment that humans must
recognize. The strong opposing sides to fracking show that Colorado citizens and
government officials claim responsibility for the practice and are all working
towards a common goal in preserving the earth—they just have different views in
how to achieve that goal. With advancing technology and research, the oil and gas
industry will be able to move forward in hopes of reducing the errors and damages
fracking causes. Whether one is pro or anti fracking, it is evident that all citizens of
Colorado share a love and admiration for our state’s beautiful landscape and natural
resource haven.
12
Works Cited America's Natural Gas Alliance. "Oil & Natural Gas in Colorado." Colorado's Oil &
Natural Gas Producers. 2010. Accessed May 2, 2015. http://www.oilandnaturalgasincolorado.com/OilandNaturalGasinColorado.html#/2.
Brommely, Richard. "What Is Fracking?" What Is Fracking? November 15, 2012.
Accessed May 2, 2015. http://www.energyandcapital.com/resources/what-‐is-‐fracking.
Cappa, Jim. "Mining History of Colorado." Yampa Valley. December 2, 2008. Accessed
May 2, 2015. http://yampavalley.info/centers/natural_resources_%26_environment/pages/mining_history_of_colorado.
Clean Water Action. "Fracking: The Process." Fracking: The Process | Clean Water
Action, Fracking: The Dangers. 2012. Accessed May 4, 2015. http://www.cleanwateraction.org/page/fracking-‐process.
Colorado Geological Survey. "Natural Gas: Where Is It Found? | Colorado Geological
Survey." Colorado Geological Survey | Colorado School of Mines. 2013. Accessed May 3, 2015. http://coloradogeologicalsurvey.org/energy-‐resources/natural-‐gas-‐2/where-‐is-‐it-‐found/.
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. "Production by County Monthly."
Colorado Oil and Gas Commission: Production and Sales by County Monthly. Accessed May 2, 2015.
Coon Rapids Municipal Utilities. "How to Measure Natural Gas?" Natural Gas.
December 1, 2013. Accessed May 3, 2015. http://www.crmu.net/PDF files/Natural Gas pdfs/How to Measure Natural Gas.pdf.
Colson, Jon. “Silt Mesa family claims gas fumes forcing them out. ”Post Independent.
January 4, 2011. Accessed May, 5 2015. Earthjustice. "Colorado and Fracking." Earthjustice. April 8, 2011. Accessed May 5,
2015. http://earthjustice.org/features/colorado-‐and-‐fracking. Garfield County. "About Garfield County, Colorado." Garfield County, Colorado. 2014.
Accessed May 3, 2015. http://www.garfield-‐county.com/about-‐garfield-‐county/index.aspx.
Lilis Energy. "Denver-‐Julesburg (DJ) Basin." Lilis Energy. February 2, 2015. Accessed
April 28, 2015. http://www.lilisenergy.com/dj-‐basin-‐land-‐holdings.
13
U.S. Energy Information Administration."Independent Statistics and Analysis." USEIA. August 21, 2014. Accessed May 13, 2015. http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CO#tabs-‐3.
Investopdedia."Mcf Definition | Investopedia." Investopedia. June 11, 2010.
Accessed May 1, 2015. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mcf.asp. Oil & Gas Financial Journal."Niobrara Shale Formation." Oil & Gas Financial Journal.
April 9, 2013. Accessed May 3, 2015. http://www.ogj.com/unconventional-‐resources/niobrara-‐shale.html.
COGCC. "Oil and Gas Conservation Act." Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation
Commission. June 1, 1951 (Amended May 31, 2014). Accessed May 14, 2015. http://cogcc.state.co.us/RR_Docs_new/rules/AppendixV.pdf.
14
Appendix
This map shows Colorado counties outlined in orange with shale formations shaded in yellow and each parcel point represents a fracking well. (Map created May 5, 2015 by Cassie Ali. Data source: FracFocus, SkyTruth, US Census Bureau, USDA, EIA, FracTracker Alliance via ArcGISonline).
This map shows oil and gas permits from the Colorado Oil and Gas Commission as of 2014 from the Colorado Natural Gas Utility Service (cdn.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite/DORA-‐PUC/.../1251632608624).
15
An example of a Colorado Fracking Well from a collaborative report by The Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission and America’s Natural Gas Alliance (http://www.oilandnaturalgasincolorado.com/OilandNaturalGasinColorado.html#/10).
top related