ccsso state consortium on educator effectiveness may 15, 2012 toward the summit of educator...

Post on 12-Jan-2016

219 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

CCSSO State Consortium on Educator EffectivenessMay 15, 2012

Toward the Summit of Educator Effectiveness: 

Which way from here?

Webinar Logistics

Everyone is muted

Use the chat function to make a comment or ask a question

You may chat privately with individuals on your team

If you have problems, you may send William Bentgen a message via the chat function or an email at williamb@ccsso.org

Poll

Poll: Did you attend the Summit?

a) I did not attend the Summit

b) I attended the Summit—11 respondents

c) Between 2 and 4 of us in the room with me right now attended the Summit

d) 5 or more of us in the room with me right now attended the Summit—2 respondents

Key Participants

Educators in Residence, CCSSO

Mary-Dean Barringer

Holly Boffy

Terry Janicki

Webinar Goal

Looking back…

Recapping the Summit

Reviewing progress in 2011-2012

Examining a topic closely…

Non-Tested Grades and Subjects in Evaluation

Taking a 30,000 foot view….

Alignment and Coherence in the Context of Complexity

Looking back…

2011-2012

Presenter

Janice Poda

Strategic Initiative Director, Education Workforce, CCSSO

State Teams

25 State Teams18 Business Partners 22 Association Partners 28 Facilitators

Data Collected

Progress Reports

State Theories of Action

Action Plans

Summit evaluations

Highlights

Michelle Shearer, 2011 National Teacher of the Year

State team work

Content workshops that were hands-on or how-to

Reception at the Space Needle

Progress During Past Year

In the past year, how much progress do you think your state has made in creating and implementing a comprehensive and coherent educator effectiveness system?

Percentage of Work Left to Accomplish

What percentage of the work do you think your state STILL HAS TO COMPLETE to have a well-planned and implemented comprehensive and coherent system of educator effectiveness by 2014?

Biggest Challenge in Upcoming Year Volume of work and number of people available

to do it

Communication

Clarity, establishing a compelling vision/compelling narrative about quality learning for [our state’s] kids and educators

Breaking silos and creating and maintaining a cohesive system of educator effectiveness

The legislative environment … threatens the progress we have made on reform

Biggest Challenge in Upcoming Year, cont. Identification of multiple measures of teacher

and administrator competencies

Developing training for the teacher evaluation system and piloting teacher and administrator evaluation model systems

Integrating evaluation with professional learning and job-embedded pd

Reviewing our systems of educator preparation

Preparation for Entry into the Profession

Priority for CCSSO

Priority for many of your states

Preparation for Entry into the Profession

How urgent do you feel the need is to revise the requirements for entry into the profession for teachers?

Leadership Preparation

How urgent do you feel the need is to revise the requirements for entry into leadership positions?

Upcoming Events Related to Entry into the Profession

Presentation at Student Assessment Conference June 29

Task Force Meeting July (TBA)

Meeting of Expert Group August

Topical Meeting September 27-28

Conference Call or Face-to-Face Meeting of Task Force

Annual Policy Forum November

Task Force Meeting (July)

Draft principles for entry into education profession

Draft definitions of classroom ready and leadership ready

Draft sample policies Initial licensure/ certification Program approval Data reporting

Update on Title II, HEA

Requests from SCEE Participants

More coordination from CCSSO between Common Core and Educator Effectiveness (e.g., joint meetings)

More interaction with NCSL

Convene association partners to address work collectively

More “how to” sessions and fewer speakers

Others…?

Questions and/or Comments

Examining a topic closely…

Non-Tested Grades and

Subjects (NTGS)

Non-Tested Grades and Subjects (NTGS)

Holly Boffy

Educator in Residence, SCEE

At the request of member states, SCEE convened a NTGS Task Force at the Summit

We realized that many of us are using different terminology for the same work

Onsite, Delaware shared their approach and lessons learned

NTGS

Diane Donohue

Special Assistant for Educator Effectiveness, Delaware

The DPAS II Component 5 Implementation Overview

Educator Groups Measure A – DCAS – percent proficient or growth

Measure B – Internal and/or External Measures

Measure C – Growth Goals

Group 1: DCAS teachers (3-10 Reading and/or Math)

50% 50%  

Group 2: Non-DCAS Content/Subject teachers who report student grades

  50% 50%

Group 3: Non-Content/Subject educators who do NOT report student grades

    100%

NTGS Challenge

Challenge—measurement of student achievement and growth that:

Measures higher-order learning

Is comparable across classrooms

Is valid and reliable

Is cost appropriate

Contributes to improvement

(Other?)

NTGS

Possible ways to achieve the goal

Vendor-developed/scored standardized exams

State-developed/scored standardized exams

Locally-developed/scored standardized exams

Performance rubrics/scored by panels

A mix of the above … and more?

NTGS

What can states do together?

Shared definitions

Test item pools

Rubrics/tasks

Reviewers (electronically)

Other?

Questions and/or Comments

Taking a 30,000 foot view…

Framing the Educator Effectiveness Agenda and Implementing the Work:

Coherence, alignment, and transformation in

the context of complexity

Alignment, Coherence, Complexity, and Transformation

Janice GoldsberryActing SCEE Team Lead, Maine

Curriculum Director, Sanford School Department, Sanford, ME

Alignment and Coherence in the Context of Complexity

Challenge articulated in ME’s DRAFT Action Plan

Address issues around cohesiveness in the system and how to get agreement among key stakeholders groups around the theory of action.

Build culture of trust continuous learning and support.

We need to address local control issues, get buy-in by school boards and superintendents.

Urgent need to identify the groups and a meaningful way to communicate with these groups.

Questions and/or Comments

Follow-up

Summit presentations and handouts are currently on the on collaboration site

Video of plenary sessions and two content workshops will be posted next week

Please post your action plans!

We will be in touch with SCEE Team Leads

Upcoming Webinars

June 12 — Principal Pipeline

July 10 — TBA, based on today’s webinar and follow-up surveys

2:00 to 3:00 pm Webinar

3:00 to 3:30 pm Chat

(All times EDT)

Thank you

top related