cecl methodology - forecasting

Post on 21-Mar-2017

95 Views

Category:

Economy & Finance

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

March 9, 2017

CECL Methodology SeriesForecasting

About the Webinar

• We will address as many questions as we can throughout the presentation or through direct communication via follow-up email

• Ask questions throughout the session using the GoToWebinar control panel

• Risk management thought leader for institutions and examiners

• Regularly featured in national and trade media

• Loan portfolio and risk management solutions

• More than 1,000 financial institution clients

• Founded in 1998

Disclaimer

This presentation may include statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” relative to publicly available industry data. Forward-looking statements often contain words such as “believe,” “expect,” “plans,” “project,” “target,” “anticipate,” “will,” “should,” “see,” “guidance,” “confident” and similar terms. There can be no assurance that any of the future events discussed will occur as anticipated, if at all, or that actual results on the industry will be as expected. Sageworks is not responsible for the accuracy or validity of this publicly available industry data, or the outcome of the use of this data relative to business or investment decisions made by the recipients of this data. Sageworks disclaims all representations and warranties, express or implied. Risks and uncertainties include risks related to the effect of economic conditions and financial market conditions; fluctuation in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. No Sageworks employee is authorized to make recommendations or give advice as to any course of action that should be made as an outcome of this data. The forward-looking statements and data speak only as of the date of this presentation and we undertake no obligation to update or revise this information as of a later date.

Rob AshbaughSenior Risk Management Consultant

About Today’s Presenters

Garver MoorePrincipal - Advisory Services

Sageworks Advisory Services

Utilize Sageworks’ Advisory Services Group as a partner and an extension of your team.

Our consultants work with institutions to optimize processes to align with strategy, goals, and mission. Our services enable firms to proactively monitor trends and drive efficiencies in the lending cycle.

P O R T F O L I O M A N A G E M E N T S E R V I C E S

Services Include

• Model Transition and Validation

Services

• CECL Transition Services

• Prepayment, Curtailment, Funding,

and Cash Flow modeling

• Risk Rating Policies and Backtesting

• Profitability Analytics

OP T I MI Z A T ION

I N S T I T U T I O N

D A T A

S A G E W O R K S

S O L U T I O N S

• Valuation Services

• Economic Modeling

• Process Optimization

• Professional Education

• DFAST Support

• ALM Support

Agenda

• Series Overview

• Forecasting Concepts:

• “Reasonable and Supportable”

• The Economic Cycle

• Sources

• Regional Versus National

• Indicator Selection

• The Future is Now!

• Applications – Data-intensive (Periodic exclusion)

• Applications – Analysis-intensive (Regression)

• Reversion

Series Overview

• Thursday, March 9, 2017, 2-3 p.m. Forecasting with CECL

• Thursday, March 16th, 2017, 2-3 p.m. CECL Calculations in a Software Environment

• Thursday, March 23, 2017, 2-3 p.m. Disclosures with CECL

Sign up at: web.sageworks.com/cecl-methodology-webinar-series/

Agenda

• Series Overview

• Forecasting Concepts:

• “Reasonable and Supportable”

• The Economic Cycle

• Sources

• Regional Versus National

• Indicator Selection

• The Future is Now!

• Applications – Data-intensive (Periodic exclusion)

• Applications – Analysis-intensive (Regression)

• Reversion

Poll Question 1

“Reasonable and Supportable”

Supportable:

• Not prescriptive

• Begs the question

• May not require external data

• Probably should leverage external data

“Reasonable and Supportable”

Reasonable:

• Should not strain credulity

• Should align with trends and past experience

• Should not factor long-tail events

• Should be harmonious with institution’s behavior

• Should not rely on exotic economic theories• “If it sells gold, it’s too bold”

Agenda

• Series Overview

• Forecasting Concepts:

• “Reasonable and Supportable”

• The Economic Cycle

• Sources

• Regional Versus National

• Indicator Selection

• The Future is Now!

• Applications – Data-intensive (Periodic exclusion)

• Applications – Analysis-intensive (Regression)

• Reversion

The Economic Cycle• Do not require one or more entire cycle(s) of loan-level data to comply!

The Economic Cycle

• Do not require one or more entire cycle(s) of loan-level data to comply!

• “Where are we” > “Where are we going”

• Consistent interpretations:• Decline faster than recovery

• Disparate causes

• Inconsistent troughs

The Economic Cycle

• Do not require one or more entire cycle(s) of loan-level data to comply!

• “Where are we” > “Where are we going”

• Consistent interpretations:

• Decline faster than recovery

• Disparate causes

• Inconsistent troughs

The Economic Cycle“To prove that Wall Street is an early omen of movements still to come in GNP, commentators quote economic studies alleging that market downturns predicted four out of the last five recessions. That is an understatement. Wall Street indexes predicted nine out of the last five recessions! And its mistakes were beauties” -- Paul Samuelson

Agenda

• Series Overview

• Forecasting Concepts:

• “Reasonable and Supportable”

• The Economic Cycle

• Sources

• Regional Versus National

• Indicator Selection

• The Future is Now!

• Applications – Data-intensive (Periodic exclusion)

• Applications – Analysis-intensive (Regression)

• Reversion

Forecast Sources

• National: Public bodies (Governmental and NGO)• Some of them might regulate you!

• State and local institutions• Universities

• Chambers of commerce

• Internal analysis• Harmony with bank’s operations

• Harmony with stress testing, etc.

Forecast Sources

Source: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/files/fomcprojtabl20161214.pdf

Forecast Sources

Source: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/update/01/

• After a lackluster outturn in 2016, economic activity is projected to pick up pace in 2017 and 2018, especially in emerging market and developing economics. However, there is a wide dispersion of possible outcomes around the projections, given uncertainty surrounding the policy stance of the incoming U.S. administration and its global remifications. The assumption underpinning the forecast should be more specific by the time of the April 2017 World Economic Outlook, as more clarity emerges on U.S. policies and their implication for the global economy.

World Economic Outlook (WEO) Update

A Shifting Global Economic LandscapeJanuary 2017

The world Economic Outlook (WEO) Update covers key WEO projections and is published between the Spring and Fall WEO reports

Forecast Sources

Source: https://ag-econ.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/nceconomicoutlookq32016.pdf

Agenda

• Series Overview

• Forecasting Concepts:

• “Reasonable and Supportable”

• The Economic Cycle

• Sources

• Regional Versus National

• Indicator Selection

• The Future is Now!

• Applications – Data-intensive (Periodic exclusion)

• Applications – Analysis-intensive (Regression)

• Reversion

Poll Question 2

Regional vs. National

• Use regional figures where they do not track

• Regional historical data available through Federal Reserve Economic Database (FRED)

• Regional performance can be correlated / regressed to national performance

• A regional or local bank may be nationally exposed

• (Very) loosely: Macro trends will drive PDs, regional trends will drive LGDs

Agenda

• Series Overview

• Forecasting Concepts:

• “Reasonable and Supportable”

• The Economic Cycle

• Sources

• Regional Versus National

• Indicator Selection

• The Future is Now!

• Applications – Data-intensive (Periodic exclusion)

• Applications – Analysis-intensive (Regression)

• Reversion

Indicators

• Unemployment, volatility, rates, commodities, asset prices, etc.

Indicators5 Factors

Indicators5 Factors Unemployment

Indicators

• Unemployment, volatility, rates, commodities, asset prices, etc.

• Unemployment: • 70-80% of predicted loss experience variation

• Regional unemployment more predictive than national

• Regional harder to forecast (reasonably and supportably!)

Indicators“Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora"

Indicators“Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora"

• Law of Parsimony: • Occam’s Razor

• More is less

• 42-50 observations, mind p-values

• Don’t “correlate-mine”

Indicators

Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-colors-give-your-car-the-best-resale-value/

Indicators

Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-colors-give-your-car-the-best-resale-value/

People with exotic cars must really take care of them!

Indicators

Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-colors-give-your-car-the-best-resale-value/

People with exotic cars must really take care of them!

It must be hard for used-buyers to find cars inodd colors, thus driving up price!

Indicators

Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-colors-give-your-car-the-best-resale-value/

People with exotic cars must really take care of them!

It must be hard for used-buyers to find cars inodd colors, thus driving up price!

The iSeeCars.com study included 700 factorsAt a p-value of 0.05, thus we would expect ~35 false positives like this!

Indicators

Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-colors-give-your-car-the-best-resale-value/

People with exotic cars must really take care of them!

It must be hard for used-buyers to find cars inodd colors, thus driving up price!

The iSeeCars.com study included 700 factorsAt a p-value of 0.05, thus we would expect ~35 false positives like this!

Agenda

• Series Overview

• Forecasting Concepts:

• “Reasonable and Supportable”

• The Economic Cycle

• Sources

• Regional Versus National

• Indicator Selection

• The Future is Now!

• Applications – Data-intensive (Periodic exclusion)

• Applications – Analysis-intensive (Regression)

• Reversion

Poll Question 3

The future is now

Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,

Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,

To the last syllable of recorded time;

And all our yesterdays have lighted fools

The way to dusty death.

The future is now

Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow…

…Will likely be very much like today

Baseline Expectations Current Conditions Reasonable and Supportable Forecasts Baseline Expectations

The future is now

Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow…

…Will likely be very much like today

Baseline Expectations Current Conditions Reasonable and Supportable Forecasts Baseline Expectations

These may be the same!

The future is now

2010 Federal Reserve Forecast

Source: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcminutes20100127ep.htm

The future is now

2010 Federal Reserve Forecast

2016 Federal Reserve Forecast

The future is now

2010 Federal Reserve Forecast

2016 Federal Reserve Forecast

The future is now

2010 Federal Reserve Forecast

2016 Federal Reserve Forecast

Adjustment Indicated

Current Conditions?

Questions on concepts?

Agenda

• Series Overview

• Forecasting Concepts:

• “Reasonable and Supportable”

• The Economic Cycle

• Sources

• Regional Versus National

• Indicator Selection

• The Future is Now!

• Applications – Data-intensive (Periodic exclusion)

• Applications – Analysis-intensive (Regression)

• Reversion

Forecasting – Application (Migration)

Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses

Total 1,150 499,500,000 1.35% 6,752,500

Pass 975 485,000,000 1.20% 5,820,000

Special Mention 25 8,500,000 2.50% 212,500

Substandard 150 6,000,000 12.00% 720,000

Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses

Total 1,150 499,500,000 0.82% 4,115,950

Pass 975 485,000,000 0.70% 3,395,000

Special Mention 25 8,500,000 1.07% 90,950

Substandard 150 6,000,000 10.50% 630,000

Baseline

Factoring Pre-Payments

Forecasting – Application (Migration)

Include Static Date Balance Charge-offs Recoveries Loss Rate

Yes 12/31/2010 270,000,000 3,000,000 150,000 1.06%

Yes 3/31/2011 275,000,000 2,750,000 145,000 0.95%

Yes 6/30/2011 300,000,000 3,500,000 160,000 1.11%

Yes 9/30/2011 309,000,000 2,700,000 145,000 0.83%

Yes 12/31/2011 320,000,000 2,300,000 130,000 0.68%

Yes 3/31/2012 324,000,000 1,850,000 130,000 0.53%

Yes 6/30/2012 343,000,000 1,850,000 130,000 0.50%

Yes 9/30/2012 365,000,000 1,700,000 130,000 0.43%

Yes 12/31/2012 400,000,000 1,400,000 55,000 0.34%

Forecasting – Application (Migration)

Include Static Date Balance Charge-offs Recoveries Loss Rate

Yes 12/31/2010 270,000,000 3,000,000 150,000 1.06%

Yes 3/31/2011 275,000,000 2,750,000 145,000 0.95%

Yes 6/30/2011 300,000,000 3,500,000 160,000 1.11%

Yes 9/30/2011 309,000,000 2,700,000 145,000 0.83%

Yes 12/31/2011 320,000,000 2,300,000 130,000 0.68%

Yes 3/31/2012 324,000,000 1,850,000 130,000 0.53%

Yes 6/30/2012 343,000,000 1,850,000 130,000 0.50%

Yes 9/30/2012 365,000,000 1,700,000 130,000 0.43%

Yes 12/31/2012 400,000,000 1,400,000 55,000 0.34%

Forecasting – Application (Migration)

Include Static Date Balance Charge-offs Recoveries Loss Rate

Yes 12/31/2010 270,000,000 3,000,000 150,000 1.06%

Yes 3/31/2011 275,000,000 2,750,000 145,000 0.95%

Yes 6/30/2011 300,000,000 3,500,000 160,000 1.11%

Yes 9/30/2011 309,000,000 2,700,000 145,000 0.83%

Yes 12/31/2011 320,000,000 2,300,000 130,000 0.68%

Yes 3/31/2012 324,000,000 1,850,000 130,000 0.53%

Yes 6/30/2012 343,000,000 1,850,000 130,000 0.50%

Yes 9/30/2012 365,000,000 1,700,000 130,000 0.43%

Yes 12/31/2012 400,000,000 1,400,000 55,000 0.34%

Forecasting – Application (Migration)

Include Static Date Balance Charge-offs Recoveries Loss Rate

No 12/31/2010 270,000,000 3,000,000 150,000 1.06%

No 3/31/2011 275,000,000 2,750,000 145,000 0.95%

No 6/30/2011 300,000,000 3,500,000 160,000 1.11%

Yes 9/30/2011 309,000,000 2,700,000 145,000 0.83%

Yes 12/31/2011 320,000,000 2,300,000 130,000 0.68%

Yes 3/31/2012 324,000,000 1,850,000 130,000 0.53%

Yes 6/30/2012 343,000,000 1,850,000 130,000 0.50%

Yes 9/30/2012 365,000,000 1,700,000 130,000 0.43%

Yes 12/31/2012 400,000,000 1,400,000 55,000 0.34%

Unemployment > 8% (exceeds

current forecast)

Forecasting – Application (Migration)

Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses

Total 1,150 499,500,000 1.35% 6,752,500

Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses

Total 1,150 499,500,000 0.82% 4,115,950

Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses

Total 1,150 499,500,000 0.55% 2,747,250

Example calculation – Prepayments - Forecasting

Agenda

• Series Overview

• Forecasting Concepts:

• “Reasonable and Supportable”

• The Economic Cycle

• Sources

• Regional Versus National

• Indicator Selection

• The Future is Now!

• Applications – Data-intensive (Periodic exclusion)

• Applications – Analysis-intensive (Regression)

• Reversion

Forecasting – Application (Regression)

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00% Baseline Scenario

Forecasting – Application (Regression)

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00% Baseline Scenario

Actual C/O Experience

Forecasting – Application (Regression)

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00% Baseline Scenario

W Avg. - Singular Regression

Actual C/O Experience

Forecasting – Application (Regression)

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00% Baseline Scenario

W Avg. - Singular Regression

Multi Regression

Actual C/O Experience

Forecasting – Application (Regression)

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%

4.00%

4.50%

5.00% Adverse Scenario

Forecasting – Application (Regression)

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00% Severely Adverse Scenario

Forecasting – Application (Regression)• 18 month economic forecast predicting a spike and then fall in negative indicators

Forecasting – Application (Regression)• 18 month economic forecast predicting a spike and then fall in negative indicators

Period Parameter Value Parameter Value

Q1 2017 PD 1.5 LGD 10.0

Q2 2017 PD 1.75 LGD 12.5

Q3 2017 PD 2.0 LGD 15.0

Q4 2017 PD 2.5 LGD 15.0

Q1 2018 PD 2.5 LGD 15.0

Q2 2018 PD 2.2 LGD 15.0

Forecasting – Application (Regression)• 18 month economic forecast predicting a spike and then fall in negative indicators

Period Parameter Value Parameter Value

Q1 2017 PD 1.5 LGD 10.0

Q2 2017 PD 1.75 LGD 12.5

Q3 2017 PD 2.0 LGD 15.0

Q4 2017 PD 2.5 LGD 15.0

Q1 2018 PD 2.5 LGD 15.0

Q2 2018 PD 2.2 LGD 15.0

?

Questions on regression?

Agenda

• Series Overview

• Forecasting Concepts:

• “Reasonable and Supportable”

• The Economic Cycle

• Sources

• Regional Versus National

• Indicator Selection

• The Future is Now!

• Applications – Data-intensive (Periodic exclusion)

• Applications – Analysis-intensive (Regression)

• Reversion

Reversion• 18 month economic forecast predicting a spike and then fall in negative indicators

Period Parameter Value Parameter Value

Q1 2017 PD 1.5 LGD 10.0

Q2 2017 PD 1.75 LGD 12.5

Q3 2017 PD 2.0 LGD 15.0

Q4 2017 PD 2.5 LGD 15.0

Q1 2018 PD 2.5 LGD 15.0

Q2 2018 PD 2.2 LGD 15.0

?

Reversion – How to revert• Instant:

• May be hard to justify (to specific audiences), but specifically mentioned.

• Straight-Line:• Reasonable approximation, past cycles bear evidence (1-2 years).

• Other:• Also hard to justify (more difficult than expansion of forecast period).

Reversion – What to revert to

• Baseline:• Consider a “cosmic background radiation” of loss peculiar to your institution.

• When there are no technical or systemic issues, you tend to have a loss experience of “X”. Consider a reversion to “X” for shorter-termed assets (WAL versus WAM).

• Average/Mean:• Arguably inappropriate (or appropriate) based on downturn in historical period or forseeable future.

• Other/Peer:• Also hard to justify (more difficult than expansion of forecast period).

• Guidance keywords:• “Available”

• “Historical”

Q & A

Sageworks ALLL and Advisory Services

Our software models, library of web videos, white papers, and archives of your data will support your:• Initial preparatory measurements

• Initial and subsequent stated measurements

• Ability to implement a variety of measurement scenarios

I N S T I T U T I O N - L E D

C E C L T R A N S I T I O N

Expert consultants will structure and lead a project to:

• Perform a Readiness Fit-Gap analysis and remediate issues

• Create and support execution of a Transition Project Plan

• Review segmentation strategy and impact

• Execute appropriate measurement scenarios and provide a Model Selection Impact Analysis

• Execute preparatory and transitional measurements

• Train users on model configuration and execution

• Analyze portfolio data to provide strongly supported, bottom-up estimations for important model inputs

• Create peer/industry benchmarks for model inputs where institutional loss experience cannot be relied on

• Create statistical models for economic forecasting

2017 2018 2019

Initial measurements

& model selection Stabilization

Parallel

Monitor

TR

AN

SI

TI

ON

A D V I S O R Y S E R V I C E S

C E C L T R A N S I T I O N A S S I S TA N C E

Resources• Quantitative Considerations for the ALLL:

• http://web.sageworks.com/quantitative-considerations-alll/

• Federal Reserve Economic Database (FRED)• St. Louis Fed• Hundreds of thousands of time-series by MSA, city, county, etc.• Excel plug-in and API

• Excel Data Analysis Pak (Older versions)• Regression analysis

• Correlation analysis

• Optional add-in, pre-installed (free)

• The R Project• Free/Open Source tools for analytics

• Python Anaconda Project• Free/Open Source tools for analytics

Poll Question

2017 Risk Management SummitThe premier conference for lending and risk

• Learn: » Sessions dedicated to lending, credit risk

and portfolio risk» Led by industry experts to address your

challenges around growth and risk• Network:

» More than 200 bankers from 130 institutions attend

• Apply:» 98% of attendees recommend the RMS to

community bankers» Offers actionable insights to help banks

grow profitably and mitigate risk

Denver, Colorado | September 25-27

top related