challenges in aviation security - aerodays2015 · julia weissbrodt fraunhofer emi am klingelberg 1...
Post on 17-Jun-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Challenges in aviation security -
prioritisation of future research
Julia Weissbrodt
Tobias Leismann
Airbus | University of Ljubljana
KLM | TNO | EBS | EOS | CEA
Smith Detection | Morpho | Fraport
• Security procedures become exceedingly complex and invasive to
passenger privacy
• Security measures/personnel and therefore costs are growing steadily.
• Passenger and cargo traffic are expected to double in the next 15 years.
• The current complex security system cannot be adapted (large costs)
Motivation of COPRA:
resilience instead of more regulations!
New, holistic solutions might lead to a new resilient
(i.e. flexible and robust) performance based aviation security system
COPRA aims to develop a roadmap for
future European R&D in aviation security
COPRA Aviation Security Research Roadmap
Framework
Drivers and Trends
in Future Aviation
Recommendations and Goals
for
Future Aviation Security Concepts
Recommendations on Future
Research and Development
Strategic Perspective
(Why?)
Functional Perspective
(What?)
Resource Perspective
(How?)
Technolo
gy P
ush
Technolo
gy P
ull
0-5 y 5-10 y 10+ y
COPRA Roadmap – A closer look
WHY?
WHAT?
HOW?
COPRA Roadmap – Drivers & Trends
WP1
WP2
Privacy
concernsHigher capacity
aircraftDemand for quicker process
times
Demand for safe, comfortable
and less intrusive checks
WHY?
COPRA Roadmap – Concepts and R&D
WHAT?
HOW?
• Resilience: prepare, prevent, protect, respond, recover
• Comprehensive: encompass all stakeholders, address all (sub-)
purposes, cover entire end-to-end path, coherent and overarching
• Comfortable - quick, not intrusive, user friendly, high service level -
and safe - health, goods, privacy, environment -
• Affordable - costs should be acceptable by market, sustainable
growth) and efficient - use of available resources (cost/benefit),
should be measured -
COPRA Roadmap – What?
Future aviation security concepts should be…
COPRA Roadmap – What and How
Resilient 5 conceptualrecommendations
12 RTD topics
Comprehensive 4 conceptualrecommendations
6 RTD topics
Comfortable andSafe
5 conceptualrecommendations 6 RTD topics
Affordable andEfficient
3 conceptualrecommendations
5 RTD topics
Resilience
Short term:
• Be resilient against current and emerging threats
• Be measurable in terms of the entire security system performance
Mid term:
• ….
Long term:
• Be resilient to known and unknown threats
• Regulation is based on system performance
COPRA Roadmap – What
Resilience
COPRA Roadmap – How
Resilience – short term
Security performance assessment methods:
Systematic improvement requires measurement:
tools, processes and joint security metrics
Risk based and random security
process:
Researching risk based approach to
checkpoints, cargo, detection measures
and decision making.
12 Recommendations on future
research and development are included
in the roadmap, some examples are:
Comprehensive
Short term
• E.g. address technical, organisational and human related issues
combined
Mid term
• E.g. include a comprehensive aviation security management system
to be shared by all stakeholders
Long term
• Be based on a harmonized security management process across all
stakeholders
COPRA Roadmap – What
Comprehensive
COPRA Roadmap – How
Comprehensive – short term
Common methodologies for
iterative risk management
approach
COPRA Roadmap – How
Comprehensive – mid term
Evaluate different security
paradigms for aviation
• Model of checkpoint
• Analytical, empirical, and simulational
assessment of performance
• Systemic approach
Future Concept - XP-DITE
Airport Checkpoint Evaluation System approach
Tobias Leismann
Tobias.Leismann@emi.fraunhofer.de
Julia Weissbrodt
Fraunhofer EMI
Am Klingelberg 1
79588 Efringen-Kirchen
Julia.Weissbrodt@emi.fraunhofer.de
Thank you for your attention!
The research leading to these
results has received funding from
Seventh Framework Programme
(FP7/2007 – 2013) under grant
agreement n° 261 651
top related