changes in cd4+ cells mirna expression following exposure to hiv-1

Post on 23-Feb-2016

52 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Changes in CD4+ cells miRNA expression following exposure to HIV-1. Claudio Casoli University of Milan. Rationale. There is evidence that miRNAs can modulate host innate immunity against viruses. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Changes in CD4+ cells miRNA expression following exposure to

HIV-1

Claudio CasoliUniversity of Milan

RationaleThere is evidence that miRNAs can modulate host innate immunity against viruses.

Specifically for HIV-1, it has been demonstrated that miRNAs can regulate viral gene expression by decreasing PCAF expression and promoting HIV-1 latency or by directly targeting HIV-1 messengers (Triboulet R. et al. Science 315, 1579-82; 2007).

Until now, five cellular miRNAs have been identified to recognize HIV-1 messengers which are up-regulated in only resting CD4+ T cells (Huang J. et al. Nature Medicine 13, 1241-7; 2007).

However, cellular miRNAs expression may also favour HIV-1 infection (Han Y. et al. Nature Medicine; 2007).

Objectives of this study

• To study if miRNA change is related to immune response or HIV-1 replication.

• To propose new approaches in investigating HIV-1/host interactions.

Population study• The HIV-related miRNA expression was assessed in CD4+ cells.

• Three patient groups were studied:a. subjects classified as éLTNP (n° 7)b. subjects naive for antiretroviral therapy (n° 10)c. subjects who were multiply sexually exposed to HIV but remained

uninfected for at least 4 years, named MEU (n° 7)

• No occurrence of a specific phenotype that restricts HIV-1 susceptibility (CCR5∆32 allele, CCR5 and CCR2 polymorphisms, CCL3L1 copy number, HLA class II alleles).

• None of the subjects had co-infection such as HBV, HCV, HTLV.

• These subjects were characterized on the basis of cellular and molecular phenotype (CD38, HLA-DR, sjTREC, Treg), proviral load quantification and miRNA expression.

Methodology• Expression levels of 377 miRNAs were obtained using real time

quantitative polymerase chain reaction based arrays (1 card for 1 patient, data obtained in 2 independent experiments). To analyse data we chose 2 -∆∆Ct method , which relates the PCR signal of patient cell miRNA transcripts to that of normal cells collected from a pool of 6 healthy donors.

• Criteria for comparison:- Replication in more than 70% of the individuals in at least one of

the three patient classes;- Variation at least of 1 log10 in either direction (up or down).

As expected, éLTNP had fewer peripheral activated T lymphocytes in comparison with those of naive patients.

Moreover, éLTNP had fewer regulatory T cells that expressed an activation marker such as HLA-DR, a higher number of sjTREC+ cells, and a lower amount of intracellular HIV-1 DNA within CD4+ T lymphocytes than naive individuals.

No significant differences were observed between éLTNP and naive patients by analysis of the differentiation marker CD127 expression in either virgin or memory T cells.

Viro-immunological features of HIV-1+ patients

- Analysis of 377 miRNAs expression demonstrated that 8 are altered in all groups. - 5 of which are down-regulated and 3 are up-regulated.

- This alteration may be interpreted as a signature of HIV exposure or infection.

Could miRNAs be considered as markers of HIV-1 exposure or infection?

This heat map of single pattern subjects shows two hierarchical groups: one is related to uninfected MEU subjects, while the second group is related to infected patients.

The MEU group shows a prevalent miRNAs down-regulation, whereas Naive and éLTNP subjects show a prevalent miRNAs up-regulation.

Could miRNAs distinguish HIV-1 exposure from infection?

29 miRNAs are differentially expressed between groups. These findings confirm the results shown in the hierarchical analysis.

Are the differences in miRNA profiles significant?

Can Dicer and Drosha expressions explain the miRNA profiles observed in patients?

Both enzymes resulted significantly

downregulated in MEU subjects in comparison

to infected patients. Only in MEU subjects the miRNA expression is strictly correlated to enzyme expression.

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.39

0.60

0.11

0.38

0.56

0.16

DicerDrosha

Rela

tive

Fold

Cha

nge

Expr

essio

n

Naive éLTNP MEU

Each class of individuals is characterized by similar levels of Dicer

and Drosha. None of them seem to play a predominant role.

Out of 377 miRNAs tested, only a few are implicated in HIV replication and immune response.

Among these, some (like 34a and 125a-3p) distinguish infected from uninfected patients in HIV replication and immune response, respectively.

In addition, 23a and 155 miRNAs characterize Naive from the other two groups.

In the MEU group, most of the miRNAs involved in the control of the immune response are down-regulated.

Which are the miRNA involved in HIV-1 replication or immune response?

r-gp120 LAI gp120

- mAb

17

3 15

14 14

8

UP

DOWN

r-gp120 LAI gp120

+ mAb

11

2 0

1 11

6

UP

DOWN

Does in vitro exposure of healthy CD4+ T lymphocytes to gp120 induce changes in miRNA

expression?

When the gp120 action was neutralized with a specific mAb, many miRNAs show the same expression as in non-exposed cells.Presumably the expression of these miRNAs could be altered by gp120 through the CD4 binding signalling.

Exposure to recombinant and natural molecules induced the same alteration in 60% of miRNAs.The different molecular structure of gp120 used could explain the different miRNAs expressed.

Which miRNAs are similarly altered after gp120 exposure and in vitro infection?

5 out of 23 miRNAs, which expression may be related to CD4/gp120 binding site, were also found altered after in vitro infection with X4 strain.

Of note these miRNAs (34c-5p, 518f, 452, 202, 487b) showed the same expression levels in both conditions (gp120 exposure and in vitro infection).

Can these miRNAs modulate HIV entry?

- miRNAs discriminate infected from uninfected subjects.

- A signature of HIV exposure may be defined.

- There is no difference between miRNA profiles of Naive and éLTNP groups.

- Only exposure to HIV is enough to induce a marked alteration of miRNA patterns and consequently may influence immune function of CD4+ T cells.

- Thus a miRNA pattern may reflect a change in the immune system.

Conclusions

Personnel and Institutions involved in the research

University of MilanClaudio Casoli Fabio BignamiPaola RonziMassimo Galli

University of ParmaMariolina GulliNelson MarmiroliRoberta Ruotolo

University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaAndrea CossarizzaLinda BertoncelliMarcello PintiCristina Mussini

Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova of Reggio EmiliaGiacomo Magnani

San Raffaele FondationLucia Lopalco

Anlaids LombardiaElisabetta Pilotti

top related