chapter 8 network security (some reviews and security protocols)
Post on 22-Jan-2016
45 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
8: Network Security 8-1
Chapter 8Network Security(some reviews and security protocols)
These ppt slides are originally from the Kurose and Ross’s book. But some slides are deleted and added for my own
purpose, and some of them are modified.
8: Network Security 8-2
What is network security?
Confidentiality: only sender, intended receiver should “understand” message contents
Authentication: sender, receiver want to confirm identity of each other
Message Integrity: sender, receiver want to ensure message not altered (in transit, or afterwards) without detection
Message repudiation: sender cannot deny that he really sent the message.
Access and Availability: services must be accessible and available to users
8: Network Security 8-3
What we have to consider
Cryptography Cryptography algorithms
Network security protocols Security for individual attacks
Ex. Web security
8: Network Security 8-4
The language of cryptography
symmetric key crypto: sender, receiver keys identicalpublic-key crypto: encryption key public, decryption
key secret (private)
plaintext plaintextciphertext
KA
encryptionalgorithm
decryption algorithm
Alice’s encryptionkey
Bob’s decryptionkey
KB
8: Network Security 8-5
Cryptography algorithms
Symmetric key algorithms DES (Data Encryption Standard) AES (Advanced Encryption Standard)
Asymmetric key algorithms RSA
Diffie-Hellman Two parties create a symmetric session key
to exchange data without having to store the key for future use.
8: Network Security 8-6
Symmetric key cryptography
substitution cipher: substituting one thing for another monoalphabetic cipher: substitute one letter for another
plaintext: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
ciphertext: mnbvcxzasdfghjklpoiuytrewq
Plaintext: bob. i love you. aliceciphertext: nkn. s gktc wky. mgsbc
E.g.:
Q: How hard to break this simple cipher?: brute force (how hard?) other?
8: Network Security 8-7
Symmetric key cryptography
symmetric key crypto: Bob and Alice share know same (symmetric) key: K
e.g., key is knowing substitution pattern in mono alphabetic substitution cipher
Q: how do Bob and Alice agree on key value?
plaintextciphertext
KA-B
encryptionalgorithm
decryption algorithm
A-B
KA-B
plaintextmessage, m
K (m)A-B
K (m)A-Bm = K ( )
A-B
8: Network Security 8-8
Symmetric key crypto: DES
DES: Data Encryption Standard US encryption standard [NIST 1993] 56-bit symmetric key, 64-bit plaintext input How secure is DES?
DES Challenge: 56-bit-key-encrypted phrase (“Strong cryptography makes the world a safer place”) decrypted (brute force) in 4 months
no known “backdoor” decryption approach making DES more secure:
use three keys sequentially (3-DES) on each datum use cipher-block chaining
8: Network Security 8-9
Symmetric key crypto: DES
initial permutation 16 identical “rounds” of
function application, each using different 48 bits of key
final permutation
DES operation
8: Network Security 8-10
AES: Advanced Encryption Standard
new (Nov. 2001) symmetric-key NIST standard, replacing DES
processes data in 128 bit blocks 128, 192, or 256 bit keys brute force decryption (try each key)
taking 1 sec on DES, takes 149 trillion years for AES
8: Network Security 8-11
Public Key Cryptography
symmetric key crypto requires sender,
receiver know shared secret key
Q: how to agree on key in first place (particularly if never “met”)?
public key cryptography
radically different approach [Diffie-Hellman76, RSA78]
sender, receiver do not share secret key
public encryption key known to all
private decryption key known only to receiver
8: Network Security 8-12
Public key cryptography
plaintextmessage, m
ciphertextencryptionalgorithm
decryption algorithm
Bob’s public key
plaintextmessageK (m)
B+
K B+
Bob’s privatekey
K B-
m = K (K (m))B+
B-
8: Network Security 8-13
Public key encryption algorithms
need K ( ) and K ( ) such thatB B. .
given public key K , it should be impossible to compute private key K
B
B
Requirements:
1
2
RSA: Rivest, Shamir, Adelson algorithm
+ -
K (K (m)) = m BB
- +
+
-
8: Network Security 8-14
RSA: Choosing keys
1. Choose two large prime numbers p, q. (e.g., 1024 bits each)
2. Compute n = pq, z = (p-1)(q-1)
3. Choose e (with e<n) that has no common factors with z. (e, z are “relatively prime”).
4. Choose d such that ed-1 is exactly divisible by z. (in other words: ed mod z = 1 ).
5. Public key is (n,e). Private key is (n,d).
K B+ K B
-
8: Network Security 8-15
RSA: Encryption, decryption
0. Given (n,e) and (n,d) as computed above
1. To encrypt bit pattern, m, compute
c = m mod n
e (i.e., remainder when m is divided by n)e
2. To decrypt received bit pattern, c, compute
m = c mod n
d (i.e., remainder when c is divided by n)d
m = (m mod n)
e mod n
dMagichappens!
c
8: Network Security 8-16
RSA example:
Bob chooses p=5, q=7. Then n=35, z=24.e=5 (so e, z relatively prime).d=29 (so ed-1 exactly divisible by z.
letter m me c = m mod ne
l 12 1524832 17
c m = c mod nd
17 481968572106750915091411825223071697 12
cdletter
l
encrypt:
decrypt:
8: Network Security 8-17
RSA: Why is that m = (m mod n)
e mod n
d
(m mod n)
e mod n = m mod n
d ed
Useful number theory result: If p,q prime and n = pq, then:
x mod n = x mod ny y mod (p-1)(q-1)
= m mod n
ed mod (p-1)(q-1)
= m mod n1
= m
(using number theory result above)
(since we chose ed to be divisible by(p-1)(q-1) with remainder 1 )
8: Network Security 8-18
RSA: another important property
The following property will be very useful later:
K (K (m)) = m BB
- +K (K (m))
BB+ -
=
use public key first, followed
by private key
use private key first,
followed by public key
Result is the same!
8: Network Security 8-19
Why is RSA Secure? Suppose you know Alice’s public key
(n,e). How hard is it to determine d? Essentially need to find factors of n
without knowing the two factors p and q. Fact: factoring a big number is hard.
Generating RSA keys Have to find big primes p and q Approach: make good guess then apply
testing rules (see Kaufman)
8: Network Security 8-20
RSA is slow
Exponentiation is computationally intensive
DES is at least 100 times faster than RSA
Session key, KS
Bob and Alice use RSA to exchange a symmetric key KS
Once both have KS, they use DES
8: Network Security 8-21
Message authentication and integrity
Cryptographic algorithms are also used for message authentication and integrity.
8: Network Security 8-22
Message Digests
Function H( ) that takes as input an arbitrary length message and outputs a fixed-length strength: “message signature”
Note that H( ) is a many-to-1 function
H( ) is often called a “hash function”
Desirable properties: Easy to calculate Irreversibility: Can’t
determine m from H(m) Collision resistance:
Computationally difficult to produce m and m’ such that H(m) = H(m’)
Seemingly random output
large message
m
H: HashFunction
H(m)
8: Network Security 8-23
Hash Function Algorithms
MD5 hash function widely used (RFC 1321) computes 128-bit message digest in 4-step
process. arbitrary 128-bit string x, appears difficult to
construct msg m whose MD5 hash is equal to x.
SHA-1 is also used. US standard [NIST, FIPS PUB 180-1]
160-bit message digest
8: Network Security 8-24
Message Authentication Code (MAC)
mess
ag
e
H( )
mess
ag
e
mess
ag
e
H( )
compare
Notation: MDm = H(m) ; MAC = K(H(m)); send {m||MAC}
MDm
m
MAC MAC
8: Network Security 8-25
MAC
Message digest hashed from a message provides the integrity of the message, but not the authenticity of the sender.
MAC is distinguished from message digest(MD) in the way that MAC takes message and symmetric key as inputs and generates the small block of data as output(so is called keyed hash).
8: Network Security 8-26
Digital Signatures
Cryptographic technique analogous to hand-written signatures.
sender (Bob) digitally signs document, establishing he is document owner/creator.
verifiable, nonforgeable: recipient (Alice) can prove to someone that Bob, and no one else (including Alice), must have signed document
Digital signature uses the asymmetric key algorithms.
8: Network Security 8-27
Digital Signatures
Simple digital signature for message m: Bob signs m by encrypting with his private
key KB, creating “signed” message, KB(m)--
Dear Alice
Oh, how I have missed you. I think of you all the time! …(blah blah blah)
Bob
Bob’s message, m
Public keyencryptionalgorithm
Bob’s privatekey
K B-
Bob’s message, m, signed
(encrypted) with his private key
K B-(m)
8: Network Security 8-28
Digital Signatures (more) Suppose Alice receives msg m, digital signature KB(m)
Alice verifies m signed by Bob by applying Bob’s public key KB to KB(m) then checks KB(KB(m) ) = m.
If KB(KB(m) ) = m, whoever signed m must have used
Bob’s private key.
+ +
-
-
- -
+
Alice thus verifies that: Bob signed m. No one else signed m. Bob signed m and not m’.
Non-repudiation: Alice can take m, and signature KB(m) to court and
prove that Bob signed m. -
8: Network Security 8-29
Message Digests
Computationally expensive to public-key-encrypt long messages
Goal: fixed-length, easy- to-compute digital “fingerprint”
apply hash function H to m, get fixed size message digest, H(m).
Hash function properties: many-to-1 produces fixed-size msg
digest (fingerprint) given message digest x,
computationally infeasible to find m such that x = H(m)
large message
m
H: HashFunction
H(m)
8: Network Security 8-30
large message
mH: Hashfunction H(m)
digitalsignature(encrypt)
Bob’s private
key K B-
+
Bob sends digitally signed message:
Alice verifies signature and integrity of digitally signed message:
KB(H(m))-
encrypted msg digest
KB(H(m))-
encrypted msg digest
large message
m
H: Hashfunction
H(m)
digitalsignature(decrypt)
H(m)
Bob’s public
key K B+
equal ?
Digital signature = signed message digest
8: Network Security 8-31
Key distribution
In the symmetric key algorithm, how can only two parties have the key without it being known to others?
In the asymmetric key algorithm, if someone claims that it is my public key, how can I trust that the key is really his public key?
To solve this problem, we need to have the trust base (starting point).
8: Network Security 8-32
Trusted Intermediaries
Symmetric key problem:
How do two entities establish shared secret key over network?
Solution: trusted key distribution
center (KDC) acting as intermediary between entities
Public key problem: When Alice obtains
Bob’s public key (from web site, e-mail, diskette), how does she know it is Bob’s public key, not Trudy’s?
Solution: trusted certification
authority (CA)
8: Network Security 8-33
Key Distribution Center (KDC)
Alice, Bob need shared symmetric key. KDC: server shares different secret key with each
registered user (many users) Alice, Bob know own symmetric keys, KA-KDC KB-KDC ,
for communicating with KDC.
KB-KDC
KX-KDC
KY-KDC
KZ-KDC
KP-KDC
KB-KDC
KA-KDC
KA-KDC
KP-KDC
KDC
8: Network Security 8-34
Key Distribution Center (KDC)
Aliceknows
R1
Bob knows to use R1 to communicate with Alice
Alice and Bob communicate: using R1 as session key for shared symmetric
encryption
Q: How does KDC allow Bob, Alice to determine shared symmetric secret key to communicate with each other?
KDC generate
s R1
KB-KDC(A,R1)
KA-KDC(A,B)
KA-KDC(R1, KB-KDC(A,R1) )
8: Network Security 8-35
Certification Authorities
Certification authority (CA): binds public key to particular entity, E.
E (person, router) registers its public key with CA. E provides “proof of identity” to CA. CA creates certificate binding E to its public key. certificate containing E’s public key digitally signed by
CA – CA says “this is E’s public key”Bob’s public
key K B+
Bob’s identifying informatio
n
digitalsignature(encrypt)
CA private
key K CA-
K B+
certificate for Bob’s public
key, signed by CA
8: Network Security 8-36
Certification Authorities When Alice wants Bob’s public key:
gets Bob’s certificate (Bob or elsewhere). apply CA’s public key to Bob’s certificate,
get Bob’s public key
Bob’s public
key K B+
digitalsignature(decrypt)
CA public
key K CA+
K B+
8: Network Security 8-37
A certificate contains: Serial number (unique to issuer) info about certificate owner, including
algorithm and key value itself (not shown) info about
certificate issuer valid dates digital signature by
issuer
8: Network Security 8-38
Security protocols
PGP: secure e-mail SSL(TSL): http vs. https SSH: telnet vs. SSH Ipsec WEB: wireless LAN And so on
8: Network Security 8-39
Secure e-mail
Alice: generates random symmetric private key, KS. encrypts message with KS (for efficiency) also encrypts KS with Bob’s public key. sends both KS(m) and KB(KS) to Bob.
Alice wants to send confidential e-mail, m, to Bob.
KS( ).
KB( ).+
+ -
KS(m
)
KB(KS )+
m
KS
KS
KB+
Internet
KS( ).
KB( ).-
KB-
KS
mKS(m
)
KB(KS )+
8: Network Security 8-40
Secure e-mail
Bob: uses his private key to decrypt and recover KS
uses KS to decrypt KS(m) to recover m
Alice wants to send confidential e-mail, m, to Bob.
KS( ).
KB( ).+
+ -
KS(m
)
KB(KS )+
m
KS
KS
KB+
Internet
KS( ).
KB( ).-
KB-
KS
mKS(m
)
KB(KS )+
8: Network Security 8-41
Secure e-mail (continued)
• Alice wants to provide sender authentication message integrity.
• Alice digitally signs message.• sends both message (in the clear) and digital signature.
H( ). KA( ).-
+ -
H(m )KA(H(m))-
m
KA-
Internet
m
KA( ).+
KA+
KA(H(m))-
mH( ). H(m )
compare
8: Network Security 8-42
Secure e-mail (continued)
• Alice wants to provide secrecy, sender authentication, message integrity.
Alice uses three keys: her private key, Bob’s public key, newly created symmetric key
H( ). KA( ).-
+
KA(H(m))-
m
KA-
m
KS( ).
KB( ).+
+
KB(KS )+
KS
KB+
Internet
KS
8: Network Security 8-43
Pretty good privacy (PGP)
Internet e-mail encryption scheme, de-facto standard.
uses symmetric key cryptography, public key cryptography, hash function, and digital signature as described.
provides secrecy, sender authentication, integrity.
inventor, Phil Zimmerman, was target of 3-year federal investigation.
---BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE---Hash: SHA1
Bob:My husband is out of town tonight.Passionately yours, Alice
---BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---Version: PGP 5.0Charset: noconvyhHJRHhGJGhgg/
12EpJ+lo8gE4vB3mqJhFEvZP9t6n7G6m5Gw2
---END PGP SIGNATURE---
A PGP signed message:
8: Network Security 8-44
SSL: Secure Sockets Layer
Most widely deployed security protocol Supported by almost all
browsers and web servers
https Tens of billions $ spent
per year over SSL Originally designed by
Netscape in 1993 Number of variations:
TLS: transport layer security, RFC 2246
SSL v3.0 = TLS v1.0 Provides
Confidentiality Integrity Authentication
Original goals: Had Web e-commerce
transactions in mind Encryption (especially
credit-card numbers) Web-server
authentication Optional client
authentication Minimum hassle in doing
business with new merchant
Available to all TCP applications Secure socket interface
8: Network Security 8-45
SSL and TCP/IP
Application
TCP
IP
Normal Application
Application
SSL
TCP
IP
Application with SSL
• SSL provides application programming interface (API)to applications• C and Java SSL libraries/classes readily available
8: Network Security 8-46
Could do something like PGP:
• But want to send byte streams & interactive data•Want a set of secret keys for the entire connection• Want certificate exchange part of protocol: handshake phase
H( ). KA( ).-
+
KA(H(m))-
m
KA-
m
KS( ).
KB( ).+
+
KB(KS )+
KS
KB+
Internet
KS
8: Network Security 8-47
Real SSL: Handshake (1)
Purpose1. Server authentication2. Negotiation: agree on crypto
algorithms3. Establish keys4. Client authentication (optional)
8: Network Security 8-48
Real SSL: Handshake (2)
1. Client sends list of algorithms it supports, along with client nonce
2. Server chooses algorithms from list; sends back: choice + certificate + server nonce
3. Client verifies certificate, extracts server’s public key, generates pre_master_secret, encrypts with server’s public key, sends to server
4. Client and server independently compute encryption and MAC keys from pre_master_secret and nonces
5. Client sends a MAC of all the handshake messages
6. Server sends a MAC of all the handshake messages
8: Network Security 8-49
handshake
Client’s nonce Server’s noncePre-master secret
generator
Master secret
generator
Server’sMAC key
Server’sencryption key
Server’sIV
client’sMAC key
client’sencryption key
client’sIV
8: Network Security 8-50
Real SSL: Handshaking (3)
Last 2 steps protect handshake from tampering
Client typically offers range of algorithms, some strong, some weak
Man-in-the middle could delete the stronger algorithms from list
Last 2 steps prevent this Last two messages are encrypted
8: Network Security 8-51
SSL Record Protocol
data
data fragment
data fragment
MAC MAC
encrypteddata and MAC
encrypteddata and MAC
recordheader
recordheader
record header: content type; version; length
MAC: includes sequence number, MAC key Mx
Fragment: each fragment 214 bytes
8: Network Security 8-52
SSL Record Format
contenttype
SSL version length
MAC
data
1 byte 2 bytes 2 bytes
Data and MAC encrypted (symmetric algo)
8: Network Security 8-53
Content types in record header application_data (23) alert (21)
signaling errors during handshake signal connection closure
handshake (22) initial handshake messages are carried in
records of type “handshake” change_cipher_spec (20)
indicates change in encryption and authentication algorithms
8: Network Security 8-54
handshake: ClientHello
handshake: ServerHello
handshake: Certificate
handshake: ServerHelloDone
handshake: ClientKeyExchangeChangeCipherSpec
handshake: Finished
ChangeCipherSpec
handshake: Finished
application_data
application_data
Alert: warning, close_notify
Real Connection
TCP Fin follow
8: Network Security 8-55
Key derivation
Client random, server random, and pre-master secret input into pseudo random-number generator. Produces master secret
Master secret, client and server random numbers into another random-number generator Produces “key block”
Key block sliced and diced: client MAC key server MAC key client encryption key server encryption key client initialization vector (IV) server initialization vector (IV)
top related