climate change and the world bank group phase i: an evaluation of world bank win-win energy policy...

Climate Change and the World Bank Group

Phase I: An Evaluationof World Bank Win-Win Energy Policy Reforms

Kenneth ChomitzDecember 17, 2008

Plan of the talk

► Evaluation premise and scope

► Prospects for delinking growth and emissions

► Win-win policies• Energy price reform• Promoting energy

efficiency • Reducing gas flaring

► RecommendationsCC license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en

source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/schlaeger/3090570862/Foto Guia Turistica / Travel Guide / Guide Touristique Turismo (Pool)

Evaluation Premise and Scope

This study: the first of three phases

This study: the first of three phases

1. Win-win Energy Policies (excludes IFC, MIGA)

This study: the first of three phases

1. Win-win Energy Policies (excludes IFC, MIGA)2. Technology diffusion; forestry (includes IFC, MIGA)

This study: the first of three phases

1. Win-win Energy Policies (excludes IFC, MIGA)2. Technology diffusion; forestry (includes IFC, MIGA)3. Adaptation

Delinking Growth and Emissions

Business-as-usual development is unsustainable

Huge disparity in emissions/capita between rich and poor

600-fold variation

So provision of energy access to the poorest puts negligible pressure on emissions

Strong link between income and emissions – between countries and over time

So broad-based growth puts upward pressure on emissions

But other growth paths are possible

Some countries had increasing income/capita but decreasing emissions/capita

And some countries emit much less than peers with similar income and climate

7 fold variation,holding income and climate constant

600-fold variation overall

Win-Win Policies:► Energy Price Reform► Energy Efficiency►Reducing Gas Flaring

Energy pricing and subsidies

Energy subsidies: large, burdensome, poorly targeted, CO2-provoking► Large

• roughly $250 billion/year outside OECDBurdensome

2 to 7 times greater than gov’t expenditures on health in (e.g.) Bangladesh, Ecuador, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, and Yemen

Poorly targetedPoor peoples’ share of subsidy is usually less than their

share of populationCO2-provoking

Diesel subsidizers emit twice as much CO2/capita as countries with similar per capita income

Energy subsidies: large, burdensome, poorly targeted, CO2-provoking► Large

• roughly $250 billion/year outside OECD► Burdensome

• 2 to 7 times greater than gov’t expenditures on health in (e.g.) Bangladesh, Ecuador, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, and Yemen

Poorly targetedPoor peoples’ share of subsidy is usually less than their

share of populationCO2-provoking

Diesel subsidizers emit twice as much CO2/capita as countries with similar per capita income

Energy subsidies: large, burdensome, poorly targeted, CO2-provoking► Large

• roughly $250 billion/year outside OECD► Burdensome

• 2 to 7 times greater than gov’t expenditures on health in (e.g.) Bangladesh, Ecuador, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, and Yemen

► Poorly targetedPoor peoples’ share of subsidy is usually less than their

share of populationCO2-provoking

Diesel subsidizers emit twice as much CO2/capita as countries with similar per capita income

Energy subsidies: large, burdensome, poorly targeted, CO2-provoking► Large

• roughly $250 billion/year outside OECD► Burdensome

• 2 to 7 times greater than gov’t expenditures on health in (e.g.) Bangladesh, Ecuador, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, and Yemen

► Poorly targeted• Poor peoples’ share of subsidy is usually less than

their share of population► CO2-provoking

• Diesel subsidizers emit twice as much CO2/capita as countries with similar per capita income

Subsidy reduction:difficult but sometimes possible► Sensitive political economy – not all clients

interested.Since 1990, more than 250 loans with explicit

energy pricing goals or conditions.Outcomes

Project-level interventions have often achieved pricing goals, at least temporarily.

Mixed results on sustainabilityDeterminants of engagement and success

Fiscal stressHigh level engagementAnalytic work

Subsidy reduction:difficult but sometimes possible► Sensitive political economy – not all clients

interested.► Since 1990, more than 250 loans with explicit

energy pricing goals or conditions.Outcomes

Project-level interventions have often achieved pricing goals, at least temporarily.

Mixed results on sustainabilityDeterminants of engagement and success

Fiscal stressHigh level engagementAnalytic work

Subsidy reduction:difficult but sometimes possible► Sensitive political economy – not all clients

interested.► Since 1990, more than 250 loans with explicit

energy pricing goals or conditions.► Outcomes

• Project-level interventions have often achieved pricing goals, at least temporarily.

• Mixed results on sustainabilityDeterminants of engagement and success

Fiscal stressHigh level engagementAnalytic work

Subsidy reduction:difficult but sometimes possible► Sensitive political economy – not all clients

interested.► Since 1990, more than 250 loans with explicit

energy pricing goals or conditions.► Outcomes

• Project-level interventions have often achieved pricing goals, at least temporarily.

• Mixed results on sustainability► Determinants of engagement and success

• Fiscal stress• High level engagement• Analytic work

Social safety nets have been used to compensate for fuel price rises

©Basri Marzuki

Win-Win Policies:► Energy Price Reform► Energy Efficiency►Reducing Gas Flaring

Energy efficiency: a low cost way to satisfy new demands for energy ► IEA: efficiency policies

could satisfy 50% of incremental energy demand over 2005-2030

► McKinsey: possible to reduce consumption growth 50% with investments that offer returns >10%

► IPCC: end user efficiency equivalent to renewables or carbon capture in potential for emissions reduction.

Energy Efficiency at the Bank:more hardware and finance than policy oriented► Efficiency was stressed in 1993 policy paperCountry assistance strategies: among top 33

emitters, 20 mention energy efficiency‘Hardware’ investments –such as district heating –

had good rates of return compared to other energy projects. Volume ramped up in recent years.

Relatively few projects supported efficiency policies and institutions: e.g. building codes, appliance standards, demand side management.

Energy Efficiency at the Bank:more hardware and finance than policy oriented► Efficiency was stressed in 1993 policy paper► Country assistance strategies: among top 33

emitters, 20 mention energy efficiency‘Hardware’ investments –such as district heating –

had good rates of return compared to other energy projects. Volume ramped up in recent years.

Relatively few projects supported efficiency policies and institutions: e.g. building codes, appliance standards, demand side management.

Energy Efficiency at the Bank:more hardware and finance than policy oriented► Efficiency was stressed in 1993 policy paper► Country assistance strategies: among top 33

emitters, 20 mention energy efficiency► ‘Hardware’ investments –such as district heating

– had good rates of return compared to other energy projects. Volume ramped up in recent years.

Relatively few projects supported efficiency policies and institutions: e.g. building codes, appliance standards, demand side management.

Energy Efficiency at the Bank:more hardware and finance than policy oriented► Efficiency was stressed in 1993 policy paper► Country assistance strategies: among top 33

emitters, 20 mention energy efficiency► ‘Hardware’ investments –such as district heating

– had good rates of return compared to other energy projects. Volume ramped up in recent years.

► Relatively few projects supported efficiency policies and institutions: e.g. building codes, appliance standards, demand side management.

An uphill fight for energy efficiency projects?►Compared to large engineering projects,

efficiency policies involve• Smaller funding• Less visibility and ‘charisma’• More complex design and preparation• Longer time horizons

►GEF and trust fund support have been critical to efficiency policy projects

Win-Win Policies:► Energy Price Reform► Energy Efficiency►Reducing Gas Flaring

Gas Flaring:an efficiency and pricing issue

CC license see::http://flickr.com/photos/travelling_e/229048139

Gas Flaring locations

Map: Elvidge et al 2007

Remedies for flaring:Carbon finance vs. price reform ► Carbon finance – stressed by GGFR – presumes

gas utilization is not privately profitable

► But gas is often underpriced, depressing returns.

► At economic prices, flaring reduction could be highly profitable

Recommendations

Looking toward the future► Systematically

promote price reform.► Use energy efficiency

measures to ease price reform.

► Help countries see efficiency as a way of meeting energy demand

► Invest in monitoring and metrics at the project, country, and global level.