coffee and cardiovascular disease is coffee beneficial?

Post on 18-Jan-2016

220 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

COFFEE AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Is coffee beneficial?

The purpose of this significance test is to ultimately assess whether or not coffee truly does reduce the risk of death from cardiovascular disease.

A 20 year study was conducted concerning this matter. 41736 men participated and 86214 women participated. The study was published in the magazine “Annals of Internal Medicine.”

Information about the participants was updated about every 2 years. This is important because age, height, weight, medical history, health status, etc. change as time goes on.

A limitation of this study is that coffee consumption was probably estimated by most of the participants in the study. Slight error due to this basically inevitable.

Age, smoking, and other cardiovascular disease factors were adjusted for. This means that these factors were controlled for so the relationship between coffee and cardiovascular disease can be better assessed. Without these factors being adjusted for, the study is useless.

These factors were controlled through the use of adjusted relative risk (RR).

Relative risk is a ratio of the probability of an event occurring in the exposed group versus a non-exposed group.

An RR>1 means the event of interest is more likely to occur in the “exposed” group.

An RR<1 means the event of interest is less likely to occur in the “non-exposed” group.

An RR=1 means there is no difference in risk between the two groups.

In this study, the RR was adjusted to 1 in the factors discussed earlier (age, smoking, parental history, weight, height, history of hypertension, Type II diabetes, etc).

If RR was not adjusted, the study would be useless obviously because older people, smokers, etc. are going to be more at risk for cardiovascular disease.

Men and women participant data was separated. Participants were grouped into six categories within the two blocks. The groups were people that drink:› <1 cup of coffee/month› 1 cup/month to 4 cups/week› 5-7 cups/week› 2-3 cups/day› 4-5 cups/day› ≥6 cups/day

Amount of Coffee # of Participants # of Cardiovascular Disease Deaths

<1 coffee/month 12168 459

1 cup/month – 4 cups/week

7353 488

5-7 cups/week 7564 664

2-3 cups/day 9968 357

4-5 cups/day 3468 66

≥6 cups/day 1215 15

Amount of Coffee # of Participants # of Cardiovascular Disease Deaths

<1 coffee/month 19276 362

1 cup/month – 4 cups/week

5264 362

5-7 cups/week 11672 868

2-3 cups/day 28375 563

4-5 cups/day 14465 151

≥6 cups/day 7162 62

H0 : pL = ps Ha : pL < ps

ps is the proportion of people that die from cardiovascular disease who drank SMALL amounts of coffee › Small amounts of coffee means 0 cups of coffee to 5-7

cups of coffee per week. pL is the proportion of people that die from

cardiovascular disease who drank LARGER amounts of coffee› Larger amounts of coffee means 2 or more

cups of coffee per day.

Conditions› SRS: The condition of SRS is not established. The sampling

method is only mentioned as a random sampling method.› Normality: n1pIc, n1(1-pIc), n2pIc, n2(1-pIc) are all at least 5.

n is the sample size and pIc is the combined sample proportion 27085(.0491) > 5, 27085(1-.0491) > 5, 14651(.0491) > 5,

14651(1-.0491) > 5› Independence: There is no reason to believe that the two

samples aren’t independent. There are probably more than 27085(10) = 270850 men in the entire population that drink small amounts of coffee. There are probably more than 14651(10) = 146510 men in the entire population that drink larger amounts of coffee. There are more than 300 million people in the United States, so yes, this is reasonable.

We will proceed to conduct a two-proportion significance test and interpret at a significance level of .05.

Calculations:

pIL = .0299 (heavy coffee drinkers)

pIs = .0595 (light coffee drinkers) z = -13.20135099 P-value = 0

Interpretation: There is very strong evidence against the null

hypothesis, according to the P-value that is practically zero. There is statistically significant evidence against the null hypothesis that the proportion of deaths due to cardiovascular disease is the same in men that drink small amounts of coffee and men that drink larger amounts of coffee. The alternative hypothesis seems more likely, according to these calculations. It is highly likely that the proportion of deaths due to cardiovascular disease in men that drink larger amounts of coffee is less than the proportion of deaths due to cardiovascular disease in men that drink small amounts of coffee.

H0 : pL = ps Ha : pL < ps

ps is the proportion of people that die from cardiovascular disease who drank SMALL amounts of coffee › Small amounts of coffee means 0 cups of coffee to 5-7

cups of coffee per week. pL is the proportion of people that die from

cardiovascular disease who drank LARGER amounts of coffee› Larger amounts of coffee means 2 or more

cups of coffee per day.

Conditions› SRS: The condition of SRS is not established. The sampling

method is only mentioned as a random sampling method.› Normality: n1pIc, n1(1-pIc), n2pIc, n2(1-pIc) are all at least 5.

n is the sample size and pIc is the combined sample proportion 36212(.0275) > 5, 36212(1-.0275) > 5, 50002(.0275) > 5,

50002(1-.0275) > 5› Independence: There is no reason to believe that the two

samples aren’t independent. There are probably more than 36212(10) = 362120 women in the entire population that drink small amounts of coffee. There are probably more than 50002(10) = 500020 women in the entire population that drink larger amounts of coffee. There are more than 300 million people in the United States, so yes, this is reasonable.

We will proceed to conduct a two-proportion significance test and interpret at a significance level of .05.

Calculations:

pIL = .0155 (heavy coffee drinkers)

pIs = .0440 (light coffee drinkers) z = -25.22125491 P-value = 0

Interpretation: There is very strong evidence against the null

hypothesis, according to the P-value that is practically zero. There is statistically significant evidence against the null hypothesis that the proportion of deaths due to cardiovascular disease is the same in women that drink small amounts of coffee and women that drink larger amounts of coffee. The alternative hypothesis seems more likely, according to these calculations. It is highly likely that the proportion of deaths due to cardiovascular disease in women that drink larger amounts of coffee is less than the proportion of deaths due to cardiovascular disease in women that drink small amounts of coffee.

These results are not surprising. Coffee causes blood vessels and arteries to become more

flexible, which automatically reduces the risk of heart disease. The older you get, the more important flexible arteries

becomes. Coffee contains antioxidants, which defend against free

radicals. Free radicals are oxidizing agents that cause health problems such as cancer, heart disease, and degradation of the immune system.

Coffee also contains methylpyridinum, which is a known anti-cancer compound exclusive to coffee.

Coffee drinkers, on average, live two years longer than people who don’t drink coffee.

Due to all of these benefits from drinking coffee, it is not surprising that these results were obtained from the significance tests conducted.

http://www.annals.org/content/148/12/904.full.pdf+html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_risk http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/

features/coffee-new-health-food http://www.health.harvard.edu/

press_releases/coffee_health_benefits http://www.bewellbuzz.com/wellness-

buzz/coffee-good-bad/

top related