collateral channel
Post on 14-Apr-2018
227 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
1/29
American Economic Review 2012, 102(6): 23812409http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.2381
2381
The Collateral Channel:
How Real Estate Shocks Affect Corporate Investment
B Thomas Chaney, David Sraer, and David Thesmar*
What is the impact o real estate prices on corporate investment? Inthe presence o fnancing rictions, frms use pledgeable assets ascollateral to fnance new projects. Through this collateral channel,shocks to the value o real estate can have a large impact on aggre-gate investment. To compute the sensitivit o investment to collateralvalue, we use local variations in real estate prices as shocks to thecollateral value o frms that own real estate. Over the 19932007
period, the representative US corporation invests $0.06 out o each$1 o collateral. (JEL D22, G31, R30)
I , B (1976), Sgz W(1981), H M (1994) gg . Pg g x g g . T, , g x . A k
. T - : Bk G (1989) Kk M (1997), , -g g , .T GD (Bk 1983) x x J 1980 (C 1990). I x g U S, . T microeconomic .
W 19932007 , $1 US $0.06. T
* C: D E, U Cg, 1126 E 59 S, Cg, IL 60657 (-:.@g.); S: D E B C F, P U,26 P A, P, NJ 08540 (-: @.); T: HEC S Mg,1 L, 78351 J J x, F (-: @.). W g IE F . F , k k N C,S DVg, D G, Lg G, T Mg, Uk M, A M, A Sz, J T. W C M, g G R A . W g INSEE P, USC, UC S Dg R S Mg,NYU S, MIT S, U A, L B S, Ox S S B, U Cg, E U I F, B U, T U, Kgg S Mg, P U, H S B Bk, FS B Dk, S GSB, INSEAD, U N. W g .
T , g ://x..g/10.1257/.102.6.2381.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.2381http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.2381 -
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
2/29
2382 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
ggg. T z g . A , 1993, g US, 59 . Ag -
g , k 19 k . T g $0.06 , , , k -g . W actuall , k . T g -. T , , . T - -g . T g C,S, Qg (2001) .
T g g : () -g , () . A Hg, M, S (2005) M S (2011), g g g g- -g . W
g. W k ggg . W , g. S, beore ater . B g , - g . T g, , g .
O , gg -. G (2007), , , g --
k , -g J gg 1990 . W . F, g , J k , g k- k U S. S, x x k , , , k J . T g g g , , . W - , g US g , g k . T, J 1980 g - J, G g - . I , g US
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
3/29
2383CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
k , k -g . T G (2007) -g -g . T g g -g
g g x, , xg g . O g -g -g - local , k .1 A Pk Rg (2000), k .B J , k g - , g .2
F, k gg . B, G, Mkz(2005) ( ) g g . B Bg(2008) US k g g x g . F,B Bg (2009) - - ,g g, g -- . W g x , - zg g
.3
T gz . S I - . S II . S III .
I. Data
W g US , g M S A (MSA) .
A.Accounting Data
W COMPUSTAT 1993 g (COMPUSTAT N. 6). T 9,211 83,683 - 19932007. Wk U S x g , , , , -g , j k . W
1
A kg k gg J G Y (2004).
2G (2007) J k k k .
3F zg g g , , g ,E R (2009) R V (2010).
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
4/29
2384 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
. Wk . T 5,584 50,858 - .
Real Estate Assets.W .A g k , g .
F, k . Fg N, P, W (2000), j g , , : Bg, L I, C Pg. U, k--k, . T k , gg k .T . T g(COMPUSTAT N. 253) g (COMPUSTAT N. 263)4 g g . B 40 ,5 g g g . W k (19932007) g - 1975, CPI 1975.6, 7
T g g COMPUSTAT
1993.8
T , g , 1993. T 2,792 1993 k 27,543 g - . T 1 kg .I 1993, 59 US .M, , k 28.4 k P, P E (4 k ). F land-holding COMPUSTAT, k 95 k P, P E 19.3 k
. R z g .
S, , k . COMPUSTAT gg . H,
4Uk g, .5A N, P, W (2000), g
( g ). Bg , , . Ag , g g 38 45. T 40--.
6
R L I (COMPUSTAT N. 260), Bg(COMPUSTAT N. 263), C Pg (COMPUSTAT N. 266).
7F g k 1993, g k 0 1993 0 k 1994.
8I 1994, 15 E D Gg, A, R (EDGAR) g . I , Bg g .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
5/29
2385CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
( STATE COUNTY). W x . T - g . F, MSA. S, . T , g 10K . W
S IC.
Other Accounting Data.A , g .
Table 1Summary Statistics
M M SD25
75
O.
F-
I 0.35 0.21 0.40 0.11 0.41 27,201(PPE) (RE) 0.06 0.00 0.34 0.08 0.13 23,5933CAPEX 0.42 0.24 0.47 0.13 0.48 21,186I-j.CAPEX 0.01 0.09 0.39 0.21 0.07 27,173C 0.01 0.26 1.76 0.11 0.59 27,407Mk/Bk 2.18 1.53 1.76 1.11 2.48 25,210DI 0.48 0.01 1.02 0.00 0.38 26,336DR 0.35 0.08 0.65 0.00 0.33 26,825NDI 0.08 0.00 0.50 0.08 0.06 25,760Cg 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 27,543REV (S-) 0.86 0.28 1.36 0.00 1.12 27,543REV (MSA-) 0.83 0.24 1.34 0.00 1.10 26,107REV (MSA-) 0.77 0.09 1.27 0.00 1.01 20,353SRPIx 0.59 0.55 0.20 0.43 0.72 27,543MSARP Ix 0.59 0.56 0.20 0.41 0.72 26,138MSAOPIx 0.68 0.69 0.21 0.52 0.80 20,589LHgSE 1.17 0.90 0.67 0.65 1.31 22,916
I (1993)
RE OWNER 0.59 1.00 0.49 0.00 1.00 2,792Lg () 4.08 3.97 2.19 2.61 5.49 2,791ROA 0.00 0.07 0.25 0.03 0.12 2,782Ag 12.22 8.00 10.57 3.00 19.00 2,792
10K (1997)
HQOWNER 0.24 0 0.429 0 0 3,727
Notes: I x ( N. 128) z gg k ,
(PPE: N. 8). (PPE) (RE) g PPE g , z gg PPE ( N. 8). 3 CAPEX g x x z gg PPE. I-j. CAPEX CAPEX g CAPEX z gg PPE. C x + -z ( N. 14 + N. 18) z gg PPE ( N. 8). Mk/Bk k ( N. 6 + ( N. 60 N. 24) N. 60 N. 74) z k ( N. 6). D I N. 111 z gg PPE ( N. 8). D R N. 114 z gg PPE ( N. 8). N D I D I D R. Cg N. 301 z gg PPE ( N. 8). REV k z gg PPE ( S I ).RE OWNER 1 g 1993. ROA g z z (( N. 13 N. 14)/ N. 6). Ag IPO. MSA/S LR P G R (. Ix) g (. z 1 2006) MSA/S
OFHEO x. O P G R (. Ix) g (. z 1 2006) MSA x. L Hg S E Sz (2010). HQ OWNER 1 1997 10K .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
6/29
2386 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
W x (COMPUSTAT N. 128) P P E (gg N. 8).9W Mk--Bk : k k k ( N. 25) --
( N. 24). T , k , k ( N. 6) (N. 60) x ( N. 74). W z g k g k ( N. 6). W ( N. 18 N. 14) PPE (gg N. 8).
W COMPUSTAT . W g g ( N. 111) z gg PPE (gg N. 8). W g ( N. 114) gg PPE. F, g ( N. 301) COMPUSTAT, z gg PPE. N g g g g z PPE. B g, g g g z gg PPE.
I g , g g 2,792 . T , 1993, R A (g (COMPUSTAT N. 13) (COMPUSTAT N. 14) A(COMPUSTAT N. 6)), A, Ag IPO,
-g SIC .F, , z g / g.10 T 1 g - . W k - (DR, D I, N D I Cg C D) g (0.48 , ) (.g., 0.01 ). T () z gg PPE, , () g k , zg,
g .
Ex Ante Measure o Credit Constraint.T x C U . E . W A, C, W (2004) g g :
9T z PPE (, .g., K Zg 1997 A,
C, W 2004). I 0.21. A z gg ( N. 6), R (2006) , .
10T - (D R, D I, N D I Cg C D) z g /- g 0. O g 5 zg .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
7/29
2387CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
Payout ratio:Ineveryyearoverthe19932007period,werankfrmsbased
g ()g () . W
( (COMPUSTAT N. 21) k (COMPUSTAT N. 115 )) g (COMPUSTAT N. 20).
FirmSize:Ineveryyearoverthe19932007period,werankfrmsbasedon
g () g () z .
BondRating: Ineveryyearoverthe19932007period,weretrievedataon
g g S P (COMPUSTAT N. 280) gz g g g . F .
B.Real Estate Data
Real Estate Prices.W , MSA .
Residential O F Hg EOg.11,12 T OFHEO H P Ix (HPI), g- U S.13B ,
. I , HPI 1975. I M S A, g 1977 1987 g MSA . W HPI g g COMPUSTAT. T MSA HPI, ggg F I Pg S COMPUSTAT MSA g - OFHEO .
Commercial G R A. T - x O I C R E. T x 64 MSA U S g
1985 2003.T 1 ( z 1 2006).
T 0.57, 0.42 MSA . T 0.86.
11:\\..g/x..12
T OFHEO D Hg U D, g g-- (GSE) F N Mgg A (F M) F H LMgg C (F M).
13T HPI g g, HPI x g . T 2007 , g 2008 .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
8/29
2388 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
Measuring Land Suppl.Cg g g .Fg Hg, M, W (2005), g g- g
. L g Sz (2010) 95 MSA. T g -g - . A g- , 30-, x gg F R , 1993 2007.
C.Measurement Issues
T g x g . I , x.
T x k . W (MSA) . W (). T k x, 10K S ExgC 1997.14 T SEC
EDGAR (:\\..g/g.). I - 4,065 1997.15 O , 3,393 g COMPUSTAT.
T 2 3,393 . O 1,578 g COMPUSTAT 1997, 33 (2 ) g 10K . T x g g .
O , 1,815 g
COMPUSTAT, 806 (44 ) g 10K .16 T gg ( MSA) . I MSA, overestimate
141997 10K . W 2000, 2000 S IIG.
15F , - 10K g . I ,171 , 19 . T
, g , , g g ( 183 , x PO x). W .
16N MSA.
http://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtmlhttp://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtmlhttp://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtmlhttp://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml -
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
9/29
2389CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
MSA, underestimate . T gg , g g x ( 10K ) g . W g g COMPUSTAT.
S, g OFHEO x - g. A , g 0.42 ( MSA ) 0.57 ( ). M, x
MSA , . T, -: x , g . W g ( ) x .
II. Real Estate Prices and Firm Behavior
I z k -
. O g (.., ) .
A.Empirical Strateg
W . S, i, t, l( MSA), g
(1) INVitl = i + t + REValueit + P tl + controlsit + it,
INV gg PPE,REValueit -k t gg PPE, P t
l l( MSA) t.
Table 210K Headquarter Ownership and COMPUSTAT Real Estate Ownership
N HQ 10K HQ 10K
N RE COMPUSTAT 1,545 33> 0 RE COMPUSTAT 1,009 806
Notes: T - 1997 10K COMPUSTAT COMPUSTAT 1997. > 0 RE COMPUSTAT COMPUSTAT 1997, N RE COMPUSTAT 1997 COMPUSTAT. N HQ 10K () 1997 10K . HQ 10K () 1997 10K .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
10/29
2390 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
T .17 I g , g . A
g . C g , g . T j gg - k k .T g , g , - . I g , . I , - , g , .
Fg g , - , PPE gg k k . T g k , - .18 W x i, x t, g ggg k, .., g . F, P t
l , -
. Sk it S/MSA . T g x- RE Valueit ( B,D, M 2004).
A S IA, k 1993, g .REValuei1993 k , REValueit k .19
L gg
$1 the frm actuall owns, k . T - k .
17I kg C, S, T (2009), j .
18F, g k , j g , g, j .
19Ug 1993 g:
, , x x ; - , x x ; , . W g k , g .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
11/29
2391CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
Endogeneit Issues.T g - 1: () - () .
T
. T g: g g gg g , - g -g gg .T . S, x k, -g .
T g, MSA- . A S IB, g Hg, M, S (2005) M S (2011), g g ggg . W , . I , ( -) g . I , g . W x MSA -, g ( -g g). W , MSA l, t, g g P t
l:
(2) P tl = l + t + Elasticit
l IRt + u tl,
Elasticit MSA , IR k , l MSA x , t , . T -g g - T 3.
T , S IIC g g . I ,
x z g g k.
T g 1 : k k, . A g , i,Xi, P t
m. I k i k , k i , g
.TXi g
Ag, A, R A -g S . W T 4
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
12/29
2392 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
g , x, . T 4 - OLS g REOWNER, 1 , REValue, k , . O, g, , .., , k .20
Cg , g :
(3) INVitl = i + t + REValueit + P tl +
k
k Xki P t
l + controlsit + it.
H, -g g -, k (3) . U, - . Y, -g -g . T , k S IIF ,
20N , , k k. T gg g -g inherentl k k k .
Table 3First-Stage Regression: The Impact of Local Housing Supply Elasticity on Housing Prices
MSA R P MSA O P
(1) (2) (3) (4)
L g gg 0.028*** 0.036***
(6.3) (5)
F gg 0.064*** 0.066***(8.9) (5.1)
S gg 0.046*** 0.033**(6) (2)
T gg 0.014** 0.0097(2.2) (0.41)
Y Y Y Y YMSA x Y Y Y YO 1,358 1,358 804 804AjR2 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.84
Notes: T g g , Sz (2009), . T x, MSA 1 2 MSA x 3 4. C 1 3 g , 2 4 . A g MSA x MSA . T- .
***Sg 1 .**Sg 5 .*Sg 10 .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
13/29
2393CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
beore . I , .S IIF g . W , , gg, , g .
B.Main Results
T 5 (1) (3). C 1 (1) . L-g
Table 4Determinants of Real Estate Ownership
RE OWNER RE V ()
(1) (2)
2 0.16*** 0.12*
(7.5) (1.8)3 0.32*** 0.17**
(14) (2.5)
4 0.49*** 0.33***(20) (4.4)
5 0.51*** 0.11(18) (1.3)
2 ROA 0.13*** 0.4***(5.6) (5.8)
3 ROA 0.14*** 0.25***(6) (3.5)
4 ROA 0.14*** 0.21***
(5.8) (3)5 ROA 0.12*** 0.23***
(5.3) (3.3)
2 g 0.045** 0.017(2) (0.25)
3 g 0.12*** 0.13**(6) (2.2)
4 g 0.24*** 0.5***(11) (7.7)
5 g 0.26*** 0.92***(11) (13)
I x Y YS x Y YO 2,782 2,782AjR2 0.54 0.24
Notes: T R E O 1993. T RE OWNER ( 1), g 1993 RE V ( 2), k 1993. C A, Ag, ROA, I S x . T- .
***Sg 1 .**Sg 5 .*Sg 10 .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
14/29
2394 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
-g . T 0.074, $1 $0.074. T g 1 . T g: RE Value 26 .21
I 2, g . T
21IgREValue (1.36) INV 0.074 1.36 = 0.10, 26 (0.4).
Table 5Real Estate Prices and Investment Behavior
C x
(OLS) (OLS) (OLS) (OLS) (OLS) (IV) (OLS) (IV)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
REV (SR.P) 0.074*** 0.065*** 0.052***(15) (13) (11)
REV (MSAR.P) 0.053***(11)
REV (MSAO.P) 0.06*** 0.062***(8.9) (5.5)
RE OWNER MSAO.P 0.21*** 0.44***(3.3) (2.75)
SR.P 0.11* 0.91** 0.46(1.8) (2) (1.2)
MSAR.P 0.58(1.3)
MSAO.P 0.25 0.22 0.062 0.2
(0.27) (0.09) (0.065) (0.075)C 0.027*** 0.027*** 0.026*** 0.026*** 0.026*** 0.026***
(8.4) (8.9) (7.5) (3.8) (7.5) (4.4)
Mk/Bk 0.068*** 0.068*** 0.071*** 0.07*** 0.072*** 0.071***(20) (20) (19) (10.1) (19) (11.3)
I.C SR.P N Y Y N N N N N
I.C MSAR.P N N N Y N N N N
I.C MSAO.P N N N N Y Y Y Y
Yx Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Fx Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
O 27,201 27,026 24,167 22,894 17,805 17,586 18,031 17,731
AjR2 0.28 0.29 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33
Notes: T k . T x ( N. 128 z gg N. 8). C 1, 2, 3 - x. C 4 MSA- , 5,6, 7 MSA- . Ex 1, g - ( g,, ROA, -g ) R E P. A g-, x 1 2, C Mk/Bk. C 6 8 IV - MSA g gg k Sz (2010)( 3 T 3 -g g). A - x - MSA- . I IV - 6 8, MSA- . T- .
***Sg 1 .**Sg 5 .*Sg 10 .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
15/29
2395CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
0.065, g 1 , 0.074 1.
C 3 g -, .., C Mk Bk. T
, 0.052.22,23 I , x 18 Mk Bk . N , , C Mk Bk g, .
C 4 3 g MSA- x - x. Ug MSA g k. I . I k g . H, - g , . T 4 , 0.053.
C 5 . T MSA g (22,894 24,167 - g MSA ). H, g g 1 g g - g : $1
g $0.06 .C 6 IV g g (S IIA). L -g g, 2. T T 3. T MSA , MSA . I 1 3, g Sz (2010). I 2 4, g MSA g .
L g MSA -
. W x g g MSA . A x, - 2 g 1 . F , g 4, 100 x 6.6 g ( ) ( ). T
22I , g, g Mk--Bk g C.
23
A x kg (C, S, T 2009), Mk--Bk g . I, Mk--Bk g k , g k . T g k g g k . A , k Mk--Bk .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
16/29
2396 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
g, g. A F- 10, k.
Mg -g , P tl
2 x 3.24 C 6
T 5 g g (.., 3 T 3). T IV g OLSg, 0.062 g 1 .
C 7 15 - . T , REOWNER ( 1 ) x. T g g, g g g. O , (REOWNER) (REValue). W 0.06 - 5 $1 $0.06 , 0.21 7 g, x, 21 g . T g - , 5. A
REOWNER (,REValue) 21 (, 19 ) .25
C 8 IV g 7. I , - , 0.21 0.44. T g, g 1 .
C.Robustness Checks
T 6 k (3) 5 T 5.
24B g, j g. I IV, -. T : MSA-; -g g ; -; (MSA-), MSA- , - (.., MSA- MSA-); -g g . W 500 ,
.25T 7 0.21, g- RE Owner MSA 0.39, 0.21 0.39 0.082 20.5 - . (0.40). T 5 0.06, RHS RE Value 1.27, 0.06 1.27 0.076 19 (0.40).
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
17/29
2397CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
C 1 2 : 1999 1, 2000 2. A g T 5 g g . F ,
gg . W , (3) , 19932000 20002007. T g . T g g 1999 2000 (0.08 0.078), . N g- g .
C 3 3 g MSA.T , g . W
z, g 20 MSA. T g 1 g , , (0.058 0.06).
Table 6Real Estate Prices and Investment Behavior: Robustness Checks
B ALgMSA (PPE)
3- I. j. U 10K
1999 2000 (RE) x x (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
RE V 0.08*** 0.078*** 0.058*** 0.03*** 0.088*** 0.061*** (MSA O. P) (6.1) (5.6) (5.7) (4.1) (12) (9.2)
RE OWNER 0.23*** 0.17***MSA O. P (2.9) (3.2)
MSA O. P 1.1 0.81 0.12 0.56 0.72 0.33 0.99 2.9(0.98) (1) (0.21) (0.58) (0.36) (0.37) (0.66) (1.6)
C 0.029*** 0.02*** 0.022*** 0.022*** 0.042*** 0.025*** 0.016*** 0.017***(5.5) (3.6) (4.7) (6.8) (12) (7.3) (5.5) (5.1)
Mk/Bk 0.079*** 0.058*** 0.061*** 0.061*** 0.069*** 0.068*** 0.087*** 0.069***(15) (8.5) (12) (18) (17) (18) (25) (21)
I. MSA O. P
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Y x Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
F x Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YO 11,440 6,365 9,282 15,691 14,384 17,782 19,886 17,558AjR2 0.37 0.32 0.28 0.19 0.49 0.27 0.33 0.28
Notes: T k . T g 5 T 5. C 1 2 g : 19931999 (- 1) 20002007 ( 2). C 3 z 20 MSA. C 4 PPE z gg PPE. C 5 g x x z gg PPE. C 6 x g x z gg PPE . C 7 7 T 5, 1993. C 8 8 T 5 10K . A g MSA- , x , C,
Mk/Bk , MSA- . S MSA- . T- .
***Sg 1 .**Sg 5 .*Sg 10 .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
18/29
2398 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
C 4 PPE . O . I , ,
g .26 Rg . T g g 1 .27
C 5 g - , g . O x , g g g. A x, $0.06 $0.088, g $1 - g 8.8 x g . T G (2007), g . S 0.8 g 10 g g g 0.88.28
C 6 i j i -g SIC . S , x g . T g $0.061 $1 g
1 .C 7 , g 1993. T - . O, x S IA, g k 1993. F 1993, k k k . W 3. T g- 7 T 6 g
7 T 5. T g (0.23 0.21) g 1 .
C 8 10K 1997.29 T S IC. U, 10K , .
26I g, g - .
27N PPE ,
. W g PPE g , . T - .
28G (2007) g 1994 1998 1989.
2910K 1997.
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
19/29
2399CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
W (3) 7 T 5 7 T 6. T 0.23 0.17, g 1 .
F, g T 6 -
g IV g ( S IIA). T g.30
D.Heterogeneous Responses: Ex Ante Credit Constraints
A x K Zg (1997), g x . T , g x : () () z () g. T S IA. W (3) .
A T 7, g - g k. T - g g g g . F , 3 z 0.091 0.042 3 . T g
1 .H g, g g .31
E. Collateral and Debt
I , x g g . I g, g , , k g. W
. T g x . S (, .g., H M 1994) g , g.
T 8 ,g COMPUSTAT . T , C Mk/Bk (3) g- :
(4) DebtIssues itl
= i + tl
+ RE Valueit + itl.
30T IV .31T IV .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
20/29
2400 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
T , z gg g x (PPE). T, g (4) 2 T 5, .., 0.067.
T T 8. C 1 2 k . W -g k g
. A $1 - $0.095 $0.05. T - , .., 3, $0.032, g . T both and gg k g g- , g g , . I , g -g . U, COMPUSTAT g , g g -
. Dg . A 1 3 (.., ) k (.., g- ). C 4
Table 7Real Estate Prices and Investment Behavior: Constrained versus Unconstrained Firms
C x
P F z B g
C U C U C U
RE V 0.084*** 0.043*** 0.091*** 0.042*** 0.073*** 0.03***
(MSA O P) (7.2) (4.1) (6.1) (4.4) (7.2) (3.6)(7) (4.3) (5.9) (4.6) (7.2) (3.7)
MSA O P 0.22 0.18 6.2 0.51 0.14 1.9(0.084) (0.16) (0.71) (0.51) (0.087) (1)
C 0.02*** 0.055*** 0.014*** 0.08*** 0.026*** 0.055***(4.5) (6.1) (2.7) (5.7) (5) (3.2)
Mk/Bk 0.069*** 0.06*** 0.057*** 0.055*** 0.075*** 0.064***(13) (8.3) (11) (7.4) (13) (5.8)
I MSA O P
Y Y Y Y Y Y
Y x Y Y Y Y Y YF x Y Y Y Y Y Y
T C. = U. 3.16*** 3.01*** 3.14***O 8,879 6,090 5,846 4,535 10,409 3,208AjR2 0.29 0.48 0.18 0.66 0.32 0.6
Notes: T 5 T 5 g x .T x ( N. 128 z gg N. 8). RE V (MSAO P) k z gg PPE. A g - ( Ag, A, ROA -g ) R E P, C Mk/Bk. C -g g x ( 1 2), z ( 3 4), g ( 5 6). T C. = U. t- RE V . A x MSA- . T- .
***Sg 1 .**Sg 5 .*Sg 10 .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
21/29
2401CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
kg k g- . T - (0.044) 3.
O - , g . H, , g g , $0.0034 $1. B k g- - .
T g g .32
F.Are Real Estate Purchasers Dierent rom Nonpurchasers?
T -. T g .F , g .
I , g - g . O g . W , beore ,
32T IV .
Table 8Real Estate Prices and Debt Issues
D D N Cg Cg g-
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
RE V (MSA O P) 0.095*** 0.05*** 0.032*** 0.044*** 0.0034(5.5) (5) (3.5) (5.6) (1.2)
MSA O P 3.1 2.5 0.12 0.048 0.56*(0.94) (0.83) (0.23) (0.069) (2)
I MSA O P
Y Y Y Y Y
Y x Y Y Y Y YF x Y Y Y Y YO 19,375 19,691 18,952 20,138 20,210AjR2 0.3 0.36 0.096 0.0069 0.012
Notes: T . T D I ( 1), D R ( 2), N D I ( 3), Cg Lg-T D
( 4), Cg C D ( 5). RE V (MSA O P) k g MSA- z gg PPE. A g - ( Ag, A, ROA -g ) R E P. A x MSA- . T- .
***Sg 1 .**Sg 5 .*Sg 10 .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
22/29
2402 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
g . Y, k - g ater .
T k , . T k g
, g . T 7 T 5.
W COMPUSTAT F,I, R E, C, Mg I, j k, . T 1984 2007, 1984 g g COMPUSTAT. W - . W 0 , ). W - . W 367 4,136 - , g gg 1986 2005. T - beore 2,144. T g 1984 2007 COMPUSTAT. T 2,751 16,011 - .
W (1) beore . T T 9, 1 2.
I g, , g , . M , - 0. F g - . T j x - -g . H, z g xg: g , g .
T g S IIB gg within . I , (1) ater . T - 3 T 9. T 0.38 , g 5 - . R 2, g 0.64 . T g 2 . T - g (0.21) - 7 T 5.33
33A RE OWNER , k 7 T 5.
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
23/29
2403CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
C 4, 5, 6 T 9 g 1, 2, 3 g g- . T -g g beore ( 4 5). D g ater ( 6). O, - g
.
G.A Closer Look at the Real Estate Bubble
I , g g 2002 2006 . T () , () x , () g . T g M S (2011) G (2007).
W MSA g g ( ), g -g . I x ( SIC), 2000, g
Table 9Real Estate Prices and Investment: The Case of Purchasers
C x Cg g-
P P P PN- N-
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
MSA O P 0.015 0.26 0.38** 0.04 0.29 0.64***
(0.23) (1.3) (2) (0.7) (1.4) (2.7)
C 0.018*** 0.033*** 0.032** 0.005** 0.0012 0.0012(6.6) (3.4) (2.3) (2.1) (0.16) (0.081)
Mk/Bk 0.074*** 0.072*** 0.071*** 0.016*** 0.012 0.041***(23) (7.2) (6.2) (6.1) (1.5) (4)
T P. = N P. 1.36 1.58
T P. = P. 2.40** 3.11**
O 15,794 1,651 1,794 15,956 1,659 1,797AjR2 0.36 0.47 0.44 0.16 0.24 0.21
Notes: T -g C, . C Ex, z gg PPE, 1 3; Cg Lg-T D, z gg PPE, 4 6. C 1 3 k MSA O P . C 2 4 k . C 3 6 , . T P. = N P. p- t- - MSA O P - . TP. = P. p- t- MSA O P . A C Mk Bk, x - . T- .
***Sg 1 .**Sg 5 .*Sg 10 .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
24/29
2404 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
10K S Exg C.34 W k S IC g . W g .
Fg 1 2000 2006 MSA g g . I , k, - . L MSA x g
g MSA: 2000 2006, 59 MSA, 24 g - MSA. Fg 2 g kg x . I MSA, CAPEX 20002006 PPE( ) 40 g g g . B , g MSA, z x g g ( ). I g, - x . Fg 3 g- :
g MSA k g
34I I 2 10K , .
Figure 1. Relative Evolution of Office Prices (High versus Low Elasticity MSA, 20002006)
Note: T g g x (z 1 2000) MSA (L E MSA) MSA (Hg E MSA) .
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
MSAofceprices
2000 2002 2004 2006Year
Low elasticity High elasticity
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
25/29
2405CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
Figure 2. Relative Evolution of Accumulated CAPEX (Owners versus Renters, 20002006)
Notes: T g , 2000 2006, g CAPEX g CAPEX , MSA (L E MSA) MSA - (Hg E MSA) . A CAPEX 0 2000, CAPEX 2000 , z 2000.
0.04
0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Relativeaccumulated
CAPEX
2000 2002 2004 2006
Year
Low elasticity MSA High elasticity MSA
Relative accumulated CAPEX (owner vs. renter)
Relativ
edebtgrowth
2000 2002 2004 2006
Year
Low elasticity MSA High elasticity MSA
Relative debt growth (owner vs. renter)
0.04
0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Figure 3. Relative Evolution of Aggregate Debt (Owners versus Renters, 20002006)
Notes: T g , 2000 2006, g g , MSA (L E MSA) MSA (Hg EMSA) . D g 0 2000, g g 2000 , z 2000.
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
26/29
2406 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
k MSA g ( ) MSA g ( ).
T 10 g g - g. W g- -- g g :
(5)CAPEXim
0006
_
Assetsim00
= m + (Ofce Price)m
0006
__
Ofce Pricem00
Headquartersi
+ (Ofce Price)m
0006__
Ofce Pricem00
+ im,
CAPEXim0006_
Assetsim00 i x 2000 2006,z 2000,
(Ofce Price)m0006
__
Ofce Pricem0006 MSA m g 2000 2006, Headquartersi 1 i - 2000, 10K .
Table 10Headquarter Ownership and the Impact of the Real Estate Bubble
A x Cg
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
H 0.18** 0.075*
( ) 20002006 (2.3) (1.8)
H 0.092** 0.1*** 0.043** 0.044**(2.6) (2.8) (2.5) (2.6)
H 0.0025 0.0017 (0.038) (0.057)
H 0.021 0.0045 (0.32) (0.11)
H 0.12* 0.063** (1.8) (2.1)
E 0.08*** 0.086*** 0.006 0.0069(2.8) (3.1) (0.7) (0.82)
( ) 20002006 0.024 0.032(0.45) (1.4)
S 0.0082 0.012(0.39) (0.69)
T 0.042 0.0091(1.3) (0.83)F 0.12*** 0.0091
(2.6) (0.8)Lg(2000) 0.02*** 0.02*** 0.0035 0.0032
(3.4) (3.4) (1.2) (1.2)O 1,696 1,794 1,794 1,794 1,772 1,870 1,870 1,870AjR2 0.002 0.0091 0.019 0.017 0.0049 0.0023 0.0035 0.004
Notes: T x 2000 2006, g - 10k . C 1 4 x z . C 5 8 g z -. E g Sz (2010). O MSA L. T- .
***Sg 1 .
**Sg 5 .*Sg 10 .
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
27/29
2407CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
T g 10K 8 T 6.
C 1 T 10 (5). T g 10K
8 T 6. O 20002006, 10 , 1.8 g . T g 19932007 (2.1g 10 ), g G (2007) J (0.8 g ).
C 2 g g -: g g . A x, g g , , g g g : MSA g g , -, -; MSA g , , .
C 3 g g 2 g z. T , g .
C 4 g .F, 58 g 14, g
g (Debtim0006_
Assetsim00) -
.O, T 10 Fg 2 3. F
g x g g g g- , MSA , .., MSA g . T g .
III. Conclusion
W $1, x $0.06. T g .T k g g k . A , g . A , x k
ggg . H, k g. I , g , ggg . Ug g
-
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
28/29
2408 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW OCTOBER 2012
k , GDP, . W k .
REFERENCES
Almeida, Heitor, Murillo Campello, and Michael S. Weisbach. 2004. T C F S C.Journal o Finance 59 (4): 1777804.
Barro, Robert J. 1976.T L Mk, C, R I.Journal o Mone, Credit,and Banking 8 (4): 43956.
Benmelech, Eraim, and Nittai K. Bergman. 2008.L V C F- C Rg: E U.S. A. Quarterl Journal o Economics 123(4): 163577.
Benmelech, Eraim, and Nittai K. Bergman. 2009. C Pg.Journal o Financial Econom-ics 91 (3): 33960.
Benmelech, Eraim, Mark J. Garmaise, and Tobias J. Moskowitz. 2005. D L V A
F C? E C L C Zg Rg. Quar-terl Journal o Economics 120 (3): 112154.Bernanke, Ben, and Mark Gertler. 1989. Ag C, N W, B F.
American Economic Review 79 (1): 1431.Bernanke, Ben S. 1983. N E F C Pg G
D.American Economic Review 73 (3): 25776.Bertrand, Marianne, Esther Duo, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2004. H M S W T
D--D E? Quarterl Journal o Economics 119 (1): 24975.Capital IQ. 2012. C D. ://-...////x.
( Ag 22, 2012).Case, Karl E., Robert J. Shiller, and John M. Quigley. 2001. Cg W E: T Sk
Mk V Hg Mk. N B E R Wkg P 8606.Chaney, Thomas, David Sraer, and David Thesmar. 2009. T C C: H R E
Sk A C I. HEC Wkg P.Chaney, Thomas, David Sraer, and David Thesmar. 2012. T C C: H R
E Sk A C I: D. American Economic Review. ://x..g/10.1257/.102.6.2381.
Cutts, Robert, L. 1990. P G U: J L B.Harvard Business Review68: 16472.
Eiseldt, Andrea L., and Adriano A. Rampini.2009. Lg, A R, D C-.Review o Financial Studies 22 (4): 162157.
Federal Housing Finance Agency. 2012. H P Ix, A T Ix, M D g 2012Q1. ://..g//23955/112_.x (Ag 22, 2012).
Gan, Jie.2007. C, D C, C I: E N Ex-
.Journal o Financial Economics 85 (3): 70934.Goyal, Vidhan K., and Takeshi Yamada.2004. A P Sk, F C, I-
: E J.Journal o Business 77 (1): 17599.Hart, Oliver, and John Moore.1994. A T D B I H C-
. Quarterl Journal o Economics 109 (4): 84179.Himmelberg, Charles, Christopher Mayer, and Todd Sinai. 2005. Ag Hg H P: B-
, F M.Journal o Economic Perspectives 19 (4): 6792.Kaplan, Steven N., and Luigi Zingales. 1997. D I-C F S P U
M Fg C? Quarterl Journal o Economics 112 (1): 169215.Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro, and John Moore. 1997. C C.Journal o Political Econom 105 (2):
21148.Mian, Ati, and Amir Suf. 2011. H P, H E-B Bg, US H-
Lg C.American Economic Review 101 (5): 213256.Nelson, Theron R., Thomas Potter, and Harold H. Wilde. 2000. R E A C B-
S.Journal o Corporate Real Estate 2 (1): 2940.Peek, Joe, and Eric S. Rosengren. 2000. C Dg: E J Bk C
R A U S.American Economic Review 90 (1): 3045.
http://wrds-web.wharton.upenn.edu/wrds/ds/comp/index.cfmhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.2381http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.2381http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/23955/1q12hpi_cbsa.txthttp://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/23955/1q12hpi_cbsa.txthttp://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/23955/1q12hpi_cbsa.txthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.2381http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.6.2381http://wrds-web.wharton.upenn.edu/wrds/ds/comp/index.cfm -
7/27/2019 Collateral Channel
29/29
2409CHANEy ET AL.: THE COLLATERAL CHANNELVOL. 102 NO. 6
Rampini, Adriano A., and S. Viswanathan.2010. C, Rk Mg, D D C.Journal o Finance 65 (6): 2293322.
Rauh, Joshua D. 2006. I Fg C: E Fg C- P P.Journal o Finance 61 (1): 3371.
Saiz, Albert. 2010. T Gg D Hg S. Quarterl Journal o Econom-
ics 125 (3): 125396.Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Andrew Weiss. 1981. C Rg Mk I I-
.American Economic Review 71 (3): 393410.
top related