continious emission vs sharp freeze-out: results of hydro-kinetic approach for a+a collisions

Continious emission vs sharp freeze-out:results of hydro-kinetic approach for A+A

collisions

Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev

Krakow 11-14 June WPCF-2008

Based on: Akkelin, Hama, Karpenko, and Yu.S - PRC 78

(2008) 034906

“Soft Physics” measurements

2

xt

A

A

ΔωK

p=(p1+ p2)/2

q= p1- p2

(QS) Correlation function

Space-time structure of the matter evolution, e.g.,

Cooper-Frye prescription (1974)

Landau, 1953

Continuous Emissiont

x

outt

F. Grassi, Y. Hama, T. Kodama (1995)

“The back reaction of the emission on the fluid dynamics is not reduced just to energy-momen-tum recoiling of emitted particles on the expan-ding thermal medium, but also leads to a re-arrangement of the medium, producing a devia-tion of its state from the local equilibrium, ac-companied by changing of the local temperature, densities, and collective velocity field. This complex effect is mainly a consequence of the fact that the evolution of the single finite system of hadrons cannot be split into the two compo-nents: expansion of the interacting locally equi-librated medium and a free stream of emitted particles, which the system consists of. Such a splitting, accounting only for the momentum-energy conservation law, contradicts the unde-rlying dynamical equations such as a Boltzmann one.”

Akkelin, Hama, Karpenko, Yu.SPRC 78 034906 (2008)

Hybrid models: HYDRO + UrQMD (Bass, Dumitru (2000))

t

z

t

r

constrconstzt

at : 22

hadr 0zat )(:hadr r

The problems: the system just after hadronization is not so dilute to apply

hadronic cascade models; hadronization hypersurface contains non-space-like

sectors (causality problem: Bugaev, PRL 90, 252301, 2003); hadronization happens in fairly wide 4D-region, not just at

hypersurface , especially in crossover scenario.

)(r

t

HYDRO

UrQMD

UrQMD

hadr

hadrhadr

The initial conditions for hadronic cascade models should be based on non-local equilibrium distributions

Yu.S. , Akkelin, Hama: PRL 89 , 052301 (2002); + Karpenko: PRC 78, 034906 (2008).

Hydro-kinetic approach

MODEL• is based on relaxation time approximation for relativistic finite expanding system;

• provides evaluation of escape probabilities and deviations (even strong) of distribution functions [DF] from local equilibrium;

3. accounts for conservation laws at the particle emission;

Complete algorithm includes: • solution of equations of ideal hydro;• calculation of non-equilibrium DF and emission function in first approximation;• solution of equations for ideal hydro with non-zero left-hand-side that accounts for conservation laws for non-equilibrium process of the system which radiated free particles during expansion;• Calculation of “exact” DF and emission function; • Evaluation of spectra and correlations.

6

and are G(ain), L(oss) terms for p. species

Boltzmann eqs (differential form)

Escape probability(for each component )

Boltzmann equations and Escape probabilities

7

Boltzmann eqs (integral form)

Spectra and Emission function

Index is omittedeverywhere

Spectrum

Method of solution (Yu.S. et al, PRL, 2002)

Relaxation time approximation ( increases with time!):

8

is related to local rest system where collective veloc.

Representations of non-loc.eq. distribution function

9

If at the initial (thermalization) time

Energy-momentum conservation:

10

Iteration procedure:

I. Solution of perfect hydro equations with given initial conditions

11

II. Decomposition of energy-momentum tensor

Kiev, June 18-22 WRNP-2007

12

13

where

III. Ideal hydro with “source” instead of non-ideal hydro

(known function)

IV Final distribution function:

14

This approach accounts for conservation laws deviations from loc. eq. viscosity effects in hadron gas:

Saddle point approximation

Emission density

Spectrum

where

Normalization condition

Eqs for saddle point :

Physical conditions at

Cooper-Frye prescription

Spectrum in new variables

Emission density in saddle point representationTemporal width of emission

Generalized Cooper-Frye f-la

Generalized Cooper-Frye prescription:

17

r

t

0

Escape probability

Yu.S. (1987)-particle flow conservation; K.A. Bugaev (1996) (current form)

OPACITY

Toy model: one-component pion gas with initial T= 320 MeV at and different cross-sections.

Momentum dependence of freeze-out

Here and further for Pb+Pb collisions we use:initial energy density

EoS from Lattice QCD when T< 160 MeV, and EoS of chemically frozen hadron gas with 359 particle species at T< 160 MeV.

Pt-integrated

Conditions for the utilization of the generalized Cooper-Frye prescription

i) For each momentum p, there is a region of r where the emission function has a

sharp maximum with temporal width .

ii) The width of the maximum, which is just the relaxation time ( inverse of collision rate), should be smaller than the corresponding temporal homogeneity length of the distribution function: iii) The contribution to the spectra from the residual region of r where the saddle point method is violated does not affect essentially the particle momentum spectrum.

Then the momentum spectra can be presented in Cooper-Frye form despite it is, in fact, not sadden freeze-out and the decaying region has a finite temporal width . Such a generalized Cooper-Frye representation is related to freeze-out hypersurface of maximal emission that depends on momentum p and does not necessarily encloses the initially dense matter.

iiii) The escape probabilities for particles to be liberated just from the initial hyper-surface t0 are small almost in the whole spacial region (except peripheral points)

Pt dependence of emission density

Transverse Spectra

Max at Pt = 0.3 GeV/c

Max at Pt = 1.2 GeV/c

Initial Conditions and Emission Function

Initial profile: Gaussian

Initial profile: Woods-Saxon

1st order ph. tr.

CrossoverCrossover

W/0 initial flow With initial flow

Conclusions

• The following factors reduces space-time scales of the emission

developing of initial flows at early pre-thermal stage;

more hard transition EoS, corresponding to cross-over;

non-flat initial (energy) density distributions, similar to Gaussian;

early (as compare to standard CF-prescription) emission of hadrons, because escape probability account for whole particle trajectory in rapidly expanding

surrounding (no mean-free pass criterion for freeze-out)

• The hydrokinetic approach to A+A collisions is proposed. It allows one to describe the continuous particle emission from a hot and dense finite system, expanding hydrodynamically into vacuum, in the way which is consistent with Boltzmann equations and conservation laws, and accounts also for the opacity effects.

24

The CFp might be applied only in a generalized form, accounting for thedirect momentum dependence of the freeze-out hypersurface corresponding to the maximum of the emission function at fixed momentum p in an appropriate region of r.