corporate investment - …d1pvbs8relied5.cloudfront.net/resources/research-reports/2014... · the...
Post on 11-Apr-2018
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 1
INTRODUCTION
;YLHZ\Y �̀�HJJV\U[PUN��HUK�ÄUHUJL�WYVMLZZPVUHSZ at U.S. corporations face numerous investment and
accounting challenges: historically low interest rates; impending regulatory reforms; high investment
performance expectations despite inviolable liquidity requirements; pressure to provide accurate and
timely information to internal and external stakeholders; and more. Forward-thinking organizations
are constantly seeking new and better ways to not only meet these challenges, but also elevate
WLYMVYTHUJL�HUK�PUJYLHZL�LɉJPLUJ �̀�)LUJOTHYRPUN�PZ�H�JYP[PJHS�[VVS�PU�[OPZ�WYVJLZZ��*-6Z��ÄUHUJL�
executives, and treasury and accounting professionals can draw on benchmarking data to gain
insight into other like-kind organizations, drive improvement in their own organizations, and enhance
VWLYH[PVUHS�LɉJPLUJPLZ�
The 2014 Corporate Investment Benchmark Survey was designed with these objectives in mind.
*-6Z��[YLHZ\YLYZ��JVU[YVSSLYZ��HJJV\U[HU[Z��HUK�V[OLY�PU]LZ[TLU[�HJJV\U[PUN�HUK�YLWVY[PUN�Z[HɈ�
provided their impressions of the current investment environment, key accounting and reporting
processes, and investment allocations. The following report delivers a detailed overview of the
investment accounting and reporting environment for corporations, and provides key market
information that institutional investors can use for industry benchmarking.
In one keystone survey question, respondents were asked to identify their biggest investment-
related concerns. While the open-ended responses to this question varied, they were clustered in four
THPU�HYLHZ!�[OL�PU]LZ[TLU[�LU]PYVUTLU[��� ������VWLYH[PVUHS�LɉJPLUJ`����������YPZR�HUK�JVTWSPHUJL�
(20.3%), and executing on strategy (15.2%) (Fig. 1). This report examines the survey results in the
context of these key concerns.
CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Survey Demographics 2
Portfolio Demographics 3
Investment and Regulatory Environment 6
Investment Strategy 8
Operational Processes and Staffing 12
Conclusion 19
Fig. 1
Key Survey-Related Concerns
The Investment Environment 29.1%
Operational Efficiency 27.8%
Risk and Compliance 20.3%
Executing on Strategy 15.2%
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 2
SURVEY DEMOGRAPHICS
Treasury and accounting professionals from nearly every type and size of corporation across
the U.S. responded to the survey over a two-month period in late 2014. More than 400
YLZWVUKLU[Z�WHY[PJPWH[LK��^P[O�������PKLU[PM`PUN�[OLTZLS]LZ�HZ�[YLHZ\Y`�Z[HɈ����� ��HZ�
HJJV\U[PUN�Z[HɈ��������HZ�*-6Z��HUK�������HZ�¸V[OLY¹�(Fig. 2).
)YLHRPUN�KV^U�[OL�KH[H�M\Y[OLY��VM�[OL�������PU�H�[YLHZ\Y`�YVSL�� ����YLWYLZLU[LK�[YLHZ\YLYZ��
������YLWYLZLU[LK�HZZPZ[HU[�[YLHZ\YLYZ��HUK�������YLWYLZLU[LK�NLULYHS�[YLHZ\Y`�Z[HɈ�(Fig. 3).
6M�[OL���� ��MYVT�[OL�HJJV\U[PUN�ZPKL��������Z[H[LK�[OL`�^LYL�JVU[YVSSLYZ�HUK�������Z[H[LK�
[OL`�^LYL�NLULYHS�HJJV\U[PUN�Z[HɈ��0UJS\KLK�PU�[OL�¸V[OLY¹�JH[LNVY`�^LYL�WVY[MVSPV�THUHNLYZ�
��������PUK\Z[Y`�JVUZ\S[HU[Z���������UVU�ÄUHUJL�L_LJ\[P]LZ���������HUK�V[OLY�TPZJLSSHULV\Z�
[P[SLZ��������
The survey drew participants from a wide and diverse group of industries (Fig. 4). The
TVZ[�YLWYLZLU[LK�PUK\Z[Y`�ZLNTLU[�^HZ�ÄUHUJPHS�ZLY]PJLZ����������MVSSV^LK�I`�[LJOUVSVN`�
hardware and equipment (11.9%), software and computer services (11.6%), healthcare
LX\PWTLU[�HUK�ZLY]PJLZ���������HUK�WOHYTHJL\[PJHSZ�HUK�IPV[LJOUVSVN`���������0U�[V[HS��
ULHYS`����KPɈLYLU[�PUK\Z[Y`�[`WLZ�^LYL�YLWYLZLU[LK�PU�[OL�Z\Y]L`�YLZ\S[Z�
25.9% Accounting
400+Respondents
18.2% CFOTreasury 41.7%
Other 14.2%
Non-Finance Executive 2.0%Portfolio Manager 3.0%
Other 5.7%Industry Consultant 2.7%
Auditor 0.8%
12.7% Accounting Staff
13.2% Controller
18.2% CFO
Treasury Staff 22.0%
Treasurer 9.7%
Assistant Treasurer 10.0%
Fig. 2
Financial Services 13.7%
Tech Hardware & Equipment 11.9%
Software & Computer Services 11.6%
Healthcare Equipment & Services 6.3%
Pharmaceuticals & Biotech 6.3%
Support Services 5.1%
Construction & Materials 4.8%
30Industries
Represented
40.3% All Others
Fig. 4
Fig. 3
Type of Industry
Survey Demographics Breakdown
Survey Demographics
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 3
PORTFOLIO DEMOGRAPHICS
As expected, investment portfolio sizes varied greatly—from portfolios with less than $100M
PU�PU]LZ[TLU[Z�[V�[OVZL�^P[O�V]LY����)��6YNHUPaH[PVUZ�^P[O�WVY[MVSPV�ZPaLZ�SLZZ�[OHU�����4�
were the most widely represented in the survey (41.1%) (Fig. 5). The second-most widely
represented set of respondents (19.4%) was organizations with portfolios ranging from
����4�[V�����4��������VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z�^LYL�PU�[OL�����4�[V���)�YHUNL��������PKLU[PÄLK�
[OLPY�[V[HS�WVY[MVSPV�ZPaL�IL[^LLU���)�HUK���)��������PKLU[PÄLK�[OLPY�[V[HS�WVY[MVSPV�ZPaL�HZ�
NYLH[LY�[OHU���)�
>OLU�HZRLK�[V�KLZJYPIL�[OLPY�SPX\PKP[`�WVY[MVSPV�VU�H�OPNO�SL]LS��������PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�[OL`�
invest in a combination of money market funds (MMFs) and individual securities (e.g., bonds,
JVTTLYJPHS�WHWLY���^OPSL�ULHYS`�VUL�PU�[OYLL���������PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�[OL`�PU]LZ[�L_JS\ZP]LS`�PU�
MMFs (Fig. 6).
9LZWVUKLU[Z�PKLU[PÄLK�[OL�ZWLJPÄJ�HZZL[�JSHZZLZ�[OL`�HYL�J\YYLU[S`�PU]LZ[LK�PU��HUK�THU`�
historically common asset classes topped the list (Fig. 7). MMFs were the most common
HZZL[�JSHZZ��^P[O� �����VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z�PUKPJH[PUN�[OLPY�JVTWHUPLZ�PU]LZ[�PU�[OLT��6[OLY�
MH]VYLK�HZZL[�JSHZZLZ�PUJS\KLK�NV]LYUTLU[�HNLUJPLZ����������JVYWVYH[L�KLI[����������
JLY[PÄJH[LZ�VM�KLWVZP[����������JVTTLYJPHS�WHWLY��� ������HUK�T\UPJPWHS�IVUKZ����������
The next tier of asset types included mortgage-backed securities (25.0%), asset-backed
ZLJ\YP[PLZ����������T\[\HS�M\UKZ����� ���HUK�JVTTVU�Z[VJR����������3LZZ�JVTTVU�
ZLJ\YP[PLZ�PUJS\KLK�MVY^HYKZ����������WYLMLYYLK�Z[VJR�� ������;07:�� ������VW[PVUZ���������
and futures (5.5%).
Fig. 5
Size of Investment Portfolio
< $100M 41.1%
$100M-$500M 19.4%
$500M-$1B 10.0%
$1B-$5B 17.3%
$5B-$10B 4.7%
$10B-$20B 1.8%
$20B-$50B 3.5%
> $50B 2.3%
Money Market Funds
(MMFs) and Individual
Securities (e.g., Bonds,
Commercial Paper)
Money Market Funds (MMFs) Only
31.8%
68.2%
Money Market Funds 95.5%
Government Agencies 67.7%
Corporate Debt 55.5%
Certificates of Deposit 53.2%
Commercial Paper 49.1%
Municipal Bonds 38.6%
Mortgage-Backed Securities 25.0%
Asset-Backed Securities 24.5%
Mutual Funds 20.9%
Common Stock 17.7%
Forwards 10.5%
Preferred Stock 9.1%
TIPS 9.1%
Options 8.6%
Futures 5.5%
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Liquidity Portfolio Structure
Assets Currently Invested In
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 4
Target duration was widely distributed (Fig. 8); 25.3% indicated 1-3 months, 30.1% indicated
3-12 months, 24.5% indicated 12-24 months, and 20.1% indicated more than 24 months.
Respondents’ organizations were almost evenly split between companies with treasury,
accounting, or investment operations in a single country (52.2%), and those with operations in
[^V�VY�TVYL�JV\U[YPLZ���������(Fig. 9).�5LHYS`�VUL�PU�Ä]L��� �����PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�[OLPY�JVTWHU`�
operates in six or more countries, revealing additional accounting challenges that we will explore
later in the report.
,_[LYUHS�(ZZL[�4HUHNLYZ
4HU`�JVYWVYH[PVUZ�OH]L�ZWLJPÄJ�SPX\PKP[`�YLX\PYLTLU[Z�HUK�PU]LZ[TLU[�WVSPJ`�YLZ[YPJ[PVUZ�[OH[�
WYLJS\KL�[OLT�MYVT�W\YZ\PUN�KPYLJ[�PU]LZ[PUN�VY�OPYPUN�HU�HZZL[�THUHNLY��6[OLY�VYNHUPaH[PVUZ�HYL�
comfortable investing directly in individual securities (such as bonds, commercial paper, and more)
or separately managed accounts (SMAs), and often hire one or several investment managers to
THUHNL�[OLZL�WVY[MVSPVZ�[V�ZWLJPÄJ�THUKH[LZ�HUK�ILUJOTHYRZ��-VY�[OL�SH[[LY�NYV\W��L_[LYUHS�
HZZL[�THUHNLYZ�WSH`�H�JY\JPHS�YVSL�PU�OLSWPUN�VYNHUPaH[PVUZ�L_LJ\[L�ZWLJPÄJ�PU]LZ[TLU[�THUKH[LZ��
achieve higher yields, and gain more nuanced liquidity control.
;OL�Z\Y]L`�YLZ\S[Z�YL]LHSLK�[OH[�H�]HZ[�THQVYP[`���������VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z�H[�VYNHUPaH[PVUZ�[OH[�
PU]LZ[�PU�PUKP]PK\HS�ZLJ\YP[PLZ�\ZL�VUL�VY�TVYL�V\[ZPKL�THUHNLYZ��6]LYHSS��[OL�U\TILY�VM�THUHNLYZ�
JVYWVYH[PVUZ�\ZL�PZ�MHPYS`�L]LUS`�ZWYLHK!�������\ZL�VUL��� ����\ZL�[^V��������\ZL�[OYLL��
������\ZL�MV\Y��HUK�������\ZL�Ä]L�VY�TVYL�(Fig. 10). While those numbers are likely correlated
to investment portfolio size, it’s fair to presume that some organizations may simply have more
outside managers because they prefer to segment their portfolios to mitigate risk, or generally
require a more tailored investment strategy.
52.2% One
Three 11.9%
Six or More 19.0%
Five 3.1%
Four 3.7%
Two 11.0%
47.8%
15.3% – None
19.4% – Two
17.6% – One
Five or More – 17.1%
Three – 18.2%
Four – 12.4%
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Operations in How Many Countries?
How Many Outside Managers?
1-3 months 25.3%
3-6 months 9.2%
6-9 months 10.0%
9-12 months 10.9%
12-18 months 16.6%
18-24 months 7.9%
>24 months 20.1%
30.1%
24.5%
Fig. 8
Target Duration
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 5
COST
INEXPERIENCE
NO NEEDMORE TO MANAGE
EXTRA WORK INVOLVED
LIQUIDITY NEEDS
STAFF LIMITATIONS
ALREADY HAVE TOO MANY
CASH BALANCES
TRUSTPORTFOLIO SIZE
INVESTMENT POLICY AND APPROVALS
SATISFIED WITH EXISTING STRUCTURE
GENERAL BANKING RELATIONSHIPS
COMPLEXITY
FEESADMINISTRATIVE
BURDEN
We asked respondents who use asset managers to identify what reasons they have for not
hiring additional asset managers (Fig. 11). The open-ended question yielded a number of
PU[LYLZ[PUN�YLZWVUZLZ��I\[�THU`�JP[LK�¸HKTPUPZ[YH[P]L�I\YKLU�HUK�JVTWSL_P[ �̀¹�¸JVZ[Z�HUK�MLLZ�¹�
¸SPX\PKP[`�HUK�YLX\PYLTLU[Z�¹�HUK�¸PU]LZ[TLU[�WVSPJPLZ¹�HZ�RL`�YLHZVUZ�^O`�[OL`�WYLMLY�[V�UV[�
hire additional investment managers. However, many simply indicated that their current roster
VM�THUHNLYZ·UV�TH[[LY�OV^�THU`�[V[HS�L_[LYUHS�THUHNLYZ�[OL`�OHK·^HZ�Z\ɉJPLU[�MVY�[OLPY�
current needs.
Reasons for Not Hiring Additional Asset Managers
Fig. 11
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 6
Increase About the Same Decrease
Short Term
(<1Year)
Medium Term
(1-3 Years)
Long Term
(3+ Years)
82.8% 75.3% 80.1%
17.2% 24.7% 17.9% 2.0%
Interest Rate Outlook
Fig. 12
INVESTMENT AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
Results from The 2014 Corporate Investment Benchmark Survey revealed corporate investors’
concerns about the persistent low interest rate environment and the strategic and operational
JOHSSLUNLZ�P[�WVZLZ�[V�JVYWVYH[L�[YLHZ\YPLZ��0U�MHJ[��ULHYS`�VUL�PU�[OYLL�YLZWVUKLU[Z��� �����
indicated that the current challenging investment environment was their top concern (see Fig.
1, pg. 1)—revealing a genuine uncertainty about whether the low interest rate environment
^PSS�WLYZPZ[�VY�YPZL��¸;OL�SV^�`PLSKPUN�LU]PYVUTLU[�PZ�[OL�IPNNLZ[�JVUJLYU�¹�ZHPK�VUL�*-6��
¸=LY`�SV^�YL[\YUZ�V]LY�H�SVUNLY�[LU\YL��HUK�[OL�NYLH[LY�WV[LU[PHS�MVY�\UYLHSPaLK�SVZZLZ�HUK�
PTWHPYTLU[��PZ�H�JVUJLYU�MVY�\Z�¹�ZHPK�HUV[OLY�YLZWVUKLU[��6[OLYZ�L_WYLZZLK�JVUJLYU�HIV\[�
not just the environment itself, but its implications on their corporate investment strategies:
¸>L»YL�JVUJLYULK�HIV\[�THUHNPUN�YL[\YU�L_WLJ[H[PVUZ�PU�H�SV^�PU[LYLZ[�YH[L�LU]PYVUTLU[�¹�:[PSS�
V[OLYZ�L_WYLZZLK�JVUJLYU�HIV\[�[OL�VWWVZP[L�ZJLUHYPV!�H�¸ZWPRL�PU�PU[LYLZ[�YH[LZ�BHUK�YLZ\S[PUND�
VWLYH[PVUHS�YPZRZ�[OH[�^L�OH]L�UV[�WYLWWLK�MVY�¹
While corporations’ liquidity requirements and investment strategies vary, treasury and accounting
professionals deal with universal investment and regulatory challenges. When asked about their
V\[SVVR�VU�PU[LYLZ[�YH[LZ��MV\Y�V\[�VM�Ä]L�YLZWVUKLU[Z���������PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�[OL`�[OPUR�PU[LYLZ[�
rates will remain about the same in the short term (less than one year) (Fig. 12). However, three-
X\HY[LYZ�VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z���������ILSPL]L�[OH[�PU[LYLZ[�YH[LZ�^PSS�YPZL�PU�[OL�UL_[�VUL�[V�[OYLL�`LHYZ��
HUK�L]LU�TVYL�YLZWVUKLU[Z���������[OPUR�[OL`�^PSS�PUJYLHZL�PU�[OYLL�WS\Z�`LHYZ�
“The low-yielding environment is the biggest concern.”
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 7
The changing regulatory environment is impacting investment considerations as well. More than
ever before, corporations are faced with a changing regulatory environment that puts greater
ZJY\[PU`�VU�PU]LZ[TLU[�HJJV\U[PUN�HUK�YLWVY[PUN��;OPZ�OHZ�[OL�WV[LU[PHS�[V�HɈLJ[�PU]LZ[TLU[�
decisions and downstream accounting and reporting. While the spotlight is often on MMF
reform, treasury and accounting teams have to pay attention to much more than that.
4VYL�[OHU�OHSM�VM�Z\Y]L`�YLZWVUKLU[Z���������^LYL�LP[OLY�¸]LY`�JVUJLYULK¹�VY�¸L_[YLTLS`�
JVUJLYULK¹�HIV\[�<:�.((7�YLWVY[PUN�(Fig. 13). 44.1% indicated a similar level of concern
over tax reporting regulations. Respondents expressed a lesser degree of concern (those who
PUKPJH[LK�[OL`�^LYL�LP[OLY�¸ZVTL^OH[�JVUJLYULK¹�VY�¸JVUJLYULK¹��MVY�[OL�YLN\SH[VY`�PTWHJ[Z�VM�
+VKK�-YHUR�SLNPZSH[PVU����������44-�YLMVYT��������HUK�0-9:�KLWSV`TLU[��� ������;OL�THQVYP[`�
VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z�^LYL�¸UV[�JVUJLYULK¹�HIV\[�JOHUNLZ�[V�<2�.((7���������VY�*HUHKPHU�.((7�
(65.0%).
+LZWP[L�JOHSSLUNLZ�VU�KPɈLYLU[�YLN\SH[VY`�MYVU[Z��44-�YLMVYT�YLTHPUZ�[VW�VM�TPUK�MVY�THU`�
corporate treasuries and investors. According to the survey results, while just over a third
(36.1%) remain neutral about the announced reforms, 55% are highly concerned or somewhat
JVUJLYULK�HIV\[�[OLPY�LɈLJ[Z·H�ZJHU[��� ��HYL�UV[�JVUJLYULK�H[�HSS�(Fig. 14).
A majority of survey respondents indicated that their auditor is their most trusted source for
Z[H`PUN�HIYLHZ[�VM�WV[LU[PHS�YLN\SH[VY`�JOHUNLZ����������MVSSV^LK�JSVZLS`�I`�YLN\SH[VY`�IVKPLZ�
themselves (55.1%) (Fig. 15).�6[OLY�ZV\YJLZ�PUJS\KLK�WLLYZ����������HZZL[�THUHNLYZ����� ����
J\Z[VKPHUZ����� ����]LUKVYZ����������HUK�JVUZ\S[HU[Z���������
Concern with Announced MMF Reform
Who Advises You on Regulatory Changes?
8.9% Not Concerned
10.1% High Concern
36.1% Neutral
44.9% Somewhat Concerned
57.0%
Auditor Regulatory Body (e.g., Website)
Peers Asset Manager
55.1%47.5% 44.9%
Custodian
27.9%
Vendor
24.7%
Consultant
20.3%
Level of Concern Regarding:
US GAAP
Tax Reporting
Dodd-Frank
Money Fund Reform
IFRS
UK GAAP
Canadian GAAP
Not Concerned Somewhat Concerned Concerned Very Concerned Extremely Concerned
0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 13
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 8
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
0U�[OL�J\YYLU[�SV^�PU[LYLZ[�YH[L�LU]PYVUTLU[��[YLHZ\Y`�[LHTZ�HYL�ÄUKPUN�P[�OHYKLY�[V�NLULYH[L�
desired returns on MMFs and other traditional investments. As the leading provider of integrated
PU]LZ[TLU[�HJJV\U[PUN��YLWVY[PUN��HUK�HUHS`[PJZ��*SLHY^H[LY�OHZ�ILLU�PU�H�WVZP[PVU�[V�VIZLY]L�
the portfolio allocations of thousands of corporations, and we’ve seen institutional investors
employ a myriad of investment approaches to address these challenges. Some corporations are
staying the course, reducing their short-term revenue expectations by investing mostly in low-
`PLSKPUN��ZOVY[LY�K\YH[PVU�ZLJ\YP[PLZ�[V�THPU[HPU�SPX\PKP[ �̀�6[OLYZ�ZLLR�OPNOLY�`PLSKZ�I`�L_WSVYPUN�
HS[LYUH[P]LZ�[V�44-Z�HUK�V[OLY�JVTTVU�Ä_LK�PUJVTL�ZLJ\YP[PLZ�I`�LP[OLY�LTWSV`PUN�KPYLJ[�
investing approaches, or by hiring asset managers to administer separately managed
accounts (SMAs).
To better understand corporations’ macro-level investment strategies, we asked respondents
a series of questions about their appetite for new investment types and their willingness to
JVUZPKLY�KPɈLYLU[�WVY[MVSPV�PU]LZ[TLU[�HWWYVHJOLZ��Z\JO�HZ�\ZPUN�:4(Z�
5L^�(ZZL[�;̀ WLZ�HUK�44-�9LMVYT»Z�,ɈLJ[Z�VU�0U]LZ[TLU[�:[YH[LN`
The likelihood that organizations are considering historically preferred asset classes is low,
presumably because they are already investing in them in high proportions (Tier 1). Tier 2 asset
JSHZZLZ�^LYL�VUS`�ZSPNO[S`�SLZZ�SPRLS`�[V�IL�JVUZPKLYLK��6M�[OH[�NYV\W��HZZL[�IHJRLK�ZLJ\YP[PLZ�
(12.3%) represented the security type mostly likely to be considered, followed by municipal
IVUKZ����������TVY[NHNL�IHJRLK�ZLJ\YP[PLZ���������T\[\HS�M\UKZ���������HUK�JVTTVU�Z[VJR�
�������(Fig. 16)��(TVUN�HZZL[�JSHZZLZ�[OH[�ML^�JVYWVYH[PVUZ�J\YYLU[S`�PU]LZ[�PU��;PLY�����;07:�
registered the highest percentage of respondents considering (5.5%), followed by options
��������MVY^HYKZ���������M\[\YLZ���������HUK�WYLMLYYLK�Z[VJR�������. Fig. 16
What Asset Types Are You Considering Investing In?
Money Market Funds 11.8%
Government Agencies 10.0%
Corporate Debt 11.8%
Certificates of Deposit 8.2%
Commercial Paper 12.7%
Municipal Bonds 11.4%
Mortgage-Backed Securities 6.8%
Asset-Backed Securities 12.3%
Mutual Funds 4.5%
Common Stock 2.7%
Forwards 3.6%
Preferred Stock 2.7%
TIPS 5.5%
Options 4.5%
Futures 2.7%
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
“We’re concerned about managing return expectations in a low interest rate environment.”
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 9
:\Y]L`�YLZ\S[Z�JVUÄYTLK�[OH[�44-Z�HYL�^PKLS`�\ZLK�HUK�ZLY]L�H�]P[HS�HUK�PUKPZWLUZHISL�
function for many corporations. They are designed to be stable, low-risk, cash-equivalent
PU]LZ[TLU[Z�[OH[�HYL�PKLHS�MVY�KHPS`�SPX\PKP[`�YLX\PYLTLU[Z��6[OLY�KH[H�Z\WWVY[LK�[OPZ�MHJ[!�VUL�PU�
[OYLL�PUZ[P[\[PVUHS�PU]LZ[VYZ���������ZHPK�[OH[�44-Z�^LYL�[OL�VUS`�SPX\PKP[`�VW[PVU�[OLPY�JVTWHU`�
pursued (see Fig. 6, pg. 3).
6M�[OL�VYNHUPaH[PVUZ�[OH[�PU]LZ[�ZVSLS`�PU�44-Z��^L�HZRLK�[OLT�[V�KLZJYPIL�¸PU�H�ZLU[LUJL¹�
why they only invest in MMFs. Respondents provided three primary reasons for deploying a
MMF-only investment approach, including: daily liquidity for the entire portfolio, preservation of
JHWP[HS��HUK�H�ZPTWSPÄLK�HJJV\U[PUN�Z[Y\J[\YL�(Fig. 17).
However, with a persistent low interest rate environment providing historically low returns, plus
YLJLU[�WYVUV\UJLTLU[Z�PUKPJH[PUN�ZWLJPÄJ�\WJVTPUN�YLMVYTZ��THYRL[�WLYJLW[PVUZ�VM�44-Z�
are evolving. Although reforms are not as drastic as originally proposed, changes are inevitable.
;OLZL�\UKLYS`PUN�JVUJLYUZ�^LYL�]PZPISL�PU�[OL�Z\Y]L`�YLZ\S[Z��;OL�ÅVH[PUN�5(=�YLX\PYLTLU[�^HZ�
the upcoming reform that most concerned respondents, followed by the potential downstream
HJJV\U[PUN�PTWSPJH[PVUZ�VM�[OL�ÅVH[PUN�5(=��3PX\PKP[`�HUK�NLULYHS�\UJLY[HPU[`�^LYL�[OL�UL_[�[^V�
most commonly mentioned areas of concern among corporations only invested in MMFs (Fig. 18).
However, when asked whether MMF reform would impact their investment strategies,
YLZWVUKLU[Z�^LYL�KP]PKLK!�������PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�YLMVYTZ�^V\SK�OH]L�UV�PTWHJ[��^OPSL�������
indicated that they anticipated somewhat of an impact, and that they planned on decreasing
their allocation to MMFs in the future (Fig. 19).�(�ZTHSS�ZL[�� �����PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�[OL`�HU[PJPWH[LK�
H�ZPNUPÄJHU[�PTWHJ[��PUJS\KPUN�JOHUNPUN�[OLPY�PU]LZ[TLU[�Z[Y\J[\YL�[V�H]VPK�44-Z�HS[VNL[OLY�
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Top MMF Reform Concerns
How Will MMF Reform Impact Your Investment Strategy?
LIQUIDITY
FEES
UNCERTAINTY
PRICINGFLOATINGNAV
ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS
REPORTING
YIELD
ADDEDCOMPLEXITY
PRINCIPAL LOSS
SHORT-TERM VOLATILITY
COMPLIANCE
GATES
37.7% Somewhat – We Anticipate Decreasing Our Allocation
52.6% No Impact – Business as Usual
9.7% Significant – We Anticipate Changing Our Structure
1. Daily Liquidity2. Preservation of Capital
3. Simplified AccountingFig. 17
Why Do You Only Invest in MMFs?*
* Respondents who indicated they are not considering moving investments into SMAs.
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 10
So, despite concern about impending MMF changes, many organizations indicated
reluctance to consider alternative strategies, such as direct investing or hiring outside asset
THUHNLYZ�[V�HKTPUPZ[LY�:4(Z��0U�MHJ[��VM�JVYWVYH[L�PU]LZ[VYZ�^OV�J\YYLU[S`�W\YZ\L�HU�
44-�VUS`�HWWYVHJO��ULHYS`�MV\Y�PU�Ä]L��� �����PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�[OL`�^LYL�UV[�JVUZPKLYPUN�
a move into SMAs (Fig. 20). 11.9% indicated that they planned to move into SMAs within
one year, and another 9.0% indicated they would, but not for at least another year.
We asked this same set of respondents to identify the key reasons that keep them from
PU]LZ[PUN�PU�:4(Z��;OL�[VW�[^V�YLHZVUZ�^LYL�¸\UMHTPSPHYP[`¹����������HUK�¸Z[YH[LN`�KVLZU»[�
HSPNU�^P[O�I\ZPULZZ�VIQLJ[P]LZ¹����������6[OLY�YLHZVUZ�PUJS\KLK�¸WLYJLP]LK�HZ�H�YPZRPLY�Z[YH[LN`¹�
�� ������¸KVU»[�OH]L�LUV\NO�Z[HɈ�[V�KLHS�^P[O�VWLYH[PVUHS�I\YKLU¹����������¸IVHYK�W\ZOIHJR¹�
���������HUK�¸KVU»[�\UKLYZ[HUK�HJJV\U[PUN�HUK�HUHS`[PJZ�PTWSPJH[PVUZ¹���������(Fig. 21).
0U]LZ[TLU[�7VSPJ`�*VTWSPHUJL��7LYMVYTHUJL�4LHZ\YLTLU[��HUK�9PZR�(UHS`ZPZ
5V[�VUS`�OHZ�[OL�J\YYLU[�PU]LZ[TLU[�LU]PYVUTLU[�HɈLJ[LK�PU]LZ[TLU[�Z[YH[LNPLZ��P[�OHZ�HSZV�
HɈLJ[LK�PU]LZ[VYZ»�WLYZWLJ[P]LZ�VU�PU]LZ[TLU[�WVSPJ`�JVTWSPHUJL��WLYMVYTHUJL�TLHZ\YLTLU[��
and risk analysis. Among respondents’ top investment-related concerns, approximately one in
Ä]L���������PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�[OL�YLN\SH[VY`�LU]PYVUTLU[�PZ�JYLH[PUN�JVUJLYUZ�HIV\[�JVTWSPHUJL��
performance, and risk (see Fig. 1, pg. 1).�6UL�YLZWVUKLU[»Z�YLMLYLUJL�[V�JVTWSPHUJL�Z\TTLK�\W�
[OL�NLULYHS�YLZ\S[Z!�¸>L»YL�^VYYPLK�HIV\[�JVTWSPHUJL�^P[O�V\Y�PU[LYUHS�PU]LZ[TLU[�WVSPJ �̀�HZ�^LSS�
HZ�YLN\SH[VY`�JVTWSPHUJL�¹�(UV[OLY�ZWVRL�[V�PUK\Z[Y`�^PKL�JVUJLYUZ�YLNHYKPUN�WVY[MVSPV�YPZR!�
Fig. 21
Reasons You are Not Pursuing SMAs*
14.8%
Board Pushback
Unfamiliar with SMAs
34.4%
Don’t Understand Accounting
and Analytics Implications
Perceived as a Riskier
Strategy
Don’t Have Enough Staff to Deal with Operational
Burden
Strategy Doesn’t
Align with Business
Objectives
Other
13.1%
19.7% 18.0%
31.2%
11.5%
Best Practices Tip: While SMAs are not for everyone, with the right tools and resources to administer their complex accounting and analytics, they can potentially provide institutional investors with the ability to achieve higher investment yields and the flexibility to meet liquidity goals.
Fig. 20
Are You Considering Moving Into SMAs?
11.9% Yes: Within One Year
9.0% Yes: But More Than a Year Out
No 79.1%
* Respondents who indicated they are not considering moving investments into SMAs.
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 11
¸>L»YL�JVUJLYULK�HIV\[�V\Y�]PZPIPSP[`�PU[V�\UKLYS`PUN�WYVISLTZ��JYLKP[��SPX\PKP[ �̀�I\ZPULZZ��L[J���
VM�PZZ\LYZ�VM�KLI[�ZLJ\YP[PLZ�OLSK�PU�V\Y�PU]LZ[TLU[�WVY[MVSPV�¹�(UV[OLY�YLZWVUZL�PUKPJH[LK�[OL�
PU[LYYLSH[LK�UH[\YL�VM�HSS�WVY[MVSPV�TLHZ\YLZ!�¸*VU[YVSSPUN�YPZR��HUK�H[�[OL�ZHTL�[PTL�Z[Y\J[\YPUN�H�
WVY[MVSPV�[OH[�PZ�HISL�[V�LHYU�H�KLJLU[�`PLSK��PZ�H�[VW�JVUJLYU�MVY�\Z�¹
)LUJOTHYRPUN�:[YH[LNPLZ
)LUJOTHYRPUN�PZ�H�JYP[PJHS�[VVS�[OH[�JVYWVYH[L�PU]LZ[VYZ�\ZL�[V�UV[�VUS`�TLHZ\YL�[OLPY�WVY[MVSPVZ»�
performance, but to help measure risk as well. The majority of survey respondents (66.2%)
indicated that they use either one or two benchmarks to measure the performance of investment
WVY[MVSPVZ��^P[O�������\ZPUN�Q\Z[�H�ZPUNSL�ILUJOTHYR�HUK�������\ZPUN�[^V�(Fig. 22).���� ��\ZL�
three benchmarks, while 15.9% use four or more benchmarks. While one in ten (10.1%) change
benchmarks multiple times during the year, most respondents wait at least a year or more to
change them (Fig. 23).� ����JOHUNL�[OLPY�ILUJOTHYRZ�`LHYS �̀�������JOHUNL�[OLT�L]LY`�VUL�
[V�[OYLL�`LHYZ��������L]LY`�MV\Y�[V�Ä]L�`LHYZ��HUK�������VUS`�JOHUNL�ILUJOTHYRZ�HM[LY�Ä]L�VY�
more years. 36.9% don’t change their benchmarks at all.
Fig. 22
How Many Benchmarks Do You Use to Measure Performance?
1 31.8%
2 34.4%
3 17.9%
4 6.6%
5 3.3%
6+ 6.0%
15.9%
66.2%
Fig. 23
How Often Do You Change Benchmarks?
9.4% Every Year
10.1% < 1 Year
18.1% Every 1-3 Years
10.1% Every 4-5 Years
15.4% >5 Years
36.9% Do Not Change Benchmarks
“Controlling risk, and at the same time structuring a portfolio that is able to earn a decent yield, is a top concern.”
Best Practices Tip: Organizations should be able to know portfolio status at any time, and instantly receive notifications if investments exceed prescribed exposure limits. Compliance monitoring based on daily accounting data can provide you with the confidence that your portfolio complies with investment policies.
Best Practices Tip: Treasury teams need to be able to easily disseminate portfolio performance information to stakeholders. Leading accounting and reporting platforms can calculate insightful performance data (e.g., multiple return types, benchmark comparisons, etc.) based on accurate and timely investment data, providing these teams with vital insight and transparency into portfolio performance.
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 12
ACCURATE REPORTINGSTAFF TURNOVER
SECURITYTIMELYINFORMATION
MANUAL PROCESSES
COMPLIANCE
RESEARCH TIME
SYSTEM ERRORS
TRANSPARENCY
OPERATIONAL PROCESSES AND STAFFING
*VYWVYH[PVUZ�HYL�\UKLY�TVYL�YLN\SH[VY`�ZJY\[PU`�[OHU�L]LY�ILMVYL��HUK�PU[LYUHSS`�[OLYL»Z�PUJYLHZPUN�
WYLZZ\YL�[V�PTWYV]L�LɉJPLUJ �̀�(JJV\U[PUN�[LHTZ��PU�WHY[PJ\SHY��ILHY�[OL�IY\U[�VM�[OPZ�VWLYH[PVUHS�
burden. They’re being asked to aggregate and reconcile investment information more quickly, close
the books faster, and decrease the turn time when preparing monthly/quarterly reports, all without
ZHJYPÄJPUN�HJJ\YHJ �̀�4HUWV^LY��[LJOUVSVN �̀�HUK�H\[VTH[PVU�HYL�RL`�[V�ZVS]PUN�[OLZL�LɉJPLUJ`�
YLSH[LK�JOHSSLUNLZ��¸>L»YL�JVUJLYULK�[OH[�YLWVY[Z�HYL�Z[PSS�THU\HS�PU�UH[\YL�¹�^YV[L�VUL�HJJV\U[PUN�
professional, when describing top investment-related concerns. This concern is shared by many
JVTWHUPLZ�^OLU�L]HS\H[PUN�[OLPY�PULɉJPLUJPLZ��;OL`�HYL�VM[LU�MHJLK�^P[O�H�Z[YH[LNPJ�JOVPJL!�
invest in new technology and software solutions to help automate manual processes and improve
LɉJPLUJ �̀�VY�OPYL�HKKP[PVUHS�Z[HɈ�
+PɈLYLU[�JVYWVYH[PVUZ�OH]L�KP]LYZL�VYNHUPaH[PVUHS�ULLKZ��HUK�[OL�HJ[\HS�Z[YH[LNPLZ�[OH[�[OL`�
LTWSV`�]HY`�JVUZPKLYHIS`�KLWLUKPUN�VU�ZWLJPÄJ�SPX\PKP[`�ULLKZ��KLZPYLZ�MVY�`PLSK��HUK�[VSLYHUJLZ�
for risk. However, survey data revealed that many corporations—no matter what type of investment
Z[YH[LN`�[OL`�JOVVZL·HYL�JVUJLYULK�HIV\[�VWLYH[PVUHS�HUK�Z[HɉUN�JOHSSLUNLZ��
0U�MHJ[��TVYL�[OHU�H�X\HY[LY�VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z���������PKLU[PÄLK�¸VWLYH[PVUHS�LɉJPLUJ`¹�HZ�[OLPY�[VW�
investment-related concern, pointing to the acute data management, accounting, reporting, and
Z[HɉUN�JVUJLYUZ�[OH[�JVYWVYH[L�[YLHZ\Y`�HUK�HJJV\U[PUN�[LHTZ�MHJL�(see Fig. 1, pg. 1)��¸(JJ\YH[L�
YLWVY[PUN�VM�WLYMVYTHUJL�HUK�HJ[P]P[ �̀¹�¸NL[[PUN�PUMVYTH[PVU�PU�H�[PTLS �̀�HJJ\YH[L�THUULY�MVY�JSVZL�¹�
¸THUWV^LY�JOHSSLUNLZ�HUK�[OL�\ZL�VM�THU\HS�WYVJLZZLZ�¹�¸YLWVY[PUN�LYYVYZ�¹�HUK�¸[PTPUN�HUK�Z[HɈ�
[\YUV]LY¹�^LYL�Q\Z[�ZL]LYHS�[VW�JVUJLYUZ�(Fig. 24). Fig. 24
What Are Your Top Investment-Related Concerns?
“We’re concerned that reports are still manual in nature.”
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 13
To gauge how accounting and treasury professionals feel about their operational processes, we
HZRLK�¸>OLU�P[�JVTLZ�[V�PU]LZ[TLU[�VWLYH[PVUZ��HYL�`V\�WSH`PUN�KLMLUZL��WSH`PUN�VɈLUZL��VY�
UL\[YHS&¹�;OL�THQVYP[`�VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z���������ZHPK�[OL`�^LYL�UL\[YHS��TLHUPUN�[OL`�HJRUV^SLKNLK�
[OH[�[OL`�OHK�¸ZVTL�VWLYH[PVUHS�PULɉJPLUJPLZ�HUK�ZVTL�THU\HS�WYVJLZZLZ¹�(Fig. 25). Nearly
VUL�PU�[OYLL���������ZHPK�[OL`�^LYL�WSH`PUN�VɈLUZL��PUKPJH[PUN�[OL`�^LYL�¸PU�JVU[YVS��LɉJPLU[��
HUK�OHK�H\[VTH[LK�WYVJLZZLZ�¹�(�]LY`�ZTHSS�ZLNTLU[�VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z��������HKTP[[LK�[OH[�[OL`�
^LYL�WSH`PUN�KLMLUZL��PUKPJH[PUN�[OLPY�VWLYH[PVUHS�WYVJLZZLZ�¸^LYL�V\[�VM�JVU[YVS��PULɉJPLU[��HUK�
JVUZPZ[LK�VM�[VV�T\JO�THU\HS�HJ[P]P[ �̀¹
The results revealed that while treasury and accounting teams acknowledge there are some
PULɉJPLUJPLZ��I`�HUK�SHYNL�[OL`�HYL�JVTMVY[HISL�^P[O�[OL�NLULYHS�Z[H[L�VM�[OLPY�PU]LZ[TLU[�VWLYH[PVUHS�
WYVJLZZLZ�HUK�HɈHPYZ��/V^L]LY��YLZWVUKLU[Z»�HUZ^LYZ�[V�RL`�VWLYH[PVUHS�LɉJPLUJ`�X\LZ[PVUZ�SH[LY�PU�
[OL�Z\Y]L`�YL]LHSLK�[OH[�KLZWP[L�V]LYHSS�JVUÄKLUJL�PU�[OLPY�J\YYLU[�WYVJLZZLZ�HUK�YLZV\YJLZ��ÄUHUJL�
teams are still dealing with persistent operational challenges that merit further exploration.
*SVZPUN�[OL�)VVRZ
>OLU�HJJV\U[PUN�[LHTZ�JSVZL�[OL�IVVRZ�MVY�PU[LYUHS�YLWVY[PUN�HUK�YLN\SH[VY`�ÄSPUN��[OLYL�HYL�[OYLL�
critical time periods: month end, quarter end, and year end. When we asked respondents how
long it takes them to close the books at each of these time periods, we expected that monthly
processes would take a fair amount of time, but that quarter- and year-end closes would take
ZPNUPÄJHU[S`�SVUNLY�ILJH\ZL�VM�[OL�HKKP[PVUHS�PU[LYUHS�YLJVUJPSPH[PVU�HUK�H\KP[PUN�ULJLZZHY`�[V�
complete these activities.
;OH[»Z�NLULYHSS`�OV^�[OL�YLZ\S[Z�WSH`LK�V\[!�HJJV\U[PUN�[LHTZ�HYL�MHPYS`�LɉJPLU[�^OLU�P[�JVTLZ�
to closing the books every month, but require more time at quarter- and year-end (Fig. 26). The
majority of respondents (69.6%) indicated that it takes them a day or less to complete the monthly
JSVZL�WYVJLZZ��HUK�������YLX\PYL�[^V�KH`Z��������PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�P[�[HRLZ�[OLT�[OYLL�KH`Z�VY�TVYL�
How Much Time Do You Spend Closing the Books?
Year EndQuarterlyMonthly
0-2 3-4 5-8 2 3-4 5+ hours hours hours days days days
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
Time:
Quarterly Close 62.4%Year-End Close 68.9%
Monthly Close 69.6%
Are You Playing Offense, Defense, or Neutral When It Comes to Investment Operations?
Fig. 25
61.7% Neutral (Some Inefficiencies and Some Manual Processes)
6.2% Playing Defense (Out of Control, Inefficient, Many Manual Processes, etc.)
32.1% Playing Offense (In Control, Efficient, Have Automated Processes, etc.)
Fig. 26
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 14
0-2 3-4 5-8 2 3-4 5+ hours hours hours days days days
36.7% 19.9% 14.8% 12.2% 5.1% 6.6%
35.4% 21.2% 14.6% 10.1% 7.1% 6.1%
Creating MonthlyJournal Entries
Auditing/Reconciling Monthly Journal Entries
71.4%
71.2%
0-2 3-4 5-8 2 3-4 5+ hours hours hours days days days
10.7% 15.2% 14.2% 21.3% 13.7% 16.2%
11.8% 16.9% 12.8% 12.8% 11.8% 16.9%
Board Packages and Management Reports
Creating Financial Statement Disclosures
40.1%
41.5%
at month end. Quarterly and yearly close processes take longer, because there’s more data to
aggregate and reconcile, and because there’s closer scrutiny on regulatory reporting. 62.4%
indicated it takes two days or more to close the books at the end of the quarter, and nearly one
PU�[OYLL�������YLZWVUKLK�[OH[�P[�[HRLZ�TVYL�[OHU�Ä]L�KH`Z��@LHY�LUK�[HZRZ�[HRL�L]LU�SVUNLY!�[^V�
V\[�VM�[OYLL����� ���YLZWVUKLU[Z�PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�P[�[HRLZ�TVYL�[OHU�[^V�KH`Z�[V�JSVZL�[OL�`LHY�LUK�
IVVRZ��HUK�ULHYS`�OHSM���������ZHPK�P[�[HRLZ�TVYL�[OHU�Ä]L�KH`Z�(see Fig. 26, pg. 13).
For associated month-end processes—such as creating monthly journal entries and auditing
HUK�YLJVUJPSPUN�[OLZL�LU[YPLZ·������VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z�PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�P[�[HRLZ�H[�SLHZ[�H�KH`�[V�
create monthly journal entries, and nearly a quarter (23.9%) indicated that it takes them two days
VY�TVYL��������PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�P[�[HRLZ�[OLT�H[�SLHZ[�H�KH`�[V�H\KP[�HUK�YLJVUJPSL�[OLZL�QV\YUHS�
entries (Fig. 27).
0U[LYUHS�9LWVY[PUN�HUK�-PUHUJPHS�:[H[LTLU[�+PZJSVZ\YLZ
*SVZPUN�[OL�IVVRZ�PZ�H�WYLJ\YZVY�[V�V[OLY�JVYL�HJJV\U[PUN�WYVJLZZLZ��Z\JO�HZ�PU[LYUHS�YLWVY[PUN�
HUK�YLN\SH[VY`�ÄSPUNZ��*YLH[PUN�IVHYK�WHJRHNLZ�HUK�V[OLY�THUHNLTLU[�YLWVY[Z�JHU�IL�
WHY[PJ\SHYS`�[PTL�JVUZ\TPUN�HJ[P]P[PLZ��YLX\PYPUN�H�ZPNUPÄJHU[�PU]LZ[TLU[�VM�YLZV\YJLZ��>OPSL�
40.1% of respondents indicated that it can take up to a day to prepare these reports, over half
(51.2%) indicated that it takes more than two days—and 16.2% indicated that it takes more than
Ä]L�KH`Z�(Fig. 28).
Best Practices Tip: Daily processing, validation, and reconciliation of investment accounting data provides corporations with audit-quality month-end data and reporting every day of the month. As a result, end-of-the-month processes are much less of a production and close times at all period ends can be dramatically improved.
How Much Time Do You Spend:
Fig. 27
How Much Time Do You Spend on:
Fig. 28
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 15
������VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z�PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�P[�JHU�[HRL�\W�[V�LPNO[�OV\YZ�[V�JYLH[L�ÄUHUJPHS�Z[H[LTLU[�
KPZJSVZ\YLZ�Z\JO�HZ�-(:�����HUK�PTWHPYTLU[Z��������PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�P[�JHU�[HRL�[LHTZ�IL[^LLU�
[^V�HUK�MV\Y�KH`Z��HUK���� ��PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�P[�[HRLZ�Ä]L�KH`Z�VY�TVYL�(see Fig. 28, pg. 14).
Not only are treasury and accounting teams tasked with closing the books and providing
period-end reporting, they are also responsible for disseminating portfolio information to key
constituents within and outside the organization. Survey results indicated that corporate treasury
HUK�HJJV\U[PUN�Z[HɈ�OH]L�THU`�TV\[OZ�[V�MLLK�(Fig. 29). When asked to identify to whom they
WYV]PKL�PU]LZ[TLU[�YLWVY[PUN��[OL�TVZ[�JVTTVU�YLZWVUZL�^HZ�*-6����������MVSSV^LK�I`�[OL�
[YLHZ\YLY�VY�HZZPZ[HU[�[YLHZ\YLY����������HJJV\U[PUN�KLWHY[TLU[����������*,6�WYLZPKLU[����������
JVU[YVSSLY����� ����PU]LZ[TLU[�JVTTP[[LL����� ����HUK�[H_�Z[HɈ����������0U�[V[HS��YLZWVUKLU[Z�
PKLU[PÄLK�TVYL�[OHU����KPɈLYLU[�JVUZ[P[\LUJPLZ�[V�^OVT�[OL`�T\Z[�WYV]PKL�PU]LZ[TLU[�YLWVY[PUN�
When asked about the key challenges treasury and accounting teams face when preparing
PU]LZ[TLU[�WHJRHNLZ�MVY�LP[OLY�L_[LYUHS��L�N���:,*��VY�PU[LYUHS��L�N���IVHYK��PU]LZ[TLU[�
JVTTP[[LLZ��H\KPLUJLZ��YLZWVUKLU[Z�PKLU[PÄLK�¸^HP[PUN�MVY�KH[H�[V�ILJVTL�H]HPSHISL¹�HZ�[OLPY�
[VW�JVUJLYU����������;OPZ�^HZ�MVSSV^LK�I`�¸THU\HS�KH[H�LU[Y`¹����������¸HNNYLNH[PVU�VM�KH[H�
MYVT�L_[LYUHS�ZV\YJLZ��J\Z[VKPHUZ�¹����������¸YLJHSJ\SH[PUN�HUK�]LYPM`PUN�KH[H�HJJ\YHJ`¹����������
HUK�¸HNNYLNH[PVU�VM�KH[H�MYVT�PU[LYUHS�ZV\YJLZ��HJJV\U[PUN�¹���������(Fig. 30). These challenges
typically extend and repeat themselves across multiple departments, and contribute to a vicious
J`JSL�[OH[�VM[LU�YLZ\S[Z�PU�TPZTH[JOLK�KH[H��K\WSPJH[LK�^VYR��HUK�ZPNUPÄJHU[�KLSH`Z�^OLU�
preparing period-end reports and investment packages.
To Whom Do You Provide Investment Reporting?
Key Challenges in Preparing Investment Packages
34.9%
CEO/President
41.3%
72.0%
43.4%34.9%
21.2%
47.1%
CFO Investment Committee
ControllerTreasurer/Assistant Treasurer
Accounting Dept.
Tax Staff
43.1% Waiting for Data to Become Available
36.0% Manual Data Entry
33.3% Aggregation of Data from External Sources (Custodians)
28.8% Recalculating and Verifying Data Accuracy
23.5% Aggregation of Data from Internal Sources (Accounting)
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 16
Cash Management
Treasury Workstation
Trade Execution Platform
Investment Accounting
Portfolio Performance & Risk Analytics
Investment Policy Compliance Monitoring
Spreadsheets Rely on Asset Manager Rely on Custodian ConsultantInstalled Software Web-Based Software Other
0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
57.1%
26.5%
33.6% 24.3%
44.7%
42.5%
40.6%
6WLYH[PVUHS�;VVSZ�HUK�7YVJLZZLZ
To learn more about organizations’ operational processes, we asked respondents
how—and with what tools—they handle core treasury and accounting functions
such as cash management, trade execution, investment accounting, portfolio
performance and risk analytics, and investment policy compliance monitoring.
The results indicated that corporations are more likely to use web-based systems
for some functions, but less sophisticated tools for others.
While some organizations still use spreadsheets for certain core treasury
functions, corporations are most likely to rely on web-based solutions for investment accounting
���������WVY[MVSPV�WLYMVYTHUJL�HUK�YPZR�HUHS`[PJZ����������HUK�PU]LZ[TLU[�WVSPJ`�JVTWSPHUJL�
monitoring (40.6%) (Fig. 31). Spreadsheets were the most common method for cash management
��������HUK�[YLHZ\Y`�^VYRZ[H[PVU�[`WL�M\UJ[PVUZ����������-VY�[YHKL�L_LJ\[PVU�M\UJ[PVUZ��
corporations mostly rely on their asset manager (33.6%), or use web-based software (24.3%).
:[HɉUN�HUK�9LZV\YJLZ
;OYV\NOV\[�[OPZ�YLWVY[��^L�OH]L�L_HTPULK�[OL�RL`�JOHSSLUNLZ�[OH[�JVYWVYH[L�ÄUHUJL�
departments face when performing core functions, and the impediments that keep them from
JVTWSL[PUN�ZVTL�[HZRZ�ZVVULY��.P]LU�HSS�[OL�Z[LWZ�[OH[�[YLHZ\Y`�HUK�HJJV\U[PUN�[LHTZ�T\Z[�
JVTWSL[L�VU�H�KHPS`�HUK�TVU[OS`�IHZPZ��ZVTL�JVTTVU�Z[HɉUN�HUK�YLZV\YJL�PZZ\LZ�HYPZL��
How Do You Handle the Following Functions?
Fig. 31
Best Practices Tip: A world-class investment accounting and reporting solution can simplify the process of compiling accurate data and assembling investment reports across multiple departments. Today’s automated and integrated solutions eliminate the burden of manual data entry and repeated data aggregation processes, yet remain flexible enough to deliver customized data to key constituents.
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 17
9LZWVUKLU[Z»�[VW�PTWLKPTLU[�[V�JVTWSL[PUN�RL`�VWLYH[PVUHS�WYVQLJ[Z�ZVVULY�^HZ�Z[HɉUN�HUK�
manpower (25.5%) (Fig. 32).�(Z�VUL�YLZWVUKLU[�WOYHZLK�P[!�¸[OL�]VS\TL�VM�^VYR�HUK�[OL�U\TILY�
VM�WLYZVUULS�PZ�H�JOHSSLUNL�¹�6[OLY�PTWLKPTLU[Z�[V�JVTWSL[PUN�[OLZL�[HZRZ�ZVVULY�PUJS\KLK!�
JVTWSL_P[`����������THU\HS�WYVJLZZLZ����������SLNHJ`�Z`Z[LTZ����������KLSH`Z�MYVT�WYV]PKLYZ�
� ������HUK�HJJ\YHJ`���������� ����PUKPJH[LK�V[OLY�YLHZVUZ�
;V�\UKLYZ[HUK�^OH[�Z[HɉUN�SL]LSZ�SVVR�SPRL�UV �̂�HZ�^LSS�HZ�[OL�M\[\YL�V\[SVVR�MVY�ÄUHUJL�
departments, we asked survey respondents about their investment accounting and reporting
resources. The results indicated that nearly 60% of all organizations require two or three
PUKP]PK\HSZ�MVY�PU]LZ[TLU[�HJJV\U[PUN�HUK�YLWVY[PUN�[HZRZ��^OPSL�Q\Z[�VUL�PU�Ä]L���������
VYNHUPaH[PVUZ�HZZPNU�VUL�Z[HɈ�TLTILY�[V�OHUKSL�[OPZ�RL`�M\UJ[PVU�(Fig. 33). 22.5% indicated
[OYLL�LTWSV`LLZ�������PUKPJH[LK�MV\Y��HUK�������PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�Ä]L�VY�TVYL�LTWSV`LLZ�HYL�
involved with investment accounting and reporting.
The hiring outlook for corporate treasuries remains stable-to-optimistic. 60.9% of respondents
PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�[OL`�L_WLJ[�Z[HɉUN�SL]LSZ�[V�YLTHPU�HIV\[�[OL�ZHTL�(Fig. 34). 36.0% indicated
[OL`�L_WLJ[�[V�OPYL�Z[HɈ��6US`������PUKPJH[LK�[OH[�[OL`�L_WLJ[�[V�YLK\JL�Z[HɈ�ZPaL��9LNHYKSLZZ�
VM�[OLPY�J\YYLU[�Z[HɉUN�ZPaL��OH]PUN�Z\ɉJPLU[�YLZV\YJLZ�PZ�PTWVY[HU[�MVY�JVYWVYH[L�ÄUHUJL�
operations, and it is often cited as a key reason why treasury and accounting teams cannot
accomplish core tasks more quickly.
*\YPV\Z�[V�ZLL�OV^�YLZWVUKLU[Z�^V\SK�YLHJ[�PM�[OL`�OHK�TVYL�YLZV\YJLZ·VY�IL[[LY�[VVSZ�HUK�
processes—to devote to core accounting and reporting tasks, we asked how respondents would
spend an extra hour in their day. Some indicated that they’d have more time for professional
[HZRZ�Z\JO�HZ�¸Z[HɈ�JVHJOPUN�¹�¸SVUN�[LYT�Z[YH[LNPaPUN�¹�¸PU]LZ[TLU[�YLZLHYJO�¹�¸PTWYV]PUN�
How Many Employees Dedicated to Investment and Reporting Tasks?
Hiring Outlook
1 20.3%
2 37.4%
3 22.5%
4 6.4%
5+ 13.4%
59.9%
60.9% Stable (Stay Much the Same)
3.1% Adverse (Downsizing)
36.0% Optimistic (We Expect to Grow)
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
What Are Your Key Impediments to Completing Key Operational Projects?
Fig. 32
25.5%
Staffing Complexity Manual Processes
Legacy Systems
17.0%14.2%
10.4%
Delays from Providers
9.4%
Accuracy
3.8%Other
19.8%
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 18
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) 30.8%
Ernst & Young 23.9%
Other 17.0%
KPMG 16.4%
Deloitte 11.9%
PULɉJPLUJPLZ�¹�HUK�TVYL��6[OLYZ�PUKPJH[LK�[OL`�^V\SK�ZWLUK�TVYL�[PTL�^P[O�UVU�^VYR�HJ[P]P[PLZ�
Z\JO�HZ�¸H[�OVTL�¹�¸V\[KVVYZ�¹�¸VU�[OL�NVSM�JV\YZL�¹�¸SLHYUPUN�H�UL^�SHUN\HNL�¹�VY�¸^P[O�T`�
RPKZ¹�(Fig. 35).
(\KP[�*OHSSLUNLZ
3HZ[S �̀�^L�HZRLK�YLZWVUKLU[Z�X\LZ[PVUZ�HIV\[�^OPJO�H\KP[VYZ�[OL`�\ZL�HUK�[OLPY�IPNNLZ[�H\KP[PUN�
JOHSSLUNLZ��7YLKPJ[HIS �̀�[OL�¸)PN�-V\Y¹�H\KP[�ÄYTZ�[VWWLK�[OL�SPZ[��7YPJL^H[LYOV\ZL*VVWLYZ�SLK�
^P[O��������MVSSV^LK�I`�,YUZ[� �@V\UN����� ����274.����������HUK�+LSVP[[L����� ���(Fig. 36).
������VM�YLZWVUKLU[Z�PUKPJH[LK�[OL`�\ZL�V[OLY�ÄYTZ.
;OL�VWLU�LUKLK�X\LZ[PVU·¸>OH[�HYL�`V\Y�IPNNLZ[�H\KP[PUN�JOHSSLUNLZ&¹·LSPJP[LK�H�^PKL�
]HYPL[`�VM�YLZWVUZLZ��/V^L]LY��ZL]LYHS�RL`�JOHSSLUNLZ�LTLYNLK!�LK\JH[PUN�H\KP[VYZ����������
HKTPUPZ[YH[P]L�KH[H�PZZ\LZ����������[PTL�JVUZ[YHPU[Z����������WYPJPUN���������H\KP[�[LHT�[\YUV]LY�
��������H\KP[PUN�JVTWSL_P[`���������HUK�JVZ[��������(Fig. 37).
Which Auditors Do You Use?
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
What Are Your Biggest Auditing Challenges?
15.7% Administrative and Data
17.1% Educating Auditors
Complexity 4.3%
Audit Turnover 7.1%
11.4% Time Constraints
8.6% None
8.6% Pricing
Other 7.1%
Cost 4.3%
Accuracy 2.9%
Accuracy 2.9%
Revenue 2.9%
Compliance 2.9%
SOX Compliance 1.4%
Scrutiny 1.4% Classification 1.4%
Best Practices Tip: Key employee risk, which exposes organizations to inefficiencies if a departing employee takes essential knowledge about data and processes with him or her, is a common problem. Putting processes and systems in place—and standardizing practices—to ensure that efficiencies remain, even if there is turnover within your team, is important. Many corporate finance departments perform internal employee rotations so more employees have a comprehensive understanding of all key department processes.
What Would You Do with an Extra Hour?
ANSWERING EMAIL
STAFF COACHING
AT THE GYM
LEARNING A NEW LANGUAGE
LONG-TERM STRATEGIZING
AT HOME WITH MY KIDS
BRAINSTORMINGAUTOMATING
PROCESSES
ANALYZING DATA
OUTDOORS
INVESTMENT RESEARCH
ON THE GOLF COURSE
ON THE BEACH
RELAXING
READING
IMPROVING INEFFICIENCIES Fig. 35
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 19
CONCLUSION
The 2014 Corporate Investment Benchmark Survey was designed to deliver a comprehensive review of the current investment
HUK�YLN\SH[VY`�LU]PYVUTLU[��PU]LZ[TLU[�HSSVJH[PVUZ�HUK�Z[YH[LNPLZ��VWLYH[PVUHS�WYVJLZZLZ��HUK�Z[HɉUN�JOHSSLUNLZ�HUK�
projections. With this, participants can better evaluate their own treasury and accounting operations, and benchmark their
PU]LZ[TLU[�Z[YH[LNPLZ�HNHPUZ[�[OLPY�WLLYZ»��;OL�Z\Y]L`�YL]LHSLK�H�U\TILY�VM�RL`�VIZLY]H[PVUZ�MVY�JVYWVYH[L�ÄUHUJL�WYVMLZZPVUHSZ!
� � (�SHYNL�ZLNTLU[�VM�[OVZL�Z\Y]L`LK�HYL�JVUJLYULK�^P[O�YLN\SH[VY`�JOHUNL��I\[�^L�ZLL�[^V�KPZ[PUJ[S`�KPɈLYLU[� � � HWWYVHJOLZ! a wait-and-see approach or a proactive strategy change
� � �;OLYL�PZ�JVUJLYU�^P[O�44-�YLMVYT��I\[�TVZ[�PUZ[P[\[PVUHS�PU]LZ[VYZ�J\YYLU[S`�ZVSLS`�PU]LZ[LK�PU�44-Z�[VKH`� � � HYL�JOVVZPUN�[V�Z[PJR�^P[O�[YHKP[PVUHS�PU]LZ[TLU[�[`WLZ
� � *VYWVYH[L�[YLHZ\Y`�[LHTZ�[OH[�HYL�^PSSPUN�[V�THRL�HU�PU]LZ[TLU[�Z[YH[LN`�JOHUNL�PU�[OL�J\YYLU[�PU[LYLZ[�YH[L�
environment are [OVZL�[OH[�OH]L�[OL�PUMYHZ[Y\J[\YL�HUK�Z[HɈ�PU�WSHJL�[V�ZJHSL�^P[O�JOHUNL
� � *SVZPUN�[OL�IVVRZ�HUK�I\PSKPUN�PU]LZ[TLU[�WHJRHNLZ�YLTHPUZ�[PTL�JVUZ\TPUN� despite pressure from
� � *-6Z�MVY�X\PJRLY�YLZ\S[Z
� � (JJV\U[PUN�[LHTZ��^OPSL�JVTMVY[HISL�^P[O�J\YYLU[�WYVJLZZLZ�HUK�Z`Z[LTZ��OH]L�L_WYLZZLK�H�KLZPYL�[V�
PUJYLHZL�LɉJPLUJPLZ�PU�WYVJLZZLZ�^OLYL�THU\HS�HJ[P]P[PLZ�HYL�Z[PSS�WYL]HSLU[
(SS�VM�[OL�Z\Y]L`�YLZ\S[Z�WVPU[�[V�H�ZWLJPÄJ�ULLK�MVY�[YLHZ\Y`�HUK�HJJV\U[PUN�WYVMLZZPVUHSZ�[V�HJJLZZ�HJJ\YH[L�PU]LZ[TLU[�
information more frequently than ever before. Time must be spent analyzing trusted data, not manually entering or processing
P[��*VTWHUPLZ�ZOV\SK�[HRL�HK]HU[HNL�VM�TVKLYU�[LJOUVSVN`�PU�VYKLY�[V�]HSPKH[L�HUK�YLJVUJPSL�KH[H�VU�H�KHPS`�IHZPZ��0U]LZ[TLU[�
PU�TVKLYU��^LI�IHZLK�ZVS\[PVUZ�^PSS�WH`�KP]PKLUKZ�PU�LUOHUJLK�LɉJPLUJ �̀�HJJ\YHJ �̀�HUK�[PTL�ZWLU[�VU�[OL�Z[YH[LNPJ�]LYZ\Z�[OL�
[HJ[PJHS��-VY�M\Y[OLY�LɉJPLUJ`�NHPUZ��HU�PU]LZ[TLU[�HJJV\U[PUN�ZVM[^HYL�ZVS\[PVU�ZOV\SK�IL�M\SS`�PU[LNYH[LK�^P[O�WLYMVYTHUJL��
YPZR��HUK�JVTWSPHUJL�TVUP[VYPUN��0U�[VKH`»Z�JVTWSL_�PU]LZ[TLU[�HJJV\U[PUN�LU]PYVUTLU[��HK]HUJLK�Z`Z[LTZ�HUK�ZLY]PJLZ�[OH[�
enable these improved processes are imperative.
www.clearwateranalytics.com 2014 Corporate Benchmark Survey Results | 20
About Clearwater Analytics Clearwater Analytics® is the leading provider of web-based investment accounting, reporting, and reconciliation services for corporate treasuries,
insurance companies, and investment managers. Clearwater aggregates, reconciles, and reports on over $1.3 trillion in assets across 25,000+ accounts
daily. For over a decade, Clearwater has helped thousands of corporate clients, such as Cisco, Facebook, Oracle, SanDisk, Starbucks and Yahoo!,
streamline their investment and accounting operations. The company remains committed to continuous improvement of the solutions it is providing
to current clients, while encouraging prospective firms to rethink how they approach their investment accounting and reporting challenges.
*VUULJ[�^P[O�*SLHY^H[LY�[V�SLHYU�TVYL�
���� �������
PUMV'JSLHY^H[LYHUHS`[PJZ�JVT
JSLHY^H[LYHUHS`[PJZ�JVT
SPURLKPU�JVT�JSLHY^H[LYHUHS`[PJZ
*SLHY^H[LY�(UHS`[PJZ, the market-leader in investment accounting and reporting, helps thousands
of corporations around the world improve their overall investment operations processes. Clearwater
has modernized investment accounting and reporting, replacing manual, Excel-based processes
with an automated, web-based approach. Clearwater provides corporate treasury and accounting
teams with the tools to eliminate manual processes, reduce close times, improve internal reporting and
communication, maximize performance, reduce risk, and pursue their desired investment strategy.
INQUIRIES208.901.7787 sales@clearwateranalytics.com info@clearwateranalytics.com
WORLDWIDE OFFICESBoise, Idaho New York, New York Edinburgh, U.K.
������*SLHY^H[LY�(UHS`[PJZ (SS�YPNO[Z�YLZLY]LK��;OPZ�TH[LYPHS�PZ�MVY�PUMVYTH[PVUHS�W\YWVZLZ�VUS �̀�*SLHY^H[LY�THRLZ�UV�^HYYHU[PLZ��L_WYLZZ�VY�PTWSPLK��PU�[OPZ�summary. All technologies described herein are either registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners in the United States and/or other countries.
03.2015
top related