creation, transformation, dissemination and preservation: advocating for scholarly communication

Post on 02-Nov-2014

2.440 Views

Category:

Education

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

As the fight for research grants intensifies and the pot of money decreases, librarians need to ensure that the topic of scholarly communication remains on the forefront, regardless of funding. Affording researchers avenues to widely share and publish their work to make it widely available should be a mission both in the library and at the highest levels of the institution. How can libraries make an impact? In this presentation two librarians, a consortia officer and vendor, will discuss how consortia have and continue to play a primary role in advocating for dissemination of information and scholarly communication. Additionally, they will discuss other tools that libraries/researchers can use as a method of collaboration, whether regional or international, and why it is essential for libraries to become part of the solution before they are left out in the cold. Please come prepared to discuss how your library is making an impact on this topic. Anne McKee Program Officer for Resource Sharing, Greater Western Library Alliance McKee received her M.L.S. from Indiana University, Bloomington and has had a very diverse career in librarianship. She has been an academic librarian, a sales rep for two subscription agencies and now a consortium officer for the past 13 years. A former President of NASIG, McKee is on the Serials Review Editorial Board, 3 publisher/vendor library advisory boards and strives to balance a busy career with an even busier family including a husband, 1 high schooler, 1 middle schooler, 2 dogs while being a first year newbie [and admittedly a rather bewildered] club volleyball mom: all this including wearing orthodontia! McKee is probably the only person you’ll meet with both an undergrad AND MLS in Library Science. Christine M. Stamison Senior Customer Relations Manager, Swets Addison, IL Christine Stamison, Senior Customer Relations Manager for Swets, has worked in various positions in the subscription agent industry for the past 20 years. Previously, she worked for 13 years in academic libraries, primarily in Serials, at both the University of Illinois at Chicago and at the University of Chicago Libraries. Christine received her Masters in Library and Information Services from Rosary College (now Dominican University) and is a regular lecturer for serials, collection development and technical services classes. When not working you can find Christine in the gym working with her trainer trying to get in shape for her upcoming vacation hiking up Machu Picchu and trekking around Easter Island.

TRANSCRIPT

Creation, Transformation, Dissemination and Preservation: Advocating forScholarly Communication

June 2013

NASIG 2013 Conference, Buffalo. NY

Christine M. Stamison, MLIS

Senior Customer Relations Manager

Scholarly Communication Definition

Scholarly communications is the:Creation

Transformation

Dissemination

Preservation of knowledge related to teaching, research and scholarly endeavors

Scholarly Communication

Scholarly communications is the:

Creation

TransformationDissemination

Preservation of knowledge related to teaching, research and scholarly endeavors

The Epitome of Scholarly Communication

2012 Noble Prize Winners

Physics - Serge Haroche, David J. Wineland• École Normale Supérieure,

Paris, France• University of Colorado,

Boulder, CO, USA

Chemistry - Robert J. Lefkowitz, Brian K. Kobilka • Duke University Medical

Center, Durham, NC, USA• Stanford University School of

Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

Physiology or Medicine - Sir John B. Gurdon, Shinya Yamanaka• Gurdon Institute, Cambridge,

United Kingdom• Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,

Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA

Economic Sciences - Alvin E. Roth, Lloyd S. Shapley• Harvard University,

Cambridge, MA, USA• University of California, Los

Angeles, CA, USA

Trend in Inter-Institutional Collaboration

Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.

Between 2000-2005

Examined 22 different fields of science

At least 60 % of publications co-authored.

88% of articles co-authored

80.5% articles Inter-institutional collaboration

Annual growth in publications 1996-2008

Source: Knowledge, Networks and Nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century, The Royal Society, 2011

In 2011, less than 26% of papers are the product of one institution alone, and over a third have multiple nationalities sharing authorship

Research Workflow

“Today, already in the early phases of the ‘knowledge chain’, the scientific community is being integrated into the discussion and evaluation of first results. Communication software makes it possible to integrate locally disperse researchers and research groups. Ideas are being generated in chat rooms via virtual discourse. Scientific preprints are being reviewed publicly, thus narrowing the qualitative gap that formerly existed between a preprint and the final publication”

Source: The Scholarly Communication of the Future: From Book Information to Problem Solving. Ball, Rafael 2011 - 27 - 1 – 1 Publishing Research Quarterly, pg. 9

Identify research opportunities

Find collaborators

Secure support

Review the literature

Collect research data

Analyze research data

Disseminate findings

Manage the research process

Research WorkflowMany platforms & tools try to support researcher workflows

• Researchers use social media to support the research lifecycle

• They may not use the

same tools • but social media most

definitely makes an impacton scholarly workflow

CIBER, University College LondonEmerald Group Publishing Ltd14 December 2010

Social MediaTools

Identify research opportunities

Find collaborators

Secure support

Review the literature

Collect research data

Analyze research data

Disseminate findings

Manage the research process

Where is the library in the digital workflow of research?

Main focus of libraries:Discoverability of content

Availability of content

Reference manager

LIBRARY

Research Collaboration Tools

Endnote – http://endnote.com/

Mendeley – www.mendeley.com

Zotero – www.zotero.org

Research Collaboration Features

Basic Package

Storage

Private Groups

Open Groups

Social Network

Collaboration Newsfeed

Annotation/Highlight

Personalized Paper Recommendations

Mobile App

Institutional Edition

Side By Side Comparison

Feature EndNote Mendeley Zotero

Basic Package $250 Free FreeStorage 1 GB 2 GB 300 MB

Private Groups ü ü ü

Open GroupsX ü ü

Social NetworkX ü ü

Collaboration Newsfeed

X ü ü

Annotation/Highlight ü ü X

Personalized Paper Recommendations

X ü ü

Mobile App ü ü ü

Institutional Edition

X ü X

You Be the Judge

http://guides.library.pdx.edu/managecitations - Portland State

http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/PUBL/endnote.html - Berkeley

http://libguides.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/content.php?pid=294548&sid=2418329 – Oxford

http://www.library.wisc.edu/citation-managers/comparison.html - U Wisconsin - Madison

Conclusion

The New Norm for Scholarly Communication:

Multiple authorship

Inter-institutional collaboration

Collaboration through social networks

The Evolving Norm for the Library:

Support Research Management

Aide Discovery of Collaborators

Analyze Research Data

And Now –Here’s Anne McKee

Dissemination and Preservation:A Consortium’s View of Scholarly Communication

NASIG Annual ConferenceJune, 2013

Anne E. McKee, MLS Program Officer for Resource Sharing

33 academic research libraries ◦ 17 states ranging from Illinois to Hawaii,

Texas to Washington State◦ All either RU/VH OR RU/H◦ Combined FTE of 850,000+

25 members of the Association of Public and Land Grant Colleges

25 members of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL)

12 members of the Association of American Universities (AAU)

12 Partners-Hathi Trust 501(c)3

GWLA-who we are!

GWLA and the Great Plains Network (GPN)◦ www.greatplains.net

SCOAP3-Worldwide effort among countries and consortia◦ http://scoap3.org/

Science Europe◦ http://www.scienceeurope.org/

Dissemination

Visiting Scholars-EduRoam◦ https://www.eduroam.org/

EDUCAUSE and Internet2 E-content Pilot Series◦ http://www.informationweek.com/education/instructional-

it/e-textbook-pilot-puts-college-books-in-c/240150097

FORCE11:◦ http://www.force11.org/

Dissemination con’t

HATHI Trust (to date 72 libraries or consortia are members)

WEST (Western Regional Storage Trust) 23 GWLA members are involved with WEST

Government Documents-GWLA and 5 other consortia/partners

PRESERVATION

BioOne.1 & .2 - Founded by Allen Press, American Institute of Biological Sciences, GWLA, SPARC and University of Kansas

TRAIL (Technical Reports Archive & Image Library): digitize, archive and make accessible federal reports issued prior to 1975: http://WWW.crl.edu/grn/trail

Western Waters Digital Library (WWDL):http://www.westernwater.org

OCCAMS Reader http://www.occamsreader.org

Scholarly Communication within GWLA

Colorado State: Open Access and Research Fund Scholarships:

http://libguides.colostate.edu/oars

Oregon State: Web of Science Faculty Articles Project: OrStU: https://wiki.library.oregonstate.edu/confluence/x/hYYKAQ

Univs of Colorado and Washington: Elementa: (Collaboration between BioOne and 5 universities) http://elementascience.org/

GWLA Member SC Projects

K-State: Open Textbook Initiative: http://www.lib.k-state.edu/open-textbook

UIC: Hosting & publishing open access journals: http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/

KU: Co-founded: Coalition of Open Access Policy Institutions (COAPI) http://www.sparc.arl.org/about/COAPI/

SC projects con’t

Half of ARL members responded to the survey

Of respondents, 93% stated they were involved in scholarly communication services

All but 3 had either a position or department devoted to SC

!ARL SPEC KIT 332:

ORGANIZATION OF SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION SERVICES, November 2012

However, when asked if their Position/department was the main SC office on campus, there was “a hesitation in staking a definitive leadership claim.”

Some said that other offices/departments on campus also contributed

Some said the library was the only one working on SC but were not recognized as THE leaders on campus

ARL Spec Kit 332 con’t

ALL respondents offered services to “advise and educate authors about copyright, retaining rights, etc.”

NONETHELESS

Altho the majority of copyright educators on academic campuses are librarians, only 25% actually have law degrees or have attended copyright training.

CALL TO ACTION!

Rather than waiting for it to come to us!

We need to ensure we are controlling the SC “ball”

THANKS!

(Shameless excuse to show my daughter’s AZ Sky Club team!)

Grace

CONTACT INFORMATION

Anne E. McKee, MLS Christine M. Stamison, MLISGWLA SWETSAnne@GWLA.org CStamison@US.Swets.ComNASIG member since 1990 NASIG member since 1992

top related