cs 3343: analysis of algorithms lecture 16: binary search trees & red- black trees

CS 3343: Analysis of Algorithms

Lecture 16: Binary search trees & red-black trees

Review: Hash tables

• Problem: collision

h(k2) = h(k5)

U(universe of keys)

K(actualkeys)

|U| >> K &|U| >> m

collision

Chaining

• Chaining puts elements that hash to the same slot in a linked list:

——

U(universe of keys)

K(actualkeys)

k1 k4 ——

k8 k6 ——

——

k7 ——

Hashing with Chaining

• Chained-Hash-Insert (T, x)– Insert x at the head of list T[h(key[x])].– Worst-case complexity – O(1).

• Chained-Hash-Delete (T, x)– Delete x from the list T[h(key[x])].– Worst-case complexity – proportional to length of list with

singly-linked lists. O(1) with doubly-linked lists.

• Chained-Hash-Search (T, k)– Search an element with key k in list T[h(k)].– Worst-case complexity – proportional to length of list.

Analysis of Chaining

• Assume simple uniform hashing: each key in table is equally likely to be hashed to any slot

• Given n keys and m slots in the table, the load factor = n/m = average # keys per slot

• Average cost of an unsuccessful search for a key is (1+) (Theorem 11.1)

• Average cost of a successful search is (2 + /2) = (1 + ) (Theorem 11.2)

• If the number of keys n is proportional to the number of slots in the table, = n/m = O(1)– The expected cost of searching is constant if is

constant

Hash Functions:The Division Method

• h(k) = k mod m– In words: hash k into a table with m slots using the slot given by

the remainder of k divided by m – Example: m = 31 and k = 78 => h(k) = 16.

• Advantage: fast• Disadvantage: value of m is critical

– Bad if keys bear relation to m – Or if hash does not depend on all bits of k

• Pick m = prime number not too close to power of 2 (or 10)

Hash Functions:The Multiplication Method

• For a constant A, 0 < A < 1:• h(k) = m (kA mod 1) = m (kA - kA)

• Advantage: Value of m is not critical• Disadvantage: relatively slower• Choose m = 2P, for easier implementation• Choose A not too close to 0 or 1• Knuth: Good choice for A = (5 - 1)/2• Example: m = 1024, k = 123, A 0.6180339887… h(k) = 1024(123 · 0.6180339887 mod 1) = 1024 · 0.018169... = 18.

Fractional part of kA

A Universal Hash Function

• Choose a prime number p that is larger than all possible keys

• Choose table size m ≥ n• Randomly choose two integers a, b, such that

1 a p -1, and 0 b p -1• ha,b(k) = ((ak+b) mod p) mod m• Example: p = 17, m = 6

h3,4 (8) = ((3*8 + 4) % 17) % 6 = 11 % 6 = 5• With a random pair of parameters a, b, the chance of a

collision between x and y is at most 1/m• Expected search time for any input is (1)

• Binary search trees

• Red-black trees

Binary Search Trees• Data structures that can support

dynamic set operations.– Search, Minimum, Maximum, Predecessor,

Successor, Insert, and Delete.

• Can be used to build– Dictionaries.– Priority Queues.

• Basic operations take time proportional to the height of the tree – O(h).

BST – Representation

• Represented by a linked data structure of nodes.• root(T) points to the root of tree T.• Each node contains fields:

– Key– left – pointer to left child: root of left subtree (maybe nil)– right – pointer to right child : root of right subtree.

(maybe nil)– p – pointer to parent. p[root[T]] = NIL (optional).– Satellite data

Binary Search Tree Property

• Stored keys must satisfy the binary search tree property. y in left subtree of x,

then key[y] key[x]. y in right subtree of

x, then key[y] key[x].

26 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 27

Inorder Traversal

Inorder-Tree-Walk (x)

1. if x NIL

2. then Inorder-Tree-Walk(left[x])

3. print key[x]

4. Inorder-Tree-Walk(right[x])

Inorder-Tree-Walk (x)

1. if x NIL

2. then Inorder-Tree-Walk(left[x])

3. print key[x]

4. Inorder-Tree-Walk(right[x])

How long does the walk take?

The binary-search-tree property allows the keys of a binary search tree to be printed, in (monotonically increasing) order, recursively.

26 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 27

Tree Search

Tree-Search(x, k)

1. if x = NIL or k = key[x]

2. then return x

3. if k < key[x]

4. then return Tree-Search(left[x], k)

5. else return Tree-Search(right[x], k)

Tree-Search(x, k)

1. if x = NIL or k = key[x]

2. then return x

3. if k < key[x]

4. then return Tree-Search(left[x], k)

5. else return Tree-Search(right[x], k)

Running time: O(h)

26 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 27

Example: search for 27

Iterative Tree Search

Iterative-Tree-Search(x, k)

1. while x NIL and k key[x]

2. do if k < key[x]

3. then x left[x]

4. else x right[x]

5. return x

Iterative-Tree-Search(x, k)

1. while x NIL and k key[x]

2. do if k < key[x]

3. then x left[x]

4. else x right[x]

5. return x

The iterative tree search is more efficient on most computers.The recursive tree search is more straightforward.

26 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 27

Finding Min & Max

Tree-Minimum(x) Tree-Maximum(x)1. while left[x] NIL 1. while right[x] NIL 2. do x left[x] 2. do x right[x]3. return x 3. return x

Q: How long do they take?

The binary-search-tree property guarantees that:» The minimum is located at the left-most node.» The maximum is located at the right-most node.

Predecessor and Successor

• Successor of node x is the node y such that key[y] is the smallest key greater than key[x].

• The successor of the largest key is NIL.• Search consists of two cases.

– If node x has a non-empty right subtree, then x’s successor is the minimum in the right subtree of x.

– If node x has an empty right subtree, then:• As long as we move to the left up the tree (move up through right

children), we are visiting smaller keys.

• x’s successor y is the node that x is the predecessor of (x is the maximum in y’s left subtree).

• In other words, x’s successor y, is the lowest ancestor of x whose left child is also an ancestor of x.

Pseudo-code for Successor

Tree-Successor(x)

1. if right[x] NIL

2. then return Tree-Minimum(right[x])

3. y p[x]

4. while y NIL and x = right[y]

5. do x y

6. y p[y]

7. return y

Tree-Successor(x)

1. if right[x] NIL

3. y p[x]

5. do x y

6. y p[y]

7. return y

Code for predecessor is symmetric.

Running time: O(h)

26 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 27

Example: successor of 56

Pseudo-code for Successor

Tree-Successor(x)

1. if right[x] NIL

3. y p[x]

5. do x y

6. y p[y]

7. return y

Tree-Successor(x)

1. if right[x] NIL

3. y p[x]

5. do x y

6. y p[y]

7. return y

Code for predecessor is symmetric.

Running time: O(h)

26 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 27

Example: successor of 28

Lowest node whose left child is an ancestor of x.

BST Insertion – Pseudocode

Tree-Insert(T, z)1. y NIL2. x root[T]3. while x NIL4. do y x5. if key[z] < key[x]6. then x left[x]7. else x right[x]8. p[z] y9. if y = NIL10. then root[t] z11. else if key[z] < key[y]12. then left[y] z13. else right[y] z

• Change the dynamic set represented by a BST.

• Ensure the binary-search-tree property holds after change.

• Similar to Tree-Search• Insert z in place of NIL

26 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 27

e.g. insert 195

Running time: O(h)

Tree-Delete (T, x)

if x has no children case 0

then remove x

if x has one child case 1

then make p[x] point to child

if x has two children (subtrees) case 2

then swap x with its successor

perform case 0 or case 1 to delete it

TOTAL: O(h) time to delete a node

Case 0

• X has no children

• e.g. delete 19056

26 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 27

Case 1

• X has one child

26 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 27

Case 2

• X has two children

26 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 27

Case 2

27 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 26

Swap with successor

Case 2

27 200

18 28 190 213

12 24 26

Case 0

Case 2

26 200

18 33 190 213

12 24 27

Case 2

27 200

18 33 190 213

12 24 26

28Swap with successor

Case 2

27 200

18 33 190 213

12 24 26

28Case 1

Case 2

27 200

18 33 190 213

12 24 28

Case 1

Correctness of Tree-Delete

• How do we know case 2 should go to case 0 or case 1 instead of back to case 2? – Because when x has 2 children, its successor is

the minimum in its right subtree, and that successor has no left child (hence 0 or 1 child).

• Equivalently, we could swap with predecessor instead of successor. It might be good to alternate to avoid creating lopsided tree.

Deletion – Pseudocode

Tree-Delete(T, z)/* Determine which node to splice out: either z or z’s successor. */1. if left[z] = NIL or right[z] = NIL2. then y z // case 0 or 13. else y Tree-Successor[z] // case 2/* Set x to a non-NIL child of x, or to NIL if y has no children. */4. if left[y] NIL5. then x left[y] 6. else x right[y]/* y is removed from the tree by manipulating pointers of p[y] and x

*/7. if x NIL8. then p[x] p[y]/* Continued on next slide */

Tree-Delete(T, z)/* Determine which node to splice out: either z or z’s successor. */1. if left[z] = NIL or right[z] = NIL2. then y z // case 0 or 13. else y Tree-Successor[z] // case 2/* Set x to a non-NIL child of x, or to NIL if y has no children. */4. if left[y] NIL5. then x left[y] 6. else x right[y]/* y is removed from the tree by manipulating pointers of p[y] and x

*/7. if x NIL8. then p[x] p[y]/* Continued on next slide */

Deletion – Pseudocode Tree-Delete(T, z) (Contd. from previous slide)

9. if p[y] = NIL

10. then root[T] x

11. else if y left[p[i]]

12. then left[p[y]] x

13. else right[p[y]] x

/* If z’s successor was spliced out, copy its data into z */

14. if y z

15. then key[z] key[y]

16. copy y’s satellite data into z.

17. return y

Tree-Delete(T, z) (Contd. from previous slide)

9. if p[y] = NIL

10. then root[T] x

11. else if y left[p[i]]

12. then left[p[y]] x

13. else right[p[y]] x

/* If z’s successor was spliced out, copy its data into z */

14. if y z

15. then key[z] key[y]

16. copy y’s satellite data into z.

17. return y

Querying a Binary Search Tree

• All dynamic-set search operations can be supported in O(h) time.

• h = (lg n) for a balanced binary tree (and for an average tree built by adding nodes in random order.)

• h = (n) for an unbalanced tree that resembles a linear chain of n nodes in the worst case.

Red-black trees: Overview

• Red-black trees are a variation of binary search trees to ensure that the tree is balanced.– Height is O(lg n), where n is the number of

nodes.

• Operations take O(lg n) time in the worst case.

Red-black Tree

• Binary search tree + 1 bit per node: the attribute color, which is either red or black.

• All other attributes of BSTs are inherited:– key, left, right, and p.

• All empty trees (leaves) are colored black.– We use a single sentinel, nil, for all the leaves

of red-black tree T, with color[nil] = black.– The root’s parent is also nil[T ].

Red-black Tree – Example 26

nil[T]

Remember: every internal node has two children, even though

nil leaves are not usually shown.

Red-black Properties

1. Every node is either red or black.2. The root is black.3. Every leaf (nil) is black.4. If a node is red, then both its children are

black.

5. For each node, all paths from the node to descendant leaves contain the same number of black nodes.

Height of a Red-black Tree

• Height of a node:– Number of edges in a longest path to a leaf.

• Black-height of a node x, bh(x):– bh(x) is the number of black nodes (including

nil[T]) on the path from x to leaf, not counting x.

• Black-height of a red-black tree is the black-height of its root.– By Property 5, black height is well defined.

Height of a Red-black Tree• Example:

• Height of a node:

h(x) = # of edges in a longest path to a leaf.

• Black-height of a node bh(x) = # of black nodes on path from x to leaf, not counting x.

• How are they related?– bh(x) ≤ h(x) ≤ 2 bh(x)

nil[T]

h=4bh=2

h=3bh=2

h=2bh=1

h=1bh=1

Height of a red-black treeTheorem. A red-black tree with n keys has height

h 2 log(n + 1).

Proof. (The book uses induction. Read carefully.)INTUITION:• Merge red nodes

into their black parents.

h 2 log(n + 1).

Proof. (The book uses induction. Read carefully.)

• This process produces a tree in which each node has 2, 3, or 4 children.

• The 2-3-4 tree has uniform depth h of leaves.

INTUITION:• Merge red nodes

Proof (continued)

• We haveh h/2, sinceat most halfthe leaves on any path are red.

• The number of leaves in each tree is n n 2h‘ – 1 log(n + 1) h' h/2 h 2 log(n + 1).

Operations on RB Trees

• All operations can be performed in O(lg n) time.

• The query operations, which don’t modify the tree, are performed in exactly the same way as they are in BSTs.

• Insertion and Deletion are not straightforward. Why?

Rotations

Left-Rotate(T, x)

Right-Rotate(T, y)

Rotations• Rotations are the basic tree-restructuring operation

for almost all balanced search trees.• Rotation takes a red-black-tree and a node, • Changes pointers to change the local structure, and• Won’t violate the binary-search-tree property.• Left rotation and right rotation are inverses.

Left-Rotate(T, x)

Right-Rotate(T, y)

Left Rotation – Pseudo-code

Left-Rotate (T, x)1. y right[x] // Set y.2. right[x] left[y] //Turn y’s left subtree into x’s right subtree.3. if left[y] nil[T ]4. then p[left[y]] x5. p[y] p[x] // Link x’s parent to y.6. if p[x] = nil[T ]7. then root[T ] y8. else if x = left[p[x]]9. then left[p[x]] y10. else right[p[x]] y11. left[y] x // Put x on y’s left.12. p[x] y

Rotation

• The pseudo-code for Left-Rotate assumes that – right[x] nil[T ], and– root’s parent is nil[T ].

• Left Rotation on x, makes x the left child of y, and the left subtree of y into the right subtree of x.

• Pseudocode for Right-Rotate is symmetric: exchange left and right everywhere.

• Time: O(1) for both Left-Rotate and Right-Rotate, since a constant number of pointers are modified.

Reminder: Red-black Properties

1. Every node is either red or black.2. The root is black.3. Every leaf (nil) is black.4. If a node is red, then both its children are

black.

5. For each node, all paths from the node to descendant leaves contain the same number of black nodes.

Insertion in RB Trees• Insertion must preserve all red-black properties.• Should an inserted node be colored Red? Black?• Basic steps:

– Use Tree-Insert from BST (slightly modified) to insert a node x into T.

• Procedure RB-Insert(x).

– Color the node x red.– Fix the modified tree by re-coloring nodes and

performing rotation to preserve RB tree property.• Procedure RB-Insert-Fixup.

InsertionRB-Insert(T, z)

1. y nil[T]

2. x root[T]

3. while x nil[T]

4. do y x

5. if key[z] < key[x]

6. then x left[x]

7. else x right[x]

8. p[z] y

9. if y = nil[T]

10. then root[T] z

11. else if key[z] < key[y]

12. then left[y] z

13. else right[y] z

RB-Insert(T, z)

1. y nil[T]

2. x root[T]

3. while x nil[T]

4. do y x

5. if key[z] < key[x]

6. then x left[x]

7. else x right[x]

8. p[z] y

9. if y = nil[T]

10. then root[T] z

11. else if key[z] < key[y]

12. then left[y] z

13. else right[y] z

RB-Insert(T, z) Contd.

14. left[z] nil[T]

15. right[z] nil[T]

16. color[z] RED

17. RB-Insert-Fixup (T, z)

RB-Insert(T, z) Contd.

14. left[z] nil[T]

15. right[z] nil[T]

16. color[z] RED

17. RB-Insert-Fixup (T, z)

How does it differ from the Tree-Insert procedure of BSTs?

Which of the RB properties might be violated?

Fix the violations by calling RB-Insert-Fixup.

Insertion – Fixup

• Problem: we may have one pair of consecutive reds where we did the insertion.

• Solution: rotate it up the tree and away…Three cases have to be handled…

Case 1 – uncle y is red

• p[p[z]] (z’s grandparent) must be black, since z and p[z] are both red and there are no other violations of property 4.

• Make p[z] and y black now z and p[z] are NOT both red. But property 5 might now be violated.

• Make p[p[z]] red restores property 5.• What’s the new problem now? • The next iteration has p[p[z]] as the new z (i.e., z moves up 2 levels).• When to stop?

p[p[z]]

z is a right child and p[z] is a left child here. Similar if z is a left child or if p[z] is a right child.

Case 2 – y is black, z is a right child

• Left rotate around p[z], p[z] and z switch roles now z is a left child, and both z and p[z] are red.

• Takes us immediately to case 3.• Similar if z is a left child and p[z] is a right child

p[z] p[z]

Case 3 – y is black, z is a left child

• Make p[z] black and p[p[z]] red.• Then right rotate on p[p[z]]. Ensures property 4 is

maintained.• No longer have 2 reds in a row.• p[z] is now black no more iterations.• Similar if both z and p[z] are right children

Insertion – Fixup

RB-Insert-Fixup (T, z)1. while color[p[z]] = RED

2. do if p[z] = left[p[p[z]]] // p[z] is a left child

3. then y right[p[p[z]]] // y: uncle

4. if color[y] = RED

5. then color[p[z]] BLACK // Case 1

6. color[y] BLACK // Case 1

7. color[p[p[z]]] RED // Case 1

8. z p[p[z]] // Case 1

RB-Insert-Fixup (T, z)1. while color[p[z]] = RED

2. do if p[z] = left[p[p[z]]] // p[z] is a left child

3. then y right[p[p[z]]] // y: uncle

4. if color[y] = RED

5. then color[p[z]] BLACK // Case 1

6. color[y] BLACK // Case 1

7. color[p[p[z]]] RED // Case 1

8. z p[p[z]] // Case 1

Insertion – Fixup

RB-Insert-Fixup(T, z) (Contd.)9. else if z = right[p[z]] // color[y]

RED10. then z p[z] // Case 211. LEFT-ROTATE(T, z) // Case 212. color[p[z]] BLACK // Case 313. color[p[p[z]]] RED // Case 314. RIGHT-ROTATE(T, p[p[z]]) // Case 315. else (if p[z] = right[p[p[z]]])(same as 3-1416. with “right” and “left” exchanged)17. color[root[T ]] BLACK

RB-Insert-Fixup(T, z) (Contd.)9. else if z = right[p[z]] // color[y]

RED10. then z p[z] // Case 211. LEFT-ROTATE(T, z) // Case 212. color[p[z]] BLACK // Case 313. color[p[p[z]]] RED // Case 314. RIGHT-ROTATE(T, p[p[z]]) // Case 315. else (if p[z] = right[p[p[z]]])(same as 3-1416. with “right” and “left” exchanged)17. color[root[T ]] BLACK

Algorithm Analysis• O(lg n) time to get through RB-Insert up to

the call of RB-Insert-Fixup.

• Within RB-Insert-Fixup:– Each iteration takes O(1) time.– Each iteration but the last moves z up 2 levels.– O(lg n) levels O(lg n) time.– Thus, insertion in a red-black tree takes O(lg n)

time.– Note: there are at most 2 rotations overall.

RB-Insert Example

Example:• Insert x =15.

88 1111

IDEA: Insert x in tree. Color x red. Only red-black property 4 might be violated. Move the violation up the tree by recoloring until it can be fixed with rotations and recoloring.

Insertion into a red-black tree

Example:• Insert x =15.• Recolor, move the

violation up the tree.88 1111

Case 1

violation up the tree.88 1111

88 1111

violation up the tree.• RIGHT-ROTATE(18).

Case 2

violation up the tree.• RIGHT-ROTATE(18).

violation up the tree.• RIGHT-ROTATE(18).• LEFT-ROTATE(7)

Case 3

Insertion into a red-black treeIDEA: Insert x in tree. Color x red. Only red-black property 4 might be violated. Move the violation up the tree by recoloring until it can be fixed with rotations and recoloring.

88 1111

violation up the tree.• RIGHT-ROTATE(18).• LEFT-ROTATE(7)

88 1111

violation up the tree.• RIGHT-ROTATE(18).• LEFT-ROTATE(7) and recolor.

88 1111

violation up the tree.• RIGHT-ROTATE(18).• LEFT-ROTATE(7) and recolor.

Deletion• Deletion, like insertion, should preserve all the RB

properties.• The properties that may be violated depends on

the color of the deleted node.– Red – OK. Why?– Black?

• Steps:– Do regular BST deletion.– Fix any violations of RB properties that may result.– We will skip. Read on your own.

Analysis

• O(lg n) time to get through RB-Delete up to the call of RB-Delete-Fixup.

• Within RB-Delete-Fixup:– O(lg n) time.

cs 3343: analysis of algorithms lecture 16: binary search trees & red- black trees

Documents

kruse/ryba ch101 object oriented data structures binary...

trees basic concepts of trees implementation of trees...

binary search trees - eecs.yorku.ca trees.pdf · search...

vanithakiotcsehome.files.wordpress.com · web viewtrees...

binary trees and binary search trees

binary trees, binary search trees and avl trees

trees eeng212 algorithms and data structures. trees outline ...

chapter 10 chapter 10 binary trees. outline 1. general...

1 binary trees binary trees binary search trees binary...

cisc 235 topic 3 general trees, binary trees, binary search...

cs 1031 trees a quick introduction to graphs definition of...

chapter 5 trees: outline introduction representation of...

trees general trees binary trees binary search trees avl...

binary trees

binary trees, binary search trees

trees by charl du plessis. contents basic terminology basic...

binary trees 2 overview trees. terminology. traversal of...

trees 2 binary trees

binary trees...

© 2004 goodrich, tamassia trees1 lecture 04 trees topics...