cslf annual meeting...apr 16, 2008  · – cslf financial issues task force meeting (new delhi,...

1

Cape Town, South AfricaApril 16, 2008

CSLF Annual MeetingReport by the CSLF Secretariat

John PanekDeputy Director

CSLF Secretariat

2

CSLF Members

CSLF Member Countries represent58% of world population70% of world energy production75% of world energy consumption76% of world CO2 emissions76% of world GDP

Sources: IMF (GDP 2005 data) and EIA (2004 data)

2

3

Overview of Secretariat Activities

CSLF Structure

Website Updates

Meetings and Workshops

Stakeholder Registry

Workshop Surveys

CSLF Projects

3

4

CSLF StructurePOLICY GROUPChair: United States

Vice Chair: United Kingdom

Vice Chair: South Africa TECHNICAL GROUPChair: Norway

Vice Chair: Canada

Vice Chair: India

CSLFSecretariat Task ForcesTask Forces

5

CSLF StructurePOLICY GROUPChair: United States

Vice Chair: United Kingdom

Vice Chair: South Africa TECHNICAL GROUPChair: Norway

Vice Chair: Canada

Vice Chair: India

CSLFSecretariat Task ForcesTask Forces

Legal Issues Task Force (Australia chair)Financial Issues Task Force (India chair)Capacity Building Task Force (United States chair)

6

Policy Group Task Forces

Financial Issues Task ForceMembers: India (chair), Australia, European Commission, France, Korea, Netherlands, South Africa, United Kingdom, and United States

Capacity Building Task ForceMembers: United States (chair), Australia, Canada, Colombia, European Commission, France, India, Italy, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and United Kingdom

7

CSLF StructurePOLICY GROUPChair: United States

Vice Chair: United Kingdom

Vice Chair: South Africa TECHNICAL GROUPChair: Norway

Vice Chair: Canada

Vice Chair: India

CSLFSecretariat Task ForcesTask Forces

Projects Interaction and Review Team (Australia, U.K., E.C. co-chairs)Storage Capacity Standards Task Force (Canada chair)Risk Assessment Task Force (United States chair)

8

Technical Group Task ForcesProjects Interaction and Review Team (PIRT)

Members: United Kingdom (chair), Australia, Canada, Denmark, European Commission, Germany, India, Netherlands, Norway, Saudi Arabia, and United States

Storage Capacity Estimation Task ForceMembers: Canada (chair), Australia, Brazil, European Commission, France, Norway, United Kingdom, United States

Risk Assessment Task ForceMembers: United States (chair), Australia, Canada, France, India, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, and IEA GHG

9

CSLF Web SiteContinued to upgrade the site.Created a new search tool for the entire site. Posted press releases on CCS projects, programs, and events to promote CCS awareness.Posted presentations and materials from these meetings and workshops:– Capacity Building in Emerging Economies Workshop (Pittsburgh, USA,

May 7-11, 2007)– 2nd Capacity Building in Emerging Economies Workshop (Porto Alegre,

Brazil, October 18-19, 2007) – 2nd IEA-CSLF Workshop on Near Term Opportunities for Carbon

Capture and Storage (Oslo, Norway, June 21-22, 2007) – Review and Identification of Standards for CO2 Storage Capacity

Estimation Task Force Meeting (Paris, France, 25 March 2007). – CSLF Financial Issues Task Force Meeting (New Delhi, India, 11-12

October 2007). – Capacity Building Task Force Meeting (Oslo, Norway, June 20, 2007).– Capacity Building Task Force Meeting (Calgary, Canada, November 27-

28, 2007).

CSLF Web Site Search Function

Search Function

Presentations

13

SPIR –Table of Contents

Task Force Reports

Policy Group

Capacity Building Task Force

Financial Issues Task Force

Technical Group

Projects Interaction and Review Team (PIRT)

Storage Capacity Estimation Task Force

Risk Assessment Task Force

Other Reports

Report from CSLF Secretariat

Report from Stakeholders

14

Strategic Plan Implementation Report (SPIR)

Status Reports from CSLF Recognized ProjectsAlberta Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery Project

CASTOR

CO2 Capture Project, Phase 2 (CCP2)

CO2 GeoNet Project

CO2CRC Otway Project

CO2SINK

ENCAP

Frio Brine Pilot Project

Geologic CO2 Storage Assurance at In Salah, Algeria

IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project

International Test Center (ITC) CO2 Capture with Chemical Solvents

Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships

Regional Opportunities for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in China

Zama Acid Gas EOR, CO2 Sequestration, and Monitoring Project

15

SPIR –Table of Contents

CSLF Activities and WorkshopsMarch 2007 – April 2008

3rd IEA-CSLF Workshop on Near Term Opportunities for Carbon Capture and Storage, Calgary, Alberta: November 27–28, 2007

1st Capacity Building Workshop, Pittsburgh, PA: May 7–11, 2007

2nd Capacity Building Workshop, Porto Alegre, Brazil: October 18–19, 2007 CSLF Annual Meeting,

Cape Town, South Africa: April 13–17, 2008

Financial Issues Task Force, Delhi, India: October 11–12, 2007

3rd Capacity Building Workshop, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia: January 29, 2008

CSLF Annual Meeting, Paris, France: March 25–28, 2007

2nd IEA-CSLF Workshop on Near Term Opportunities for Carbon Capture and Storage, Oslo, Norway: June 21–22, 2007

17

Paris

CSLF Events Timeline

March2007

April2008

Pittsburgh

OsloDelhi

PortoAlegre

Calgary

Al Khobar

CapeTown

18

Stakeholder Growth

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dec. '05 April '06 Oct. '06 Mar '07 Jan. '08 Mar. '08 Apr '08

Registrycomesonline

Delhi

London

Paris

Al Khobar

Cape Town

19

Stakeholder Registry34 stakeholders have registered since the Paris CSLF meeting.120 registered stakeholders, as of April 7, 2008 Stakeholders by Industry:

– Technology suppliers – 26%– Government – 15%– Association – 15%– Energy resource company – 13%– Environmental – 9%– Consulting/law – 10%– Other – 12%

Type of organization:– Governmental – 16%– Non-governmental – 78%– Multilateral – 7%

Areas of Interest:– CO2 capture – 81%

– CO2 transport – 60%

– CO2 storage – 88%

– Environmental policy – 83%

– Energy policy – 86%

– Economics – 72%

– Legal/regulatory issues – 82%

– Capacity building – 63%

– Financing – 51%

20

Stakeholders by Industry

Government, 15%

Association, 15%

Energy Resource Company, 13%

Environmental, 9%

Consulting/Law, 10%

Other, 12%

Technology Suppliers, 26%

21

Type of Organization

Non-governmental,

78%

Multilateral, 7%Governmental,

16%

22

Areas of Interest

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

CO2 Storag

eEne

rgy P

olicy

CO2 Cap

ture

Enviro

nmental

Policy

Legal/

Regula

tory I

ssue

sEco

nomics

CO2 Tran

spor

t

Capac

ity B

uilding

Financin

g

23

Overcoming Barriers to CCS Deployment Workshop Survey

Date of Workshop: March 27, 2007Location: IFP Offices, Paris, FranceNumber of Attendees: Approx. 120

24

CCS Deployment WorkshopSurvey – Overall Ratings

6g

6f

6e

6d

6c

6b

6a

5

4

3

2

1

12345Ratings: 5 = best, 1 = worst

QuestionNumber

= Weighted Average

25

CSLF Project Recognition Survey

Questions to Stakeholders:1. Has your organization ever considered

submitting a project to the CSLF for recognition?

2. What can the CSLF do to encourage project sponsors to apply for CSLF recognition?

3. What are the reasons for not seeking CSLF recognition?

4. Is your organization presently a sponsor of any of the 19 CSLF-recognized projects?

26

CSLF Project Recognition Survey

Questions to Project Sponsors:1. What do you see as the value of CSLF

recognition to a project sponsor?

2. What can be done to make CSLF recognition more attractive for project sponsors?

27

CSLF Projects Overview

28

Project Technologies

19 CSLF Recognized Projects (16 Active Projects; 3 Completed Projects)

Project Technologies:– CO2 Capture – 10 projects – CO2 Transport – 3 projects – CO2 Storage with Enhanced Oil Recovery – 4 projects– CO2 Storage with Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Recovery – 4 projects– CO2 Storage with Enhanced Natural Gas Recovery – 4 projects– CO2 Storage with No Secondary Recovery – 8 projects– CO2 Measurement, Monitoring, and Verification (MMV) of Storage – 13

projects– Identification of potential CO2 storage sites – 4 projects– Identification of target CO2 sources – 4 projects– Economic and/or Environmental Evaluation and/or Risk Assessment –

13 projects28

29

Project Technologies68% 68%

53%

42%

21% 21% 21% 21% 21%16%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

EER E

val

MMV

Captu

reNo 2

nd R

ecov

ery

ECMBR

ENGR

EOR

ID S

inks

ID S

ourc

esTr

ansp

ort

Percentage of CSLF-Recognized projects showcasing a given technology 29

30

Completed CSLF Projects

Report: “Best Practice Manual” summing up results from the previous SACS project and CO2STORE (http://www.co2store.org, look in “Archive”)

Denmark, Germany, Norway, and United Kingdom

CO2STORE

Project duration: February 2004 – February 2008

CASTOR 2 solvent under test (Sept. – Dec. 2007)

Four site studies in progress (modeling, monitoring design, …)

Final CASTOR workshop 22-24 January 2008 with ENCAP, CACHET and DYNAMIS EU projects.

Final technical reporting in progress

Conclusion: enhancement of coalbed methane recovery and storage of CO2 is feasible in the anthracitic coals of Shanxi ProvinceCurrent bi-lateral country funding phase (Canada and China) completedRecommendation 1: proceed to multi-well pilot at test siteRecommendation 2: evaluate deeper coal seams at alternative sitesProject paper in the International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Volume 1(2007) p. 215-222, available at http://www.sciencedirect.com

Denmark, Spain, Austria, The Netherlands, Norway

CASTOR

ChinaChina’s CBM Technology/CO2 Sequestration Project

Project Location

30

31

Cape Town Closing Dinner

31

32

CSLF Recognition Awards

Completed Projects to be Honored at the Closing Dinner on Wednesday April 16th. – China’s CBM Technology/CO2

Sequestration Project– CO2STORE– CASTOR

33

Backup Slides

34

CSLF Annual MeetingParis, France, March 25–28, 2007

Back to Timeline

35

Pittsburgh, PA May 7–11, 20071st Capacity Building Workshop

Back to Timeline

36

Back to Timeline

Oslo, Norway, June 21–22, 2007

2nd IEA-CSLF Workshop on Near-Term Opportunities for CCS

37

Delhi, India, October 11–12, 2007Financial Issues Task Force

Back to Timeline

38

Porto Alegre, Brazil, October 18–19, 20072nd Capacity Building Workshop

Back to Timeline

39

Calgary, Alberta, November 27–28, 2007

3rd IEA-CSLF Workshop on Near Term Opportunities for Carbon Capture and Storage

Back to Timeline

40

Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia, January 27–29, 2008

CSLF Technical Group Meeting

Back to Timeline

41

CSLF Annual MeetingCape Town, South AfricaApril 13–17, 2008

Back to Timeline

42

Overview

Purpose:Gather feedback on the workshop’s strengths and weaknesses. Learn what attendees would like to see in future workshops.

43

Overview

Attendees were asked about:Level of success in identifying opportunities and obstacles;Appropriateness of workshop content;Value of the poster session;Overall success of the workshop in meeting expectations;Interests of workshop attendees;Amount of presentations and panel discussions;Ideas for future workshops; andOverall impressions.

44

Key Findings

The workshop was worthwhile.85% thought topics were appropriate (neutral or higher).

Most were interested in technical as well as policy aspects.Unanimous support for more time for panel discussions. Majority would like to see fewer presentations.Overall Impressions: – More time for audience interaction and panel discussion.– Fewer presentations and posters. – Scheduling the workshop in the middle of a CSLF meeting

ensures best possible attendance.

45

CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Stakeholders

1. Has your organization ever considered submitting a project to the CSLF for recognition?

Yes (7)

Intend to, after funding decisions are made (2)

No (2)

46

CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Stakeholders

2. What can the CSLF do to encourage project sponsors to apply for CSLF recognition?More could be done to promote endorsed projects, to disseminate information on their progress and to facilitate collaboration between project participants Clarify and communicate the benefits of CSLF recognitionUse the CSLF R&D projects to coordinate the development of policy and regulatory frameworks Widen areas of interest, and not restrict to "conventional" CO2capture & storageSeek out projects and solicit applications

47

CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Stakeholders

3. What are the reasons for not seeking CSLF recognition?

Benefits of doing so are not made clearAdministrative burden outweighs apparent benefitsAwaiting funding decisions/financial supportFor R&D projects there is currently little apparent pay-off in terms of project promotion and collaborationLack of awareness of CSLF

48

CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Stakeholders

4. Is your organization presently a sponsor of any of the 19 CSLF-recognized projects?

Yes (7)

No (4)

49

CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Project Sponsors

1. What do you see as the value of CSLF recognition to a project sponsor?opportunity for to seek partnerships and collaborations

distinguishes projects from rest of the pack

“Prestige.”

Access to US DOE co-funding, or other potential funding

50

CSLF Project Recognition Survey –Project Sponsors2. What can be done to make CSLF recognition more

attractive for project sponsors?Pay for travel to present results at CSLF meetingsInvite the project sponsors to present the progress, opportunities and technology advancement of a project to the CSLF audience Show clearly that the outputs from the research projects are used for policy developmentIncrease the profile of projects and encourage CSLF members to work cooperatively rather than developing competing projects.Multi-lateral agreements among member countries that facilitate the project collaborations under those agreements. Seed funding for initiating collaborative projects through CSLF recognitionThere needs to be some way of CSLF demonstrating its value through national members or by providing better access to endorsed projects.