davis junior high

Post on 16-Jan-2016

37 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

DAVIS JUNIOR HIGH. Academic Achievement Meeting November 9, 2010. Davis Junior High School. Davis Junior High School MEAP 2005-2009 7 th & 8 th Grade. 7 th Grade increased 8% UCS increased 3% Cohort increased 4% UCS Cohort increased 4%. 8 th Grade increased 2% UCS increased 5%. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

DAVIS JUNIOR HIGH

Academic Achievement Meeting

November 9, 2010

Davis Junior High School

0

200

400

Davis Junior High Demographics

Economic Dis

LFAY

Black

Hispanic

Asian

Special Education

Economic Dis 33 116 166 188 178 266

LFAY 20 32 28 78 79

Black 7 36 28 46 45 41

Hispanic 8 19 25 25 24 21

Asian 3 23 21 22 23 18

Special Education 90 91 90 92 97 128

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

92

Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 7th & 8th Grade

8th Grade increased 2%

UCS increased 5%

7th Grade increased 8%

UCS increased 3%

Cohort increased 4%

UCS Cohort increased 4%

Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20097th & 8th Grade7th Grade

remained the same

UCS 7th Grade increased 5%

Cohort increased 7%

UCS Cohort increased 8%

8th Grade increased 5%

UCS 8th Grade increased 13%

Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20097th & 8th Grade 7th Grade

increased 13%

UCSincreased 10%

Cohort decreased 6%

UCS Cohort increased 18%

8th Grade increased4%

UCS increased 24%

Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 7th & 8th Grade

8th Grade decreased 5%

UCS decreased 3%

7th Grade increased 1%

UCS increased 1%

Cohort decreased 5%

UCS cohort decreased 7%

AYP 8th grade

54%

Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 7th & 8th Grade

7th Grade remained the same

Cohort decreased 3%

UCS increased 3%

UCS Cohort decreased 5%

8th Grade increased 10%

UCS Increased 2%

AYP 8th grade 54%

Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20097th & 8th Grade

7th Grade increase 25%

UCS increase 12%

Cohort decreased 11%

UCS cohort decreased 6%

8th Grade decreased 12%

UCS decreased5%

AYP 8th grade

54%

Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 8th Grade8th Grade

economically dis. remained the same

UCS 8th Grade decreased 2%

8th Grade economically dis. increased 11%

UCS 8th Grade economically dis. increased 5%

Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20098th Grade

8th Grade decrease 6%

UCS 8th Grade decreased 2%

Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 9th Grade9th Grade

decreased 10%

UCS 9th Grade decreased 2%

9th Grade economically dis. decreased 1%

UCS 9th Grade economically dis. stayed the same

Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 9th Grade

9th Grade decreased 18%

UCS 9th Grade decreased 1%

Tier II Indicators

Reading Tier II Indicator

Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient on the MEAP tests in reading, writing, math, science

and social studies.Reading Tier II Indicator: Increase the number of students who score at proficient or higher in

Reading.S.M.A.R.T. Goal: The percentage of Davis 7th, 8th and 9th grade students scoring proficient or higher in Reading will increase as measured by the school-wide expository assessment from ____% to _____%.

Reading Tier II Indicator

7th Grade GeographyBased on a variety of reading assessments, the 7th grade teachers have identified several deficiencies in comprehension of informational text:

MEAP – Inference, Locating Supporting EvidenceExplore Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Generalizations, Locating Supporting Evidence, VocabularySchool-wide Expository Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Inference, Locating Supporting Evidence

Reading Tier II Indicator

MEAP GRAPH

Reading Tier II Indicator

8th Grade U.S. HistoryBased on a variety of reading assessments, the 8th grade teachers have identified several deficiencies in comprehension of informational text:

MEAP – Generalizations, Identifying Main IdeasExplore Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Generalizations, Locating Supporting Evidence, VocabularySchool-wide Expository Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Inference, Accessing Prior Knowledge, Metacognition, Vocabulary, Cause and Effect

Reading Tier II Indicator

• 9th Grade World Histriry• Based on a variety of reading

assessments, the 9th grade teachers have identified several deficiencies in comprehension of informational text:– MME – Generalizations,

Identifying Main Ideas, Inference

– Explore Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Generalizations, Locating Supporting Evidence, Vocabulary

– School-wide Expository Test – Inference, Chronological Order, Cause and Effect, Identifying Main Ideas.

Reading Tier II Indicator

Reaching Higher

By 2014, all students in the Utica Community Schools will meet or exceed proficiency standards in English language arts (reading and writing), math, science, social studies, fine arts and career and technical education, as defined by national, state and UCS standards.

Reaching Higher

Davis Junior High Action Plan 2010-2011

Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient on the MEAP tests in reading, writing, math,

science and social studies.Writing Tier II Indicator: Increase the number of students who score at proficient or higher in

writing.

7th Grade Writing

S.M.A.R.T. GoalPercentage of 7th grade students who achieve a score of 4 (out of a 6 point scale) or higher on the HRW Online Expository Essay assessment will increase from __% to __% by June 2011.

8th Grade Writing

S.M.A.R.T. GoalPercentage of 8th grade students who achieve a score of 4 (out of a 6 point scale) or higher on Compare/Contrast Essay assessment will increase from __% to __% by June 2011.

9th Grade Writing

S.M.A.R.T. GoalPercentage of 9th grade students who achieve a score of 4 (out of a 6 point scale) or higher on the ACT Persuasive Essay assessment will increase from 30% to 60% by June 2010.

Math Tier II Indicator

Science

Tier II Strategies Persons Responsible Implementations, Resources, Start and End Dates

Progress Monitoring

All science teachers will use the 6+1 writing rubric to assess the students’ written lab report conclusions.

Persons Responsible: Science TeachersResources: 6+1 rubric Sept. 7, 2010-June 17, 2010

All students will complete one written lab report conclusion per marking period.

All science teachers will review and demonstrate multiple choice test taking strategies to interpret tables, charts, and graphs.

Persons Responsible: Science TeachersResources: MEAP Review and ACT Review PacketsSept. 7, 2010-June 17, 2010

All teachers will include interpreting tables, charts, and graphs on all quizzes and test.Also use sample questions as bell ringers.

All science teachers will model and demonstrate reading strategies mini lessons to help the students understand the textbook.

Persons Responsible: Science TeachersResources: RA Binder and science textbookSept. 7, 2010-June 17, 2010

All teachers will model and demonstrate reading strategies weekly.

Science

Special Education

top related