debra s. baker and donald g. huggins

Post on 13-Jan-2016

48 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Nutrient Trends in Reference Streams of the Central Plains. Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins. Central Plains Center for BioAssessment. Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas. 30 th Annual Great Plains Limnology Conference, Lincoln, NE, 10 – 11 October 2003. Nutrients in Streams. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Debra S. Baker and Donald G. HugginsDebra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins

CC

P B

Central Plains Center for BioAssessmentKansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas

Nutrient Trends in Reference Nutrient Trends in Reference Streams of the Central PlainsStreams of the Central Plains

30th Annual Great Plains Limnology Conference, Lincoln, NE, 10 – 11 October 2003

Nutrients in Streams• Clean Water Action Plan 1998 - USEPA initiative to

establish regionally-based nutrient criteria for waterbodies via Regional Technical Assistance Groups (RTAGs).

• Develop a dataset of nutrient levels found in “reference” or least impacted streams of USEPA Region 7.

• Should criteria be single values for the entire EPA Region, or should criteria be based on a subset of stream characteristics, such as ecoregion?

Stream Sites

Parameters• in situ:

DO, turbidity, pH, conductivity

• Lab analysis:

TN, NH4-N, NO3-N,

TP, PO4-P,

chlorophyll a, phaeophytin a

Hypothesis• Streams will show affiliations based on some suite of

water quality characteristics (e.g. nutrient concentrations).

• Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was used to determine probable relationships among the parameters.

• Resulting factor scores were used as input for clustering analyses to identify stream groupings and compare resulting spatial differences to ecoregions.

Analyses

Resulting Dataset

• May 1999 – June 2002

• 94 streams, 522 records, taken at base flow

• TN: 5 – 20410 g/l; Median: 1180 g/l• TP: 2.5 – 1320 g/l; Median: 86 g/l• Chlorophyll a: 0.5 – 216 g/l; Median: 4 g/l

PCA Analysis

• Factor 1 TP, PO4-P

• Factor 2 TN, NO3-N

• Factor 3 chlorophyll a, phaeophytin a

• Factor 4 pH, DO

• Factor 5 conductivity

• Factor 6 NH4-N

• Calculated medians of the 6 PCA factor scores for each of the 94 sites.

• K-means cluster analysis on all PCA factors – resulted in 6 clusters.

• K-means cluster analysis on just the nutrient factors – resulted in 6 clusters.

K-means Cluster Analysis

Clustering on All Factors

Clustering on Nutrient Factors

N & P Factors

-3

-1

0

1

2

-3 -1 0 1 2high nitrogen factor 2 low

hig

h

ph

osp

ho

rus

fact

or

1

lo

w

cluster

123456

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1 2 3 4 5 6

clusters

med

ian

TN

ug

/l

0

50

100

150

200

250

med

ian

TP

ug

/l

TN

TP

N & P Factors

-3

-1

0

1

2

-3 -1 0 1 2high nitrogen factor 2 low

hig

h

ph

osp

ho

rus

fact

or

1

lo

w

cluster

123456

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1 2 3 4 5 6

clusters

med

ian

TN

ug

/l

0

50

100

150

200

250

med

ian

TP

ug

/l

TN

TP

N & P Factors

-3

-1

0

1

2

-3 -1 0 1 2high nitrogen factor 2 low

hig

h

ph

osp

ho

rus

fact

or

1

lo

w

cluster

123456

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1 2 3 4 5 6

clusters

med

ian

TN

ug

/l

0

50

100

150

200

250

med

ian

TP

ug

/l

TN

TP

N & P Factors

-3

-1

0

1

2

-3 -1 0 1 2high nitrogen factor 2 low

hig

h

ph

osp

ho

rus

fact

or

1

lo

w

cluster

123456

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1 2 3 4 5 6

clusters

med

ian

TN

ug

/l

0

50

100

150

200

250

med

ian

TP

ug

/l

TN

TP

N & P Factors

-3

-1

0

1

2

-3 -1 0 1 2high nitrogen factor 2 low

hig

h

ph

osp

ho

rus

fact

or

1

lo

w

cluster

123456

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1 2 3 4 5 6

clusters

med

ian

TN

ug

/l

0

50

100

150

200

250

med

ian

TP

ug

/l

TN

TP

N & P Factors

-3

-1

0

1

2

-3 -1 0 1 2high nitrogen factor 2 low

hig

h

ph

osp

ho

rus

fact

or

1

lo

w

cluster

123456

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1 2 3 4 5 6

clusters

med

ian

TN

ug

/l

0

50

100

150

200

250

med

ian

TP

ug

/l

TN

TP

N & P Factors

-3

-1

0

1

2

-3 -1 0 1 2high nitrogen factor 2 low

hig

h

ph

osp

ho

rus

fact

or

1

lo

w

cluster

123456

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1 2 3 4 5 6

clusters

med

ian

TN

ug

/l

0

50

100

150

200

250

med

ian

TP

ug

/l

TN

TP

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

CG

P

CIP

CO

T DA FH IRL

MA

P

NG

L

NG

P

NSH O

H

ST

WC

B

WH

P

Ecoregions

med

ian

TN u

g/l

0

50

100

150

200

250

med

ian

TP u

g/l

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1 2 3 4 5 6

Clusters

med

ian

TN u

g/l

0

50

100

150

200

250

med

ian

TP u

g/l

TN

TP

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

CG

P

CIP

CO

T

DA FH

IRL

MA

P

NG

L

NG

P

NS

H

OH

ST

WC

B

WH

P

med

ian

TN

ug

/l

TN nonref

TN ref

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

CG

P

CIP

CO

T

DA

FH

IRL

MA

P

NG

L

NG

P

NS

H

OH ST

WC

B

WH

P

med

ian

TP

ug

/l

TP nonref

TP ref

Conclusions

• Nutrient levels varied by ecoregion.

• Streams that we clustered by nutrient factors and independently of ecoregion showed ecoregional affiliations.

Future Study

• Seasonal influences

• Chlorophyll a

• USEPA Region7 Nutrient RTAG

• Macroinvertebrates

• Watershed and land use

top related