depending on the others: producing and using geospatial...

Post on 23-Jul-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Markus Jobst

Depending on the Others: Producing and Using Geospatial Information in Service-Oriented Architectures

LBS/SOMAP 2014, Vienna

2

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Outline

■ Geospatial examples of production and modern usage

■ Characteristics of the SOA approach

■ Management methodologies and toolbox

■ Conclusion

3

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Maps - UI, Devices, Gadgets

[2014] Google GLASS

4

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Einleitung

[2014] www.splashmaps.net

5

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Modern Map ProductionKey-requirements approaching geospatial infrastructures

■ Driving parameters (key requirements) in Modern Map Production are

□ Time/Actuality

□ Accessibility

□ Quality (geometric, semantic, pragmatic)

6

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Extended Information Sources

■ Direct embedding VGI in map production workflows; public as a sensor and geoinformation source (unknowingly or actively)

■ Public/user as quality management

□ receiving feeback for quality improvements or

□ observing changes

[2014] Data Mining, www.openstreetmap.org[2014] Information Tracks, www.52north.org

7

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Extending geospatial networks

www.linkeddata.org

■ Internet of Things

■ Linked Data

■ GeoIntelligence

www.silabs.com

8

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Geospatial networks/infrastructuresAdditional frameworks

■ Realtime Visualization of geospatial situations and cross-linked sensors (e.g. traffic, air- and water quality)

■ Apparent scalelessness; smooth transitions between „scales“

■ Enormous data amounts

http://www.opengeospatial.org/pub/www/files/SensorCollage.jpg2014 Richter, www.hpi3d.de

9

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)?

10

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

SOA approachCharacteristic/paradigm

Simplification of

■ Publish

■ Search and Find,

■ Access (technical, organisational and legal),

■ Bind / Use of geoinformation (e.g. for service-oriented map production)

11

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

■ Decentralized networked infrastructure

■ Responsible stakeholders for single system components

■ combined stewardship

■ Ubiquitous accessibility

■ Publishing and maintenance by the responsible provider

□ sharpening competencies

□ reducing/controlling redundancy

SOA approachImpact

12

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Geospatial obstacles within the SOA approach

13

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Overcoming geospatial obstacles within the SOA approach

■ Supranational (apriori) homogenisation of geospatial information preparation

■ Defining/preparing concrete use cases of visualization, reports or even adaptive maps

= product definition/ development

14

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

[2014] www.ethiopianreview.com

Quality with SOA/GDIAdditional quality considerations/requirements

■ Infrastructure quality

□ Performance and consistency of search- and result delivery

□ Performance and capacity ofservices and data access

□ Standard conformity

□ Safety and reliance

□ Availability

■ „Freedom for use cases“

□ Support of serendipity effects: generating added values by „free“ orchestration of data and services

15

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

[2014] sdi4philippines.blogspot.com

16

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

SOA approach

■ Dependency: a SOA behaviour

□ unconsidered system component dependencies (impact on planning and implementation)

□ missing/not working system components(e.g. based on architecture variations; load balancing; ..)

□ system failures

□ maintenance downtime

□ ...

17

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Rolle der NMCA

18

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

SOA approach

Governance of geospatial infrastructure

maintenance/development?

19

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Identification of Requirements

■ Further development of map production automating

■ Process networks of geoinformation- and map production

■ Modified and more efficient concepts of an ongoing change management of the infrastructure components

■ Education: ongoing recreation of trainings and open accessibility

20

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

■ Measureability of system dependencies (product states, revision cycles, license-, version-, software- and format dependencies)

■ Measureability of dependencies of use (dependencies of applications and their use)

Evaluating impact and possibilities

21

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

■ Visualization and „decision cockpit“ for process and dependency governance

Visualization

22

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Management tools

only theory?

23

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Management tools Proof of concept

Monitoring and evaluation of the external situation

Monitoring and evaluation of the internal situation

Modification of the external picture

Modification of the internal situation

Process landscapeincl. dependencies

Assessment of all information and deviating decisions

24

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Management tools Proof of concept – balanced geo-product scorecard

Importance of a product(usage, market situation, relevance, image, ...)

Island position / quality characteristics(covered area, quality constraints, ...)

Actual map production processes(hw-sw dependencies, ressources, complexity, ...)

Potential of change(Organisational effort, financial effort, additional demand, ...)

25

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Management tools Product-based process landscape

26

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

conclusion?

27

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Conclusion

■ SOA approach highly needed in

modern map production

■ „Dependency on the others“ is a main characteristic within SOA

■ Appropriate management structures are urgently needed (stewardship, cross-organisational process- and change management)

■ Geospatial specific management tool derivations

■ e.g.: impact of OGD requirements on evaluation parameters?

28

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Resume

29

LBS-SOMAP 2014, Vienna | Markus Jobst

Outline

■ Geospatial examples of production and modern usage

■ Characteristics of the SOA approach

■ Management methodologies and toolset selection

■ Conclusion

markus@jobstmedia.at

top related