e-traceability to single window implementation - unescap.org to single window... · regional study...
Post on 04-Sep-2019
10 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Training on Electronic Traceability for Agricultural Trade Facilitation and Smallholder Integration
16-18 June 2014
Thimpu, Bhutan
Sangwon Lim
Trade and Investment Division
United Nations ESCAP
e-Traceability to
Single Window
Implementation
2
What is Single Window
Chamber
Importer Exporter
Shipper Forwarder
Customs
Inspection
Single
Window
“A facility that allows parties involved in trade
and transport to lodge standardized
information and documents with a single
entry point to fulfill all import, export, and
transit-related regulatory requirements. If
information is electronic, then individual data
should only be submitted once.”
Source: UNECE Rec. 33, APEC Report
3
FROM TO
PORT
CUSTOMS
WHARFINGER
CUSTOMS
BROKER
CARRIER
HAULIER
PORT
AUTHORITY
CONSIGNEE LINE AGENT
CONSIGNOR OGA
PORT
CARRIER CUSTOMS
HAULIER
PORT
AUTHORITY
CONSIGNEE
CONSIGNOR OGA
LINE AGENT
CUSTOMS
BROKER
WHARFINGER
Why Single Window
4
Benefits of Single Window
Effective & Efficient Deployment of
Resources
Correct Revenue
Yield
Improved Trader
Compliance
Enhanced Security
Increased Integrity &
Transparency
Faster Clearance &
Release
Predictable Application and
Explanation of Rules
Cutting Costs through
Reducing Delays
Effective & Efficient Deployment of
Resources
Increased Transparency
Single
Window
Traders Government
5
After introducing the SW in Singapore, the time to process trade documents was
reduced from 4 days to 15 minutes.
Thailand has implemented a number of trade facilitation measures such as
procedural reforms and customs modernization as groundwork for SW development.
These measures have eliminated redundant processes and reduced the number of
days for export from 24 days (in 2006) to 14 days (in 2009).
In Hong Kong, China annual savings from the automated information transaction
system are estimated at HK$1.3 billion.
The total savings for the business community from the use of the uTradeHub, which
provides an automated information transaction system in the Republic of Korea,
estimate to be 1 billion and 818.9 million USD. These include savings from
transmission cost by using e-documents, improving productivity by automating
administrative work and improved management, storage and retrieval of information
and documents through use of Information Technology.
Benefits Materialized through Single
Window Implementation
6
Political
Will
(Mandate)
Stakeholder
Coordination
Legal
Framework
Business
Model
Technical
Issues
Critical Factors in Single Window
Implementation
7
Political Will and
Strategic Mandate
Business Case
Sustainability
Competitive Edge
Economic Impact
Political
Buy-in
8
Korean Case: Political
Commitment at the Top Level
Chair : Vice Minister of MOCIE
Administrative Committee
Chair : Prime Minister
National e-Trade Committee
Chair : Dr. Jung Uck, Seo
Private e-Trade Committee
Korea e-Trade Facilitation Center
Platform
W/G Finance
W/G
Logistics
W/G Marketing
W/G
Global
W/G
Law
W/G
e-TP PM
e-TDR
Law Reform
e-L/C
e-Nego
RFID
e-L/G
e-D/O
e-MP
e-Catalog
Solutions
e-C/O
e-B/L
APEC,ASEM
Bilateral Networking
Source: Hee-Chul Jung, “Republic of Korea” UN/CEFACT Single Window Repository
9
Manufacturing Logistics improvement
Infrastructure and logistics network
optimization
Logistics service international-ization
Trade facilitation enhancement
Capacity building
5 4 3 2 1
2. Manufacturing logistics Action Plan
3. Trade logistics Action Plan 5. Logistics data system Action
Plan
6. Logistics human resource development Action Plan
1. Urgent logistics Development AP 2007
World Class Logistics System to support Thai Business and Industries Vision
Objectives
Strategic Agendas
1. Cost Efficiency / Responsiveness / Reliability and Security
2. Business value creation
4. Single Window e-Logistics Development Plan (SWeL)
Source: Suriyon (NESDB), ESCAP/ECE SW Workshop, Mongolia, 2009
Thai Case: Linked to
Strategic Mandate
11
Source: Hoang Huy Hoang, “The Implementation of National Single Window and ASEAN Single Window in
Vietnam” (2009/SCCP/SWWG/WKSP4/011), paper presented at the APEC SCCP SWWG Capacity Building
Workshop, Singapore, 6-8 April 2009.
Vietnam Case: Inclusive
Inter-agency Coordination
Platform
12
Thai Case: Broad
Stakeholder Engagement
Source: Suriyon (NESDB), ESCAP/ECE SW Workshop, Mongolia, 2009
13
Legal Framework
Enabling Legal Environment
Legal basis for
Single Window
e-Archiving
e-Documents Liability
Data quality Data protection
Data access
authority
Identification,
authentication &
authorization
Single Window
structure &
organization
IPR and
data ownership
Competition Arbitration and
dispute resolution
Source: UN/CEFACT Recommendation 35
14
Single Window Models
(System View)
Customs
Inspection
Chamber
Hybrid Model
Source: Partly from APEC Single Window Implementation Guide, July 2007
15
Trader A
Trader B
Then, how should this
arrangement be viewed?
SW 1
SW 2
Customs
Inspection
Chamber
Port
16
Type Arrangement Remarks
Establishment
Public Govt. budget or donor funding (grant/loan)
Private Private Sector Investment (BOT, etc.)
PPP Joint Funding
Operation Government Customs. Ministry of Trade, etc.
Service provider Private Sector
Service Basis Free of Charge Government budget
Fee Based Service charge
Single Window Models
(Establishment and Operation View)
17
Malaysia Case: Private
sector leadership in PPP
Source: Yong Voon Choon, “Sharing the Malaysian Experience,” APTFF 2010, October, 2010
18
Singapore Case: Evolutionary
Model of Single Window
Source: Singapore Customs, “Evolution of Singapore’s Single Window,” April, 2009
19
Technical Issues in Single Window
(Step-by-step Implementation Approach)
Business
Process Analysis
Data
Harmonization
ICT
Application
20
Border
Political
Will
Stakeholder
Coordination
Legal
Framework
Business
Model
Technical
Issues
Political
Will
Stakeholder
Coordination
Legal
Framework
Business
Model
Technical
Issues
Common Int’l
Standard
Coordination
Capacity
Gaps
Public/Private
Cooperation
Beyond national Single
Window
21
ESCAP Resolution 68/3 and Its
Implementation
Enabling paperless trade and the cross-border recognition of electronic data
and documents for inclusive and sustainable intraregional trade facilitation
ESCAP Member Countries requests the secretariat
To support and facilitate the process for the development of regional
arrangements on the facilitation of cross-border paperless trade
Implementation of the Resolution
Regional study and expert review
Member consultations (3 subregional and 1 regional meetings)
Report to the third session of Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI)
Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Meeting on a Regional Arrangement for the
Facilitation of Cross-border Paperless Trade (22-24 April 2014): decided to
create an interim intergovernmental Steering Group on Cross-border Paperless
Trade Facilitation
22
Capacity Building Support Framework
in Single Window Implementation
Manage
ment
Level Capacity
Building
Policy
Level
Operation
Level Stakeholder
Commitment
Public
Awareness
Planning Government
Decision
Institutional
Mechanism
Implemen-
tation
Technical
Issues
23
UN Network of Experts
for Paperless Trade in Asia-Pacific Region
“ongoing community of knowledge and practice
to facilitate the implementation of single
window and paperless trade in the Asia-
Pacific region ”
24
Single Window implementation
is not one time show.
Source: UNNExT Single Window Implementation and Planning Guide, 2012
25
Single Window implementation
and E-Traceability
Source: UN/CEFACT Buy-Ship-Pay Model
Produc
tion
Consu
mption
Single Window
E-Traceability
26
SW scope:
Regulatory (public)
International trade transaction
SW Expansion: integration of traceability through value-added
services (cargo tracking, SME service, data pipeline, etc.)
Implication:
International trade transaction portion (Inter-agency coordination)
Traceability across borders (intergovernmental)
28
Thank you
www.unescap.org/
www.unnext.unescap.org/
top related