ebm presentation

Post on 22-Jan-2015

1.207 Views

Category:

Health & Medicine

7 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

EBM PresentationGroup No. 3

蔡依達1 陳冠良2 張弘正3

1. Department of surgery, VGHTC2. Department of internal medicine, TAFGH3. Department of family medicine, LSH

Scenario

Scenario

80 y/o male with diabetes for 20 years

Scenario

80 y/o male with diabetes for 20 years

s/p right BK amputation 3 years ago

Scenario

80 y/o male with diabetes for 20 years

s/p right BK amputation 3 years ago

Left foot chronic ulcer, ABI: 0.6, angio: femoral a. stenosis

Scenario

80 y/o male with diabetes for 20 years

s/p right BK amputation 3 years ago

Left foot chronic ulcer, ABI: 0.6, angio: femoral a. stenosis

Afraid of amputation !!!

Scenario

80 y/o male with diabetes for 20 years

s/p right BK amputation 3 years ago

Left foot chronic ulcer, ABI: 0.6, angio: femoral a. stenosis

Afraid of amputation !!!

Femoral popliteal a. bypass VS stents

Question

Question

In patients with critical limb ischemia, is the amputation rate of endovascular stent less than of bypass surgery?

PICO

PICO

P Patients with limb ischemiaI StentsC Bypass surgeryO Amputation rate

Background Knowledge

Background Knowledge

Treatment of chronic critical limb ischemia

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

Bypass surgery

Thrombolytic therapy

Background Knowledge

Treatment of chronic critical limb ischemia

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

Bypass surgery

Thrombolytic therapy

Aortoiliac vs infrainguinal disease

Refined PICO

Refined PICOP Patients with limb ischemiaI AngioplastyC Bypass surgeryO Amputation rate

Refined PICO

Type: Therapy

P Patients with limb ischemiaI AngioplastyC Bypass surgeryO Amputation rate

Refined PICO

Type: Therapy

Level of evidence

P Patients with limb ischemiaI AngioplastyC Bypass surgeryO Amputation rate

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

RCT Cohort Case-control Case series

Database: PubMed

Keywords(limb ischemia) AND bypass AND angioplasty AND amputation

Database: PubMed

Keywords(limb ischemia) AND bypass AND angioplasty AND amputation

Results: 175

Database: PubMed

Database: PubMed

Keywords(limb ischemia) AND bypass AND angioplasty AND amputation*[MeSH]

Database: PubMed

Keywords(limb ischemia) AND bypass AND angioplasty AND amputation*[MeSH]

LimitsHumans, Clinical Trial, Meta-analysis, Randomized Controlled Trial

Database: PubMed

Keywords(limb ischemia) AND bypass AND angioplasty AND amputation*[MeSH]

LimitsHumans, Clinical Trial, Meta-analysis, Randomized Controlled Trial

Results: 8

Database: PubMed

Database: PubMed

Database: PubMed

Paper

Why?

Why?

Multicentric randomized trialsurgery-first (n=228) or angioplasty-first (n=224) strategy

Why?

Multicentric randomized trialsurgery-first (n=228) or angioplasty-first (n=224) strategy

Infrainguinal disease

Why?

Multicentric randomized trialsurgery-first (n=228) or angioplasty-first (n=224) strategy

Infrainguinal disease

Primary Endpoint: Amputation-free survival

Critical Appraisal

Critical AppraisalTrial duration: 5.5 years

Critical AppraisalTrial duration: 5.5 years

Eight individuals (1.7%) were lost to follow-up

Critical AppraisalTrial duration: 5.5 years

Eight individuals (1.7%) were lost to follow-up

Baseline data

Critical Appraisal

Critical AppraisalAfter 6 months, no significant difference in amputation-free survival (48 vs 60 p’t; hazard ratio: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.49-1.07)

Critical AppraisalAfter 6 months, no significant difference in amputation-free survival (48 vs 60 p’t; hazard ratio: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.49-1.07)

No difference in health-related quality of life

Critical AppraisalAfter 6 months, no significant difference in amputation-free survival (48 vs 60 p’t; hazard ratio: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.49-1.07)

No difference in health-related quality of life

One third higher hospital costs in surgery-first strategy for the first year

Validity of Critical Appraisal

Validity of Critical Appraisal

病人的分組是隨機分派的嗎? Yes

Validity of Critical Appraisal

病人的分組是隨機分派的嗎? Yes

分派的方法是否保密? Yes

Validity of Critical Appraisal

病人的分組是隨機分派的嗎? Yes

分派的方法是否保密? Yes

追蹤是否完整? Yes

Validity of Critical Appraisal

病人的分組是隨機分派的嗎? Yes

分派的方法是否保密? Yes

追蹤是否完整? Yes

治療方法對病患、醫護人員、是否 blinded?No

Validity of Critical Appraisal

病人的分組是隨機分派的嗎? Yes

分派的方法是否保密? Yes

追蹤是否完整? Yes

治療方法對病患、醫護人員、是否 blinded?No

除了研究治療項目以外,其他的治療是否相同?Yes

Validity of Critical Appraisal

病人的分組是隨機分派的嗎? Yes

分派的方法是否保密? Yes

追蹤是否完整? Yes

治療方法對病患、醫護人員、是否 blinded?No

除了研究治療項目以外,其他的治療是否相同?Yes

兩組在治療開始時的 baseline 是否相似?Yes

Level of Evidence

Level of Evidence

Application to our case

Application to our case

Angioplasty = Stents ?

Application to our case

Angioplasty = Stents ?

根據文獻看法: outcome 相似、較低 costs

Application to our case

Angioplasty = Stents ?

根據文獻看法: outcome 相似、較低 costs

文獻證據中的治療我們能不能執行: Yes

!anks!a

top related