environmental & siting r&d program peer review meeting bob thresher & karin sinclair,...

Post on 11-Jan-2016

217 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Environmental & Siting R&D Program

Peer Review Meeting

Bob Thresher & Karin Sinclair, NRELLaura Miner, DOE

Bonnie Ram, Energetics Incorporated

Golden, Colorado • May 10, 2006

A Subsidiary of VSE Corporation

Environmental & Siting is Related to Program Mission

• Primarily land-based focus

• Barriers relate to cost of energy and deployment delays

• Potential showstoppers

• Reasonable permitting requirements

• Public perception and involvement• Collaborative research and peer

review process• Establish framework for

comparative risk assessment

FY06 Budget Allocation$900,000

• NREL technical oversight, research, workshops

• NWCC wildlife & siting workgroups and publications

• Bat Wind Energy Cooperative• Prairie birds & grassland

species• Offshore Wind Energy

Collaborative (DOE, MTC, GE)

Environmental FY06

Selected FY06 Activities ($900,000)Priority Challenges

Environmental & Social Impacts

Public Perception

Improved Tools for Industry and Government

Consistent Policies and Leadership

Grassland and Shrub Steppe Species Collaborative Bat and Wind Energy Collaborative ($75K) Siting Workshop results

Offshore and onshore policy and research support Wildlife Research Meeting V State stakeholder workshops ($575K)

Mitigation tool box, Nocturnal Methods and Metrics, and Risk Assessment framework ($250K)

DOE-Minerals Management Service MOU Offshore Wind Energy CollaborativeState legislation briefings and materials ($50K)

Challenges & Measures

Priority Challenges

Environmental & Social Impacts

Public Perception

Improving Tools for Industry and Government

Consistent Policies and Leadership

Progress Measures

Improved assessments of species and population impacts; better understanding of relative and cumulative impacts

Studies show risks and impacts reflect public concerns; greater awareness of the benefits of wind to national energy security

Reasonable permitting requirements, studies, & process; siting strategies

Policy and enforcement measures that support the sustainable development of wind energy

Are Wind Projects Impacting Population Viability of Greater Prairie-Chickens?

• $165,000 for FY06• NWCC – Oversight

Committee• KSU Research

Team• NREL - Technical

Monitor

Collaboration between Industry, Government, University, and NGOs

• FPL Energy• Horizon Wind Energy• Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks• National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL)• PPM Energy• The Nature Conservancy, Kansas &

Oklahoma

Are Wind Projects Affecting Bat Populations in Certain Regions?

• Formed Cooperative in 2004

– NREL, BCI, AWEA, FWS

• 6 week intensive mortality

study

• June 2005 Draft Report

• Acoustic deterrent tests

• Ultrasound sample

• 2006 Pre-construction

monitoring

National Wind Coordinating Committee (NWCC FY06) Blueprint

• Update Measures & Metrics document (nocturnal focus)

• Oversight of prairie birds & grassland species collaborative

• Initiate mitigation tool box

• Explore benefits of applying ecological risk assessment framework

NWCC Meetings and Workshops

• Air Quality Issue Forum, Oct 20th, Lansing, MI• NWCC Business Meeting #36, Nov 30th, Washington, DC• Technical Considerations in Siting Wind Developments

Research Meeting, Dec 1-2, Washington, DC• Wildlife Workgroup Core Group Meeting & Risk Assessment

Workshop, Feb 27-28, Washington, DC• Conduct monthly scheduled conference calls

UPCOMING• Wind Energy Contributions in a National Energy Strategy

Issue Forum, May 18-19, Washington, DC• Wildlife Workgroup Core Group: Gaps Prioritization Meeting,

June 20-21, Boulder, CO• Wildlife Research Meeting VI, Nov 14-16, San Antonio, TX

NREL and DOE Keeping Up with Workshops and Activities

2005• NAS study• GAO Report• DOE/NREL Environmental Strategy• WPA – Raleigh, NC• NYSERDA Wind & Wildlife Working Group

2006• AWEA/Audubon Wildlife in California• Columbus, OH – IAFWA• Toledo, OH USFWS/EPA• Colorado State, Fish and Game Services

Selected Offshore Meetings and Workshops

2005• Raleigh, NC• Mineral Management

Service – tutorial & regulatory

• IEA Annex 23

2006• Great Lakes Offshore Wind• NJ Public Hearing• Houston’s OTC• OWEMES

Atlantic Ocean

Gulf of Mexico

Cape Wind Associates

Winergy

LIPA & Florida Power and Light

W.E.S.T. LLC

Hull Municipal

Southern Company

Green Energy Ohio

Toronto Hydro

Offshore Activities

• MMS Actions– New regulations expected– Memorandum of Understanding– Scoping meetings on PEIS

• NREL Actions– White Paper– SeaCon Studies– IEA Annex 23 Workshop

• Offshore Wind Energy Collaborative business plan

Cape Wind Tower --- 179 feet

Ian Baring-gould
Based on the “Issues of Strategic Importance” addressed in the beginning of the presentation, provide questions that will lead the discussion to discuss these issues. Add more slides to facilitate discussion of strategic questions or address specific points.

Offshore Project Challenges• Complex siting process in

the ocean• New regulations may

create a one-stop-shop• Better understanding of

public acceptance• Conduct comparative risk

assessment framework• Need government support

for Before-After-Control-Impact (BACI) studies

• Put demonstrations in the water

Operation (2003):

Response distance:

day = c. 3000mday = c. 3000mnight = c. 1000mnight = c. 1000m

Proposed Technical and OutreachActivities FY07

• Support and fully participate in the collaboratives for avian and bat species– Identify cost effective technologies and strategies to mitigate impacts to

the site ecology• Facilitate Interagency Efforts

– Offshore regulations with MMS– Fish and Wildlife Service– DOD radar hazards– NEPA analysis

• State/Great Lakes/Regional Actions– Offshore– Land-based guidelines – Wind Powering America – regional focus groups

• International – IEA Annex 23– R&D studies

National Activities to Watch• National Academy of Sciences Report• US Fish and Wildlife Guidelines• State Guidelines for land-based projects• Wildlife Society Report• Mineral Management Service regulations and NEPA

Strategic Challenges

Offshore • International lessons learned• Risk assessment and multiple uses• Complex siting process• Public education

Land-Based• Proliferation of

State Guidelines• Identifying

Priorities and Gaps

• Comparative Risks

• Cumulative Risks

• Addressing Surprises – Radar

• Public acceptance

More than 400MW added in next 10 years

Public benefit charge for renewable energy

Bonnie Rambram@energetics.com

Thank you DOE and NREL for supporting this research

A Subsidiary of VSE Corporation

top related