evaluating classifiers

Evaluating Classifiers

Reading:

T. Fawcett, An introduction to ROC analysis, Sections 1-4, 7

(linked from class website)

Evaluating Classifiers

• What we want: classifier that best predicts unseen data

• Assumption: Data is “iid” (independently and identically distributed)

Accuracy and Error Rate

• Accuracy = fraction of correct classifications on unseen data (test set)

• Error rate = 1 − Accuracy

How to use available data to best measure accuracy?

Split data into training and test sets.

But how to split?

Too little training data: Don’t get optimal classifier

Too little test data: Measured accuracy is not correct

One solution: “k-fold cross validation”

• Each example is used both as a training instance and as a test instance.

• Split data into k disjoint parts: S1, S2, ..., Sk.

• For i = 1 to kSelect Si to be the test set. Train on the remaining

data, test on Si , to obtain accuracy Ai .

• Report as the final accuracy.

“Confusion matrix” for a given class c

Actual Predicted (or “classified”) Positive Negative(in class c) (not in class c)

Positive (in class c) TruePositive FalseNegative

Negative (not in class c) FalsePositive TrueNegative

Evaluating classification algorithms

Example: “A” vs. “B”

Results from Perceptron:

Instance Class Perception Output1 “A” −12 “A” +13 “A” +14 “A” −15 “B” +16 “B” −17 “B” −11 “B” −1

Accuracy:

Actual Predicted Positive Negative

Positive

Negative

Assume “A” is positive class Confusion Matrix

Evaluating classification algorithms

“Confusion matrix” for a given class c

Actual Predicted (or “classified”) Positive Negative(in class c) (not in class c)

Positive (in class c) TruePositive FalseNegative

Negative (not in class c) FalsePositive TrueNegative

Type 2 error

Type 1 error

Precision and Recall

All instances in test set

Positive Instances

Negative Instances

Precision and Recall

All instances in test set

Instancesclassifiedas positive

Positive Instances

Negative Instances

Instancesclassifiedas negative

Precision and Recall

All instances in test set

Instancesclassifiedas positive

Positive Instances

Negative Instances

Recall = Sensitivity = True Positive Rate

Example: “A” vs. “B”

Results from Perceptron:

Instance Class Perception Output1 “A” −12 “A” +13 “A” +14 “A” −15 “B” +16 “B” −17 “B” −11 “B” −1

Assume “A” is positive class

Results of classifier

Threshold Accuracy Precision Recall

.9

.8

.7

.6

.5

.4

.3

.2

.1

-∞

Creating a Precision vs. Recall Curve

14

(“sensitivity”)(1 “specificity”)

15

Results of classifier

Threshold Accuracy TPR FPR

.9

.8

.7

.6

.5

.4

.3

.2

.1

-∞

Creating a ROC Curve

17

Precision/Recall versus ROC curves

http://blog.crowdflower.com/2008/06/aggregate-turker-judgments-threshold-calibration/

18

19

20

• There are various algorithms for computing AOC (often built into statistical software) – we won’t cover this in this class.

How to create a ROC curve for a perceptron

• Run your perceptron on each instance in the test data, without doing the sgn step:

• Get the range [min, max] of your scores

• Divide the range into about 200 thresholds, including −∞ and max

• For each threshold, calculate TPR and FPR

• Plot TPR (y-axis) vs. FPR (x-axis)