evaluating web content using digg

Post on 07-Dec-2014

423 Views

Category:

Education

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

This presentation presents an asynchronous instructional module demonstrating how social networking sites can enhance digital information fluency. Digital Information Fluency (DIF) is the ability to find, evaluate and use digital information effectively, efficiently and ethically. Students preparing for high school graduation need to be able to identify, evaluate and use information related to reading comprehension effectively. Social networking sites serve as a good learning platform for students, as they have the flexibility and privacy to balance learning with work and personal responsibilities. This presentation addresses a needs assessment for librarians helping DC high school students to evaluate internet resources for reading comprehension resources from various social media networks by determining the authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and functionality of the information. After a brief instruction, they will complete the web exercise using Facebook, and provide feedback using SurveyMonkey. With the explosion of information on the Internet, it is important for users to have the skills to analyze the various web sources using the information literacy competency standards. This presentation also provides an example to librarians how they can supplement classroom instruction with social networks to teach the importance of information literacy. Combining classroom skills with Web 2.0 strategies allows users to learn at their own pace and can allow students to maintain confidentiality.

TRANSCRIPT

EVALUATING WEB CONTENT INFORMATION

Using Digg.com

2

Let’s discuss:

Definition of Digital Information Literacy Five criteria for web evaluation Evaluation of Digg.com links

3

Digital Information Literacy (DIF)

DIF is the ability to find, evaluate and use digital information (web content) effectively, efficiently, and ethically.

Resource: http://21cif.com/resources/difcore/

4

Five criteria for evaluation

Authority – Author’s credentials Accuracy – Truth of information Objectivity – Goals met Currency – Updated or outdated Functionality – Free or no special

software

Resource: http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu/ref/research/webcrit.html

5

Digg.com

Using the search term “reading comprehension,” we’ll evaluate the top four links.

6

Digg.com

Here’s the search field

7

Top Four Sites

A

B

C

D

Using Search term: Reading Comprehension

8

A – Enhancing Looking at Comprehensive Capabilities

Authority – Maybe; Accuracy – Maybe; Objectivity – Yes; Currency – Yes; Functionality - Yes

9

B – Theron Sheppard’s Site

Authority – Maybe; Accuracy – Maybe; Objectivity – Yes; Currency – Yes; Functionality - Yes

10

C – TeachStreet.com

Article deletedAuthority – No; Accuracy – No; Objectivity – No;

Currency – No; Functionality - No

11

D – Looking at Comprehension

Authority – Maybe; Accuracy – Maybe; Objectivity – Yes; Currency – Yes; Functionality - Yes

12

What did you learn?

Send an evaluation - http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/B55GYXQ.

How can you use Digg.com as a social network resource?

Where else can you apply these search techniques?

13

Now it’s you turn

Go to Digg.com Pick a search term(s) Use this online form to tally your results:

http://on.fb.me/tbGkWB

Learn to evaluate other sites athttp://on.fb.me/sS0LwQ

Links in this presentation from 2011 search.

14

About Me

Judine Slaughter Master of Library and Information Science student at

Catholic University of America. Projected graduation in 2012.

Web Content Manager at Federal Aviation Administration since 2002.

Contact mePhone: 301-219-9378Email: 90slaughter@cardinalmail.cua.edu

© 2011

top related