executive summary - baylor universitybusiness.baylor.edu/steve_rich/corp/projects/f13_1430...also...
Post on 16-Jul-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Furniture Brands International Inc. was first established in 1911 as a corporation to manufacture, design, and sell furniture. The company distributes their products through wholesale and retail outlets. The majority of Furniture Brand’s products are wooden, upholstered, glass, or metal home and office furnishings. The company has diverse brand offerings including: Thomasville, Lane, Broyhill, Drexel Heritage, Henredon, Hickory, Maitland-Smith, Pearson, and Lane Venture. Prices across brands are competitive within the industry compared with mid-grade and high-end competition.
The company’s stock value has fallen steadily since 2002 when trading at nearly $300 to today’s price of $0.50 due to declining sales, mounting debt, lack of investor support, and other factors. Furniture Brands is to be removed from trading and has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in hopes of addressing its current challenges and strengthening its operations. Our paper addresses two solutions the company may use in order to reduce liabilities and increase cash, in turn stabilizing and increasing the value of the company.
We recommend that Furniture Brands divest the Lane subsidiary in order to decrease liabilities and channel resources into better performing brands which will increase Furniture Brand’s overall profit margin. The following discussion demonstrates the benefits of divesting the Lane subsidiary which will strengthen FBNIQ’s long-term financial position.
To reduce other insolvent obligations, we recommend offering employees covered by the defined benefit plan the option of converting their pension to equity in the newly restructured company. After total equity available has converted a large portion of the outstanding pension, we suggest the company offer lump sum payments to employees to cover their pension liability, reducing the pension further as cash becomes available from profitable operations.
Both suggestions enable Furniture Brands International to decrease liabilities, increase operations, and increase overall profit margin. If recommendations are followed successfully, Furniture Brands will be well positioned for higher growth and higher returns in the future making it a more competitive company in the furniture industry.
3
Introduction
Furniture Brands International is one of the world’s leaders in designing, manufacturing,
sourcing, and retailing home furnishings. They market products through different channels
including Broyhilll, Hickory, Thomasville, La Barge, Lane, Lane Venture, Maitland-Smith,
Pearson, Henredon, and Drextel Heritage. Some of its major competitors include La-Z-Boy Inc.,
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc., Ashley Furniture Industries Inc., Basset Furniture Industries Inc.,
Hooker Furniture Corporation, and Stanley Furniture Company Inc. Furniture Brands.
The furniture industry has faced many challenges since the housing market crash of 2007,
and many companies like Furniture Brands International have struggled to stay in business.
Many have failed. Though Furniture Brands has continued its operations, it has lost a significant
amount of market share.
Furniture Brands International has experienced a great decline in profits, including six
consecutive years of negative profits to date. The lack of profit has contributed to a major decline
in their stock price to the current trading price near $0.50. The company has recently filed for
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware.
After review of the company’s financial position, we recommend the divesture of the
Lane subsidiary and a reduction of the pension liability through equity and cash offerings. We
believe these suggestions will lead to increased operating and overall profit through the removal
of an unprofitable brand and through decreased liabilities.
4
Recommendation 1: Divesting the Lane Subsidiary
Furniture Brands International (FBNIQ) and its competitors were hit hard with the
collapse of the housing market in 2007 all the way through 2009. Lack of consumer spending on
new furniture and appliances, as well as a lack of consumer confidence in the stock of these
companies led to increased inventory levels and declining stock prices. While many of the
companies with direct ties to the housing industry are starting to recover some of the financial
ground that was lost during the crisis, others, like Furniture Brands International, are still
laggards and cannot seem to find a foothold in the new competitive landscape. For the last eight
years FBNIQ has reported a negative EBITDA. FBNIQ’s wholesale business has fallen out of
favor with the consumer leading to buildups in inventory and deep discounting tactics leading to
FBNIQ’s compressed profit margin (Appendix B). The two subsidiary business lines that make
up FBNIQ’s wholesale business are the Lane and Broyhill brands.
The Lane brand includes case furniture like tables and wooden chairs, as well as motion
and stationary upholstered items like recliners and couches for a family room setting. All of
these goods are wholesale and aimed at the low and mid-range price point. The Broyhill brand is
also wholesale and includes both case goods and upholstered goods for every room in the house
or office and is targeted to more mid-range price points.
Because of falling demand for the wholesale products in the Lane and Broyhill lines,
FBNIQ has started a repositioning and redesigning of many of the collections to cater to the
currents trends and modern influences. These changes were instituted in the Broyhill line before
2008, and the effects are just now starting to take shape and transform the brand into something
that appeals to more price sensitive consumers. On the other hand, the changes that have been
made to the Lane brand are so recent that the benefits will not be realized for a few years.
5
Management stated in their Q1 2013 earning call, “We’re in the process of dramatically
reconfiguring the merchandise assortment across key categories for both Lane and Broyhill.
…We’re much farther along in driving this strategy at Broyhill, where we’ve seen improved
performance in upholstery and some improvement in case goods.”
Due to the Lane brand’s negative weight on overall company margins and slow projected
turnaround, we recommend that Furniture Brands International divest the business to a strategic
buyer. Doing so would free up much overhead as over time rent and employee expenses related
to the Lane business would be eliminated. Also, the divesture would allow FBNIQ to reduce the
underfunded pension obligation by transferring the portion of the pension related to the workers
being divested to the buyer. By initiating a sale of the Lane brand, FBNIQ would no longer have
to pour money into expensive repositioning strategies that it has already begun by rebranding and
strategically positioning the line within the market. These expenditures would not be all loss, but
in fact, create an attractive asset for the potential buyer and result in an increased bid price since
the Lane business already invested in seed capital expenditures in order to transform the brand
into a profitable business.
Without the Lane wholesale brand, FBNIQ would be able to focus on developing the
Broyhill line as well as the better performing, upper end retail lines. The selloff would not
absolve FBNIQ of all aspects of the Lane brand that are currently reducing overall company
profit during the year of the sale, but once remaining costs are paid, FBNIQ would be freed to
start producing positive EBITDA numbers.
The possible consolidation of factory and manufacturing space would be another benefit
of the sale of the Lane brand, as would be the ability to increase their liquidity position from the
proceeds of the sale of the company. With this excess liquidity FBNIQ would have the
6
flexibility of capital that all struggling companies need to either make strategic investments or to
pay off any obligations.
Similar plans can be seen in the works from companies like Shell. Recently Shell’s CEO
Peter Voser discussed plans to enter a “divestment phase” in order to decrease net capital
spending. Discoveries in Brazil, acquisitions, and investments led to increased net spending this
year, and the market’s recognition of the fact caused the stock price of Shell to drop. Because of
this and other reasons, Shell plans to sell off pieces of oil and gas production in Nigeria, the US,
and other regions in order to offset the increase. Bloomberg says the company needs to raise $15
billion through divestments in order to meet financial targets. In the same way, we suggest that
FBNIQ invest in successful areas of its business and sell off less profitable segments such as the
Lane brand.
Vale is another company that has been telling a similar story. The largest iron-ore
exporter has divested $3 billion worth of assets this year selling its low performing assets and
focusing on building the more profitable ones in order to enlarge its profit margins over all.
Share price for the company fell to a four-year low in July but has risen 1.1 percent since. With
continued divestment plans, we may see Vale continue to gain shareholder confidence and a
continued increase in stock price. We desire the same increase in confidence and stock price for
FBNIQ.
Brasil Foods (BRF), the largest food producer in Brazil, did not achieve its projected
third-quarter revenues by an extremely large margin and is now focusing on its more profitable
areas of expertise in addition to free up working capital by the divesture of the other areas. The
company has sold two beef plants and will continue to divest other assets in order to streamline
the company’s operations. The company is the world’s largest meat processor by market value is
7
going to change focus from slaughterhouses and poultry farms to focus on its core business of
packaged and processed foods. The company also plans to focus on international expansion and
increasing sales of “in natura” products. BRF’s sale of the beef plants will help focus the
operations of the company and help enable it to move into specific markets that will help calm
stockholder fears regarding sales volume, pricing, and competition. Its decision to continue
divestment will enable the company to regain the measures it has failed to meet, improve its
ability to operate and gain shareholder confidence, as well as get a leg-up on competition by
channeling its energy into the successful areas of the company. We would like to see something
similar result for FBNIQ through the divestment of Lane brand and believe that the additional
resources gained from the sale of the brand would enable the company to focus energy in its
more profitable segments and increase overall profit margin.
Recommendation 2: Reducing Pension Liability through Stock and
Lump Sum Offerings
One of the biggest burdens on FBNIQ’s credit rating and balance sheet is the company’s
underfunded $191 million pension liability. This amount represents the difference in the
company’s $519 million projected benefit obligation and the plan’s assets of $327 million
(Appendix C). According to FBNIQ CEO Ralph Scozzafava, the company is contributing
between $6 million to $6.5 million toward their pension liabilities (Appendix B), which is well
under the amount that is necessary to cover the majority of benefits plans that are an essential to
employee retirement security. At this rate, the company will not be able to meet pension
obligations in the near future.
8
The defined benefit plan was terminated in 2005 (Appendix B), meaning that all
employees hired after this date became part of a new defined contribution 401(k) plan. Defined
pension plans are important to employees in guaranteeing them retirement security and are a
motivation for company loyalty. Many employees have the potential to lose a large portion of
their retirement funds once the company’s defined benefit pension plan is insolvent, which
would place employees in an unfair situation and hurt FBNIQ’s reputation. As an alternative, we
recommend that the company negotiate away some of its current pension liabilities related to the
benefit plan by allowing FBNIQ to restructure these liabilities into an equity offering of the post-
bankruptcy stock of Furniture Brands International.
The first step would be to negotiate with the owner of FBNIQ’s restructured debt a
percentage of the newly issued common stock to allocate to the pension employees. The next
step of implementation would be to mail out a survey to the employees covered by the defined
benefit pension to gain a sense of the interest in the pension conversion plan based on the
allocated equity pool. Based on the interest in the conversion plan, FBNIQ will convert up to the
dollar amount of allocated shares based on an employee’s tenure. The amount of stock that
would be awarded to each employee would be determined by actuaries and would equal the
amount represented by the present value of the future pension payments based on the employee’s
age and time with the company. This method of valuing pension benefits has been used by the
likes of GM and Ford (Motley Fool, 2010). For the employees that did not convert to new equity
or chose not to convert we recommend FBNIQ wait until the cash flow improves and offer the
employees with the longest FBNIQ tenure lump sum payments as excess cash becomes available
after payment of normal operational obligations. Once again, the lump sum amount will be
9
determined by actuaries based on the present value of the future pension payments and the
employee’s age among other factors.
These actions will not relieve FBNIQ of all previously accrued obligations due to
provisions in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA); however, it will greatly
reduce the amount of pension benefit obligation. This will allow management to focus on
growing the underlying plan assets in order to reduce its underfunded obligations.
Currently, the Pension Guaranty Benefit Corporation (PBGC), which is a government
entity that insures pension obligations, is taking part in recommending solutions to handle the
situation (2). The PBGC acts as a safeguard for failed plans and will relieve a company of all its
pension liabilities (up to a certain amount per plan), given that the company proves it cannot
continue operations unless the pension liabilities are removed from the balance sheet. While it
may be a hindrance to cash flows, FBINQ’s pension obligation does not suggest that operations
will cease if the company maintains responsibility for it. Therefore, it is not reasonable to assume
that the company can relieve itself of all pension liabilities by means of a PBGC takeover of
payments.
As part of company restructuring, we concede that there will be a high likelihood of
employee layoffs. This is regrettable given that the greatest asset to a company is its people.
However, we see a common stock offering to remaining employees as a motivation for helping
the company succeed. The recommendation gives personnel the chance to create wealth for
themselves in the terms of stock price appreciation and future dividend payouts. With a potential
to reap rewards from successful operations, employees will contribute to growing FBNIQ’s
profitability. Additionally the personal stake and sense of ownership employees will possess
have the potential to help quickly align them to new management ideals. This solution provides
10
an opportunity to mitigate the losses suffered by employees while allowing the company to stop
some of its current financial problems.
Conclusion
From the research of Furniture Brands International’s situation, we feel that FBNIQ still
cannot seem to find a foothold in the new competitive landscape after the crisis. Our
recommendation is that Furniture Brands International divests the Lane brand to a strategic buyer
which will reduce overhead, rent, and employee expenses and liabilities related to the business.
By initiating a sale of the Lane brand, FBNIQ would no longer have to pour money into
expensive repositioning strategies. In addition, FBNIQ would be able to focus the freed capital to
develop the Broyhill line as well as the upper end retail lines. We would like to see FBNIQ focus
its efforts into its more profitable segments and increase overall profit margin through the
divestment of Lane brand and believe that the additional resources gained from the sale of the
brand.
We also recommend that the company reduce its pension liability by offering employees
equity conversion of their outstanding pension. The pension liability is a large burden on
FBNIQ’s credit rating, and reducing the liability before allowing the PBGC to take it over would
mitigate the losses suffered by employees. The recommendation allows FBNIQ to strengthen its
financial position by reducing outstanding obligations.
11
WORKS CITED
Wall Street Journal. (September 9, 2013). Furniture Brands International Voluntarily Files for Chapter11 Bankruptcy Protection. Retrieved from The Wall Street Journal website: http://online.wsj.com Lexicon. (2013). Corporate divestiture. Retrieved from Financial Times Lexicon website: http://www.lexicon.ft.com Mitch Frazer. (May 22-25, 2011). Pension issues in Mergers and Acquisitions. Retrieved from Torys website: http://www.torys.com Eduard Gismatullin. (November 13, 2013). Shell to sell off $15B in assets to offset spending. Retrieved from Fuelfix website: http://www.fuelfix.com Juan Spinetto. (November 14, 2013). Vale steps up divestments as Brazil Tax Deadline Looms. Retrieved from Bloomberg website: http://www.bloomberg.com Julia Leite. (November 5, 2013). Bid: Corporate Brazil. Retrieved from Bloomberg BusinessWeek website: http://www.businesswek.com Steve Wilhelm. (January 11, 2013). Why Boeing’s fighting to retire pensions. Retrieved from Business Journal website: http://bizjournals.com Richard Craver. (November 5, 2013). Furniture Brands’ top stakeholder to enter bid for bankrupt manufacturer. Retrieved from Winston-Salem Journal website: http://www.journalnow.com Richard Craver. (September 23, 2013). Government pension agency takes wait-and-see approach on Furniture Brands’ bankruptcy. Retrieved from Winston-Salem Journal website: http://www.journalnow.com Allen Cook. Personal Communication. November 3, 2013. Funding universe. (2013). Furniture Brands International, Inc. History. Retrieved from Funding Universe website: http://www.fundinguniverse.com Bloomberg. (November 15, 2013). Furniture Brands International Inc. Retrieved from Bloomberg website: http://www.bloomberg.com Furniture brands. (2012). Furniture brands 2012 Annual Report. Retrieved from Furniture brands website: http://www.furniturebrands.com Furniture brands. (2012). Careers and benefits. Retrieved from Furniture brands website: http://www.furniturebrands.com
12
Furniture brands. (August 6, 2013). Furniture Brands Earnings Call. Retrieved from Bloomberg website: http://www.bloomberg.com Susan Tompor. (July 12, 2012). GM, Ford hope lump-sum pensions ease obligations. Retrieved from Us today website: http://www.usatoday30.usatoday.com Dan Caplinger. (December 3, 2010). Don’t flub this million-dollar decision. Retrieved from Fool website: http://www.fool.com Wikipedia. (November 2, 2013). Chapter 11, Title 11, United States Code. Retrieved from Wikipedia website: http://www.en.wikipedia.org
13
APPENDIX A
Furniture Brands International Overview
Furniture Brands International Inc. is a residential furniture manufacturer and distributor
(Funding universe, 2013). The company was founded in 1911 as International Shoe Company
and is based in St. Louis, Missouri. International Shoe Company moved its business segment to
furniture during 1980s and in 1996 the company changed its name to Furniture Brands
International (Funding universe, 2013). The Company's products include stationary upholstery
products, occasional furniture, recliners, and sleep sofas. (Bloomberg, 2013)
Products
Furniture Brands International has some of the best known and most respected furniture
lines in the industry. Among these brands, the company offers case goods, stationary upholstery
products, motion upholstery products, occasional furniture and decorative accessories and accent
pieces.
Distribution
The company services retailers ranging in size from small, independently owned furniture
stores to national and regional department stores and chains. The residential furniture retail
industry has consolidated in recent years, displacing many small local and regional furniture
retailers with larger chains and specialty stores.
There are four main way provide the company competitive advantages.
A diverse network of independently owned, full-line furniture retailers: The network is
the distribution base of the company and also the main source of income.
14
Gallery programs: Retail stores provides the model rooms, which accessorized by
furniture instead of showing pieces by pieces. By viewing the models, customers will have a
perceptual intuition of the entire room’s decoration.
Distribution channel of Thomasville Home Furnishings Stores: This is a single brand
store for Thomasville brand in order to increase the brand awareness and lead the trend in the
industry.
Relationships worth large national department stores and specialty stores: This
breakthrough became the essential part of company’s distribution base. As a multinational
company, Furniture Brands International is still seeking corporate opportunities with
international sales and stores to explore its business.
Manufacturing and Sourcing
As a manufacturing and distributing company, Furniture Brands International takes a mix
manufacturing strategy of domestic production, non-domestic production and products from
offshore. North Carolina and Mississippi are responsible for domestic production. Offshore
manufacturers are in Asia, such as China, Philippines and Vietnam. The Company also provides
the sourcing group in Asia to control the qualities of the production process. The offshore
operations with foreign manufacturers also helps company save manufacturing cost and also
explores its brands in different countries.
Suppliers
Furniture Brands International has no long-term contract with particular supplier and uses
a wide variety of suppliers that vary depending on the cost and location.
Management and Employees
15
On December 29, 2012, there are approximately 5,600 full time domestic employees and
3,500 non-domestic employees all around the world. All full time employees are covered by
comprehensive healthcare plan and also other benefits for working for the company (Furniture
Brands, 2012).
Environmental Matters
Abiding by the federal, state, local and international laws and regulations, the company
closely monitors the environmental performance of production facilities, and tests the raw
materials to produce the furniture to ensure the quality and safety of products in order to protect
environment and workers and customers’ health.
Competition
Furniture Brands International is in a highly competitive industry. The company’s
products compete with both domestic and foreign furniture producers. Competitors include
Ashley Furniture Industries Inc., La-Z-Boy Inc., and Stanley Furniture Company Inc. and many
other companies within furniture industry (10k).
16
APPENDIX B
Excerpts from Q2 2013 Earnings Call Transcript
“The year-over-year decline in gross margin excluding the aforementioned charge was primarily due to additional clearances of older inventory and product that is being replaced; as well as lower plant utilization, the majority of which was concentrated in our wholesale businesses.” “One, we continue to expect to contribute $6 million to $6.5 million to our pension plan in 2013. Number two, we now expect to spend around $9 million in CapEx in 2013. And three, we expect D&A to be approximately $17 million to $19 million in 2013.”
Excerpts from 2012 Annual Report “We currently provide retirement benefits to our domestic employees through a defined contribution plan. Participating employees may contribute a percentage of their compensation to the plan, subject to limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. We match a portion of the employee's contribution and employees vest immediately in the company match.” “Through 2005, domestic employees were covered primarily by noncontributory plans, funded by company contributions to trust funds held for the sole benefit of employees. We amended the defined benefit plans, freezing and ceasing future benefits as of December 31, 2005. Certain transitional benefits were provided to certain participants, but ceased accruing when the plan became inactive on December 31, 2010.”
17
APPENDIX C Funded status of the Company-sponsored qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans:
The components of net periodic pension expense for the Company-sponsored defined benefit plans:
Source: Furniture brands. (2012)
18
APPENDIX D
Source: Furniture brands. (2012)
19
APPENDIX D (Continued)
Source: Furniture brands. (2012)
top related