fire emissions from luc: promoting credibility and incentives

Fire emissions from LUC:Promoting credibility and incentives

Daniel Murdiyarso

Multi-scale drivers and responses

Murdiyarso and Lebel 2007

Promoting credibility through MRVM IPCC – Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF activities

• Publish data (area, biomass data, carbon density) • Describe methodologies (measurements in 5 pools, use model• Include all greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O, CH4)• Document QA/QC procedures

R IPCC Reporting Principle – managed uncertainties•Consistency • Transparency•Comparability•Completeness•Accuracy

V Validation Project development phase•Estimation of future GHG emissions reductions to be achieved•Use models (historical trend, numeric, economic)

Verification Project monitoring phase•Confirmation of actual GHG emission reductions achieved

during crediting period•Compare between estimations and observations

Developing higher Tier EFs is possible

2006 IPCC Guidelines: 2013 Wetlands supplement

Indonesia has good practice MRV for emission hotspots in place

Linking GHG emissions and removals with IPCC Guidelines will ensure credibility

Fire emissions may be included

Concluding remarks