gfsp overview accra, november 2013. the global food safety partnership reduce risks to consumers...
Post on 31-Mar-2015
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
GFSP OverviewAccra, November 2013
The Global Food Safety Partnership
- Reduce risks to consumers and businesses- Improve skills, efficiencies and public health - Create economic opportunity
Global Food Safety PartnershipBreaking New Ground
Formally established December 2012 at the first GFSP stakeholder conference in Paris
Builds on earlier collaboration 2009-2011 with APEC FSCF PTIN
First partnership supported by the World Bank combining public and private money with public and private implementation
5-year initial capacity building work plan with defined activities
In parallel, use the experience to learn and develop a new cooperation model for future collaboration
Dual Approach
Harmonization of Training
Improving Outcomes from Training
Ensuring Best Practices for Monitoring and Evaluation
Cross-sector Coordination & Collaboration
Developing a Common Baseline for Training Standards
GFSP Secretariat
Multi Donor Trust Fund for:
Industry
National Governments
International Organizations
Universities
NGOs
Other Stakeholders
Service Providers
Contributions
Other inputs
Advisory Working Groups
Donor Advisory Council
Preparing for the future
Operational Structure
- Implemented by contracted service providers, themselves often stakeholders as well
- Use of Advisory Working Groups (WGs)- IT/Learning Systems - Food Safety Technical- Communication- Monitoring and Evaluation- Governance (to be formed in 2014 to shape GFSP governance after initial
5-year period)- Combined WG co-chairs meetings- Donor’s Advisory Council - Secretariat (hosted at World Bank)
Organization & Management
Initial contributions US$ 1 m
Program design and
pilots
World Bank US$ 1.2mAdvisory Working Groups
Multi-Donor Trust Fund
US$ 45-50 m(pending)
Global scaling up
Financing Sources
Donor’s Advisory Council
• GFSP Secretariat will convene a Donor’s Advisory Council (DAC) to provide an additional mechanism for direct consultation and advice on the Partnership. The DAC has been established to advise on:– High level stakeholder engagement
– Fund raising
– Inputs to the Secretariat regarding funding priorities (topics, countries, sectors)
– Emerging issues
• The DAC will meet in the week of 9-13 December 2013 at the 2nd GFSP Conference to be held in Singapore.
Governments (Donors)CanadaDenmarkNetherlandsUnited States
Governments (Pilot countries)
ChinaIndonesiaMalaysiaVietnamZambia
Multilateral & International Organizations
FAONetwork of Aquaculture Centers in Asia-Pacific (NACA)UNIDOWHOWorld Bank/IFC
Industry and AssociationsMars Inc.Waters CorporationCargillFood Industry Asia (FIA)General MillsGrocery Manufacturers Association (GMA)
Current Partners
Universities, NGOs and In-kind and Implementing Partners
Food and Environment Research Agency (FERA), UK DEFRAFood Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ)Global Aquaculture Alliance/Responsible Aquaculture Foundations (GAA/RAF) GLOBALG.A.P International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI)Institute of Food Technologists (IFT)International Union of Food Science and Technology (IUFoST)Massey University Michigan State UniversityNetwork of Aquaculture Centers of Asia-Pacific (NACA)Orange House
Current Partners cont…
Advisory Process
Advisory Working Groups
GFSP Secretariat
Issues and Opportunities
Feedback on current work program
Advice sought
Advice Provided
Decisions on:• Projects• Activities• Funding
Stakeholder feedback on GFSP progress and issues
GFSP Coordinated Approach for Greater Impact
Separate Independent (variably linked) actions
Collective and Cohesive Approach(More Collaboration, Coordination, Communication, Connection)
GFSP Support
GFSP 1st Current Work Plan
• GFSP Secretariat reviewed Roadmap and 5-Year Plan and revised 1st Year Plan for mid-2013 to mid-2014.
• The Roadmap describes three pillars of engagement by the GFSP:
• Training Program Implementation• Global and Regional Scaling up• Program Facilitation
#1 Training Program
APEC/FSCF+
Supply chain management
Incident management
Laboratory competency
Risk analysis
Food safety regulatory system
On-farm quality assurance
#2Global Scaling up
CountryCapacity Building
Needs Assessments
- East Asia- South Asia- Latin America- East Europe
& Central Asia
- Africa- Middle East- “Responsive
activities”
#3Program Facilitation
Learning PlatformOpen Education
ResourcesCurriculum Development
Food Safety Technical
Monitoring and Evaluation
GFSP Secretariat
Communication
Countries are selected using
criteria based on each category
Country Selection Criteria
Country policy
environment
Potential for scaling up
APEC countries
Public-Private commitment
Partner priorities and cost sharing
• Phased implementation based on available funding
• Currently about US$2M available in multi-donor trust fund
• Enough to implement 40% of Year 1 workplan (total budget: US$5M)
1st Year Workplan Implementation
Activities already planned for 2013-2014
GFSP activities recently completed, underway, or planned for implementation during 2013 and Q1,2 of 2014
– Supply Chain Management (SCM) – On-farm Quality Assurance and GAP– Food Safety Incident Management – Laboratory Competency – Risk Analysis - Risk Assessment – Food Safety Regulatory Systems
..but what about taking a risk-based
approach?Pros• Consistent with best practices in
food safety• Focuses attention• May garner more poltical,
technical, financial support• Interests public, private, civil
society all at once• Facilitates testing and tweaking
of GFSP collaborative model • May be more doable in medium
term• May have positive spinoffs for
broader food safety system
Cons• Requires picking a “winner”
among many real risks that compete for attention and resources
• Will not solve many other real problems
• Externalities not proven for food safety (although there is evidence for avian/human influenza and HIV/AID)
Pilots under consideration
• Food Safety in Aquacultural Supply Chains
Pilots under consideration
• Food Safety in Aquacultural Supply Chains• Food Safety for the Dairy Industry
Pilots under consideration
• Food Safety in Aquacultural Supply Chains• Food Safety for the Dairy Industry• Pathways for Global Mycotoxin Preventioon
and Control
Agriculture
Mycotoxins represent a core challenge within the food safety field
NutritionHealth
Food Safety
Mycotoxins
Why mycotoxins?
Why start with aflatoxins?
• They matter greatly to agriculture, health and nutrition• They simultaneously affect poverty/hunger, productivity,
commerce/trade, and economic growth• The challenge straddles the developed, emerging, and
developing economies• It is a global problem, growing in scope• The science is advancing rapidly • Awareness is also rising• They require a concerted effort backed
by significantly more resources
Why start with aflatoxins?
• They matter greatly to agriculture, health and nutrition• They simultaneously affect poverty/hunger, productivity,
commerce/trade, and economic growth• The challenge straddles the developed, emerging, and
developing economies• It is a global problem, growing in scope• The science is advancing rapidly • Awareness is also rising• They require a concerted effort backed
by significantly more resources
GFSP can add value!
Opportunities and issues relating PACA
• How to coordinate approaches and programs while avoiding duplication
Opportunities and issues relating PACA
• How to coordinate approaches and programs while avoiding duplication
• How to leverage and multiply respective resources
Opportunities and issues relating PACA
• How to coordinate approaches and programs while avoiding duplication
• How to leverage and multiply respective resources
• What is the best division of roles and responsibilities going forward
Opportunities and issues relating PACA
• How to coordinate approaches and programs while avoiding duplication
• How to leverage and multiply respective resources
• What is the best division of roles and responsibilities going forward
• How to achieve a win-win situation
top related