going all the way: use of clickers for peer instruction and just-in-time teaching

Post on 07-Nov-2014

358 Views

Category:

Education

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Ross and his colleagues moved from the traditional classroom model, where in lectures students are given information to remember and possibly to understand, to an inverted classroom model. In the inverted classroom model content is provided as reading in advance of the lectures and the contact time instead focuses on developing understanding.

TRANSCRIPT

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

Going all the way: Use of clickers for peer instruction

and just-in-time teaching

Ross Galloway School of Physics & Astronomy

University of Edinburgh

‘Clickers Reloaded’ 7th December 2011

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

Acknowledgements

The Physics 1A Course Team: Simon Bates & Richard Massey Workshop heads of class and Teaching Assistants Secretaries and technicians

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

Outline

•  Motivation •  What we did •  What happened •  What the students thought •  Some personal reflections

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

Motivation: the Traditional Classroom

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

Motivation: the Inverted Classroom

•  Move information transfer out of the classroom.

•  Devote in-class learning time to higher level activities.

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

Motivation: the Inverted Classroom

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

Week n + 1

Workshops

What we did: Physics 1A Course Structure

Week n - 1

Personal Reading

Online Reading

Quiz

Week n

Peer Instruction Lectures

“What I still don’t understand

is…”

Hand-in Assignment

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

What happened

•  Students (mostly) did the reading! •  Students (mostly) did the quiz! •  Students (mostly) came to lectures!

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

What happened

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

preprepostg

−=

%100 :gain Normalised

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41

PI session

Norm

alis

ed g

ain

<g>

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

What happened: diagnostic test results Pre-test Scores

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29

Score

Freq

uenc

y

Pre-test n=161

Post-test Scores

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29

Score

Freq

uenc

y

Post-test n=161

52.0=g

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

What happened: diagnostic test results

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0 20 40 60 80 100

Mean Post-test Score (%)

Nor

mal

ised

Gai

n <g

>

Other universities Physics 1A

Data taken from R.R. Hake, Am. J. Phys. 66(1), 1998

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

What the students thought

N = 90

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

What the students thought

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh

Some personal reflections

•  Can be scary at first •  But you soon get into the rhythm •  Forget about carefully planned timing •  Great classroom atmosphere •  Freedom from ‘coverage’ •  Focus on what matters

top related