humboldt county board of commissioners october …...agenda - monday, october 17, 2016 1. 9:30 a.m....
Post on 09-Jul-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Humboldt County Board Of CommissionersOctober 17, 2016Page 1
Notice of Public MeetingHUMBOLDT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Humboldt County Board of Commissioners Regular MeetingREGULAR MEETING
Monday, October 17, 2016 9:30 AM:
Humboldt County Courthouse Meeting Room 20150 West Fifth Street, Winnemucca, Nevada 89445
All times on this agenda are approximate. Consideration of items may require more or less timethan is scheduled. Items on the agenda may be taken out of order; the public body may combinetwo or more agenda items for consideration; and the public body may remove an item from theagenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda at any time. Public comment isdesignated for discussion only. The public has the opportunity to address the Commission on anymatter not appearing on the agenda; however, no action may be taken on Matter raised until thematter itself has been specifically included on the agenda as an item upon which action may betaken. Additionally, public comment may be heard on any item listed on the Agenda. Persons areinvited to submit comments in writing and/or attend and make comments on any agenda item at theCommission meeting. All public comment may be limited to three (3) minutes per person, at thediscretion of the Commission.
Agenda - Monday, October 17, 2016
1. 9:30 A.M. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Public Comments: General public comment is designated for discussiononly. The public has the opportunity to address the Commission on any matter not appearing on thisagenda; however, no action may be taken on a matter raised until the matter itself has beenspecifically included on the agenda as an item upon which action may be taken.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Discussion and action on correction/approval of minutes for January 19,2016; February 1, 2016; February 16, 2016; March 7, 2016; March 21, 2016; April 4, 2016; April 18,2016; May 2, 2016; May 16, 2016 June 6, 2016: July 11, 2016: August 1, 2016; August 15, 2016;September 6, 2016; September 19, 2016 and October 3, 2016 Regular Meetings and January 11,2016; January 25, 2016; March 28, 2016; July 12, 2016 and August 31, 2016 Special Meetings. (ForDiscussion and Possible Action)4.A. Minutes
HCC011116unapprovedUNOFFICIAL.pdf
1
Humboldt County Board Of CommissionersOctober 17, 2016Page 2
5. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND CORRESPONDENCE - 1) Other information and upcoming meetings
October 10, 2016 Regional Airport Board November 10, 2016 Regional Planning Commission Meeting November 15, 2016 County Commission Meeting November 29, 2016 County Commission Meeting
2) Reports from Commissioners regarding other Boards and Committees on which they serve, includingNevada Association of Counties (NACO), Regional Airport Board, Humboldt River Basin WaterAuthority (HRBWA), Western Interstate Region (WIR), Legislative Interim Land Council, HumboldtDevelopment Authority (HDA), Winnemucca Visitors & Convention Authority (WCVA), HospitalBoard, Humboldt Foundation, Western Nevada Development District (WNDD), and Humboldt CountyElk Planning Steering Committee, and the State Land Use Planning Advisory Council (SLUPAC).
6. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES FOR 9-29-16 THROUGH 10-7-16 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) 6.A. Expenditures
7. UPDATE ON PINE FOREST WILDERNESS ISSUES FROM BLM AND TROUT UNLIMITED (FORPOSSIBLE ACTION) - Consideration of, discussion and possible action including a request to theBLM to provide an Implementation Plan with itemized expenses and budget for the land ownersbased on outstanding tasks remaining to complete the process that resulted from the Pine ForestWilderness Act that was signed into law in 2014. Discussion and For Possible Action.7.A. Pine Forest
8. 10:00 A.M. PUBLIC HEARING: ABANDONMENT REQUEST FOR ROBBIE CIRCLE (FORPOSSIBLE ACTION) - AH-16-02 An abandonment request submitted by Michael Andersen toabandon the westerly portion of the 60’ right-of-way known as Robbie Circle; assessor’s parcel #’s3738-21-226-006, 3738-21-226-007, 3738-21-227-001 and 3738-21-227-003. For Discussion andPossible Action.8.A. Submitted photos
AH-16-02 Public Notice.pdf
Broken Cement Pile and Durt Piles.jpg
Broken Cement Pile.jpg
Durt Piles.jpg
East Road way Blocked.jpg
Full Road way.jpg
South Broken Cement Pile.jpg
2
Humboldt County Board Of CommissionersOctober 17, 2016Page 3
South Road way.jpg
West Road way Blocked.jpg
West Road way.jpg
West Side Lambert.jpg
Keeping All of Robbie Circle.pdf
9. 60-DAY REVIEW OF NUISANCE COMPLAINT AT 3110 ARTEMESIA WAY, WINNEMUCCA, NV(FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) - Nuisance Complaint(s) status update, discussion and review of thestatus complaint at 3110 Artemesia Way, Winnemucca, NV Assessor’s Parcel Number3738-16-453-004 on the property belonging to Tomas Barajas & Hortencia Godinez to determinewhether to take any further action or close or dismiss this case. This is the 60-day follow-up reportas directed by the Commission at the August 15, 2016 meeting. Potential action may includemaking the cost of abatement a special assessment against the real property, to determineassessment of costs of abatement in accordance with County Code 8.04.080, or provide direction tothe District Attorney for further legal action to abate the nuisance, or other action necessary to abatesaid nuisance. Discussion and for Possible Action. 9.A. Nuisance Review-Artemesia
100_0772.JPG
100_0778.JPG
100_0779.JPG
3110 Artemesia Way Nuisance Investigation.pdf
10. 60-DAY REVIEW OF NUISANCE COMPLAINT AT #43 GRASS VALLEY RANCHOS/HILL DRIVE(FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) - Nuisance Complaint(s) status update, discussion and review of thestatus of the nuisance at at #43 Grass Valley Ranchos/Hill Drive, Winnemucca, Nevada, Assessor’sParcel Number 3536-27-252-002 on the property owned by Kirk & Denrah Thompson to determinewhether to take any further action or close or dismiss this case. This is the 60-day follow-up reportas directed by the Commission at the August 15, 2016 meeting. Potential action may includemaking the cost of abatement a special assessment against the real property, to determineassessment of costs of abatement in accordance with County Code 8.04.080, and provide directionto the District Attorney for further legal action to abate the nuisance, or other action necessary toabate said nuisance - Discussion and for Possible Action
10.A. Nuisance Update-Hill Drive100_0776.JPG
100_0777.JPG
11. ADMINISTRATOR: POTENTIAL PURCHASE OF PROPERTY AT 426 BRIDGE STREET (FORPOSSIBLE ACTION) - Consideration of, discussion of possible purchase of said property by
3
Humboldt County Board Of CommissionersOctober 17, 2016Page 4
Humboldt County for property located at 426 Bridge Street, Winnemucca, NV (APN3638-29-108-003) for a price not to exceed $170,000 including all fees. Terms for said purchase,lease back options and any additional direction to staff regarding the purchase will be considered.Discussion and Possible Action.11.A. 426 Bridge Street Purchase
12. RESOLUTION: GRANT OF 10-FOOT EASEMENT TO NV ENERGY FOR ACCESS TO ROSECREEK TOWER SITE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) - Consideration of, discussion and possibleapproval of a Grant of 10-foot Easement for NV Energy for the Rose Creek Lot located at 8255 RoseCreek Road (County Property). This is our new communications Site. This easement will run parallelto the property line to provide power to the back of the lot. Discussion and For Possible Action.
12.A. EasementRose Creek Easement Survey notes.pdf
13. WILDFIRE SUPPORT GROUP PETITION (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) - Consideration of,discussion and possible approval of a petition recognizing Wildfire Support Group (WSG) as aRangeland Fire Protection association in accordance with NRS Chapter 472 to operate in theiridentified zone in Northern Humboldt County. Discussion as to whether a three-way agreement should be considered between the Nevada Division of Forestry, Humboldt County and WSG. ForDiscussion and Possible Action.13.A. Wildfire Support Group
Wildfire Support Group Petition Rev.docx
14. ADMINISTRATOR: PERSONNEL POLICY UPDATES FOR 2016 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) -Consideration of, discussion and possible approval of the Humboldt County Personnel Policy updatesfor 2016 pertaining to County employees. For Discussion and Possible Action.14.A. Personnel Policy Updates
15. SHERIFF: ADULT DETENTION FACILITY MEDICAL AGREEMENT (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) -Consideration of, discussion and possible approval of an agreement between Robbie Grant, DO andHumboldt County for medical services at the Adult Detention Center in Winnemucca, Nevada.Discussion and for Possible Action.15.A. Adult Detention
ADULT DETENTION FACILITY MEDICAL AUTHORITY AGREEMENT 2016 (002).pdf
16. PLANNING: SET TO PUBLIC HEARING (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) -
AH-16-01 An abandonment request submitted by Steve Dixon to abandon an approximate 60 foot by 285.85foot easement (known as Anna Way) along the east side of assessor’s parcel #3738-15-102-003;along the west side of assessor’s parcel #3738-15-126-001 between Delaney Drive and Ivan Drive.For Discussion and Possible Action.
TH-16-01 An ordinance repealing Humboldt County Code Title 17 Chapter 17.68 Conditional Use Permitsand replacing all provisions of Title 17 Zoning, Chapter 17.68 regarding Conditional Use Permits,
4
Humboldt County Board Of CommissionersOctober 17, 2016Page 5
including but not limited to Conditional Use Permit Applications through the appeal process and othermatters properly relating thereto. For Discussion and Possible Action.
TH-16-02 An ordinance adding new Chapter 17.69 Above Ground Utility Projects to Title 17 Zoning, to theHumboldt County Code to allow for a permit for construction of an above ground utility project locatedin a Master Plan designated utility corridor; and an ordinance to allow for a permit for construction ofan above ground utility project which is not located within a Master Plan designated utility corridorand other matters properly relating thereto. For Discussion and Possible Action.
TH-16-03 An ordinance repealing the Humboldt County Code Title 17 Zoning, Chapter 17.70 Amendments toTitle and Plan adding a new Chapter 17.71 “Amendments to Title and Plan” and other mattersproperly relating thereto. For the purpose of modifying the Chapter numbers only. For Discussionand Possible Action.
TH-16-04 An ordinance adding new Chapter 17.70 Renewable Energy Generation Projects to the HumboldtCounty Code Title 17 Zoning, to allow for a conditional use permit and an expedited conditional usepermit for Renewable Energy Generation Projects to include an application process, requirements,and fees, and other matter properly relating thereto. For Discussion and Possible Action.
16.A. Set To Public Hearing-16-02-0110-17-16.pdf
17. HUMBOLDT TV DISTRICT: APPROVAL TO STOP TV DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (FOR POSSIBLEACTION) - Approval to stop assessing fees assessed by the Humboldt TV District.
A) Josh Burnette (Winnemucca, Nevada) - No TV signal on property at 17655 Sierra Pass Road (APN3636-29-200-003)
Discussion and For Action.
17.A. HUMBOLDT TV DISTRICT: APPROVAL TO STOP TV DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (FORPOSSIBLE ACTION) TV District Josh Burchette.pdf
18. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE UPGRADE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) -Consideration of, discussion and possible approval of a proposal from Bosch Security Systems, Inc.in an amount not to exceed $60,000 to upgrade the Humboldt County Dispatch 911 Software toaccommodate new equipment and enhanced features. For Discussion and Possible Action.18.A. Dispatch Software Upgrade
Bosch SW Upgrade - 911.pdf
19. ADMINISTRATOR: PHASE 2 WATER PLAN AGREEMENT (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) -Consideration of, discussion and possible approval of Phase II of the Humboldt County Water Planfrom Resource Concepts, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $24,900. For Discussion and Possible Action.19.A. Phase ii Water Plan
5
Humboldt County Board Of CommissionersOctober 17, 2016Page 6
20. COMPTROLLER (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) - Consideration of resolution and/or appointment of aninterim comptroller for Humboldt County until a new Comptroller can be hired as well as considerationof authority of interim Comptroller. For Discussion and Possible Action.
21. DISTRICT ATTORNEY: BUDGET AUGMENTATION REQUEST AND REVIEW OF PRINTERPURCHASE OPTIONS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) -
A.Discussion and possible approval of augmentation of the 2016-2017 Budget for the DistrictAttorney Office to increase the account for Machinery by $9,500 for the purchase of aprinter/scanner/copier/fax machine – For Discussion and Possible Action.
B.Review and discussion of proposals received for the purchase or lease of a new combination colorprinter, scanner, copier and facsimile machine and possible authorization for the District Attorney tosign a purchase or lease agreement for a new machine in an amount not to exceed $9,500 – ForDiscussion and for Possible Action.
22. FUTURE AGENDAS
23. RESOLUTION: INTENT TO SELL REAL PROPERTY AT PUBLIC AUCTION (FOR POSSIBLEACTION) - Consideration of, discussion of a Resolution to proceed with the sale of real propertiesthat were designated for possible sale by the Humboldt County Board of County Commissioners. Theparcels to be sold and the minimum bid price are as follows:
1)Northwest Corner of Godchaux Road and Winchester Drive, Paradise Estates, Paradise, Nevada(APN 3938-02-200-020) Minimum Bid: $3,000
2)Northwest Corner Godchaux Road and Browning Road, Paradise Estates, Humboldt County,Nevada (APN 3938-12-200-005) Minimum Bid: $20,000
3)Portion of North ½ of Section 9, T37N,R41E, M.D.B & M. North of Golconda in Eden Valley, eastof Osgood Mountains, Humboldt County, Nevada (APN 3741-09-200-001) Minimum
Bid: $$17,000; 4)Northwest corner of Third Street & Guernsey Avenue, approximately 100 feet east of Morrison
Avenue, Golconda, Nevada (APN 3640-32-227-002) Minimum Bid: $13,000; 5)140 feet west of Melrose Avenue on the east side of Cleveland Avenue, Golconda, Nevada,
Humboldt County Nevada (APN 3640-32-251-009) Minimum Bid: $5,000; 6)6960 Airport Road, Winnemucca, Nevada (APN 3537-09-476-005) Minimum Bid: $9,000 7)617 Monroe Street, Winnemucca, Nevada (APN 3638-30-428-004) Minimum Bid: $25,000 8)3269 Frontier Street, Winnemucca Nevada (APN 3638-28-255-002) Minimum Bid: $55,000; and 9)130 Rodeo Drive, Denio, Nevada (APN 4730-04-101-001) Minimum Bid: $70,000
Discussion and for Possible Action.23.A. RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO SELL REAL PROPERTY AT PUBLIC AUCTION
Resolution - Intent to Sell Property REV 10 12 16.pdf
24. BUDGET EXPENSE REVIEW COMMITTEE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) - Consideration of a requestfrom the Budget Expense Review Committee to add Brad Schultz, Extension Educator, Professor,University of Nevada Cooperative Extension, to the Committee. Discussion and For Possible Action.
6
Humboldt County Board Of CommissionersOctober 17, 2016Page 7
25. PUBLIC COMMENT: - General public comment is designated for discussion only. The public hasthe opportunity to address the Commission on any matter not appearing on this agenda; however, noaction may be taken on a matter raised until the matter itself has been specifically included on theagenda as an item upon which action may be taken.
26. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: The County Com m ission m ay close the m eeting to receive inform ation from legal counsel pursuant toNevada Revised Statutes 241.015
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
PLACES POSTED: Humboldt Co. Courthouse, 50 W. 5th St.: Rooms 201, 205, & 207 at ___________ A.M. By :____________________________________________
Humboldt County Library : 85 E. 5th St. at ___________ A.M. By :__________________________________________________________________
County Annex: 4th & Bridge St. at ___________ A.M. By :________________________________________________________________________
Winnemucca City Hall: 4th & Melarkey St. at _____________ A.M.By : ______________________________________________________________
Humboldt County Website: www.hcnv .us at _____________A.M. By : ______________________________________________________________
State of Nev ada Website: www.notice.nv .gov . ____________ A.M. By : ______________________________________________________________
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2016 POSTED BY: _______________________________________________
DATE POSTED: ___________________________ Karen Bannister, Administrativ e Assistant
NOTE FOR SUPPORTING MATERIAL: A copy of the supporting material f or the meeting may be obtained at Commissioner meeting/agendas on the Humboldt Countywebsite: www.hcnv .us or by contacting Dav e Mendiola, County Administrator, at 50 W. Fif th Street, Winnemucca, Nev ada 89445, (775) 623-6300
NOTICE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES - Reasonable ef f orts will be made to assist and accommodate phy sically disabled persons desiring to attend the meeting.
7
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--241Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: County Clerk Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTMinutes
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS HCC011116unapprovedUNOFFICIAL.pdf
8
01/11/2016
Page 1 of 11
Monday, January 11, 2016
A special meeting of the Humboldt County Board of Commissioners was called to order on
Monday, January 11, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. at the place of meeting at the Paradise Valley Community Hall,
Paradise Valley, Nevada. Those present were Chairman Marlene Brissenden, Commissioners Mike Bell,
Garley Amos, Jr., Jim French and Ron Cerri, Deputy District Attorney Gabrielle Carr, Administrator
Dave Mendiola and Clerk of the Board Tami Rae Spero.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Chairman Brissenden asked for public comments. Gary Echevarria, present on
behalf of the Paradise Valley New Building Fund, requested that Humboldt County grant an easement
through the RV Park that the County owns; he noted that he had approached the Community Board who
runs the Park and they were in favor of the request as was Jason Deputy, the Chief for the Paradise Valley
Fire Department. Mr. Echevarria continued explaining the plan for the easement including the purpose
and the location. Chairman Brissenden explained that as this item is not on the agenda so it could not be
discussed but directed that the item be placed on the next County Commission Agenda. Mr. Echevarria
asked for direction on what would be needed to present the request. Commissioner French suggested that
Mr. Echevarria speak to the County Administrator. Chairman Brissenden asked for further public
comments.
Tina Gast a home owner near the proposed site for the gymnasium appeared before the
Commission and explained that she might not be able to stay for the entire meeting so she wanted to offer
her comments; she continued to offer comments related to the effect of this proposal on the community
including issues with Mr. Echevarria and other members of the new building group and actions and
statements made by those individuals; Chairman Brissenden interrupted the public comment by Mrs. Gast
and asked that any comments be directed to the Commission not audience members. Mrs. Gast continued
referring to comments she has heard related to living in Winnemucca versus living in Paradise including
being told that she is unable to serve on the Paradise Valley Community Board, the appearance that the
Community Board is stacked with members who support the gym building, the division in the community
caused by this building and the proposed type of building and location. Chairman Brissenden asked for
further public comments.
Steve Lucas a resident of Paradise Valley appeared before the Commission and noted that he is
the owner of the property that lies just east of the proposed site; he continued asking that the community
come together to build a building that would not only have a basketball court but would have room to
grow without the issues that are at hand; he commented on the effect of this proposal on the community
and issues with the proposed location including the trees on his property which would result in a liability
9
01/11/2016
Page 2 of 11
for him if branches were to fall on the building site and cause damage or injuries, noise and debris that
will effect property owners around the site and the lack of parking; he concluded by commenting on the
benefits of attending school in the Paradise area.
No further public comment offered.
COMMISSION AND PUBLIC TO VISIT SITE WHERE THE RECREATION CENTER IS
CURRENTLY PROPOSED TO BE BUILT: The Board of Commissioners, Administrator Mendiola
and audience members visited the proposed site.
PUBLIC HEARING - To consider an appeal of a conditional use permit (CUP) (UH-15-08)
approved by the Regional Planning Commission at their November 11, 2015 meeting to allow
construction of a 70 foot x 125 foot steel building at 110 Bridge Street in Paradise Valley, NV for
use as a gymnasium: Chairman Brissenden disclosed for the record that she and her husband had
contributed to the New Building Fund but that she does not believe that this will prevent her from
objectively and independently evaluating testimony and facts in the matter therefore she will be
participating in the discussion and vote. Commissioner Cerri stated that he had also contributed but that
would not effect his vote and that he has no financial benefit either way so he would also be participating
in discussion and action on this matter. Chairman Brissenden stated that this hearing would be conducted
as a Trial de Novo and explained what that would entail including that evidence would be considered
related to two issues: does this application and the use of the gymnasium comply with the Master Plan
and with the Humboldt County Zoning of M-3, who could present evidence, the type of evidence that
would be considered, the manner in which comments/testimony could be offered and that this hearing
would only be related to the appeal of the Conditional Use Permit at 110 Bridge Street. Deputy District
Attorney Carr noted that all letters and correspondence that had been provided to the Regional Planning
Commission at their November 12, 2016 meeting as well as the minutes, staff report and transcript from
that meeting have also been provided to all members of this Board. Discussion occurred regarding the
manner in which the hearing would be conducted.
Gary Echevarria, President of the non-profit corporation, Paradise Valley New Building Fund and
Rolfe Schwartz, secretary and Richard Gavica treasurer appeared before the Commission. Mr. Echevarria
offered opening comments stating that the building is permitted under the current zoning, conforms with
the Master Plan, that they would like to exercise their rights as property owners as they like this spot for
the proposed building due to its closeness to both the school and the community hall and that they will
adhere to any building codes and requirements by the City and Health Departments.
Chairman Brissenden asked for public comments. Therese A. Ure of Schroeder Law Offices,
10
01/11/2016
Page 3 of 11
appeared before the Commission supporting appellant, Steve Lucas; she stated that appellant Lucas and
the other appellants are requesting this Commission to disapprove and withdraw the current CUP permit
at this time; she noted the appellants’ understanding of the time frame for decision set by Humboldt
County Code and notified the Board of appellants’ request for notification per Code of the decision in this
matter; she continued noting comments submitted by her office on January 8th which supplemented the
appellants’ statements and requested that the Board take notice of said comments and that they be made
part of the appeal packet. Ms. Ure stated that Mr. Lucas does not oppose the building of a recreational
facility in Paradise Valley but in fact supports it if done correctly and in a manner to allow for maximum
benefit to the community and to allow for future growth; she continued offering comments on the planned
use for the facility as opposed to the use identified within the CUP, issues that may arise if the building is
dedicated to the County and the County assumes liability for the facility, the requirements related to
CUPs per County Code and what must be found for issuance of the CUP, an alternative site that is
available, issues with the CUP as issued including parking availability, emergency services access, zoning
issues, lighting requirements and how they may create a nuisance, emergency exit problems, fire
protection issues, the liability to the County if they were to take over the facility and the need to control
the uses to which the building is put, issues with the old trees including liability and damage to, the
disturbance of surrounding properties as to their way of life and the potential of creation of a nuisance, the
lack of sufficient water availability, the operating/maintenance costs and lack of a plan for those costs and
lack of taxing authority to generate funds to cover the costs unless a General Improvement District is
formed, that another location for a facility is available and while it also has issues they can be more easily
mitigated. Ms. Ure concluded by noting that there are other more feasible options available for this
facility in this community. Chairman Brissenden asked for further public comment.
Mike Gast appeared before the Commission discussing his concerns about the proposed facility
including the requirement in the CUP that the facility not interfere with the peace of the community, that
given the proposed size of the building it will be the highest building in the community and will be able to
be seen as people come into the community, that the proposed lighting will illuminate neighboring
properties and create a disturbance and his opinion is that this is not the proper location for a community
building.
Camma Marvel commented on the need for growth in the Paradise community and the attempt by
some residents to keep things as they are forever which is not the reality; she continued commenting on
the trees previously discussed noting that they have been a hazard all along; she spoke in support of
letting the process begin.
11
01/11/2016
Page 4 of 11
Tony Lesperance offered comment on the division in the community and offered caution to the
Commission on rushing in with any type of judgment at this time further suggesting that it might be
prudent to stand back and select several people in the valley from both sides to sit down and try and
resolve the issue as any decision made today would be the wrong one, no matter which way it goes.
Tina Gast appeared before the Commission noting that she had submitted an appeal letter and
confirming that the Commission had received said letter; she reiterated her concerns as to the adverse
effect of the facility location on adjacent property owners including the parking and lighting issues and
voiced concern about the effect the facility will have on property values on adjacent property owners.
Tom Cassinelli addressed the Board and clarified that people are not opposed to the building but
to the location of the building; he noted the other possible location for the building and that contributions
to the building fund were made for a community hall similar to Orovada’s facility as opposed to a gym;
he stated his concerns that the location identified would not allow for a community hall. Chairman
Brissenden asked for further public comment. None offered.
Chairman Brissenden asked the appellants for any evidence to support the arguments or opinions
presented that the CUP is not consistent with the Master Plan or fails to comply with the zoning
requirements. Ms. Ure appeared before the Commission and addressed the zoning requirements noting
that the zoning for this building is M-3 as contained in HCC 17.44 and in said chapter recreational
facilities are not listed but they are also not specifically prohibited; she continued noting that the current
CUP is void of information related to safety issues such as parking and ingress & egress of emergency
vehicles and so the CUP as applied for in the application itself is deficient: she further noted that HCC
17.68.080 sets forth what the Planning Commission shall make findings including the size and shape,
which, in this case, keeps shifting and that adequate parking spaces are available and that also keeps
changing so until more information is submitted and until a survey of the plan is provided what evidence
is there to show that there are adequate parking spaces. Ms. Ure provided a copy of a Facebook© page to
the Commission that referred to the proposed building as a community center as opposed to a gym and
noted that the application for the CUP identified the facility as being for recreation; she noted that
requirements for a community center are more stringent and commented on requirements for additional
approvals if the lot size is under 2.5 acres. Ms. Ure suggested that no evidence is necessary at this time as
the application itself if deficient and insufficient and noted the information provided from multiple
sources as well as the ability of the Commission to take this matter under review. Commissioner French
asked Ms. Ure if her comments submitted previously included all of the information she provided today.
Ms. Ure indicated that she had included additional comments today but that she could provide those in
12
01/11/2016
Page 5 of 11
writing if the Commission wished. Commissioner French asked that she do so. Commissioner Bell asked
Ms. Ure to elaborate as to how the parking spaces are a nuisance. Ms. Ure responded discussing the
location of the spaces, the language of the Nevada Revised Statutes related to nuisances and the effect
they would have on Mr. Lucas as the property owner next to those spaces; she noted that if and when the
property is dedicated to the County, if the County would be willing sign a hold harmless agreement with
Mr. Lucas as to the trees that would be acceptable. Commissioner Bell asked why those trees were not
currently a nuisance and noted the responsibility of a property owner to maintain their trees; he again
asked about the potential nuisance and suggested that assumptions are being made. Ms. Ure noted that
part of the issue is that they do not know where the parking spaces will be located as the application is
deficient as to that point; she agreed that she was assuming that the parking would be on the east side of
the lot which means the trees would overhang it. Commissioner Bell questioned why that would be the
applicant’s nuisance and not the owner of the property that has the trees. Ms. Ure agreed that it would be
a nuisance against Mr. Lucas but indicated that it is occurring because of the change in what is located on
the abutting lot and would interfere with his enjoyment of his property as he will have added maintenance
and added liability. Ms. Ure asked when the additional comments are required. Commissioner French
asked that it be provided as soon as possible perhaps by next Monday. Deputy Carr commented on the
ability to provide additional information and the time frame for decision; she noted her issue with any
new information being provided after this meeting. Commissioner Bell commented on the proposed
building being referred to today as both a gym and a community center and asked for clarification on that.
Ms. Ure explained that the CUP application before the Commission today indicates a recreational facility
only however during the fund raising it had been identified as both and today at the site the applicant had
indicated that a kitchen would be included. Commissioner Bell asked if the inclusion of a kitchen would
change the designation. Ms. Ure indicated that it would have different code regulations and noted that in
the future, if the County takes over the facility, they would have to control who can use the facility and
for what it can be used. Commissioner Bell noted that would be another assumption as he did not believe
the County would have an obligation to take over the building from a 501C3. Ms. Ure concurred.
Commissioner French stated his concern that there may be additional plans for the building down the road
and it brings into question whether all of the conditions in the CUP being discussed have been adhered to
given the size of the property and the ability of ingress/egress and the parking issues though he noted that
the CUP does address limiting the scope of permission of how to use the property based on gymnasium
only. Deputy Carr commented that if the matter came back to the Planning Department to amend or
change the uses it would need to go before the Planning Commission again. Deputy Carr stated that there
13
01/11/2016
Page 6 of 11
was some additional information that she believes will be relevant to the Commission’s determination
today including that the Planning Commission had concerns about the parking and setback requirements
and ensuring that they complied with various codes and so there was supposed to be an updated map or a
different configuration of the building provided to ensure this was accomplished; she asked Betty
Lawrence of the Planning Department if that had been received yet. Mrs. Lawrence indicated that it had
not. Mr. Echevarria stated that they had not presented it to the Building Department yet but that they
have a proposed drawing. Deputy Carr respectfully recommended that because the Commission is
making a brand new determination on this matter, that the document be turned into them to assist in that
determination. Ms. Ure, for the record, objected to the entry of this additional map as it was not
submitted prior to this hearing and not made available to everyone, to have a fair hearing and be
addressed in the hearing. Commissioner Bell asked Deputy Carr to address said objection. Deputy Carr
responded to the objection and explained why it is acceptable to consider this information as this was a
condition placed on the applicant by the RPC and it is necessary to be make a determination.
Commissioner French asked about the prior discussion related to the appellant not being able to provide
additional information after today’s hearing. Deputy Carr noted that this evidence had been specifically
requested of the applicant at a prior hearing. Commissioner French asked Mr. Echevarria how long he
had this information prior to today’s meeting. Mr. Echevarria indicated that they had not been aware of
any issues with the parking until late last week and agreed that there are some things that they have not
done but that is because they do not have their land issue resolved and they are working on a limited
budget so they are addressing items as they can; he stated that he had the plan if they would like to see it.
Commissioner Bell agreed that it was relevant but he asked the Building Director if it could be approved
today. Building Director Bobby Thomas appeared before the Commission and stated that what they are
being presented has not been reviewed for any compliance other than several visits by individuals asking
what would be the minimum requirements and so could be subject to change during the review and that
until he gets a complete package he cannot give any determination whatsoever. Deputy Carr agreed that
usually the various departments review for compliance with code and requirements and that will be done
in this case but the Commission could potentially consider the recommendations from staff and the input
from the various individuals as one of the conditions of this permit is that it comply with all applicable
laws and codes so if he submits to staff who submit their recommendations to the Commission based on
their analysis as to whether it complies with the applicable codes and regulations the Commission could
proceed. Discussion occurred between the Commission and Deputy Carr about the need for the
compliance with all applicable state, local and federal laws in order for the project to move forward and
14
01/11/2016
Page 7 of 11
the Commission’s ability to approve based on compliance occurring. Director Thomas explained what
would occur once the plans are presented and how deficiencies can be addressed. Commissioner French
and Bell agreed that a decision can be made today on the appeal based on the evidence submitted today.
Deputy Carr explained the three options available to the Commission for today per the Code.
Commissioner French asked if the issue could be referred back to the Regional Planning Commission for
further deliberation and to consider the additional evidence presented today. Deputy Carr stated that the
law does not contemplate that action. Commissioner French observed that there are compelling
arguments on both sides of this issue and that with the references in the staff report related to maintaining
the peace and welfare and the references today to the nuisance statutes, it truly depends on who you are
and where you reside based on the comments as to that issue have been received today and through
comments he had heard prior to this meeting; he stated that with the evidence presented today he does not
believe that he is in a position to make a decision today as he would like have time to review all of the
facts before making any decision.
Commissioner Cerri noted the difficulty of making this decision for a valley which can’t come
together and agreed that this building is being planned for the kids but stated that he also believed the
building would turn into a community hall and as there would be different codes and building requirement
for a community hall, it would seem that those are being circumvented; he stated his concern with that
occurring as if the community comes to the County to take the building over, would the County be able to
and, if it can’t, is the community prepared to pay for and take care of the facility forever. Commissioner
Cerri stated that if it does not meet parking and fire requirements, he does not believe this Commission
should take it over and burden the rest of the taxpayers with the liability; he referred to Mr. Lesperance’s
suggestion of a getting a group to try and bring the community together and wondered if that would help
but, he observed head shaking in the audience which seemed to indicate that was not a good idea.
Commissioner Bell observed that it appeared that either location resulted in a community split. Mr.
Echevarria explained that when this matter went before the RPC letters were submitted from people in
support of and opposed to and he reviewed the signatures and counted them and there were 74 signatures
in support and 44 against and anyone who was not specific was included with the against; he continued
stating that the building will only be used as a gym, that there is no other use and he apologized for it not
being correct on the Facebook© page; he noted that the research had shown that they could not afford a
community center so that is why the gym plan went forward and that the kitchen was included for the
purpose of the concession stand. Discussion occurred regarding the letters that were sent out by the PTO
to determine support and that they were not included in today’s packet. Commissioner Amos suggested
15
01/11/2016
Page 8 of 11
that the Commission needed to either approve the action taken by the Regional Planning Commission or
not approve it. Commissioner Bell stated that he was okay with some additional time to review the
information provided.
Audience member Lewis Trout, a member of the Regional Planning Commission, asked if the
code specifically prohibited remanding the matter back to the RPC. Deputy Carr replied that the authority
is not given and her recommendation would be that, as the ordinance specifies that the Commission
reverse, approve or amend and modify the conditions, that is what their authority is and that she would be
uncomfortable going outside of that if it is not specifically identified in the ordinance, however, this
ordinance and chapter do require revision and that may be something to consider for the future. The
following motion was made by Commissioner French and passed unanimously:
To continue this matter until the next County Commission meeting to allow for the
opportunity for review of the documents and information provided.
DISCUSSION OF AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CREATION OF A GENERAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS INVOLVING PARADISE VALLEY,
OR OTHER OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO MAINTAIN GYMNASIUM, IF APPROVED, AND
STEPS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH NRS CHAPTER 318 INCLUDING VOTING
REQUIREMENTS AND TIMING OF VOTING PROCESS: Commissioner Bell asked if this matter
is premature and should be tabled. Commissioner French commented on the need to receive input on the
matter from the people in this community. Commissioner Cerri commented on how the facilities are
handled in the Orovada and McDermitt communities and suggested that Paradise Valley needs to figure
out how they want to handle this matter. Mr. Echevarria noted that the New Building Fund has nothing to
do with bringing this matter up and that in the past an attempt to create a GID was voted down by the
community so that is one of the reasons the smaller lot was chosen so they could pay for everything; he
did state that he is not opposed to a GID. Commissioner Cerri commented on what it takes to maintain a
facility for the community and stated that there needs to be a long term plan for the maintenance of the
building. Discussion occurred regarding the issue. Administrator Mendiola commented that, from the
County perspective, these types of buildings are often turned over to the County and that he would be
very uncomfortable accepting any building without having a funding source in place; he noted issues that
are occurring with the McDermitt building and that the costs to repair that have to be absorbed by the
whole county as there was no funding source in place. An audience member commented on the same
type of issues with the IOOF Hall that is being used as a community hall currently and the importance of
doing this building right to protect the community. Commissioner Cerri suggested that if the community
16
01/11/2016
Page 9 of 11
wants a community hall that they create an assessment district first, then build a building. An audience
member commented on the need for the community to work together. Lewis Trout commented that the
RPC had not offered any comments about the creation of a district, that he as an individual had offered
the suggestion during public comment in a Commission meeting following a conversation with
Commissioner Cerri. Discussion occurred regarding the manner in which a GID could be created,
election or commission action, the time frame for that creation, the need to have community support, the
need to create a revenue stream, what funding is being used currently, the length of time it would take to
build a community center, the difference between a community hall/center and a gym and the benefits to
the community of both facilities. Tom Cassinelli stated his opposition to building a gymnasium that
would remain a gymnasium, he stated that he would support a structure that will accommodate growing
into a community center. Discussion occurred regarding the cost of running the facility in Orovada, the
ability of the County to assist in the process of creating a GID or assessment district, the ability of the
County to assist in funding the building and the need of the community to meet without the Commission
to discuss the matter. Commissioner French asked that the processes and options for creating a GID be
placed on a Commission agenda within a couple of meetings. Comments were made from the audience
regarding the need for a GID if the County is going to be responsible for the meeting, the ability to
combine the other districts within Paradise into one district, the need for the community to meet and
discuss this matter outside the presence of the County Commission, that the community may not approve
a GID in a vote, that the Commission directing the creation with an appeal process would be the way to
go, the creation of the GID occurring separate from this proposal as there is currently a community
building but there is no gym for the school, the need to use restraint to avoid further division within the
community, the need to give the community time to see if they can decide how to proceed, the need to
determine what the cost would be and what the difference would be between special assessment district
and a GID. After discussion the following motion was made by Commissioner French and passed
unanimously:
To place this item on the Tuesday, February 16th Commission agenda to deliberate on
whether we will vote on a resolution for forming a GID in Paradise Valley or a special
assessment depending on the nuances of which one would work best for the valley and at
the same time have some information from our county administrator on what the rate
would be per 100 for a GID.
DISCUSSION OF ABILITY OR AUTHORITY OF COUNTY TO ACCEPT DEDICATION OF
REAL PROPERTY AND STEPS RELATED TO THE PROCESS OF DEDICATION, CREATION
17
01/11/2016
Page 10 of 11
OF A PROCESS TO ACCEPT DEDICATIONS OF REAL PROPERTY, RESPONSIBILITIES OF
THE COUNTY IN ACCEPTING DEDICATED PROPERTY AND POSSIBLE ACCEPTANCE
OF DEDICATION OF REAL PROPERTY REGARDING PARADISE VALLEY PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 110 BRIDGE STREET: Administrator Mendiola suggested that this item might be
more appropriate to be discussed as part of the retreat as he wants to prepare some suggested criteria
based on prior acceptances the County has done including not only buildings but roads and such; he noted
that some dedications such as with roads have specific criteria already identified the need to be included.
Chairman Brissenden directed the Administrator to place this item on the retreat agenda. Commissioner
French suggested that a formal policy needs to be developed and adopted so all requests are treated the
same. Commissioner French also suggested that representatives from Paradise that are interested in the
formation of a GID also attend the meeting.
CONSIDERATION OF AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF FINAL DRAFT COMMENTS
LETTER PREPARED BY THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF
COMMENTING ON THE PROPOSED WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION (“NOTICE OF
PROPOSED WITHDRAWAL; SAGEBRUSH FOCAL AREAS; IDAHO, MONTANA, NEVADA,
OREGON, UTAH AND WYOMING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE AN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT”) BY THE BLM POSTED ON SEPTEMBER 24,
2015. THIS NOTICE TEMPORARILY SEGREGATES THE WITHDRAWAL LANDS FOR UP
TO TWO YEARS WHILE THE APPLICATION IS PROCESSED. COMMENTS ARE DUE BY
JANUARY 14, 2016: Commissioner French requested that a couple of other items be added to the
letter related to the travel management for keeping roads open and the need for the EIS to fully comply
with the County Master Plan; he indicated that he would be willing to add a paragraph to the letter to
address these issues. Commissioner French explained the purpose of the letter to the audience.
Commissioner Cerri inquired if compliance with the State Plan could also be included. Commissioner
French indicated that he could add language related to that too. After discussion the following motion
was made by Commissioner Bell and passed unanimously:
To approve the letter drafted by Commissioner French with the inclusion of the
modifications indicated related to travel management plan, compliance with the master
plan and with the state plan.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Chairman Brissenden asked for public comments. Lewis Trout appeared
before the Commission and commented on the importance of providing to the citizens of Paradise Valley
of the estimated cost to establish a GID; he suggested that information be provided to the citizens prior to
18
01/11/2016
Page 11 of 11
any meeting and further suggested that a County Commissioner moderate the meeting.
Ron Schrempp commented on the availability of property he owns for the building of a
community hall, the contract he has signed with community members for that use and that use only, with
the stipulation that the water tower remain.
Gary Echevarria questioned if the property is for a community hall why the special use permit
applied for by Mr. Lucas on behalf of Mr. Schrempp indicates a gymnasium/sports center. Mr. Lucas
stated that it would become a community hall. Mr. Schrempp stated it is for whatever the community
needs, as long as it is for the community he is okay with it.
ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Brissenden adjourned the meeting at 12:41 p.m.
ATTESTED: ______________________________ APPROVED: _________________________
Clerk Chairman
(Minutes approved by the Commission and signed by the Chairman on ___________________)
19
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--242Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Comptroller Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTExpenditures
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS
20
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--243Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Administration Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTPine Forest
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS
21
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--244Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Planning Department Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTSubmitted photos
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS AH-16-02 Public Notice.pdf Broken Cement Pile and Durt Piles.jpg Broken Cement Pile.jpg Durt Piles.jpg East Road way Blocked.jpg Full Road way.jpg South Broken Cement Pile.jpg South Road way.jpg West Road way Blocked.jpg West Road way.jpg West Side Lambert.jpg Keeping All of Robbie Circle.pdf
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Supporters of keeping all of Robbie Circle Lorne & Debra Lyon
10500 Kearns way
10520 Kearns way
(775) 623-2422
Zach Campbell
10055 Indian court
(775) 403-0623
George Elms
10100 Indian court
(775) 304-4334
Adolfo Ruiz
10250 Robbie circle
(775) 625-2530
David Garcia
10335 Robbie circle
(775) 304-6749
Donald Valle
Lieutenant Winnemucca Rural Fire Department
(775) 304-0670
34
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--250Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: County Clerk Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTNuisance Review-Artemesia
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS 100_0772.JPG 100_0778.JPG 100_0779.JPG 3110 Artemesia Way Nuisance Investigation.pdf
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--245Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: County Clerk Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTNuisance Update-Hill Drive
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS 100_0776.JPG 100_0777.JPG
60
61
62
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--246Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Administration Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECT426 Bridge Street Purchase
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS
63
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--240Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Administration Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTEasement
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS Rose Creek Easement Survey notes.pdf
64
65
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--248Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Administration Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTWildfire Support Group
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS Wildfire Support Group Petition Rev.docx
66
PETITION
The Rangeland Fire Protection Association (RFPA) known as Wildfire Support Group, has petitioned the Humboldt County Commission to be sanctioned under NRS 472.200 Rangeland Fire Protection Associations and NAC 472.100-472.170 inclusive.
An RFPA has the responsibility for prevention, protection and suppression of wildland fires on State Lands and private lands that are located within the boundaries of the established fire district or RFPA boundary. These lands, protected by the RFPA are intermingled or adjacent to lands protected by the BLM. Therefore, it is mutually advantageous, and in the public interest, for the parties to coordinate their efforts in the prevention, detection, and suppression of wildfires in, and adjacent to their areas of responsibility, including private, state, and federal lands.
Therefore, we the undersigned members of the Wildfire Support Group Rangeland Fire Protection Association hereby petition the Humboldt County Board of Commissioners for their support and approval to operate with the area defined with Humboldt County borders.
_____________________________Mel Hummel, President
______________________________Jess Frye, Vice President
______________________________Eric Hummel, Sec./Treasurer
APPROVED this 17th day of October, 2016.
BY: HUMBOLDT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Marlene Brissenden, Chairman
ATTEST:
Tami Rae Spero, County Clerk
67
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--249Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Administration Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTPersonnel Policy Updates
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS
68
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--251Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Sheriff's Office Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTAdult Detention
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS ADULT DETENTION FACILITY MEDICAL AUTHORITY AGREEMENT 2016 (002).pdf
69
1
ADULT DETENTION FACILITY MEDICAL
AUTHORITY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this _______ day of
_______________________, 2016, by and between HUMBOLDT COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of Nevada, the “COUNTY,” and
ROBBIE L. GRANT, D.O., the “PHYSICIAN.”
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the COUNTY is responsible for the operation of the
Humboldt County Adult Detention Facility (“Detention Facility”) in
Winnemucca, Nevada and desires to obtain the services of a licensed
and qualified physician to provide periodic medical care services
for inmates detained at the facility and to assist with medical
services at the facility; and
WHEREAS, PHYSICIAN is qualified and licensed to practice in
the State of Nevada with experience and capability in providing
medical services pursuant to this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants,
promises, terms, and conditions herein, the parties agree as
follows:
///
///
///
///
70
2
ARTICLE I – PHYSICIAN SERICES
Section 1.1: PHYSICIAN shall provide professional medical
care services as outlined in Attachment A for inmates at the
Detention Facility on an “as requested” basis.
Section 1.2: In the event PHYSICIAN is temporarily unable to
provide medical care services for COUNTY, then PHYSICIAN shall,
with the concurrence of the Humboldt County Sheriff, designate a
suitably qualified and licensed medical professional to provide
the medical care services contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 1.3: For purposes of administering this Agreement
and the services provided by PHYSICIAN, COUNTY designates the
Humboldt County Sheriff, or the Sheriff’s designee, as the person
with authority to act on behalf of the COUNTY.
ARTICLE II – TERM/RENEWAL
Section 2.1: This agreement becomes effective upon execution
by all parties and will remain in effect until the end of the
calendar year unless sooner terminated by the terms of this
agreement. This agreement will automatically renew for two (2)
successive one year terms beginning January 1 and ending December
31 of each calendar year unless written notice is given by either
party (30) days prior to the commencement of a calendar year that
the agreement will not be renewed, or unless sooner terminated as
herein provided.
///
71
3
ARTICLE III – CONSIDERATION
Section 3.1: COUNTY shall pay PHYSICIAN fees for medical
care services as follows:
A. A fee of $95.00 per inmate for each inmate provided services at the PHYSICIAN office or at a
site other than the Detention Facility;
B. The customary fee in effect for each Inmate provided services at the PHYSICIAN office or at a
site other than the Detention Facility.
Section 3.2: PHYSICIAN shall submit periodic invoices to
COUNTY for services provided, and COUNTY shall remit payment within
thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice.
Section 3.3: The PHYSICIAN is responsible for payment of
federal, state and local taxes, fees and withholding resulting
from the compensation received by PHYSICIAN pursuant to this
Agreement.
ARTICLE IV – RELATIONSHIP
Section 4.1: COUNTY is contracting for the performance of
PHYSICIAN’s services as an independent contractor and COUNTY does
not control the manner in which PHYSICIAN shall exercise medical
judgment nor does COUNTY retain control over the methods and
procedures to be utilized in the performance of PHYSICIAN‘s
professional activities.
Section 4.2: No relationship of employment, partnership,
joint venture or agency is created or intended to be created by
this Agreement and PHYSICIAN shall have no claim against COUNTY
72
4
for services provided under this Agreement for vacation pay, sick
leave, retirement benefits, social security, workers’
compensation, disability or unemployment insurance benefits, or
employee benefits of any kind.
ARTICLE V – PHYSICIAN WARRANTIES
Section 5.1: PHYSICIAN represents and warrants that: (I)
PHYSICIAN is a doctor of osteopathy, presently duly licensed and
in good standing, without restriction, as a physician in the State
of Nevada; (II) PHYSICIAN will maintain and keep in good standing
the Nevada license to practice medicine without restriction or
challenge during the term of this Agreement; and, (III) PHYSICIAN’s
services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be consistent
with the standard care and quality of services generally available
from general practice physicians in the Winnemucca, Nevada area.
ARTICLE VI – INDEMNIFICATION
Section 6.1: The PHYSICIAN assumes all liability for and
agrees to defend protect, indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY
against liability, claims, demands, costs, losses and expenses,
including attorney fees, for damage to property or injury,
including death to persons, arising from the active or passive
negligence or willful misconduct of PHYSICIAN in performing
services pursuant to this Agreement.
///
///
73
5
ARTICLE VII – INSURANCE
Section 7.1: The COUNTY shall maintain, at COUNTY expense,
professional liability insurance for PHYSICIAN for claims arising
out of the performance of PHYSICIAN’s services as described herein
on such terms (current coverage is in excess of any other coverage
available) and within the coverage limits (current coverage does
not exceed $1,000,000 per event) defined in the COUNTY professional
liability endorsement providing for such coverage, it being
understood that the COUNTY maintained insurance is from time to
time subject to changes in terms and coverage limits without
notice.
Section 7.2: PHYSICIAN shall, at PHYSICIAN expense, be
responsible for procuring and maintaining any other insurance
coverage applicable to services provided by PHYSICIAN pursuant to
this Agreement, including “tail coverage” or continuation of
insurance after termination of the services provided hereunder.
Section 7.3: PHYSICIAN shall promptly notify COUNTY of any
claim or threatened claim based on services provided by PHYSICIAN
or under PHYSICIAN’s supervision, and shall cooperate fully with
COUNTY and the insurers in investigation, defense, and other
disposition of such claims, including not making any voluntary
statements or commitments which could prejudice defense of same.
///
74
6
ARTICLE VIII – EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES
Section 8.1: PHYSICIAN shall provide, at PHYSICIAN expense,
equipment and supplies that are necessary for conducting the
PHYSICIAN services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
ARTICLE IX – NON-DISCRIMINATION
Section 9.1: PHYSICIAN shall, while performing services and
duties pursuant to this Agreement, uphold and abide by all laws
pertaining to equal access and employment opportunities,
including: Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as
amended, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1975, the
Equal Pay Act of 1963, Section 501 and 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 and Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990.
Section 9.2: PHYSICIAN shall not discriminate against the
COUNTY, the Humboldt County Sheriff, and their officers,
employees, agents or any other individual the PHYSICAN comes into
contact with by reason of the services performed pursuant to this
Agreement because of race, color, religion, age, sex, sexual
orientation, national origin, veteran’s status or disability
(including AIDS and related conditions).
///
///
///
75
7
ARTICLE X – TERMINATION
Section 10.1: This Agreement and the services of PHYSICIAN
may be terminated without cause by COUNTY or PHYSICIAN upon service
of a written notice of termination upon the other party. The
termination shall become effective not sooner than thirty (30)
days following service of the notice of termination, unless another
time is mutually agreed upon by COUNTY and PHYSICIAN.
ARTICLE XI – RELEASE
Section 11.1: Upon any termination of this Agreement and
upon acceptance of all compensation for services performed, the
PHYSICIAN shall be deemed to have voluntarily released and
discharged the COUNTY, the Board of Commissioners of the COUNTY,
the Humboldt County Sheriff, and their officers, employees, agents
and successors and assigns, individually and collectively, and in
their official capacities, from any and all liability arising out
of PHYSICIAN providing services under this Agreement.
ARTICLE XII – GENERAL CONDITIONS
Section 12.1: This Agreement may be modified or amended only
in writing by an instrument executed with the same formality as
this Agreement.
Section 12.2 This Agreement and all rights and obligations
hereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Nevada in effect from time to time. In
the event litigation is used to enforce or interpret the provisions
76
8
of this Agreement, such litigation is to be brought and adjudicated
in Humboldt County, Nevada and the parties waive the right to
bring, try or remove such litigation to any other county or
judicial district; provided, however, nothing in this Agreement
shall be construed to limit the right of a court of competent
jurisdiction to change the venue.
Section 12.3: This Agreement relates to the performance of
services by PHYSICIAN and shall not be transferred or assigned by
PHYSICIAN without the prior written consent and agreement of
COUNTY. Any unauthorized transfer of this Agreement shall be void.
The COUNTY may assign this Agreement to a successor entity of
COUNTY.
Section 12.4: This Agreement will inure to the benefit of
and bind the respective successors and permitted assigns of the
parties hereto.
Section 12.5: The captions or titles used in this Agreement
shall have no effect on its interpretation and are for convenience
and reference only and in no way define limits or describe the
scope of this Agreement or the scope or content of any Agreement
provision.
Section 12.6: In the performance of services pursuant to
this Agreement, there shall be compliance by COUNTY and PHYSICIAN
with all applicable laws, regulations and rules, and PHYSICIAN
77
9
shall comply with applicable COUNTY and Detention Facility
policies.
Section 12.7: Whenever the construction of this Agreement
requires, singular terms shall be deemed plural, and plural the
singular; and, masculine shall be deemed to be feminine or neuter,
and feminine the masculine or neuter. The language of all parts
of this Agreement shall in all circumstances be construed as a
whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or
against any party. The doctrine or rule of construction against
the drafting party shall not apply, nor shall any presumption
apply, to the interpretation and/or enforcement of this Agreement
or any documents attached to this Agreement.
Section 12.8: This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall be
deemed an original, but all such counterparts together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.
Section 12.9: The capitalized terms used in this Agreement
with reference to federal or state law or regulation shall have
the meaning ascribed to such term in the law or regulation. The
term “PHYSICIAN” as used in this Agreement shall include, when the
context requires inclusion, all PHYSICIAN associates and
subcontractors, agents of PHYSICIAN used to provide services or
carry out PHYSICIAN services under this Agreement, and authorized
assignees of PHYSICIAN.
78
10
Section 12.10: This Agreement contains the entire
understanding between the parties and there are no terms, promises,
conditions, inducements, representations or warranties, express or
implied, other than as herein set forth. This Agreement and the
other instruments attached hereto or herein referred to supersede
any prior discussions, contracts or agreements of the parties
pertaining to the subject of this Agreement.
Section 12.11: Any notice, request, or demand or other
communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and
shall be considered given (I) upon personal service to the party
to be served, or (II) upon acknowledgment of receipt or proof of
transmittal of a facsimile or other electronic transmission or
communication, or (III) upon the sooner of first attempted delivery
or receipt for Federal Express or other similar delivery service
keeping records of deliveries and attempted deliveries, or (IV)
seventy-two(72) hours after deposit in the United States mall,
certified and postage prepaid, return receipt requested, in a
regularly maintained receptacle for the deposit of United States
mail to the party to be served at their address given herein, that
is:
///
///
///
///
79
11
If to COUNTY: County of Humboldt
Attn: County Administrator
50 W. Fifth Street, Room 205
Winnemucca, Nevada 89445
If to PHYSICIAN: Robbie L. Grant, D.O.
P.O. Box 417
Winnemucca, Nevada 89446
or at such other address or attention as from time to time may be
specified by either party by notice to the other party in the
manner herein provided.
Section 12.12: The recital and introductory paragraphs of
this Agreement are considered an integral part of this Agreement
and form a basis for entering into this Agreement and shall be
considered prima facie evidence of the facts, events, documents
and information referred to therein.
Section 12.13: The parties represent that they have read this
Agreement, that the terms and provisions of this Agreement have
been explained to them and that they are fully aware of the
contents and binding legal effect of this Agreement and that they
are entering into this Agreement freely and voluntarily.
Section 12.14: The enforceability, voidability, invalidity
or illegality of any provisions of this Agreement shall not render
any other provisions unenforceable, void, invalid or illegal.
Section 12.15: Time is of the essence of this agreement and
each of its provisions.
80
12
Section 12.16: All waivers under this Agreement must be in
writing and signed by the party against whom the waiver is sought
to be enforced. One or more waivers of any term, condition or
covenant by either party shall not be construed as a waiver of any
other term, condition or covenant.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement
effective as of the day and year first above written.
ATTEST: COUNTY:
___________________________ By ___________________________
Its __________________________
PHYSICIAN:
Date:______________________ _____________________________
Robbie L. Grant, D.O.
81
13
ATTACHMENT A
TO
ADULT DETENTION FACILITY MEDICAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
1. PHYSICIAN shall attend to the medical needs of inmates, on a case by case basis, at the Detention Facility.
2. PHYSICIAN shall, in the event of a medical emergency, assure that normal protocol is followed for transportation
of the detention Facility inmates and disposition of the
medical emergency.
3. PHYSICIAN shall assist in arranging specialist consultation as needed by Detention Facility inmates.
4. PHYSICIAN shall keep and record this information necessary to insure the proper care of Detention Facility inmates,
and provide legal documentation of same.
5. PHYSICIAN shall review and countersign all medical records generated in the Detention Facility.
6. PHYSICIAN shall oversee and be responsible for the distribution instructions for prescription medication used
in the Detention Facility and prescribed by PHYSICIAN.
ATTACHMENT A
82
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--252Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Planning Department Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTSet To Public Hearing-16-02-01
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS 10-17-16.pdf
83
Memo
TO: Dave Mendiola
Tami Spero
FROM: Planning Department/BL
DATE: October 7, 2016
RE: County Commission Meeting October 17, 2016
Please place the following on the agenda for the 10/17 HCC meeting:
Please set the following for public hearing:
AH-16-01 An abandonment request submitted by Steve Dixon to abandon an approximate 60
foot by 285.85 foot easement (known as Anna Way) along the east side of assessor’s parcel
#3738-15-102-003; along the west side of assessor’s parcel #3738-15-126-001 between
Delaney Drive and Ivan Drive.
TH-16-01 An ordinance repealing Humboldt County Code Title 17 Chapter 17.68 Conditional Use Permits and replacing all provisions of Title 17 Zoning, Chapter 17.68 regarding Conditional Use Permits, including but not limited to Conditional Use Permit Applications through the appeal process and other matters properly relating thereto.
TH-16-02 An ordinance adding new Chapter 17.69 Above Ground Utility Projects to Title 17 Zoning, to the Humboldt County Code to allow for a permit for construction of an aboveground utility project located in a Master Plan designated utility corridor; and an ordinance to allow for a permit for construction of an aboveground utility project which is not
located within a Master Plan designated utility corridor and other matters properly relating thereto.
TH-16-03 An ordinance repealing the Humboldt County Code Title 17 Zoning, Chapter 17.70 Amendments to Title and Plan adding a new Chapter 17.71 “Amendments to Title and Plan” and other matters properly relating thereto. For the purpose of modifying the Chapter numbers only.
TH-16-04 An ordinance adding new Chapter 17.70 Renewable Energy Generation Projects to the Humboldt County Code Title 17 Zoning, to allow for a conditional use permit and an expedited conditional use permit for Renewable Energy Generation Projects to include an application process, requirements, and fees, and other matter properly relating thereto.
84
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--260Submitted by: Karen BannisterSubmitting Department: Administration Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTHUMBOLDT TV DISTRICT: APPROVAL TO STOP TV DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (FOR POSSIBLEACTION)
Recommendation:Approval
ATTACHMENTS TV District Josh Burchette.pdf
85
- HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA
TelevisionlRadlo Tax Refund CeftificationNoucher
Pay To: JcSj] 3’arcA e77tC Humbddt Television Depaflfredt OoboJtho1/0 \J jddress: /755 5/crr.. Pa55 M/ b Quinn River Television Distrf4t 709-000-52020
/%“,‘thilen7it’€rcc t’jJ t71yc E Denio Television District V I 716-6bb-2O1&’i,
Assessor’s Parcel # 19 1cc t ‘ Physical Address: / 765 5,arra &.p.j1j,JNe,t, tetc c 1ir / Lom ‘1c -
I/We certify that the television tax paid on the tax roll for the above parcel is incorrect because:
,t This parcel cannot be sewed by television/radio signals of the television district/departmentThere is not and will not be a television/radio receiver on this property during this tax year
C The correct number of television/radio receivers for this property should beC Other:
Under ains and penalties of perjury, a felony I/we swear that flw abovp is fle and correct.(OQ- Ct(c f)L&’ eActs,? -//;e- /O-17
fro,r, 1?n7 C/tier/Qd.
Ja___.__._.Z_.Z_.._._..._.__._.This section to be completed by T&e,tskn Beard or Manager This section to be completed by Board of County Commissioners
Communications Manager. Humboldt TV orChairman, Quinn River or Denio TV District
U
/o- /o -
Date
This section to be completed by County Administrator’s Office
•..
.9
Refund of Television/Radio Tax for reason stated above -I!eParcel#Parcel #Parcel#
TOTALI certify that the (oregoing claim Is correct and just;hat the articles specified have been received by the
proper officials of the County, the Courts and/or
Special Districts, or the services stated have been,erformed; and that they were necessary for, have
een or will be applied to County. Court or Special
District purposes.
Authorized Signature
For Comptroller Use OnlyDate
Recommend for: ApprovalLI Denial
Comments tics-c ‘s.: Ad. fS h&ctAtiQ jt1 * CO4MS 4e4icuc. TV
Request was:
By:
County Commission Approval
o ApprovedO Denied
Chairman
1)818
86
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--253Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Administration Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTDispatch Software Upgrade
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS Bosch SW Upgrade - 911.pdf
87
88
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--254Submitted by: Dave MendiolaSubmitting Department: Administration Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTPhase ii Water Plan
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS
89
Humboldt County Board of CommissionersAgenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. 2016--258Submitted by: Karen BannisterSubmitting Department: Administration Meeting Date: October 17, 2016
SUBJECTRESOLUTION OF INTENT TO SELL REAL PROPERTY AT PUBLIC AUCTION
Recommendation:Approval
ATTACHMENTS Resolution - Intent to Sell Property REV 10 12 16.pdf
90
Resolution of Intent to Sell Property – page 1 of 7
SUMMARY: A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO SELL REAL
PROPERTY AT PUBLIC AUCTION.
RESOLUTION NO. ____________
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Humboldt County, a political subdivision of the State
of Nevada (hereafter referred to as “County”), owns certain
property generally described as follows:
1. Parcel located at northwest corner of Godchaux Road and
Winchester Drive, Paradise Estates, Paradise, Nevada (APN
3938-02-200-020);
2. Parcel located at northwest corner of Godchaux Road and
Browning Road, Paradise Estates, Humboldt County,
Nevada (APN 3938-12-200-005);
3. Parcel containing a portion of North ½ of Section 9, T37N,
R41E, M.D.B & M. North of Golconda in Eden Valley, east of
Osgood Mountains, Humboldt County, Nevada (APN 3741-
09-200-001);
4. Parcel located at northwest corner of Third Street &
Guernsey Avenue, approximately 100 feet east of Morrison
Avenue, Golconda, Nevada (APN 3640-32-227-002);
5. Parcel located at 140 feet west of Melrose Avenue on the
east side of Cleveland Avenue, Golconda, Nevada (APN
3640-32-251-009);
6. Parcel located at 6960 Airport Road, Winnemucca, Nevada
(APN 3537-09-476-005);
7. Parcel located at 617 Monroe Street, Winnemucca, Nevada
(APN 3638-30-428-004);
8. Parcel located at 3269 Frontier Street, Winnemucca Nevada
(APN 3638-28-255-002); and
91
Resolution of Intent to Sell Property – page 2 of 7
9. Parcel located at 130 Rodeo Drive, Denio, Nevada (APN
4730-04-101-001).
These parcels are more particularly described in the Exhibits attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, these properties are not needed for County
purposes and selling the property is in the County’s best interest; and
WHEREAS, the County desires to sell the properties individually
pursuant to NRS 244.281 and 244.282 allowing for real property owned
by a county to be sold at public auction; and
WHEREAS, these properties have been appraised by two (2)
disinterested competent appraisers chosen as required by NRS
244.2795, and the County considers the findings and determinations set
forth in said appraisals to be accurate and reasonable; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA,
THAT:
1. It is in the best interest of the County to sell the properties,
at auction, as provided in NRS 244.282, and the Board of County
Commissioners (hereafter referred to as the “Board”) declares the
properties as surplus to the County’s needs.
2. The sale of the properties is for purposes other than to
establish, align, realign, change, vacate or otherwise adjust any street,
alley, avenue, or other thoroughfare, or portion thereof of flood control
facility within the County.
3. The properties will be sold individually at public auction to
the highest bidder at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, November 22, 2016, in the
Commission Meeting Room at the Humboldt County Courthouse, 50
West Fifth Street, Winnemucca, Nevada, during the regular Commission
meeting, at which time and place all sealed bids will be opened,
examined and declared and oral bids will be taken under the following
terms and conditions.
a. Any sealed bids must be made on the County’s bid form
available at the County Administrator’s Office, located on the
92
Resolution of Intent to Sell Property – page 3 of 7
2nd floor of the Humboldt County Courthouse, 50 West Fifth
Street, Room 205, Winnemucca, Nevada.
b. The bid forms must be filled out completely and signed. A
bid form may only be used to make a bid for a single property.
If a bidder desires to make bids on multiple properties,
multiple bid forms must be filled out completely with a
separate deposit for each bid.
c. THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE BID FOR EACH PROPERTY,
WHICH REPRESENTS THE HIGHEST OF THE TWO (2)
APPRAISALS FOR EACH PROPERTY, IS AS FOLLOWS:
1) Parcel located at northwest corner of Godchaux Road
and Winchester Drive, Paradise Estates, Paradise,
Nevada (APN 3938-02-200-020) – Minimum Bid of
$3,000.
2) Parcel located at northwest corner of Godchaux Road
and Browning Road, Paradise Estates, Humboldt County,
Nevada (APN 3938-12-200-005) – Minimum Bid of
$20,000.
3) Parcel containing a portion of North ½ of Section 9, T37N,
R41E, M.D.B & M. North of Golconda in Eden Valley, east
of Osgood Mountains, Humboldt County, Nevada (APN
3741-09-200-001) – Minimum Bid of $17,000.
4) Parcel located at northwest corner of Third Street &
Guernsey Avenue, approximately 100 feet east of
Morrison Avenue, Golconda, Nevada (APN 3640-32-227-
002) – Minimum Bid of $13,000.
5) Parcel located at 140 feet west of Melrose Avenue on the
east side of Cleveland Avenue, Golconda, Nevada (APN
3640-32-251-009) – Minimum Bid of $5,000.
6) Parcel located at 6960 Airport Road, Winnemucca,
Nevada (APN 3537-09-476-005) – Minimum Bid of
$9,000.
93
Resolution of Intent to Sell Property – page 4 of 7
7) Parcel located at 617 Monroe Street, Winnemucca,
Nevada (APN 3638-30-428-004) – Minimum Bid of
$25,000.
8) Parcel located at 3269 Frontier Street, Winnemucca
Nevada (APN 3638-28-255-002) – Minimum Bid of
$55,000.
9) Parcel located at 130 Rodeo Drive, Denio, Nevada (APN
4730-04-101-001) – Minimum Bid of $70,000.
d. The properties are to be sold individually.
e. The properties are to be sold for cash.
f. Sealed written bids shall be submitted to the Humboldt
County Clerk, Courthouse, 50 West Fifth Street, Room 207,
Winnemucca, Nevada 89445, by not later than 5:00 p.m. on
December 1, 2016. All bids must be signed and submitted in
sealed envelopes clearly marked on the outside: “REAL
PROPERTY AUCTION”. Bidders mailing their bids assume
the risk of late delivery. Any bids received and time-stamped
after the deadline will not be considered.
g. During the meeting on December 12, 2016, any sealed
written bids will be opened, examined and declared by the
Board before calling for oral bids. Any initial oral bid must
exceed the highest written bid by at least five percent (5%),
and subsequent bids must be in increments of One Thousand
Dollars ($1,000) or more above the previous highest oral bid.
h. All written and oral bids shall be accompanied by certified
check or cashier’s check in the amount of ten percent (10%)
of the bid for the land and drawn in favor of Humboldt County.
This amount shall be forfeited as reasonable liquidated
damages to the Humboldt County, should the successful
bidder fail to enter into and/or complete the required escrow.
In submitting a bid, all bidders irrevocably agree that the
stated liquidated damages are reasonable and that it would
94
Resolution of Intent to Sell Property – page 5 of 7
be impossible to determine the actual damages incurred by
the Humboldt County. Successful bidder’s deposit will be
credited toward the purchase price. Unsuccessful bidder’s
deposits will be returned to the bidder at the conclusion of the
auction.
i. The Board reserves the right to determine which bids
conform to all terms and conditions specified in this
Resolution. The Board may reject any and all bids, either
written or oral, and withdraw any or all of the properties from
the auction. The final acceptance or rejection of any bid may
be made at the same meeting or at any adjourned session of
the same meeting held within ten (10) days. Unless the
Board withdraws a property, the right to purchase a property
will be granted to the highest bidder for that property.
j. It is the bidders’ responsibility to inspect the property and to
determine the property’s condition, value, current zoning
district and master plan designation, access, matters
affecting title, applicable development codes, and all other
pertinent information about the property. The acreage stated
for each parcel is approximate and Humboldt County in no
way guarantees its accuracy. Before submitting any bid,
bidder is to satisfy himself concerning the acreage if acreage
is a critical element of the purchase decision. If the actual
acreage is different than the approximate acreage stated, it
shall in no way affect the enforceability of the bid that has
been accepted by the Humboldt County.
k. The County is selling the property in “as-is” condition and
under the assumption that the successful bidder’s purchase
of the property is based upon the bidder’s independent
investigation. The County makes no representations or
warranties regarding the property’s physical condition or
stability, the existence of hazardous materials on or under the
surface of the property, the property’s suitability for the
bidders’ purposes or for any other purpose, the property’s
value, current zoning district, master plan designation, or
access, or matters affecting title, or applicable development
codes.
95
Resolution of Intent to Sell Property – page 6 of 7
l. A tour of the property located at 130 Rodeo Drive, Denio,
Nevada will be provided for potential bidders on November
18, 2016, between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m.
m. The property shall be conveyed by quitclaim deed subject to
existing liens, encumbrances, covenants, conditions,
restrictions, reservations, rights-of-way, and easements.
n. The sale of the property shall be consummated through
escrow at Western Title Company, Winnemucca, Nevada.
All costs associated with the auction and sale of the property,
including but not limited to any escrow fees, closing costs,
title insurance premiums, real property transfer tax or other
taxes, appraisal fees, publication costs, commissions and
loan costs shall be paid by the successful bidder.
o. The deadline for close of escrow is sixty (60) days after the
Board’s final acceptance of the highest bid. Time is of the
essence. The successful bidder may request one (1) thirty
(30) day extension of the deadline for close of escrow along
with the deposit of an additional ten percent (10%) non-
refundable deposit to be applied towards the purchase price
upon closing. In the event the successful bidder fails to
perform within sixty (60) days, or ninety (90) days if an
extension has been granted, (i) the County may terminate the
escrow and rebid the Property, (ii) the successful bidder
forfeits its non-refundable deposit(s), and (iii) such failure
shall be deemed by Western Title as instruction to
immediately refund the deposit to the County without any
further instruction or court order.
p. Any individual who submits a sealed or written bid on behalf
of an entity shall be deemed to have represented and
warranted that such individual has the legal power, right and
authority to bind the entity to purchase the property on the
terms contained in this Resolution.
q. All bidders shall be deemed to have represented and
warranted that either they, or the entity or individual they
96
Resolution of Intent to Sell Property – page 7 of 7
represent, have the funds necessary to pay the amount bid
and all costs associated with the auction and sale of the
property.
DATED this __17th ___ day of ___October__, 2016.
By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA
By: ________________________________ MARLENE BRISSENDEN, Chairman
ATTEST: ______________________________ TAMI RAE SPERO, Clerk
97
top related