hydrodynamic performance of an unmanned wave glide...
Post on 24-Apr-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
Hydrodynamic performance of an unmanned wave glide vehicle
Weixing Liu,1 Ningyu Li,1,a) Yumin Su,1 Yazhou Zhu,2 and Zhiyang Zhang3
1Science and Technology on Underwater Vehicle Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001,
China
2School of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang
212003, China
3Deepwater Engineering Research Center, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: liningyu123@aliyun.com
Abstract: A principle prototype of the unmanned wave glide vehicle (UWGV) “Voyager I” was
designed and constructed. A hydrostatic resistance test in a tank, a self-propelled experiment and a
free-sailing experiment in a regular wave were carried out. The component of hydrostatic
resistance of the UWGV was investigated. The effect of the wavelength and amplitude on the
heaving amplitude, pitch angle, thrust of the wave glider propulsor (WGP) and free-sailing
velocity of the UWGV were analyzed. The changing trends of various parameters for a series of
wavelengths and amplitudes were obtained. The experimental results provide a new research
direction for numerical computation and a technical foundation for the development of an
unmanned surface vehicle with long voyage and low-carbon capabilities.
Keywords: unmanned wave glide vehicle; tandem foil configuration; regular wave; hydrodynamic
performance
2
1. Introduction
With the development of marine resources, marine exploration and territorial sea safety have
received significant attention from various countries, which has prompted changes in ocean
observation, such as three-dimensional ocean observation, platform diversification, and systematic
and networked ocean observation. The need for observing platforms to undertake long-term,
large-scale, economical, flexible, reliable and autonomous observing missions is urgent. An
unmanned boat is an intelligent sports platform capable of performing various maritime
explorations and monitoring tasks, and it has the capability for autonomous navigation. Therefore,
unmanned boats in the civil and military fields have an extensive range of applications [1].
Conventional unmanned boats generally use fuel or batteries as a driving force with limited load
capacity. Therefore, they have low endurance and a short voyage capability and pollute the marine
environment. An unmanned wave glide vehicle (UWGV) is an unmanned boat that is completely
dependent on the use of absorbing waves to promote movement and has the advantages of long
voyage capability, long cycles, minimal pollution, and strong environmental adaptability. AUWGV,
as a marine surveillance platform, produces low noise levels, has excellent stealth, can easily carry
out laying group operations, and so on. A representative of this type of unmanned boat is the Wave
Glider series manufactured by Liquid Robotics Inc, United States[2], which yields excellent
performance in marine applications [3-4].
A UWGV consists of a floating body, a wave glide propulsor (WGP) and a connecting
umbilical cable. WGP thrust is caused by a series of tandem-arranged foils do the heave and pitch
movements with the ups and downs of waves. This process is similar to the process of swimming
of fish by oscillating tail; thus, both theoretical models can be attributed to bionic flapping foils.
3
Jones et al. [5] used a two-dimensional panel method and a test method to verify the propulsion
performance of single and tandem flapping foils. The results indicate that the propulsion
efficiency of the tandem foils is significantly higher than the propulsion efficiency of a single foil.
Yu Xianzhao et al [6] employed the sliding mesh method to calculate the performance of the
flapping foil and the stationary foil in tandem and to give the performance difference among the
different positions of the foils. Broering et al. [7-8] investigated the effect of the front-to-rear foil
phase angle and spacing on the aerodynamic performance of two-dimensional and
three-dimensional tandem foils using an overlapping grid method. The results indicate that the
same phase flapping increases the thrust of the tandem foils. When the phase difference is 90 °, the
motion efficiency of the tandem will be improved. Liu Peng et al. [9] employed the finite volume
method to analyze the hydrodynamic performance of tandem asynchronous foils with a gliding
wave propeller as the prototype, which provided an important reference for the selection of
experimental parameters for a UWGV prototype. In a UWGV marine trial study, Smith et al. [10]
made a preliminary prediction of the velocity of the Wave Glider by using the velocity
measurement in a real marine environment for a long period. Bingham et al [11] completed a
UWGV actual detection application test using a UWGV equipped with active and passive sonar to
perform field measurements of the test area.
Apart from the aforementioned, most existing research on flapping foils is also focused on
simulations and experiments of the foils that mimic the active locomotion of fish fins [12-20] or
are used for the appendages of ships and submarines [21-24]. However, the number of studies that
have investigated the passive motion of the WGP foil with wave is rare. Moreover, existing
experiments also comprise a qualitative test of the practical application performance of a UWGV
4
but cannot provide thrust, heave amplitude, resistance and other performance parameters of the
WGP for different marine environments and cannot provide a reference for UWGV hydrodynamic
performance research. We designed and built the UWGV prototype “Voyager I”. A resistance test
in hydrostatic environment, a hydrodynamic performance experiment and velocity measurements
of free sailing in regular waves were conducted in the Harbin Engineering University towing tank.
The resistance components of the UWGV and the influence of different regular wave parameters
on the performance of the UWGV were analyzed.
2. UWGV basic principles
When sailing on waves, the floating body of the UWGV will perform heaving movements as
the waves fluctuate and convert the wave energy into its kinetic energy and potential energy. The
UWGV passes the heaving motion of the floating body to the WGP through the umbilical cable,
and the kinetic energy and potential energy of the heaving and pitching movements of the WGP
foils are transformed into the kinetic energy of the UWGV. The state of the floating body and
WGP foils and their force bearing during the movement are shown in Figure 1 [25]. In the figure,
λ represents the wavelength, h denotes the wave height, a 0 represents the wave amplitude, L
denotes the length of the floating body, and C 0 represents the foil chord length. When navigating
in the ocean, the UWGV continues to encounter waves and can continue to convert the wave
energy into its forward kinetic energy to achieve a long voyage and long-term operation.
5
Figure 1 UWGV working principle diagram
3. UWGV design and experimental scheme
3.1 UWGV design and model
Based on reference to and analysis of existing research results, the profile design and
three-dimensional (3D) modeling of the UWGV floating body and WGP were completed.
Considering the influence of the profile structure of the floating body and the WGP structure on
the hydrodynamic performance of the UWGV, theoretical optimization of the design was
conducted, and the 3D design model of the UWGV prototype was determined and completed.
Figure 2 Three-dimensional UWGV model
The floating body is a large flat structure, the length of the vehicle L = 2m, the width of the
vehicle B = 0.6m, the depth of the vehicle H = 0.25m, and the designed draft is 0.15m.The WGP
foils were hinged in pairs on both sides of the beam, and no relative rotation occurs between the
6
pairs of foils. A NACA0012 airfoil was employed for the foil board, the length of the single foil
chord C 0 = 0.16m, the extended length S 0 = 0.54m, and the foil oscillation angle stopper was
installed on the beam. The floating body, WGP and rigid umbilical cable were hinged and can
achieve a single degree of freedom movement respectively. The UWGV prototype is shown in
Figure 3.
(A) Floating body model
(B) Gliding wave propeller model
Figure 3 UWGV prototype
3.2 Tank test program
A UWGV tank test was completed in the Harbin Engineering University towing tank. The
tank length × width × depth = 108m × 7m × 3.5m; the test tank wave was generated by the
7
pushing plate, and the maximum wave height was 0.4m with a wave period of approximately 0.4
~ 4s. Prior to the test, a trial voyage was conducted with different test parameters to obtain
effective test parameters, save test time and protect the test prototype and tank equipment; the
final test parameters are shown in Table 1. In the table, “*”denotes the test point, and“—”indicates
serious green water on the floating body; in this case, the experiment cannot be effectively
performed.
Table 1 Test point selection of the wave (drag velocity 0.412m/s)
Firstly, the resistance of the individual floating body and the UWGV in still water was
measured. In the various tests in wave environment, the UWGV was in the condition of head sea.
In the self-propelled experiment in the regular wave, the resistance, maximum pitch angle and
heave amplitude of the UWGV in different wave conditions were recorded by the Seaworthiness
Measurement Data Acquisition System. In the free-sailing experiment in head sea, the average
velocity of the UWGV in different regular wave environment was preliminarily measured. The
8
UWGV test situation is shown in Figure 4.
(A) Self-propelled experiment
(B) Free-sailing experiment in head sea
Figure 4 UWGV tank test
4 Results and discussion
According to the principle of WGP thrust production, the heaving amplitude and motion
cycle of the WGP foil are primarily affected by the wave height and wavelength. In the test, the
distance between the leading edge of the rear foil and the trailing edge of the front foil of the WGP
was 0.08m, and the oscillation angle stopper limits the oscillation angle to ± 15°for each foil.
9
The velocity of the trailer for the self-propelled experiment in the wave is V = 0.412 m/s = 0.8 kn.
The Froude number Fr =v/(gL)0.5, the dimensionless wave height n = h/L, and the dimensionless
wavelength m = λ/L were introduced as non-dimensional parameters.
4.1 Hydrostatic resistance of the floating body and UWGV
The UWGV umbilical cable length was designed as 6m; due to the tank conditions, the
length was shortened to 2.5m in the test. According to the surface characteristic of wave motion
[26], the WGP can be considered to be unaffected by the surface waves for the majority of the test
wave parameters. The hydrostatic resistance test of the individual floating body and the UWGV
was performed to qualitatively investigate the proportion of the WGP resistance in the UWGV
resistance, which provided a reference for the optimal design of the UWGV.
The changes of the resistance Rt of the individual floating body and the UWGV for different
Fr in still water are shown in Figure 5. The hydrostatic resistance value calculated from the
equivalent plate theory is employed as a comparison.
Figure 5 Hydrostatic resistances of the floating body and UWGV for different Froude numbers
The resistance of the individual floating body and UWGV increased in nearly quadratic form
with an increase in Fr; when joined onto the WGP, the static water resistance of the UWGV
10
rapidly increased in comparison with that of the individual floating body for the same Fr.
Moreover, the greater Fr is, the greater the resistance difference. The UWGV resistance is more
than ten times the individual floating body resistance. Thus, the WGP resistance accounted for
approximately 90% of the UWGV hydrostatic resistance components. Therefore, the follow-up
UWGV performance optimization should focus on reducing the resistance of the WGP.
4.2 Heaving amplitude of the UWGV floating body for different wavelengths and wave
heights
The magnitude of the heaving amplitude of the UWGV had a direct impact on the WGP
heaving amplitude, which affected the magnitude of the WGP thrust. Figure 6 shows the changes
of the heaving amplitude of the UWGV floating body y for different dimensionless wavelengths m
and wave height n.
Figure 6 UWGV heaving amplitude for different wavelengths and wave heights
As shown in Fig. 6 (a), the UWGV heaving amplitude gradually became close to the wave
height n with an increase in m. This finding indicated that the UWGV sailing in the waves in the
test required a certain amount of time to respond to the waves. For the same n, a small m value
corresponded to a short wave period; the UWGV entered the next status when it had not yet
responded to the wave in this case. Therefore, for a small m, the actual heaving amplitude of the
11
UWGV deviated the set value largely, whereas a large m value was more conducive to the UWGV
response to the waves. As shown in Fig. 6 (b), with a fixed m and an increase in n, the heaving
amplitude of the UWGV gradually increased with a certain degree of deviation from the amplitude
set value. The smaller the value of m is, the greater the deviation. When n <0.08, the heaving
amplitude of the UWGV increased in a nearly linear form with an increase in n, whereas when n >
0.08, the growth rate of the UWGV heaving amplitude decreased and an increasing difference
from the amplitude set value was observed. This is because that with a fixed m, the UWGV
motion cycle is the same; and the greater n is, the greater the heaving velocity, and moreover the
relationship of the WGP resistance was quadrilateral to the UWGV’s velocity.
4.3 UWGV floating body pitch angle for different wavelengths and wave heights
In the prototype arrangement, the WGP is suspended on the front position of the middle part
of the floating body bottom—approximately 0.45L from the bow. Therefore, the pitch angle of the
UWGV floating body has a significant impact on not only the total security of the UWGV and the
stability of the UWGV after the instrument is deployed but also the generation of the WGP thrust.
Figure 7 shows the variation of the pitch angle a of the UWGV floating body for different
dimensionless wavelength m and wave height n.
Fig.7 Effect of wavelength and wave height on the pitch angle of the UWGV floating body
12
For the same n and an increase in m, the pitch angle of the UWGV decreases in a nearly
linear manner. For the same m, the greater the value of n is, the greater the pitch angle of the
floating body. Therefore, considering the safety of the UWGV, the wave environment with a large
m value and a small n is more favorable. Considering that the WGP layout approaches the middle
part of the ship, when the pitch angle is small, the WGP heaving amplitude caused by the pitch is
small. Therefore, the reduction of the pitch of the UWGV from the perspective of floating body
safety and resistance performance can be employed for the subsequent optimization design, which
will not affect the generation of WGP thrust.
4.4 WGP thrust for different wavelengths and wave heights
The thrust generated by the WGP is an important parameter in the hydrodynamic
performance metrics of the UWGV. The magnitude of WGP thrust in different wave conditions
will directly affect the UWGV navigation velocity, which will affect the working efficiency and
other performance of the UWGV. Figure 8 shows the changing trend of the WGP thrust for
different dimensionless wavelength m and wave height n in a regular wave environment in the
UWGV self-propelled experiment.
As shown in Figure 8 (a), the WGP thrust decreases with an increase in m. According to the
regular wave dispersion relation, the greater the value of m is, the longer the wave period, which
leads to a longer heaving cycle of the WGP foil board with the wave. With a fixed value of n, the
smaller the heaving velocity of the foil board is, the smaller the thrust. As shown in Fig. 8 (b),
with a fixed m, the greater the value of n is, the higher the WGP thrust, which is similar to the
curve trend shown in Figure 8 (a).A linear relationship between WGP thrust and the wave height n
was no longer observed. With an increase in n, the growth rate in thrust decreases. Since the
13
heaving amplitude of the WGP has a greater effect on its thrust value, and with an increase in n the
difference between the heaving amplitude WGP and the wave height n increases (referred to
Figure 6 (b)), a deceleration trend of the total rate of increase of the curve is observed. (see Figure
8 (b)). In summary, the wavelength and amplitude of the regular wave have a significant effect on
the WGP thrust. Under the premise of guaranteeing the safety of the UWGV, a small wavelength
and a high wave height are favorable to the generation of WGP thrust; that is, the WGP thrust is
greater in a high state of the sea.
Figure 8 Effect of wavelength and wave height on WGP thrust
4.5 Velocity of UWGV free sailing for different wavelengths and wave heights
In free sailing in head sea, the velocity of the UWGV is the most intuitive parameter for
evaluating its performance. Figure 9 shows the trend of the change in the average velocity V f of
the UWGV in free sailing in head sea for different dimensionless wavelength m and wave height n
in regular waves. With an increase in m of the regular waves, the UWGV velocity increases and
then decreases; at n =0.1 and m = 4.5, the UWGV velocity reaches the maximum of 0.82kn.With a
fixed n, the wavelength that corresponds to the maximum velocity of the UWGV is the optimum
wavelength. Different values of n correspond to different optimal wavelengths, which indicates
that there is not a stable combination of m and n at which the UWGV reaches the optimal velocity.
14
With a fixed m, the UWGV velocity also increased and then decreased with an increase in n. The
maximum velocity generally appeared at m ≈50n in a regular wave. Although the WGP thrust is
high for large values of m or small values of n, the UWGV velocity is not the maximum at this
time. The reason is that in comparison with the optimal situation, the resistance of the UWGV in
the navigation will increase for either a large m or a small n, and the growth rate of the resistance
is higher than that of the WGP thrust.
Figure 9 Effect of wavelength and wave height on UWGV velocity
5 Conclusions
(1) According to the prototype test, when the UWGV is towed in static water, the resistance
of the WGP is approximately 90% of the total resistance. Therefore, enhancing the UWGV
powering performance by reducing the WGP resistance will be a useful method.
(2) The WGP thrust magnitude is primarily determined by the WGP heaving motion that is
transferred from the UWGV floating body, and the pitch motion of the floating body does not
affect the WGP thrust value. Thus, the floating body can be designed to reduce the pitch in the
subsequent optimization, which can improve the stability of the UWGV to improve the efficiency
of the installed equipment on the floating body while ensuring the powering performance.
(3) When the dimensionless wavelength is small or the dimensionless wave height is large in
a regular wave, the WGP can produce more thrust and the total resistance of the UWGV will
15
rapidly increase, which causes a decrease in the velocity of the UWGV in free sailing in head sea.
Therefore, a mall wavelength and a large wave height of the regular wave are unfavorable for the
UWGV velocity and security.
(4) The experimental results of this paper provide a technical basis for the development of
long voyage, low-carbon and environment-friendly unmanned water surface robots and provide a
new research direction for additional numerical simulation. In our further work, the experimental
prototype will be theoretically analyzed and optimized, and the corresponding outfield test will be
carried out to verify and enhance its performance.
Acknowledgments
This paper has been supported by NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China) funds
(Grant no. 51479039).
References
[1] Caccia M, Bibuli M, Bono R, et al. Basic navigation, guidance and control of an
unmanned surface vehicle. Autonomous Robots, 2008, 25(4): 349-365.
[2] Daniel T, Manley J, Trenaman N. The wave glider: Enabling a new approach to persistent
ocean observation and research. Ocean Dynamics, 2011, 61: 1509-1520.
[3] Hine R, Willcox S, Hine G, et al. The wave glider: A wave-powered autonomous marine
vehicle. Proceedings of MTS/IEEE Oceans, 2009: 1-6.
[4] Manley J, Willcox S. The wave glider: A new concept for deploying ocean instrumentation.
IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 2010, 12: 8-13.
[5] Jones K D, Castro B M, Mahmoud O, et al. A numerical and experimental investigation of
flapping wing propulsion in ground effect. 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit,
16
2002: 1-14.
[6] Yu X Z, Su Y M, Li X. Propusive performance analysis of tandem wing based on sliding
mesh method. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012, 46(8): 1315-1327.
[7] Broering T M, Lian Yong-sheng. The effect of phase angle and foil spacing on tandem
flapping wings. Acta Mechania Sinica, 2012, 28(6): 1557-1571.
[8] Broering T M, Lian Y S. Investigation of three-dimensional low Reynolds number tandem
flapping wings. 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2012: 1-21.
[9] Liu P, Su Y M, Liu H X, et al. Propulsive performance analysis of tandem asynchronous
flapping Foil. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(4): 30-36.
[10] Smith R N, Dasy J, Hinez G, et al. Predicting wave glider velocity from environmental
measurements. OCEANS, 2011: 1-8.
[11] Bingham B, Kraus N, Howe B, et al. Passive and active acoustics using an autonomous wave
glider. Journal of Field Robotics, 2012, 29(6): 911-923.
[12] Anderson J, Streitlien K, Barrett D, et al. Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 360: 41-72.
[13] Blondeaux P, Fornarelli F, Guglielmini L, et al. Numerical experiments on flapping foils
mimicking fish-like locomotion. Physics of Fluids, 2005, 17(11): 12.
[14] Bozkurttas M, Dong H, Mittal R, et al. Hydrodynamic performance of deformable fish fins
and flapping foils. 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2006: 16743-16753.
[15] Dong H, Mittal R, Najjar F M. Wake topology and hydrodynamic performance of
low-aspect-ratio flapping foils. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 566: 309-343.
[16] Akhtar I, Mittal R, Lauder G V, et al. Hydrodynamics of a biologically inspired tandem
17
flapping foil configuration. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2007, 21(3):
155-170.
[17] Li N Y, Su Y M, Wang Z L, et al. Computation method of propulsive efficiency of a
three-dimensional flapping foil. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012, 46(2):
323-328.
[18] Abbaspour M, Ebrahimi M. Comparative numerical analysis of the flow pattern and
performance of a foil in flapping and undulating oscillations. Journal of Marine Science and
Technology, 2015, 20(2): 257-277.
[19] Li N Y, Su Y M. Fluid dynamics of biomimetic pectoral fin propulsion using immersed
boundary method. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2016: 22.
[20] Li N Y, Su Y M, Wang Z L, et al. Hydrodynamic analysis of rigid and flexible pectoral fins.
Journal of Environmental Biology, 2016, 37(5): 1105-1116.
[21] Li Y, Yao Z Q. Numerical simulation and validation of wake field of submarine with stern
appendage. Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, 2006, 20(2): 7-12.
[22] Yang P Q, Guan Y F. Numerical simulation and analysis of navigating resistance of
submarines with different fins. Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,
2007, 21(3): 6-9.
[23] Yang S L, Gao L. Experimental study on resistance performance of an 11.8 meter
gliding-hydrofoil craft. Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, 2008, 22(2):
6-10.
[24] Zhuang L F, Cong W C, Wang Z D, et al. Influence of geometric parameters of the airfoil
rudder ball on energy saving effect of the propeller-rudder system. Journal of Jiangsu
18
University of Science and Technology, 2017, 31(3): 259-267.
[25] Manley J, Willcox S. The wave glider: A persistent platform for ocean science. OCEANS,
2010: 1-5.
[26] Zhang Liang, Li Yun-Bo. Fluid Mechanics. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University Press,
2009: 136-139.
top related