inspire thematic working group production and industrial facilities (pf)

1

INSPIRE THEMATIC WORKING GROUPINSPIRE THEMATIC WORKING GROUP

Production and Industrial Facilities (PF)Production and Industrial Facilities (PF)

Edinburgh, Scotland

30 June 2011

2

The group

Heinrich “Level of detail”Geerling

Claudia “THE Editor” Pegoraro

Antonello “IPPC” Navarretta

Angel “Tres Sombreros” Lopez

Andrea“what’s your main occupation”

Giacomelli

FACILITATOR

EDITOR (2010) / P.O.CEDITOR (From Feb 2010)

EXPERT

EXPERT

3

Input

1. User survey documents + core INSPIRE reference material

2. Expert-derived documents(directly used by experts in their other job

or from their contacts)

3. Other EU projects

4INSPIRE progress 4

Activity tracking (R.O.M.) Activity tracking (R.O.M.) apr 2010 – jun 2011apr 2010 – jun 2011

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

14019

/04/

2010

03/0

5/20

10

17/0

5/20

10

31/0

5/20

10

14/0

6/20

10

28/0

6/20

10

12/0

7/20

10

26/0

7/20

10

09/0

8/20

10

23/0

8/20

10

06/0

9/20

10

20/0

9/20

10

04/1

0/20

10

18/1

0/20

10

01/1

1/20

10

15/1

1/20

10

29/1

1/20

10

13/1

2/20

10

27/1

2/20

10

10/0

1/20

11

24/0

1/20

11

07/0

2/20

11

21/0

2/20

11

07/0

3/20

11

21/0

3/20

11

04/0

4/20

11

18/0

4/20

11

02/0

5/20

11

16/0

5/20

11

30/0

5/20

11

13/0

6/20

11

27/0

6/20

11

TWG-PF

JRC

Meetings (face-to-face or remote)

5

Output

1. A UML model

2. The data specification(model + use cases)

3. Increased insight on the dataspecification process

6

The Model (1/4)SITE

FACILITY

INSTALLATIONPART

PLOT INSTALLATIONADDRESS(link)

BUILDING(link to BU)

OPERATOR

7

The Model (2/4)

TechnicalUnit

8

The Model (3/4)

ACTIVITY

Process input Process output

ProductWasteEnergySubstance

Emission

Production process

9

Cross-theme relationships

AdministrativeUnits

Cadastralparcels

Addresses

Land Use

Area Mgmt.

…as explicit Relationships…

10INSPIRE progress 10

Key changes from v1.0 to v2.0Key changes from v1.0 to v2.0

• A dedicated editor (with prior experience on Annex I)

• A common model for the “Facility”

• A productive Winter

11INSPIRE progress 11

Parts to be surely improvedParts to be surely improved

• Use Cases

• Energy production facilities

• Off-shore facilities

• Statistical applications of PF data (e.g. statistical business registers)

• Planning

12

Interesting topics

• Temporal aspects (change in use of facilities)

• What about the production process (IN or OUT of scope ? Different views exist and are not currently reconciled)

13

Please note……

Page VI

…and a couple of other similar notes in the text

14

Next steps

• K.I.S.S.

• Next teleconference: July 8

• “recruitment” of testers/reviewers

• Prepare to receive comments

• Follow “revamped” facilitation strategy (defined in May in an informal meeting in Torino and shared with all other TWGs).

1515

If you don’t register to be a tester or If you don’t register to be a tester or reviewer (for any of the groups), please reviewer (for any of the groups), please

tell us whytell us why

Andrea Giacomelli - info@pibinko.org