iresistible: novel parts for use in s. cerevisiaeweb.utk.edu/~ctrinh/utk_igem2012 oral.pdf ·...

Post on 30-Jan-2018

219 Views

Category:

Documents

4 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

IRESistible: Novel Parts for Use in S. cerevisiae

UTK-Knoxville iGEM team Morgan Baltz, Katie Lutes, and Akshitha Yarrabothula

October 13, 2012

July

Get  it?  …  IRESis-ble    LOL  

Outline

§  Who we are §  Motivation §  What is an IRES – How does IRES mediated translation differ

from cap dependent translation §  Applications §  Completed work §  Proposed work §  Conclusions

Who we are The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Go  Big  Orange!!  

Who we are §  We are UT’s inaugural iGEM team §  Morgan, Katie, and Akshitha were the

core members

Genesis Minter Brandon Wilbanks

Who we are

Michael Wierzbicki works with E. coli Adam Thompson works with S. cerevisiae

Dr. Cong Trinh was our primary advisor Dr. Dan Close works with IRESs

Motivation

   

   

   

   Promoter                  Gene1                        Terminator                    Promoter                      Gene  2                        Terminator  

   

   

Promoter                  Gene1                                Gene  2                    Terminator  

In  prokaryotes,  mul-ple  genes  can  be  expressed  under  the  control  of  the  same  promoter.  

In  eukaryotes,  each  gene  must  be  expressed  under  the  control  of  its  own  promoter.    

What is an IRES?

Internal Ribosomal Entry Site

July

Hey!    That  looks  like  me!  Tumban  et  al.  Journal  of  Nega-ve  Results  in  BioMedicine  2009  8:4      doi:10.1186/1477-­‐5751-­‐8-­‐4  

What is an IRES?

>2?78$*:@)AB4:$ (2;4525$$

C9;?2B4:78$0;7?D7B4:$ EFG4H27$

!"##$%&'"(($

Motivation §  Why –  The Parts Registry has no IRESs –  IRESs included in other parts are poorly

documented §  Goals –  Introduce IRESs to the Synthetic Biology

community because IRESs: •  Allow for protein expression under one promoter •  Drastically reduce the size of the construct •  Reduce likelihood of recombination

– Create a method of standardizing IRES strength

Traditional mechanism:

AUG$

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA$

PABP$

7MGPPPG$

eIF4E$

eIF4G$

eIF3$ eIF4A$

40S$Ribosomal$$Subunit$

Cap dependent translation initiation  

3’  

5’  

!"#$

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

$

%!&%$

'(#%%%#$

)*+,-$

)*+,#$

*<!+$)*+.$

)*+,!$

,/0$123454678$$0939:2;$

=1+$ !"#$

IRES mechanism: Cap independent translation initiation  

3’  

5’   eIF4A  

ITAF  

Application §  How can synthetic biologists use

IRESs – reporter genes •  example: pIRES commercial vector •  example: AIDS kittens

July

Those  cats  are  almost  as  IRESis-ble  as  we  are!  

Application Estrogenic Hormone Biosensor

Schematic representation of S. cerevisiae BLYES. Estrogenic compounds cross the cell membrane and bind to the estrogen receptor.

Sanseverino J et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:4455-4460

Completed work

Name Description Length

BBa_K813000   YAP1  -­‐  Yeast  Genomic  IRES     164  

BBa_K813001   URE2  -­‐  Yeast  Genomic  IRES   167  

BBa_K813002   HAP4  -­‐  Yeast  Genomic  IRES   270  

BBa_K813003   pSAP  -­‐  Yeast  Genomic  IRES   528  

BBa_K813004   p150  -­‐  Yeast  Genomic  IRES   348  

Completed work

PART   ORIGIN  Backbone  (BBa_J63010)   2012  Kit,  Plate  1,  Well  1C  

ADH1  (BBa_J63005)   2012  Kit,  Plate  1,  Well  1C  

mOrange  (BBa_E2050)   2012  Kit,  Plate  2,  Well  13N  

GFP  (BBa_I13522)   2011  Kit,  Plate  2,  Well  8A    

cyc1   Trinh  Lab  

All  IRESs   S.  cerevisiae  genomic  DNA  

Completed work

Completed  IRES    Characteriza=on  Construct  

9400  bp  

Comparison

Construct  with  IRES  

9,400  bp  

Construct  without  IRES  10,559  bp  

Proposed work

mOrange  

GFP  

ADH1   mOrange   Cyc  

mOrange  GF

P  

ADH1   GFP   Cyc  

Proposed work

mOrange  

GFP  

ADH1   mOrange   IRES   GFP   Cyc  

mOrange  

GFP  

Rela=vely  weak  IRES   Rela=vely  strong  IRES  

Proposed work

IRES   GFP   Cyc  

mOrange  

GFP  

July

Hey  I  don’t  work  that  way!  

Conclusions

Problems §  Antibiotic resistance §  ADH1 promoter §  Limited experience with S. cerevisiae §  Small team §  Limited resources

Conclusions

What we learned §  IRESs §  Yeast techniques §  BioBrick §  Wiki §  Flow cytometry §  Research project management

Acknowledgments §  The University of Tennessee, Knoxville College of

Engineering §  UT-ORNL Joint Institute for Biological Studies §  The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Office of

Research §  IDT §  NEB §  The Parts Registry §  iGEM §  Duquesne University §  Dr. Cong Trinh

July

Thanks!  

top related