jan 5 comment card analysis
Post on 13-Jun-2015
810 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
School Section For Against Notes
Oak Hill 149 1 8 1 person for the proposal has tracking concerns
349 24 91% of OHE's bilingual population moved under Plan 2?249 9
49 49Other/NA 4 1 Other/NA= did not identify their section
Total 63 33 96 Total cards
Mills CCN 1 Keep CCN at MillsVP
96H3 18 These were those who specifically said they lived in that area96A2 6
Other/NA 5 48Total 5 73 78 Total cards
Patton 83C1 4Other 1Total 5 5 Total cards
Boone 1 2Total 3 Total cards
SSV 1 5 Don't move existing SSV neighborhoods to BooneTotal 6 Total cards
Kiker
Clayton 4 All these comments questioned the demographers numbersTotal 4 Total cards
SWES 7Total 7 Total cards
Cowan 0
For: those in favor of Plan 2, Against: Those opposed to part or all of Plan 2
Many of the comments said to address the underutilization separately
Most addressed keeping underutilization as a separate issue/Pro Plan 2 wanted more relief for Mills
Move more kids to Boone/Against plan because "create stress" at Boone
I know 2 parents spoke from Kikerat the meeting. One questioned the process, one welcomed Mills students where
are their comments?
All these comments asked for more students to be moved into SWES
School not identified 6 7
Other 12 Other schools who asked to move 96H3/96A2 to Mills
Utilization 37 1
13 Total comments from people who did not identify their school
Those parents who addressed looking at utilization in a separate process
top related