john perrine portfolio

Post on 26-Mar-2016

228 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

John Perrine - Undergraduate portfolio from Illinois Institute of Technology. 2009-2014

TRANSCRIPT

JOHN FARNSWORTH PERRINE

JOHN PERRINE

OBJECTIVE

EDUCATION

WORK EXPERIENCE

TECHNICAL SKILLS

5242 N. MAGNOLIA | CHICAGO, IL 60640

JPERRINE@HAWK.IIT.EDU | 773.450.5242

To work in an environment that pushes the current limits of my abilities, allows me the chance to further my knowledge, and offers me a chance for mutual respect between my peers. In addition, the opportunity to offer up my skills to better the design, development, and quality of a project.

Illinois Institute of Technology | Chicago, IL | Graduated: May 2014Bachelors of Architecture

Study Abroad | Paris, FranceJanuary 2013 - June 2013

Binny’s | Chicago, IL | September 2013 - PresentStore Associate: Assisting customers throughout the store, stocking sales floor shelves and managing the registers.

Chicago Urban Pets | Chicago, IL | Summer 2013 - Spring 2014Dog Walker: General in-home pet sitting, dog walking, and overnight care for clients pets.

Walmart | Cheyenne, WY | Spring 2012 - Fall 2012Receiving Associate: Loaded and unloaded shipments, organized warehouse stock, and stocked sales floor shelves to meet customer demand.

Computer SkillsAutoCAD | Rhinoceros | Grasshopper | SketchUpPhotoshop | Illustrator | InDesign | Microsoft Office

Constructions SkillsWood Shop | Welding/Metal Work | Hand DraftingModel Making | Furniture Design | 3D Printing | Laser Cutting

PROJECTS Open Source Construction IPRO | Chicago, IL | Fall Semester 2013Development and implementation of a recycle/found object based construction manual for developing countries, impoverished communities, and disaster relief zones.

Big Tree Paradigm Competition| Fukushima, JPN | Fall Semester 201214th Shelter International Competition: The design of a home with the attrac-tive qualities of a big, ancient tree.

Contents

Monastery/ChapelIndiana, USA

Wood FramingToronto, CAN

1-14

27-38

15-20

Technical DrawingsIllinois, USA

21-26

27-38

Cultural CenterHelsinki, FIN

Big Tree ParadigmFukushima, JPN

39-52

RURAL CHAPEL + MONASTERYIndiana, USA

1

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center - 2

Chapel Model Shot:MDF and paper model

View from chapel entrance.

3

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center - 4

Monastery in Rural Indiana:A place for personal contemplation

A monastery is a closed circuit, a private and internal building. Everything comes from within and stays there. Because of this, the monastery should be designed from the inside out; each room should be tailored for the specific activity it is built for.

5

Chapter House Rendered Model Shot:MDF and paper model Internal meeting place for discussion among monks.

The refectory is the sole place where monks have discussions. It provides an open forum to go over ideas, issues and updates with the monastery. Traditionally a refectory has seating in a ‘U’ shape to allow for focus to be directed to single speaker or allow for a circular discussion. Creating a lit backdrop focuses attention at the speaker while at the same time blanketing the space with light for group talks.

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center - 6

Hall Rendered Model Shot:MDF and paper model Outside monk cells, through to Cloister.

7

Library Rendered Model Shot:MDF and paper model Shot though both library entrances.

Refectory Rendered Model Shot:MDF and paper model Dining Hall for monks.

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center - 8

Public Church Rendered Model Shot:MDF and polished plywood View towards alter.Only public place in monastery

9

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center - 10

Monk Cell Rendered Model Shot:MDF and paper model View towards door.Personal bedroom and reflec-tive space for monks.

11

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center - 12

Perceived mass and a decentralized cloister:

The plan and layout of the monastery originates from the idea that the cloister, the garden for god, should not be used simply as circu-lation, but rather a room in itself. Traditionally the cloister serves as the primary means of moving from room to room. By decentraliz-ing it, the cloister will become a destination. Because of this, the monastery can take on a new form, one that allows for a more direct way of moving from place to place. The plan is broken up into 4 sections; the public church, the monks cells, the day to day activities, and the cloister. Each part is sectioned off using blocks of utility space; bathrooms, kitchen, infirmity, and administration.

13

Two hallways line both sides of the monastery creating a barrier between the internal workings and the external world. By recessing the doors of the private areas, a perceived mass is created, allowing for a noticeable compression that dictates the quiet mood of the space. In contrast, the more open spaces like the refectory and chapter house are left open to the circulation allowing for an easy pro-cession of monks in and out.

Spring 2012 - Rural Monastery - 14

WOOD FRAMINGCraven Road House - Shim ArchitectsToronto, CAN

First Floor

Second Floor

Roof

Framing Model:1/4”=1’

Basswood and MDF

17

Spring 2011 - Wood Framing - 18

Section Model:3/4”=1’Basswood and MDF

19

Spring 2011 - Wood Framing - 20

TECHNICAL DRAWINGSResidential Studio, Fall 2010Chicago Boathouse, Fall 2011

21

- 22

Residential Studio Floor Plan:Brick and CMU bearing walls with interior stud walls.

23

Fall 2011 - Residential Studio

Residential Studio wall section:Brick and CMU bearing walls with hollow core conrete slabs.

- 24

Chicago Boathouse Wall Section:

Steel frame with cast in place conrete slabs.

25

Fall 2012 - Chicago Boathouse

Chicago Boathouse Wall Section:Steel frame with brick fascade.

- 26

CULTURAL MAGNETHelsinki, FIN

IIT Paris Program:Re-imagining the failed Guggenheim Cultural Center in Helsinki, Finland

The proposal for a Guggenheim museum in Helsinki was ultimately a failure due to its status in the art world and lack of sensitivity towards the disinterests of Helsinki residents. The people of helsinki feared that the “ArtDonalds” that is Guggenheim was there to simply milk the The Helsinki Arts Museum commission fee

29

with little to no support for the museums construction and operation as had happened in previous cities.

In the end, the project was scrapped leaving a void in the expectations of the population for a cultural center. The cultural development has taken wide swings over the years with backing from different sides of the political spectrum; the conservative right pushed for shopping and attractions while the left pushed for museums and arts. The resulting composition is a thorough mix of malls and museums.

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center - 30

MALL DENSITY

Kamppi Mall

Proposed Site

31

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center

MUSEUM DENSITY

Kiasma Museum

Proposed Site

- 32

33

Creation of a Mall-Museum magnet:

The current state of the MUSEUM is flawed. The presentation and exclusivity of objects displayed removes any and all purpose or design intent. It has created an extreme disconnect between the objects and the viewer. At the other extreme is the MALL, a place filled with bastardized product versions in an effort to increase productivity and fuel our consumerist world. The age of building prod-ucts to last has been replaced by planned obsolescence, cheap materials, and outsourced production.

These issues, both with the MUSEUM and the MALL, lead to the same outcome, a disconnect between the origin of a product and the process needed to produce that product. There is a lack of appreciation for the effort needed to produce both museum and con-sumer grade products; in some cases, what was once a commercial product has been eaten up by the prison that is the MUSEUM with little to no explanation.

The remedy comes through a leak in both institutions. The quality of the MUSEUM needs to be merged with the access of the MALL while at the same time exposing the process of production in order to give substance back to the products. The result of this creates an institution that is unfortunately alien to the public but will, in time, become an exemplary model.

By attaching the Cultural Center to the existing Kamppi mall it can create a parasitic relationship, leaching the inhabitants of the mall and exposing them to the craft of the center. By placing the process of each workshop linearly, the process from a products conception can be shown in full. Using the exterior facade as exposed storage units, the embodied input of the products can be displayed.

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center - 34

Rendered Model Shot:Wood and chipboard model

View from Kamppi squareCultural center wall partially filled with material.

35

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center - 36

Glass Metals Ceramics PrintTextile Stoneware Wood Bakery Brewery

MaterialDropOff

Design

PrintScreen

Printing

Sealing

Washing

Shop

MaterialDropOff

SilicaMelting

Forming/Coloring

Cooldown/Tempering

Shop

MaterialDropOff

Sizing

Construction/Welding

Finishing

Plating

Painting

Shop

MaterialDropOff

Moulding

Forming

Drying

Painting

Baking

Shop

MaterialDropOff

PigmentSelection

Printing

Coalating

Cutting

Binding

Shop

MaterialDropOff

Model Casting

Sizing

Detailing

Smoothing

Finishing

Shop

MaterialDropOff

Sizing

Construction

Finishing

Painging/Staining

Shop

MaterialDropOff

MaterialDropOff

Measuring

Mixing

Forming

Baking

Cooldown

Shop

Measuring/Milling

Mashing

Boiling

Fermentation

Conditioning

Bottling/Shop

MaterialDropOff

MaterialDropOff

MaterialDropOff

MaterialDropOff

MaterialDropOff

MaterialDropOff

MaterialDropOff

MaterialDropOff

MaterialDropOff

Design

PrintScreen

Printing

Washing

Shop

Shop

SilicaMelting

Forming/Coloring

Cooldown/Tempering

Construction/Welding

Finishing

Shop

Forming

Drying

Painting

Baking

Shop

Shop

Pigment

Printing

Coalating

CuttingBinding

ModelCasting

Sizing

Detailing

SmoothingFinishing

Shop

Construction

Finishing

Shop

Shop

Shop

Bottling

Mashing

Fermentation

Conditioning

Glass Metals Ceramics PrintTextile Stoneware Wood Bakery Brewery

37

Spring 2013 - Paris - Helsinki Cultural Center

Second Floor Plan

- 38

BIG TREE PARADIGM COMPETITION14th Shelter International Architectural Design Competition for Students 2012Fukushima, JPN

41

A Single Big Tree used in parts to provide for the growth of a home over numerous generations.

A single big tree similar to the great redwoods of California could be used in parts on as-needed basis as a family grows. When a new member comes into the family, they will be alloted a piece of the family tree to be used to add room to the home. The tree would con-tinue to give generation after generation.In later developments of the project, the one Big Tree would be supplemented with numerous small trees in the form of an orchard.

FAMILY HOME

GENERATIONAL HOME

FAMILY HOME

COUPLES HOME

INDIVIDUAL HOME

Fall 2012 - Big Tree Paradigm - 42

43

MUTUAL GROUND

Fall 2012 - Big Tree Paradigm

Final Competition Board

- 44

Forced Perspective Model Shot:Basswood frame in shadowbox

View from tea room onto orchard

45

Fall 2012 - Big Tree Paradigm - 46

Organization and Hierarchy of spaces to facilitate a communal family:Creating a central gathering space in the form of a traditional Japanese tea room

The first generation of the home is designed as an outpost. It serves as a meeting and resting space for the workers and family as the orchard is developed. Key to this outpost is the tea room, serving as the communal place to talk, eat, and relax. This room serves as the basis for the proportions, layout, and future generation additions of the whole home. Using the traditional tatami mat proportions (176cm x 88cm) of the tea room, each room serves as supplements.

The tea room is where the family exists.

Situated on the second floor, the tea room also acts as the observation point of the orchard, looking out over the fuel that builds the home. The addition rooms grow out from the spine and grow into the ground becoming what is essentially the roots of the home. The home grows from the outpost generation into a couples home, a family home, and a generational home. Each generation expands the house using the forest as material.

Forced Perspective Model Shot:Paper model in shadowbox

Long section through bedroom and tea room

47

Forced Perspective Model Shot:Paper model in shadowbox

Section of tea room Cantilever

Fall 2012 - Big Tree Paradigm - 48

Forced Perspective Model Shot:Paper model in shadowbox

Section of tea room, kitchen,and dining room

49

Fall 2012 - Big Tree Paradigm - 50

Gen 1: Outpost

Gen 2: Couples Home

51

Gen 4: Generational Home

Gen 3: Family Home

Fall 2012 - Big Tree Paradigm - 52

JOHN FARNSWORTH PERRINE

top related