judicial order for adjustment of support - cddm001353

8/13/2019 Judicial Order for Adjustment of Support - Cddm001353

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/judicial-order-for-adjustment-of-support-cddm001353 1/417

In the Iowa District Court in and for SAC County

Case No: 02811 CDDM001353 Title: JUDITH L NEVILLE VS DAVID GENE NEVILLE

NOTICE REGARDING ELECTRONIC FILING

This case has been converted to an electronic case by Order of the Court.

New rules apply to electronically filed cases.Because your case has been converted to an electronic case, it is now governed by Chapter 16 Rules Pertainingto the Use of the Electronic Document Management System. What is required of you? You must register to use the Electronic Document Management System (EDMS). If you haven't already registered, please log on to the Iowa Judicial Branch eFiling website at https://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/EFile to register. You are required to have a current e-mail account for use with EDMS. Registration requires you to understandand agree to comply with the rules that govern electronic filing, contained the Chapter 16 Rules Pertaining to

the use of the Electronic Document Management System, available on the Iowa Judicial Branch eFiling website. Your registration constitutes your request for, and consent to, electronic service of court-generated documentsand documents filed electronically by other parties. When you have completed your registration, you can beginfiling and viewing documents on your case and receiving notifications of filings, and events. EXCEPTIONS: For good cause, the court may authorize you to submit a document in paper. Upon showing of exceptional circumstances, the chief judge of the district in which a case is pending may grant you an exemptionfrom registering and filing electronically. You must protect private information when using EDMS.

Division VI of Chapter 16 Rules Pertaining to the Use of the Electronic Document Management Systemspecifies personal information that is now considered protected by the court, as well as what you must do tokeep protected personal information out of the public documents you eFile. Training and technical support are available for EDMS.Technical support for the Iowa Judicial Branch eFiling website is available at 1-877-369-8324. If you havequestions about court procedures related to electronic filing, contact your county clerk of court office.

E-FILED 2013 MAR 15 10:09 AM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

We look forward to your comments and suggestionsas we implement electronic filings in the Iowa Courts

In The Iowa District Court for the Second Judicial District

In re the conversion of paper files to electric documents

Administrative Order

Iowa Court Rule 16.102 authorizes a chief judge to order the conversion of paper court files to an

electronic file of any case not subject to the Rules Pertaining to the Use of the Electronic DocumentManagement System (EDMS). It is in the best interest of all for the Court to have access via EDMS to pendingfiles that exist at the time a county clerk of court office implements EDMS. Accordingly: It is so Ordered that:

1. Each Clerk of Court may take action to convert paper case files that are pending and will likely appear on a future court schedule as soon as implementation of EDMS begins in their respective counties. 2. The Clerk shall work with the local Court to identify specific documents that are to be scanned in each case type. Upon implementation of electronic filing in the County, the security level of these electronic records shall be as identified by the EDMS Business Advisory Committee. 3. The Clerk shall send the Notice Regarding Electronic Filing to the attorneys and parties appearing pro se. 4. Once notified, counsel of record or parties appearing pro se shall apply the rules pertaining to

protection of personal privacy (Iowa Ct.R.16.602 through 16.607) to all future filings in that case. 5. After being notified of commencement of the electronic filing in that County, attorneys, parties appearing pro se and all other shall file all future filings on that case electronically. It is so Ordered: Dated 3rd day of November, 2010

/s/ Kurt L. WilkeKurt L. Wilke, Chief Judge of the SecondJudicial District of Iowa

Case ID : 02811 CDDM001353 - JUDITH L NEVILLE VS DAVID GENENEVILLE

Event Cd : NOOT

CHARLES ADAM SCHULTE filed

In the Iowa District Court in and for SAC County

Case No: 02811 CDDM001353 Title: JUDITH L NEVILLE VS DAVID GENE NEVILLE

NOTICE REGARDING ELECTRONIC FILING

This case has been converted to an electronic case by Order of the Court.

New rules apply to electronically filed cases.Because your case has been converted to an electronic case, it is now governed by Chapter 16 Rules Pertainingto the Use of the Electronic Document Management System. What is required of you? You must register to use the Electronic Document Management System (EDMS). If you haven't already registered, please log on to the Iowa Judicial Branch eFiling website at https://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/EFile to register. You are required to have a current e-mail account for use with EDMS. Registration requires you to understandand agree to comply with the rules that govern electronic filing, contained the Chapter 16 Rules Pertaining to

the use of the Electronic Document Management System, available on the Iowa Judicial Branch eFiling website. Your registration constitutes your request for, and consent to, electronic service of court-generated documentsand documents filed electronically by other parties. When you have completed your registration, you can beginfiling and viewing documents on your case and receiving notifications of filings, and events. EXCEPTIONS: For good cause, the court may authorize you to submit a document in paper. Upon showing of exceptional circumstances, the chief judge of the district in which a case is pending may grant you an exemptionfrom registering and filing electronically. You must protect private information when using EDMS.

Division VI of Chapter 16 Rules Pertaining to the Use of the Electronic Document Management Systemspecifies personal information that is now considered protected by the court, as well as what you must do tokeep protected personal information out of the public documents you eFile. Training and technical support are available for EDMS.Technical support for the Iowa Judicial Branch eFiling website is available at 1-877-369-8324. If you havequestions about court procedures related to electronic filing, contact your county clerk of court office.

We look forward to your comments and suggestionsas we implement electronic filings in the Iowa Courts

In The Iowa District Court for the Second Judicial District

In re the conversion of paper files to electric documents

Administrative Order

Iowa Court Rule 16.102 authorizes a chief judge to order the conversion of paper court files to an

electronic file of any case not subject to the Rules Pertaining to the Use of the Electronic DocumentManagement System (EDMS). It is in the best interest of all for the Court to have access via EDMS to pendingfiles that exist at the time a county clerk of court office implements EDMS. Accordingly: It is so Ordered that:

1. Each Clerk of Court may take action to convert paper case files that are pending and will likely appear on a future court schedule as soon as implementation of EDMS begins in their respective counties. 2. The Clerk shall work with the local Court to identify specific documents that are to be scanned in each case type. Upon implementation of electronic filing in the County, the security level of these electronic records shall be as identified by the EDMS Business Advisory Committee. 3. The Clerk shall send the Notice Regarding Electronic Filing to the attorneys and parties appearing pro se. 4. Once notified, counsel of record or parties appearing pro se shall apply the rules pertaining to

protection of personal privacy (Iowa Ct.R.16.602 through 16.607) to all future filings in that case. 5. After being notified of commencement of the electronic filing in that County, attorneys, parties appearing pro se and all other shall file all future filings on that case electronically. It is so Ordered: Dated 3rd day of November, 2010

/s/ Kurt L. WilkeKurt L. Wilke, Chief Judge of the SecondJudicial District of Iowa

Case ID : 02811 CDDM001353 - JUDITH L NEVILLE VS DAVID GENENEVILLE

Event Cd : NOOT

CHARLES ADAM SCHULTE filed

E-FILED 2013 MAR 15 4:09 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR SAC COUNTYIn Re the Marriage of Judith Lu i!!e Ne"i!!e and Da"id #ene Ne"i!!e

Upon the Petition of

JUDITH LUCILLE NEVILLE,

Petitioner,

And concerning

DAVID GENE NEVILLE,

Respondent.

CDD!"#$%$

ORDERFOR RECORDS

This &'tter is (efore the Co)rt on Respondent*s App+ic'tion for Co)rt rdered

-)(poen'. The App+ic'tion recites th't C'tho+ic Ch'rities i++ not prod)ce the s)(poen'ed

records itho)t ' co)rt order. The proposed -)(poen' inc+)des s)fficient +'ng)'ge to protect the

pri/'c0 of the p'rties 'nd chi+dren in/o+/ed in this &'tter, 'nd to protect the interests of C'tho+ic

Ch'rities. Th't +'ng)'ge is incorpor'ted herein 's ' Protecti/e rder 'nd the re1)ested -)(poen'

is 'ppro/ed.

IT I- RDERED th't the proposed -)(poen' is 'ppro/ed 'nd C'tho+ic Ch'rities is

ordered to prod)ce the records descri(ed in the -)(poen' on the ter&s pro/ided in the -)(poen',

either in 'd/'nce to the 'ttorne0 re1)esting the records, ith ' cop0 to (e pro/ided to the other'ttorne0, or 't tri'+ (0 person'+ 'ppe'r'nce of 'n ')thori2ed represent'ti/e of C'tho+ic Ch'rities.

State of Iowa Courts

Type: OTHER ORDER

Case Number Case TitleCDDM001353 JUDITH L NEVILLE VS DAVID GENE NEVILLE

So Ordered

Electronically signed on 2013-03-18 10:51:26 page 2 of 2

2RDM02 IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR SAC COUNTY

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF

JUDITH LUCILLE NEVILLE AND DAVID GENE NEVILLE

UPON THE PETITION OF JUDITH LUCILLE NEVILLE ,

PETITIONER, AND CONCERNING DAVID GENE NEVILLE ,

RESPONDENT.

Case No. 02811 CDDM001353

COURT REPORTER MEMORANDUM AND CERTIFICATE

COURT REPORTER MEMORANDUM

(The court reporter shall file this memorandum with the district court clerk.)Appearances:For Plaintiff/Petitioner: Charles SchulteFor Defendant/Respondent: James Van DykeOther:

Information required by Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.903(3):I, Jackie Thompson Schaffner, am providing the following information as required by Iowa Rule ofCivil Procedure 1.903(3): 1. The type of proceeding that was reported: Modification 2. The date(s) on which the proceeding occurred: 03/28/2013 3. The name of the court reporter who reported the proceeding: Jackie Thompson Schaffner 4. The name of the judge who presided over the proceeding: Joel Swanson 5. The reporting fee for the proceeding: $40.00 6. We, the undersigned judge before whom the above-entitled case was tried, and the official courtreporter who, by order of the Court, reported the same, do hereby certify that the above and foregoingis the report of the whole proceedings upon the trial and/or hearing of the above-entitled cause madeand taken pursuant to the order and direction of the Court, in accordance with Iowa Code Section624.10.

/s/Jackie Thompson Schaffner1 of 3

_________________________________________ These notes were electronically filed.

2 of 3

Type: COURT REPORTER MEMORANDUM AND CERTIFICATE

So Ordered

Electronically signed on 2013-03-28 15:28:38

3 of 3

IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR SAC COUNTY

JUDITH LUCILLE NEVILLE ,

Plaintiff, vs. DAVID GENE NEVILLE ,

Defendant.

Case No: 02811 CDDM001353

EXHIBIT LIST

Presiding Judge: Joel Swanson

The following exhibits were offered and admitted by the Court at the hearing as shown above: Petitioner Exhibit 2 - Memo from P. CurranExhibit 3 - Memo from P. Curran

Exhibit 4 - School research

Respondent Exhibit 1 - Catholic Charities record

1 of 2

TO:WHOM TMAYCONCERN

FROM: atr ic ia . Curran, |SW

RE: udyNevi l le

03/25/20L3

I am a psychotherapisttCathol ic har i t ies enter or LifeCounsel ing,branch ff ice fca thol ic har i t ies iocese f DesMoines. have cl ient y he name fJudyNevi l le , ho hasbeen eeing me since 5/07 2072 with her daughters atelynn nd Jennifer eville.

Ms. Neville nd her daughters ave een navigatinghrough ifficultmother nd daughterre la t ionshipssues. udy as hown erse l f o be pat ient nd indwithcate lynn nd enni fer.She l lows erse l fo e t hem ay nything i thinmy presence i thout nterrupt ion rreactivity. he offers er opinions o them, and presents hese pinions ithout alking own othem r cr i t ic iz inghem. She as roven erse l fo be calm nd houghtfu .

I have bserved o menta l l lness r personal i ty isordersn Judy s c t ions r houghts . hewants e r hi ldreno be happy nd o do wel l .she swi l l ingo ook t herse l f n order o helpthem chieve dul thood afe ly nd uccessful ly.

TO: Whom t May Concern

FROM: a t r ic ia .Curran, ISW

RE:Cate lyn Nevl l le

03/2s/20L3

Catelynn eville s a client f mine. She as been ttending ession since 5/07 2012.determined hat she was uffering rom Posttraumatic tress isorder PTSD). he nitially am efor hree essions nd hen he ook a break or a ime. This sa ypica l esponse or someonewithPTSDo come or a whi le nd hen hey ake break rom herapy. he ame ack gainand eports hat she eels etter and ess riggered y houghts f the raumatic vent. otherthan sleeping ith her bedroom ights n and eeling fraidwhen she ees he perpetrator fher abuse, he s ar ess riggered. hen I ast awher, decided hat she need not return n aregular asis. She s always elcome o come back f the symptoms eturn r for anv otherreason. he s doing ery well n school nd with her amily. she s ess eactive o acting utand r i t ic i smsrom her r iends. t i s hard o magine hat she wi l lbe anything ther han hugesuccess n ife.

AEA District am e4 Year

Numerator4 Year

Denominator

4 Year Cohort

GraduationRate

98 .63

'79 . t5

100 .00

Denison

Denver

Des Moines ndependent

Diagonal

Dike-NewHartford

Dubuque

Dunkerton

BoyerValley

Durant

EagleGrove

Earlham

EastBuchanan

EastCentral

EastGreene

EastMarshall

EastUnion

Eastern llamakee

RiverValley

Edgewood-Colesburg

Eldora-New rovidence

Elk Horn-Kimballton

| 1 J 4I

) nt -| 1 .s22I

r 5 9lt - ^

88 .45

9 3 . 1 08 5 . 1 9

83 .64

88 .24

100 .00

9',714

100.00

d ) ' \

http://www.educateiowa.gov/index.php?option=com_docman&task=catview&gid=530&rtemid=55Source: owaDepartment f Education, ureau f InformationndAna[,sis, tudent eportingn Iowa EASIER)Files.Notes:FourYear Cohort raduation ate (Fc + TIC) (F + TI _TO )

FG =First-time9thgrade tudentsn fallof200g and raduatedn 2012 r before.TIG= students ho ransferrednto he cohort n grades to l2 andgraduate n 2012or before.F = First-time thgrade tudentn falt of2008.

TI = Transferrednto he irst-time thgraden' ohort n grades to 12.TO : Transfer ut including eceased).

Web ReportEngine Finished Page Page of I

Denison Elk Horn-Kimballton Exira-

View he TREND REPORT

The percen of slLr ents prono ef I s c?lc ulated rom lhe dzla su b milled tor rhe Adequ at€ yearty progress (Ayp) Repod, nor rh eAnnu al Progress Reporl (APR The €lculation is pedormed l the Iotat number of slu den s ra kinq he tesl is 1 O or arearer ti ewerrhdr 10 s rLdenr s oo l rhp e s t , ^e d . r a wr show J \ \ A n 1c oa ra aotp . tow. a .o w. tnor oe c t r aneo

Exi.a 16 67

Staie 72.99

http://wr"v.iowaschoolprofi[es.com/profileschart.asp?t:d&fl:1&12:2&11=l&s0-170100.. .3

l - t 6 6

; E iz , 7ia, : :'

i t r r

-lm-.1comz--t

oImm3mzJ

t;t ql 3t -

E T6 ,

- i ii I

; € 9

I > :g6

t " r :

-.{tTt

m3mz--lo-t

ft;ll ql 3L:]

o€s,

ooq).t

E P 3i li

,+-,- /-a-

,-,<_)--i

-l|n-.1cmz-.1

oIfrmmz--lo-l

fdl dl e

l e 9 a

r E ; .

i : 9 9

r j . t : iS t j l .a a ' . a l

' ; t t

--lm--lcomz-.{

oImm3mz-tE--l

'-< ):-:/_\

1 r R 9

, t r F :a

--- F6 i

ris,iiI

--lm-lcom--l

oImmITIz-l

trll ql 3t _ l

: -9 ;

-.:-r\, t '

6--,-1 -i

.,.\- -I---1,

"_,,'-1-\

f qs 9

3 +Lr q3

cImz--.1

c)IFmmz-lo-l

f\^ir<-

-.,1-.

,j-__,

9 t '< . 9

' ' €- r qd i

Ifrm3m

z-lo--l

.\ -J2

o{t-1o

m 0 0= E t lr = a

6@ 5 5 5 n tb a b e , :

O O O O O T r l . J l . . J l . J l . J h J o J ( , C , ] s J G lb i.r b cn bo cf ir :E i' bo b irj b of bo 6 i$ s s, coc f o o o e o o a o 6 0 6 0 ( f o o o o 0 0

m:ga/,

6'ot 6)o)

(.,otDr.)c

m5 =< 4 d

x3cr q.o=

aq(Dc)(D

U)oo' , , t; cY ( D

N ( , ( n f , =c o o o o l

N ( j ( J ( '

d 6 6 5 6 '

-)o o o N g t

6 3 3 S ED(lt

r N ( r r S ( ' t c D { @ @ oo o o o o o o o o o o

t)ogtgf

@9.o5oo

Percent rofcientlr h J ( . t ) 5 ( ' r c n a l A o 9 p e

o o C 5 c a o c l o c f c l c f ob a t b b c r t l b o b e bE E E 6 - o o o { f , ( 3 c f

a aE Ea oq >

8 9= hJ ( Dm 3o ( A5oc|s9t: .sELr,

i n HQ Z ( Oo o: l =6 J

s €, o= g='. 1r lX* f r t =; > c )q F

8 ncL O -

= 3 Ht a =

, ao3v,

N)oo-{

C)CDCL(D

(.)o6)csEL(D

N J ( 4 } S ( J r g t * , 1 @ { I } 6O O c ) ( 3 O ( 3 ( ) C l O ( f ( : 'b b b b b i r t r b b b i lo ( f , o o o o t 3 ( 3 r f , o o

a a5 EA ' oq t s* e= >= . l ' l lu 3 t so u r g )5oog(A

Fi. hJ

r - A= - {

Go-o3o \ J

:Io zo o

; +q €= . s3 t s= r n; >o >8 sc

B f re *cELo3u)

Percent ProficientI

N J { l ) 5 q t g r ' \ { o ( 0 6( f o o o o t 3 0 0 ( 3 o oo o c r t r o b b 6 b o ao ( 3 c l o o B c l o o o o

o r Dg f ,d ( D' q ) 'P 9= oJ 1 | |t n Jii u,ooIg= .s

i.J(fog)

t\)oCf-.{

t. J(fcf@

E Ho z ( o( l ' o

; +s €= r L

i z n HH' ,> c)g ' >; ?a9 3 Ho-r t ,

=(D3at

- { s ( o oo ( f o ( ft l E r b oo o ( f o

| \ ) ( . l ) $ ( J | g |o o c f o c f c l oo o o o o o oo ( 3 0 0 c f o o

IE 4+ o= Fi :7 . 4i l c

F * N r14 :i o- r = c 33 - ar)o=3g ' re 8o \ {

0gs= t sA O, t ma.(D3a,

I N )I O c} > ( Drn

oan N-)( D ( f= o-J-=v,FrntsF T i9 :cCLo3q,

Percerfi rofcient

c,AIILo

Percenl Profcientn 9+ oX Fi :4 g l c- o _

o E= *o a=Cto=-ac}J

=9go;l.A

nrn ]>r r n- FD . rj c o

i a= ( D6 Eo - ,= == 6= >[ 0 m5 >9 >E n 4 C

e 8. o .o3an

r \ ) g ) 4 r ( ' r ( ' ) - * l @ Q dO O ( f o O O O ( 3 O O Oi r b b i r b t r b b b e e- - - - 6 e l c l o o o ( 3

oC)cstL(D

FJ(3o(tl

hJoO-..1

NJoo(o

l\)o(f

t\)€f

Percent P ofcienttlr I

# 6 '= t s4 Q= . -* ag _ q;- =.3 Qa,o==aoJ(]oI4cP

9co"(||;ran

, nrn ]>rr rn- FO - ri c^ri q- ( Da gs - J= == 6= >

lg ni5 >n >+ :a 9 4 C

> &a 6cq(D3(4

N s ) 5 { r t q ) - \ . @ ( 9 4o c ) 6 e r o o o o o o c so b b c l b o a g Q a a- 8 6 - 6 6 - o c r o o

61q)a(D

hJ(fG-.{

i.Joo(o

t\)oCf

r N g ) F ( , t c D { @o o o o o o o o o

noq)g=(o@9.o=oo

a ag sA ' oq >J :

8 9= b .J ( Da =o o:'ooso= .sE9ga(D3u,

(slc|A)IL(D

zq N )+ o

rnF N )t s 9: eIga.(D:1a^ Nl

Percent ProfcientG ) s ( ' r c ' ) - { C o ( 4 A- o o o o o c f , oc l o b C l o b a a- - 6 o o o o o

r t )c f ( 3 ot r b c lE C C '

N)OOCD

l.J(f(3'{

Percent rofcientI

O AE g6 ' oq FJ :

8 93 AJ ( Da Ji ooosU'=.sEg

' q .(D

Iz.o+ t s€ 8o.AtsrnF N )

: oIco.o3c,l hJo

w ( l ) 5 ( , r 9 ) - ' l @ ( 4 4( : l o O c l o o c r c S ( 3 o c 't r b t r b b i l b b b a a- o o c l o o o c f ( f , c l E l

N)OOg)

6|c$ao

Percent Profcient-

V,c)(D

6,oSL.D

l Q ( r s . , t c t - { @ ( € E( 3 O C l . 3 0 ( f o o o o oo c r ( f o b b b o a a a6 6 - - E o o O ( 3 0 0

9E(DF'

9a1 N)

5 6a c r '

NJO(3o,

oo=a,o==(Ac)JooIg=.g

>9g(1-(D3.A

u ] t= $ h rg t 1 gbt" r ( r rq c )J 16 ' E

:t..-)

= o( t =

tJbtTl

Ee 8. 1a.(D+a,

t\)IhJ

Percent rofcient

6')oa(D

N J ( . l ) 5 ( . r r g r - { C O ( 0 6t S o E o ( ) o o o ( 3 c f oo o o o o o o o o o oc l o o o o c ) o o o € o

u 96 - o= ] '1 :x u )= t c

F - * H r Y ; {

q t 6c,o=3 pR Bj. cnogIg=. NJ

a oo= - r9cCL9 -* c lv t o

. x F= r n N )

9 : IA .-^) (Oq oJ -a E

a\J= O6 ibrnFEe t sC JcL ..:o|U'

Percent Profcient4 9d " ( D= Fa :4 Qq cf f O -

6 q= *O . naa)(]=5aoJooIg= .s=ga"(D3at

, n- - t s- r n@ >= . )

q o6 - E

3=utFrTl

Ico(D.l

h J u ) 5 ( ' t o , - { s @ qo o ( 3 0 0 c ) ( f o c l c ) c lo o o o c f o o c f , c l a E |6 0 ( 3 ( ' e c 3 ( 3 E t r C ] C 3 O

oC:]('l

N)O(3g)

N.)oO-r{

A)CDIL$

}\Joo@

NJol\J

; r €

J F : =+H-BA

c < o? . e 6 F-:FfEE€gF+q = - 5 - € = - * E Ir r 6 . b d

- =-= . = -9 P -

- l = . .

? r i l i l rs s Q S: 9 8 =

o q l{ i d

; i i- z

o i o 6 6 o a 5 5 H J

3 A 3 8 , i 3

t €a i - o

SS. Peter & Paul Church106 West d' St.

Atlantic lA 50022

712-243-4721"WETHEPEOPLEOF SAINTPETER NDPAULCATHOLIC HURCH TRIVETOFUFILLOUR

CALLTOBE ONEWTHAND NJESUS CHRIST

To Whom t May Concernr

lam writing o give my whole hearted upportof Cati Neville, as a candidatefor Leadership amp this summer. As the Director f Youth Ministryat SS peter &

Paul Church, have had the privilege f workingwith Cati on several occasions

during her participation n various youth activities n our parish. She is always willing

to help out when needed. Cati also works well with the younger outh as well as

the older youth and adults. Her willingness o share her giftswith others s what

makes Cati a wonde rful eader n our youth group. On many occasions, Cati ha s

been asked o step out of her comfort one, o help complete task and has done

so with an open heart. believe his is what will make her a wonderful andidate or

Leadership amp his summer.

Thanks ou or your consideration,

Nathan enzDirector f Youth Ministry

SS Peter & Paul Church

nathan.renz@yahoo.com

Exi ra -EH KS 2012-2013 '1a rchNeville, ennifer uzanne 22

Grade:

20 , 2013

Q3 GPA Grad Cr Cum GPAYr GP A10 3 . 709 29 . 000 3 . 841 3 . 820

Page of I

Q1Q2 Q3 otAbsUn 0 0 0AbsEx1 1 5 .5 .5T a t d y 2 O 2 4Advisorl

Report Card

D raw& P ain tPublication roductionAl9 IIS pan i s h IB io logyWorld StudiesP EEng i i s h 0Draw & Paint

Teegerstrom, A,D ixon , .Boys en , .Sloth, l. A.Rasmussen,P e te r s en , .

D ixon , .Teegerstrom, A.

51 Q3 Q4 Ex 52 Ex Yr Comment

B+ B .

Congratulations, ou have attained he Honor Roll.

https://jmc.elk-hom.k 2.ia.us,P rent/Online_Parent_Report ards.aspx?treeView==tvn2 312012013

aEHKHS 2A112A12'lay24,2012iile,ef ifer uzanneod ard G|ade

422 52 GPA3.859

YTGPA3.859

GradCf Clm GP A14.000 3.859

51 52 TotAbsent 0.0 1.0 1. 0

aroY u I

sSciencength raingebraHlstorylljshign un dnrshign und

Wahlert,Yates,Freed,Schaefer, JChristensen,L4adsenS oth,M.A.lvladsen

B * A A -

B+ A- A A-

B * A A -

A A - A

KEEP PTHEGOOD ORK

DOES XCELLENTORK

om'KimbaltonS tl; '"-2Al May31,2AlJie,enniferuzannertCafu Giade

422 52 GPA4.447

YI GPA4.077

Absenl52 Tot1 . 5 1 . 50 0

s10 .00

ort.88h 8lence 8rEd888

tudiess7/8ceh8

Watson, .

Hunrphfey,

Watson, .

Chnstensen,Peiersen, .Pitzen,BlakeR.Witt.Lrp,Yates, .Petersen, .Newton,Madsen, .Walson, .

A + AA +

A+ A* A+

A* A* A+

A, A. A-A+ A+ A+

. a. tHf \4 's#h'al 2012-201

il-b c aldynn Juo lne"*g:ta --- - uTaoe /

N , 4 a r c h8 , 2 0 1 3421 03 GPA Grad Cr Cum GPA

3 9 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0YTGP A

3 . 9 1 7

Q 1Abs Un 0A b s E x 0 5Tardy 0

Adv LkliefothComment

Q3 Tot0 0

3 . 5 6 .50 0

KEEP UP THE GOOD WORKd 7E 7

fe Skillse Algebra

nglishStudies

clenceH Chorlts

DDarkerTPeterse11

JKliefoth

JWalkerC B u r n sRBlakeRNlelsen

A. B+ KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK

x i r a -BS choo l 2A 11-2A 12 ay 3 , 2012ev i l l e , a t e lynn ud i th 421 52 G P Aeport Card Grade 3.952

51 52 To tY rG PA A bs en t 2 . 0 7 . 5 9 . 5

3.976 Tardy 0 0 0

Q ] Q 2 L\ S r Ol e4 E. S Z t \ Y rcience A RBlake Studies A CBurns

echnology AlB RBlakert 64E 6A

rt 64E 64

D D aikerLD re ie r

D D aikerLD ree

DOES XCELLENTOR KKEEPUP THE GOODWORK

POSITIVETTITUDEA S tudyH al l J K l ie fo thng l i s h 4 J w alke ra th A CJ es s en

horus RN ie l s encience 4 RB ke S tud s 6A CBurns

echno gy 6418 RB ke

4 S tudyH al J K l le fo thng l i s h A J Wa er1ath 4 CJessenhorus RN ie l s en

KEEPUP HE GOODWORK

orn-Kimballion-8 2010-2011 ay31' 01 1

lle atelYnnu0ltnrt ard Grade

421 52 GPA4.000

51 52 TotAbsen i 0 .0 10 10T a d y 0 0 0

YIGP A3 989

Ex Y f2

+ A+ A+

A B + A

inghputerSt dles

5c5ance

Ed 5nceish

Christensen,.Blake, .Dickinson,

HLUENA

EischeidMadsen, .StefiensBlake, .Christensen,

J u d y N e v i l l e2 1 1 2 a l n L a n ?E L k l l o r n , I a . S r 5 3 i

o r t h o C h a r , tC a t e l y n n

/ a + - o z / )

5 Ti', r E- :1€, T

FA M ILY D EN TA L CEN TERT I M O T H Y J , K R E I F E L S, D . D . S . , P . C .

4O2 POPLARATLANTIC, IOWA 5OO22

TELEPHONE: t7 l 2 ) 243 .3275

(rr- ,fi) (.

6 l <( 5 T-

t r l f LF z

\/\q/l1ilit)f,sf,,'lt{/r,

iliI'falP/,,1(

Q,\er,,c,.i,1c\1tl('o*,1ii

[.,\:\lrc- t" r : , i^

Cc,\"-\ Cr[li-I / + r l \ {id-,-Gfr-raL

\ L, G{XL\.:Curer,f

- r* tiv, r ' t

(,ai ct,,,rn

v . t lo( YirL_u,JI"r;, t

/ 5 r l _ -

9 o otrco

,,ri u\ (j.f-\rc. " ' . , \ . - - \ .

50.761F 2 A 17430S

A F I N A N C E C H A R G E O F I Z %

PLEASEAY AST I\4OUNTN THISCOLUI\,INW I L L B E C H A R G E D O N A L L B A L A N C E S O V E R 3 0 D A Y S .

t \ll-1

- - J ' | \. A....\'

-.<a'{ ' l

>JA Aa\

tr-) \-_-2'

c-"--r

Ii--\.-- \

r a 'L '>

llo3qodo_

lc_q.(a

g ;ofo l=

zzoog Vl '3[NvlIV

uvldod zof'c'd "s'o c 'sl:Jl3u) 'r AHLol^llr

6=o:.N

i;]1=-:--i-j.. ::J.ih"i=r*:-:Ij-:iP*g-i::4*fti# }:;ry4:: ". . , - , - ,4q1:; i , i rn : , , " , . , . . " i , i . ' r ' ' . . r r " :-

, tillS Fi;3, ' "." lll"., .i ' i-, ,",r# t{..1"

ytr.ffin1,"rrti,rrir 'r,rr,r:'r,rrc:rnnir;"ir,; i

sgryill-=lil|:.:=--J9"*9*J:-"-*.'#:=J":ii'---:: ) ' ' ' ' : i t ; '

D 0 1 2 0 P e r i o d . Tooih Tootlr

# Surface FEE Cc i€ 1i SLr. fac-" FEE

ADADental procedlrres an' l Nomenclature/Tooth o-Veterans Alomenclature

O|ACT]OS' I IC FEE AMA-Gl lv lBtSr aqATlONSAYTI:I\CiIiGDENI]ST'S STA'I"EMENT

OTHERSEF\, , FS: -- - Code

3a:30 Panol i : Fr :

D i l2 2 nlrao , '1 lav Slfqre

DC: l l0 in ira . rrr- l \dd FlLnrl

n0270 B (e ' / r t X RaYSLng

r ) , / - B : l e w i f t A d d F l l n l *

I 'P 'EVENTIVE

l l l i L . r i t f D l l : 1 0 C h ld P r o P h Yi 1 2 | jr . r i d o r e a t m e n t

L r l 3 3 r lO , ; l v q . - ' r o s t f u c t i o n

O S A LS I ] R G L RY

) 7 r 1 0 E r l a . t c | l t 7 l : n A d d ' T € e t h

' ; 2 : l OS u r q r c t l L x t | a c i r r

_ s _ D . r3 $

CBOWNRESTORATIONS

S .. D2 a

. F I X E DR I O G E

- $ D 6 / s

ENDODONTICSRootCana

TODAY'S CHARGES

' |,q,MILYEIVTALENTER' i |\4oTHYJ. KtlEtFEl-S,D ; P C'

a02PoPlar;ATLANTIC,OWA 50022

Telephone : 1 2 ) 43 ' 3275

co\n"oslrL9o-lrOr ttrED Rt>roaA oN S

D23 )J o# /'s o" s

S D T S

OFTITOD, iNTICS

Do:40 cephal o r ifh

r l0 4 l0 Study rodels UrL

D08 Removab Appliance

D23 _,

ADDXE"Ss' SERVICE REQUESTED

RONALD S BERGMAN DO2OOO GR,ejND AVENUEDES MOINES IA 50312

l 5 r 5 ) 2 2 2 - L r r 7l l r ' i L i j r , l l \ : i \ i . E F l

6 6 3 5 b 4 1 6 9 T ' U 1 0

STATEMENTFOR YOUR CONVENIENCE WE ACCEPTMASTERCARD, VISA, & DISCOVER

L l CH ECK ERE o rC r e c i t a r d a y m e n tSf l , - l , / i l . : i l i l r ii APA I I ] H F R F 9

7 4 7 5 0

o 7 r o / 7 2u . l : t i t a . i i :

7 4 7 5 0' ia - 1 i , " : - r i i t i ; - 1 1 i | a E i

0 1 7 ' t5 7 5: , r i a ^ , r r r i L r i : - . - r , i . a l

> 0 t 0 8 n - 8 1 a 5 0 0 0 1 [ : - 0 t tJ U D ITH L N EV ILLE2 712 ELM LNELK H O RN A 515 31- 5116

f . O T EC h a r i r s ; | i l p : - n a " t : . a : j a ; : - " J - l :s : ; : i ; r t r i , a lrr.eaf i t r i l . . t a l ' . r . . j " . - , . .

t , t , t ,l , , , , , i l , , , , i l , ,, t , , , i l , t , , , , t ,l , , , i l , , ,, , , , 1 , ,1RONALD S BERGMANDO PC2O O O G RA N DA V ED ES M O IN ES A 5A 3T2 . 492A

CATELY N NN EV lLLEts r A S E REt t tRf . t f I s po i I l a l \ . ] , r, l. i pA , ' i . lENi

041012 BERCI4 AN O VISIT OFFICE OR OOTPAT. I€ NT EST CATELYNN J 9 O.OO0 4 3 0 1 2 c o L D E N R U L E 3 ? 6 0 2 # 1 ? 1 5 3 9 F i l e t t0 5 3 1 1 2 e o L D E N R O L E 3 c $ 1 7 1 5 3 9 1 0 . o o0 s 3 1 1 2 D 6 d u c t i b l € ? 0 . 9 00 5 1 1 1 2 W R I T E - O F F G O L D E N O L E c { 1 ? 1 5 3 9 1 _ 1 y. 1 0

a 3 2 4 1 2 B A L A N C E F O R WA R D 1 0 5 . 2 5

FOR QUESTIONS ABOI 'T YOUR BILL, CAT]L I 5 5 J 222-1o R ( 8 0 0 ) 3 2 5 - 3 6 9 5 . T E I N K Y O O I

t , L ) , l i - I o 1 / l o / t 2 | | r ' . : . . i a \ a . r u . r i L a L t . , tr u . , a - ? f . f t t _ t r f , : r i r r t , , i l _ : ? 4 ? 5 0

3 0 - 5 0 D AY S 5 0 - 9 0 D AY S

7 0 . 9 0

TOTAL INS PENDING

1 7 5 . 1 5 0 . 0 0

90 DAYS

7 0 5 . 2 5

S E N D N O U | R S T ORONALD S BERG[,'].N DO pC l5 5) 222_a1A12000 GBI \ I{D AVENOE rf you cannot pay rh is ba lanceD E s M o r N E s r A 5 0 3 1 2 - 4 9 2 0 i n f u ] 1 , p l e a s € c o n r a c t s o u

of f ice to hake payn€nra r r a n g € n e n s . 5 \ 5 _ 2 2 2 " 7 l l t

c r lA Rl iES P t rEA R]N GN Tf l s s rA i r [ tEN T REN or N ' -LU D F DN A f]"F ros . , A LB t oR ;Ta j iN T

9 : a 9 6 S 1 r a - a

00'0ts :'lvror

8ez 99 0 8t 269 /0 ttt 026 99 CO

s = .r L9tt9z9 xuazz6 naLr arjzit | laaI Iro oe(zt )

r 0 9 r 9 v t E O H I l :Nl /rJll zrlz

NNA'13IVC31"llA:lN

? r ^ | ^ ^ r e 6 P - ]

.-, ^ld8a 3e 10 z ozis ,-0A partnboa rnleu6rs Q >-

N)-ttr -

'lllfiffilillililfrfifrllil'

- ' ^ ' . ^ ^ ' r 6 pc ] v I v l \ v v v a

. - . na r00t 10 410? 'El 0A palnbau arnleubrs

N EV ILLECATELYNN2712 ELMLNELKHORN A 51531 iltlt|]iltlllllllllill " ' '79314"96206" '

oc# 655 923 107 76592384 107 59 23 8

TOTAL: $22.25

Signature equirec lo? '15/2012750:30 Nl '

02115i2A12 012)21392?3

RX.6764469 FEF 25

MEBP a g e o : 1 o l 2

7s =33g 89it9Z9 :XUEaz'-araLrl rlztsrlzD9 to r0[12 1]

r€9 9 Vl NBQIr)1-llN l l l r : z L Z '

NNAl3-wCr'l-'llA:lN

8tz 699 Or t8€ 269 LZnto tz6 992 50'ilflfriiilifiililfrflfr

d g U ' <i : ; €"r=-=:3q,

O D \ O D _

3 = 3 f ; N € -' 835 - - " ; - I= o { - . = F i = J-?ii=-ii Fq,

-+ E:i acr :: . A- ;N Ei q Fii * \ ,t"^ - raU J , \F =I

-n ' - a ( , , ' ' n - x- T r ' J ( ' { ( , D ) < ) <

an cr--rE rrEr (, --l -.rxrE---aGJ a: tn tn

i o 5 - rc J - t c 5 5--r -<E HzE d\ o\

D < Z ->< crc)- o c > o o o o

E r r t tN- ( - - .1- o l r r o - a \ o r E l E

Ir --.J (nNr-ooo (,l sr> H - l r o o \ o o o o \ - o o = ea , o r r o \ o - o - a o x - 7 ) Et n - -{o-{AJouro- J

- - JCr O-6- - l - ( r -< -<5 m --.r r< --.r \o ca ('l - - d\c :z :D :DA)<)sa tA

'n'n 'T:'Tl

I G Li - F1 0 F

\o \o \.o + l

; i-{:- i.;.;; -; no (n {r| r A} (n ca o\ oo co -..1

o -{ )< >< ><t:<

a 6F I: l

; lI , l

t - lt:- ta. f Nt > l

t.- i>J

l A l >l t >t -

t:IIII--lt {l Ft . _ '6

l ,l- 'I1.:l-*I

+ e* 6

In Re the Marriage Of JUDITH NEVILLE and DAVID NEVILLE

Up n The !etiti n Of

JUDITH NEVILLE"

!etiti ner"

And C n#erning

DAVID NEVILLE"

Re$p ndent%

NO% CDDM&&'()(

RULIN* ON !ETITION TO MODIFY

Trial in the above matter commenced on March 28, 2013. At that time Judith

Neville appeared personally alon !ith her attorney "harles #chulte. $avid Neville

appeared personally alon !ith his attorney James %. &an $y'e.

$avid Neville (iled a !ETITION TO MODIFY !RIMARY CARE on July 31,

2012. $avid Neville see's to modi(y the terms o( a dissolution o( marria e decree (iled

)ctober 20, 2000, as it pertains to the primary physical care o( t!o minor children, Jenni(er

*dob 12+ +1-- and "atelynn *dob 2+2 +2000 . The /etition as (iled by $avid alle es that

there has been a material and substantial chan e in circumstances !hich !ould re uire

the "ourt to order chan e o( physical care o( the children that bein in their best interest.#peci(ically $avid Neville alle es that the children have a stron desire to chan e

residence to live !ith their (ather, that Judith Neville has promised to move to )maha, that

Judith Neville has treated or mistreated the minor children and (inally that Judith has (ailed

to (ollo! her medically re uired re imen o( medication !hich has caused mood s!in s and

e treme stress to the children.

Judith Neville has (iled an ans!er and counterclaim denyin the alle ations

as contained in $avid s petition and (urther re uested the "ourt to increase child support

that has been ordered payable by $avid because there has been a si ni(icant and material

chan e in the (inancial circumstances o( the parties !hich !ould re uire recalculation and

increase in the child support.

The "ourt has revie!ed the dissolution (ile and notes that Judith Neville (iled

E-FILED 2013 APR 10 12:57 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

her /etition (or $issolution o( Marria e on January 20, 2000. The dissolution !as tried on

)ctober 3, 2000, and the "ourt on November 2-, 2000, entered its indin s o( act,

"onclusions o( 4a!, Jud ment and $ecree. At that time Jenni(er !as (our years o( a e

and "atelynn !as seven months old. The "ourt incorporated the STI!ULATION

RE*ARDIN* VISITATION dated )ctober 20, 2000, !herein the parties a reed that the

physical care o( the t!o minor children !ould be !ith Judith Neville. That stipulation also

set (orth a visitation schedule.

or the ne t number o( years the court (ile re(lects numerous court

involvement !ith the parties, primarily child support and custodial matters. 5t appears clear

to the "ourt that this matter, li'e many other dissolution proceedin s, continues !ith

on oin disa reements especially !hen children are involved. Jenni(er and "atelynn !ere

e tremely youn at the time o( the dissolution and althou h the ori inal decree+stipulation

has remained in e((ect, both Judith and $avid have chan ed livin arran ements, chan ed

employment, become involved !ith ne! partners. Jenni(er and "atelynn have attempted

ad6ustments throu hout these years. 7hen children reach teena e years, it becomes

e tremely important (or their best interest that their mother and (ather act responsibly and

to 'eep at the (ore(ront !hat is in the best interest o( their children. n(ortunately the

Nevilles have been unable to ad6ust appropriately.rom testimony o( !itnesses in these proceedin s alon !ith the testimony o(

Judith Neville it is apparent she is an a ressive and concerned mother alon !ith bein

e tremely busy and dedicated to her current employment. 9er time spent a!ay (rom home

is re uired !hich leaves more (reedom (or her dau hters. 5t should come as no surprise to

Judith and $avid that such circumstances lead to con(lict.

$avid does not appear to be as driven as Judith. 9e has not consistently and

daily been involved !ith his dau hters activities and lives and thus has not been re uired

to be a :parent; as his dau hters mature and develop ne! habits and desires. <oth

Jenni(er and "atelynn are e tremely bri ht as evidenced by their school rades. They are

involved in e tra curricular activities and are driven (or success.

<oth irls attend =l' 9orn>?imballton "ommunity #chool $istrict and have

achieved reat success there. The testimony o( teachers, coaches and e hibits provided

by Judith truly re(lect ho! hard !or'in , industrious and intelli ent both irls are.

)ne o( the primary reasons o((ered (or the re uest o( the chan e in physical

care is the potential move by Judith to )maha, Nebras'a !here she currently has been

employed (or a number o( years. That concern or (ear has not been substantiated by

credible evidence. 5n (act, Judith testi(ies that she has no intention o( movin to )maha.

<oth "atelynn and Jenni(er !ould move (rom their current school district to the $enison

"ommunity #chool in the event $avid Neville !ere to receive primary physical care. Judith

has o((ered a number o( e hibits comparin the $enison "ommunity #chool and =l' 9orn>

?imballton #chool. As it pertains to raduation rate, readin and other pro(iciency

cate ories such as math, science, enerally spea'in , the =l' 9orn>?imballton #chool

$istrict rates hi her than $enison "ommunity #chool $istrict in these cate ories. The

court notes that the $enison #chool $istrict has a total enrollment o( 2,28@ students. The

=l' 9orn>?imballton #chool $istrict has a total enrollment o( 23 students. Althou h a

lar er school district may provide ne! and reater opportunities (or a student, the

evidence presented by Judith !ould not veri(y that. %ather it could be determined that the

=l' 9orn>?imballton #chool $istrict !ould perhaps provide a reater opportunity (or

Jenni(er and "atelynn.The testimony o( Jenni(er and "atelynn clearly establishes con(rontation !ith

their mother. 5t is disturbin to note that Jenni(er in particular re(ers to her mother as :Judy;

rather than :mom; and o((ers the statement that Judy does not deserve to be called mom.

An interestin observation+evaluation by a youn teena e irl.

The "ourt notes that much o( the testimony o( the t!o irls relates to

behavior in the past. The current disa reements are dissatis(action !ith their present

custodial arran ement probably !as ma ni(ied !hen a disa reement at home ave rise to

a su estion by Judith that she had breast cancer and that the (amily may have to move

(rom their current residence. The interpretation by the t!o irls and Judith di((er some!hat

as to the emphasis placed on all o( these alle ations but it is clear that the evenin s

discussion resulted in the t!o irls leavin , their (ather $avid pic'in them up and ta'in

them to his home !ithout the 'no!led e or consent o( Judith. <oth irls ac'no!led e that

i( in (act the "ourt rants the re uest (or a chan e in physical care that a ne! school

district !ould become a reality. The "ourt (inds no credible reasonin (or a chan e in

school district based upon the current levels o( success achieved by both Jenni(er and

"atelynn. 5n addition to academic chan es, there !ould appear to be a reat chan e in

social environment and iven the a es o( Jenni(er and "atelynn that !ould be no easy

underta'in . Testimony reveals that $avid has lived !ith his ne! irl(riend+(iancB !ho also

has a son in colle e and one still in hi h school. The blendin o( these (amilies could

present un'no!n problems.

7ithout uestion the testimony o( Jenni(er and "atelynn reveals their desire

to live !ith their (ather. The reasons o((ered at the time o( hearin althou h disheartenin

to a parent are real in the minds o( the irls. Their belie( that their li(e !ould be less

complicated !ith their (ather is based upon the limited time spent !ith him since the

dissolution *2000 and his minimal involvement and their day to day problems. 7ithout

uestion, Judith demands certain thin s (rom her dau hters but the "ourt !ould concur

that Judith has the best interest o( her dau hters !hen she re uires compliance in school

!or' and household and social activities.

The rearin o( children is best served by t!o concerned parents on board!ith the same oals (or the children. $issolutions create only additional barriers to the

rearin o( healthy, happy and are oal driven children. The le al system o((ers no ma ic

(ormula, no uarantees and can only attempt to resolve those issues brou ht be(ore the

"ourt based on the evidence presented. The "ourt continues to remind parents that the

system has at the (ore(ront !hat is in the best interest o( the child !hich sometimes are

con(licts !ith the desires o( the child.

Modi(ication o( a decree is appropriate only i( a material and substantial

chan e in circumstances has occurred and i( the chan e !as not contemplated by the

"ourt issuin the ori inal decree. In Re Marriage of Sjulin C31 N.7. 2d @@3, In Re

Marriage of Full, 2 N7 2d 1 3. The party see'in a modi(ication has the burden to

prove that a substantial chan e in circumstances has occurred ma'in it e uitable and 6ust

chan e in physical care is based primarily on conversations !ith his dau hters. 9e truly

has a very limited personal 'no!led e o( the events testi(ied to by the irls. 9is petition

alle es that Judith has (ailed to (ollo! her medically re uired re imen o( medications but no

testimony is o((ered to substantiate that position. The primary reason (or $avid s re uest in

these proceedin s is based upon the re uest o( his dau hters.

5n this case, the "ourt has been (aced !ith t!o teena e irls testi(yin in the

(orm o( :complaints; about their mother and the rules and the manner in !hich she handles

discipline. Judith Neville as the mother o((ers e planation and corrections in some o( the

interpretations o( her dau hters, all o( !hich cannot stren then the relationship o( mother

and dau hters. This is e tremely un(ortunate. 5t appears Judith and her dau hters have

attempted counselin , !hich the "ourt !ould encoura e. nderstandin o( both mother

and dau hters o( their relationship !ould only be help(ul in the (e! years be(ore the irls

reach adulthood.

5nsu((icient testimony+e hibits have been o((ered as it pertains to income and

e penses o( the /etitioner and the %espondent. No child support uideline !or'sheets

have been o((ered or discussed and accordin ly the "ourt !ill deny the re uest (or

modi(ication o( child support.

The "ourt (inds that $avid Neville has (ailed to provide su((icient evidence toestablish a material and substantial chan e in circumstances since the date o( the decree

not contemplated by the parties, !hich !ould re uire a chan e in the physical custody o(

Jenni(er and "atelynn.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the !etiti n t M dif+ !ri,ar+ Care

(iled July 31, 2012, is hereby dismissed !ith costs to $avid Neville.

$ated this April 10, 2013.

"ler' to (or!ard copies toD"harles #chulteJames &an $y'e

Type: OTHER ORDER

So Ordered

Type: CERTIFIED NOTICE OF APPEAL

So Ordered

E-FILED 2013 JUL 10 2:42 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

E-FILED 2013 OCT 16 11:35 AM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR SAC COUNTY

UPON THE PETITION OFJUDITH LUCILLE NEVILLEPetitioner,

AND CONCERNINGDAVID GENE NEVILLERes on!ent.

NO. CDD"##$%&%

NOTICE OF HEARING

PURSUANT to Io'( Co!e C)( ter *&*H, t)e (+ove (tter '(s -erti ie! to t)e Co/rt.

T)e (+ove0entit1e! -(se is set or )e(rin2 to t)e Co/rt on t)e * n! !(3 o De-e +er *#$%, (t #45%#A.", (t t)e -o/rt)o/se in S(- Cit3, Io'(. T)e (rties (re !ire-te! to erson(113 ( e(r (t t)e(+ove ti e (n! 1(-e. T)e C1er6 s)(11 noti 3 o t)e ti e i7e! +3 (i1in2 ( -o 3 to e(-) o t)e

o11o'in25

Child Support Recovery Unit David G. Neville J(!e H(ver (nnAssist(nt Attorne3 Gener(18*& N. West St. Judith L. Neville PO 9o7 4%:C(rro11, IA &$;#$

CSC< ;;:=#&

I 3o/ nee! (ssist(n-e to (rti-i (te in -o/rt !/e to ( !is(+i1it3, -(11 t)e !is(+i1it3-oor!in(tor (t 8;$0;*$0#44#. Persons ')o (re )e(rin2 or s ee-) i (ire! (3 -(11 Re1(3Io'( TTY >$0=##0:%&0*4;*?. Disability Coordinators cannot provide le al advice.

E-FILED 2013 OCT 16 2:13 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

Type: ORDER SETTING HEARING

So Ordered

2RCV55IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR SAC COUNTY

STATE OF IOWA, ex rel.,JUDITH LUCILLE NEVILLESTATE OF IOWA EX REL,

Petitioner,

vs. DAVID GENE NEVILLE ,

Respondent.

Case No. 02811 CDDM001353

COURT REPORTER MEMORANDUM AND CERTIFICATE

COURT REPORTER MEMORANDUM

(The court reporter shall file this memorandum with the district court clerk.)

Appearances:For Plaintiff/Petitioner: Jade HavermanFor Defendant/Respondent: Did not appearOther: Judith Neville Information required by Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.903(3):I, Tara Gibson, am providing the following information as required by Iowa Rule of CivilProcedure 1.903(3):

1. The type of proceeding that was reported: 252H Hearing 2. The date(s) on which the proceeding occurred: December 2, 2013

3. The name of the court reporter who reported the proceeding: Tara Gibson 4. The name of the judge who presided over the proceeding: Gary McMinimee 5. The reporting fee for the proceeding: $40.00 6. We, the undersigned judge before whom the above-entitled case was tried, andthe official court reporter who, by order of the Court, reported the same, do herebycertify that the above and foregoing is the report of the whole proceedings upon the trialand/or hearing of the above-entitled cause made and taken pursuant to the order anddirection of the Court, in accordance with Iowa Code Section 624.10. /s/Tara Gibson _________________________________________

1 of 2

E-FILED 2013 DEC 02 2:04 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

State of Iowa CourtsCase Number Case TitleCDDM001353 JUDITH L NEVILLE VS DAVID GENE NEVILLEType: COURT REPORTER MEMORANDUM AND CERTIFICATE

So Ordered

2 of 2

E-FILED 2013 DEC 02 2:04 PM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

In Re the Marriage Of JUDITH LUCILLE NEVILLE and DAVID GENE NEVILLE

U !n The "etiti!n Of

JUDITH LUCILLE NEVILLE#

"etiti!ner#

And C!n$erning

DAVID GENE NEVILLE#

Re% !ndent&

NO& CDDM''()*)

A 252H Hearing to modify child support was held on December 2, 2013.

udith appeared without counsel. Da!id did not appear. "#$% appeared by Assistant

Attorney &eneral ade Ha!erman.'he parties( dissolution decree was filed on )o!ember 2*, 2000. +t awarded

udith physical care of the parties( two children and ordered Da!id to pay udith monthly

child support in the sum of 505.-2. $egarding child medical support the decree pro!ided

During the time Da!id is obligated to pro!ide support for a child, udithshall pro!ide health insurance for the child. Da!id shall reimburse herone half of the health insurance premium. udith shall pay the first250 per year per child of unco!ered medical e/penses up to ama/imum of 500 per year. %nco!ered medical e/penses in e/cessof 250 per child or a ma/imum of 500 per year for all children shallbe paid 25.3 by udith and -.3 by Da!id.

udith was awarded the oldest child as an e/emption and Da!id was awarded the youngest

child as an e/emption. "#$% in these proceedings determined that Da!id(s support

obligation for the two children should be 3 .3*, based on udith ha!ing a gross monthly

income of -,32 . and Da!id ha!ing a gross income of 2,* .50. udith did not agree

with "#$%(s determination of Da!id(s support obligation and re4uested the December 2,

2013 hearing.udith does not appear to ob ect to "#$%(s determination of her gross

monthly income. udith has insurance on the children. 'he cost of her family policy is

23.0 per month. A single policy is a!ailable at a cost of 32 .*2 per month.

Accordingly, the cost for co!ering the children is 2*5.1- per month.

E-FILED 2013 DEC 17 11:07 AM SAC - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

udith disagrees with "#$%(s determination of Da!id(s gross monthly

income. #he contends that Da!id(s income should be set higher based on Da!id(s 6arch

2 , 2013, affida!it indicating his wage as a mechanic with 7uality 'ruc8 #er!ice was

3*,000 per year, her representation that the %.#. 9ureau of :abor and #tatistics indicates

that the wage for an entry le!el mechanic in +owa is -0, 50 and her belief that Da!id

earned money in addition to his wage. Although Da!id became self;employed during 2013,

"#$% based its determination of Da!id(s gross income on wages his employer reported for

the last half of 2012, the first 4uarter of 2013 and eight wee8s of the second 4uarter of

2013. 'here was no e!idence presented that his actual self;employment income is

anything more or less. +n this court(s !iew, the basis for "#$%(s determination of Da!id(s

wage is more reliable than Da!id(s self;reporting or data from the %.#. 9ureau of :abor and

#tatistics. $egarding udith(s belief that Da!id had income while employed in addition tohis wage, there was no e!idence offered to support her belief.

"onsidering the forgoing, this court is of the !iew that udith should continue

to pro!ide health insurance for the children and Da!id should continue to reimburse her for

one half of the premium all in accordance with the original decree. Da!id should pay child

support and the parties should share unco!ered medical e/penses in accordance with the

following <or8sheet

I. Net Monthly Income of Petitioner , David Neville[ ] Custodial Parent [X] Noncustodial Parent [ ] Joint Physical CarePetitioner claims 1 child as tax dependents.

A. Sources and Amounts of Annual Income:

T T!"# $%&,'((.))

B. Federal Tax Deduction: *ross !nnual Taxa+le ncome $%&,'((.))

less 1-( sel /employment 0 C!2 tax# 3).))4less ederal ad5ustments to incomeless personal exemptions, sel plus 1 dependents 36,7)).))4less standard deduction

ilin8 as sin8le 3',1)).))4 Net taxa+le income / ederal# $(1,6((.))ederal Tax "ia+ility# $(,71(.)&ederal Tax Credits 31,))).))4inal ederal tax lia+ility# 31,71(.)&4

C. State Tax Deduction: *ross !nnual Taxa+le ncome# $%&,'((.))

less 1-( sel employment 0 C!2 tax# 3).))4less ederal tax lia+ility 0ad5usted or dependent tax credit2 31,71(.)&4less standard deduction

ilin8 as sin8le 31,9)).))4 Net taxa+le income / state# $%1,9)9.9&:tate tax lia+ility 0ta+les2# $1,&9&.')

!pplica+le rate 06.'&; Ba8es or 1&.%; sel /employment as ad5usted2!nnual :ocial :ecurity and <edicare tax lia+ility 3%,961.974

!. "ther Deductions #Annual$: 1. <andatory occupational license ees# 3).))4(. =nion dues# 3).))4%. !ctual medical support paid pursuant to court order or administrative

order in another order or other children, not the pendin8 matter# 3).))4>. Prior o+li8ation o child support and spouse support actually

paid pursuant to court or administrative order# 3).))4&. Deductions or ) additional ?uali ied dependents# 3).))4'. Child care expenses# 0present action2 $).))

less ederal tax credits# 3).))4less state tax credits# 3).))4less state tax re und# 3).))4

Net child care expenses# 3).))4

Preliminary Net Annual Income: $>(,)%9.66Preliminary A%era&e Monthly Income of +es,ondent $%,&)%.%16. <onthly Cash <edical :upport ordered in this pendin8 action $).))Ad'usted Net Monthly Income of +es,ondent $%,&)%.%1

III. Calculation of the -uideline Amount of Su,,ort

Custodial Noncustodial Com inedParent Parent

[ ] Petitioner [X] Petitioner[X] @espondent [ ] @espondent

!. !d5usted Net <onthly ncome $%,&)%.%1 $(,>'>.11 $&,9'6.>(

E. Proportional :hare o ncome &7.6)6>; >1.(9('; 1));

C. Num+er o Children or Fhom :upport is :ou8ht (

D. Easic :upport +li8ation =sin8 nly NCPGs!d5usted Net <onthly ncome N-!

H. Easic :upport +li8ation =sin8 Com+ined!d5usted Net <onthly ncome $1,&6%.))

. Hach ParentGs :hare o the Easic :upport +li8ation=sin8 Com+ined ncomes $9(%.>6 $'>9.&%

*. NCPGs Easic :upport +li8ation Ee ore Aealth nsurance $'>9.&%

A. Cost o Child0ren2Gs Aealth nsurance Premium $1>6.&6 $1>6.&6

. Aealth nsurance !dd/ n or Deduction rom NCPGs +li8ation / $7'.'%

J. *uideline !mount o Child :upport or NCP $'(%.7>

/. Chan&es in Child Su,,ort " li&ation as Num er of Children !ntitled to Su,,ort Chan&es0 or cases Bith multiple children +ased on present income and applica+le 8uidelinescalculation method2#

/. a. Basic " li&ation

Num+er NCPGs Easic Aealth nsurance Hxtraordinary *uidelineo :upport !dd/on or Iisitation !mount o

Children +li8ation Deduction Credit Child :upport1 $>&>.'% $7'.'% $).)) $>(7.9>

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the attorney for "#$% shall submit to the

"ourt a proposed order in the usual form with respect to child support and child medical

support, consistent with the foregoing "hild #upport &uideline <or8sheet and

determinations regarding health insurance.

Dated this December 1 , 2013.

"ler8 to forward copies to"#$%udith )e!illeDa!id )e!ille

Type: OTHER ORDER

So Ordered

JUDITH LUCILLE NEVILLESTATE OF IOWA EX REL,

Plaintiff,

vs. DAVID GENE NEVILLE ,

Defendant.

Case No: 02811 CDDM001353

EXHIBIT LIST

252HDecember 2, 2013

Presiding Judge: Gary McMinimee

The following exhibits were offered and admitted by the Court at the hearing as shown above: CSRU's Exhibits

1. Child Support Guideline Worksheet2. Letter to Child Support Recovery Unit requesting a hearing3. Child Support Guideline Worksheets

1 of 2

State of Iowa CourtsCase Number Case TitleCDDM001353 JUDITH L NEVILLE VS DAVID GENE NEVILLEType: EXHIBIT LIST

So Ordered

2 of 2

470-3504 (Rev. 07/2013) 1 *447805*

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR SAC COUNTYIn e !"e #$ %$&e ' Nev% e

U*'n !"e +e!%!%'n ',UDITH UCI E NE I E+e!%!%'ne

An 'n e n%n&

DA ID ENE NE I ERe *'n en!.

No. CDDM001353

252H Judicial OrderFor Adjustment of a u!!ort O"li#ation

T"% $!!e ' e e ' e !"e C'6 ! 6*'n !"e e 6e ! ' ,UDITH . NE I E ' !"e $ 86 ! en! ' !"e 'n! ' %n&

6**' ! ' e ( ) $ ' %n& !' I'9$ C' e "$*!e 252H. 1 T"e S!$!e ' I'9$ % e* e en!e : ,$ e H$ve $nn.

T"e C'6 ! 6*'n !"e e ' $n e%n& 6 : $ v% e %n !"e * e % e F$ND %

1. T"e C'6 ! "$ 86 % % !%'n 've !"e 6 8e ! $!!e $n I'9$ % !"e * '*e !$!e %n 9"% " !' en!e $n ' e '

6**' ! $ ' %n& !' e !%'n 252;.5(7) "$*!e 252H $n 252<.

2. ,6 %!" . Nev% e % !"e $ e!$=e ' !"e %n' "% ( en) $n n'!% e ' !"% $ !%'n 9%!" $ e 6% e en! '

e !%'n 252H.14$ ' 252H.15 9$ e ve 'n !"e ' '9%n& ne e $ : *$ !%e 9"' $**e$ e $ ' '9 >

Name &elations'i! to C'ildren tate of &esidence 2 (art) A!!eared

+$:' 3

+$:ee 4

D$v% . Nev% e

,6 %!" . Nev% e

D% n'! $**e$

T"e "% en $ e !e : !"e 'n&'%n& 6**' ! ' e ( ) $ e>

Affected C'ild*s Name Date of +irt' C'ild Currentl) &esidin# ,it'%

C.,.N.,.S.N.

20001??@

,6 %!" Nev% e,6 %!" Nev% e

T"e Un%! 'n % e e !"e ' '9%n& 'n&'%n& 6**' ! ' e 5>

$ssuin# tate $ssuin# Count) Doc-et Num"er File tam!ed Date u!!ort Amount

I'9$ S$ CDD#001353 11/2?/2000 505.42 *e 'n!"

3. ,6 %!" "'6 'n!%n6e !' * 'v% e "e$ !" %n 6 $n e ' !"e "% en $n D$v% "'6 'n!%n6e !' e% 6 e "e

' 'ne "$ ' !"e * e %6 $ %n $ ' $n e 9%!" !"e ' %&%n$ e ee. D$v% B "$ ' !"e "% enB * e %6 %

147.57 *e 'n!".

4. T"e %n ' e $n e 6 !%'n ' !"e *$ en! $ e e % e %n !"e ' e % e "e e%n 'n De e e 17 !" 2013.

H/&/FO&/ !"e C'6 ! $ ' %n& !' "$*!e 252H CONC D/ AND O&D/& %

1. A ' %n& !' !"e !$n $ ' e !%'n 252<.207 !"e 'n! ' %n& 'n&'%n& 6**' ! ' e % !"e I'9$ ' e en!e e%n S$ C'6n!: D' =e! N6 e CDD#001353. T"% ' e % 'n! ' %n& e $6 e %! % !"e 'n : =n'9n 'n&'%n&

6**' ! ' e %n e % !en e.

2. E e !%ve 'n !"e $!e !"e C'6 ! en!e !"% ' e !"e 'n! ' %n& ' e ( ) $ $ 86 !e % /$ e !"e 'n :

en ' e$ e 'n&'%n& 6**' ! ' %&$!%'n. In !"e even! !"e e % $n'!"e e % !%n& ' e !"e 'n&'%n& 6**' !

' %&$!%'n e! : !"e '!"e ' e % !e %n$!e $n 6nen ' e$ e. H'9eve 6**' ! $ e$ $&e !"$! $ 6e $

3. A ' %n& !' e !%'n 5? .22; !"e *$:' *$:ee $n $n: ne e $ : !"% *$ !: "$ * 'v% e !"e Un%! 9%!"9 %!!en %n ' $!%'n $ '6! !"e *e 'nB % en!%!: ' %$ e 6 %!: n6 e e % en!%$ $n $% %n& $ e e!e e*"'ne n6 e %ve B % en e n6 e $n !"e n$ e $ e $n !e e*"'ne n6 e ' !"e *$ !:B 6 en!e * ':e ' '!"e '6 e ' %n ' e $n =ee* !"e Un%! %n ' e ' $n: "$n&e . ;'!" *$ en! "$ $ ' * 'v% e!"e Un%! %n ' $!%'n $ '6! "e$ !" %n 6 $n e !"$! % $v$% $ e %n 6 %n& "e$ !" %n 6 $n e *' % : %n ' $!%'n. I $$!e "% 6**' ! $ !%'n % !$ !e $n $ % %&en! 6! 6n 6 e 6 e ' ! % $ e !' ' $!e !"e *$ !: 6e * ' ee 6% e en! $: e e! : e %ve %n& $ 9 %!!en n'!% e !' !"e ' ! e en! e % en!%$ ' e * ':e $ e 'n % e9%!" !"e Un%!.

4. A ' %n& !' e !%'n 252;.23 % 6**' ! %n $ e$ % e e e !' $ ' e !%'n en!%!: $ 6 "$ &e $: e$ e e !' !"e *$:' $n %n ' $!%'n $: e * 'v% e !' $ ' e !%'n en!%!: ' *6 *' e ' $ %n% !e %n& $nen ' %n& !"e 6 "$ &e. T"e $ '6n! ' !"e 6 "$ &e % $ *e en!$&e ' !"e $ '6n! %n $ e$ .5. +$ !%e e e%v%n& n'!% e ' !"% ev%e9 $n $ 86 ! en! $ !%'n $n $% %n& !' % ' e !"e e % !en e ' '!"e6**' ! ' e 9"% " "$ve n'! een 'n % e e $: e $ e ' "$ en&%n& !"e e!e %n$!%'n ' 'n! ' %n&' e %n $ $!e $ !%'n.

1 T"e ev%e9 9$ $ e 'n $ e 6e ! 6 %!!e : ,6 %!" . Nev% e.2 T"e *$ !:B !$!e ' e % en e $! !"e !% e !"e Un%! % 6e !"e N'!% e ' In!en! !' Rev%e9.3 T"e *$ en! ' %&$!e !' *$: 6**' !. T"e C'6 ! "$ *e 'n$ 86 % % !%'n 've !"e *$:' e $6 e !"e *$:'e % e %n I'9$.

4 T"e *e 'n en!%! e !' e e%ve 6**' ! 'n e"$ ' !"e "% ( en). T"e C'6 ! "$ *e 'n$ 86 % % !%'n 've !"e*$:ee e $6 e !"e *$:ee e 6e !e !"% ev%e9 $n 9$%ve $n: 'n!e ! !' *e 'n$ 86 % % !%'n.5 T"e *$ !%e "$ve n'! % ' e $n !"e C'6 ! $n !"e Un%! $ e n'! $9$ e ' $n: '!"e 'n&'%n& 6**' ! ' e9"% " $ e ! !"e *$:' $n !"e "% ( en) n$ e $ 've.@ See e !%'n 5? .21C. En! : ' $n $ 86 !e 'n&'%n& 6**' ! ' e %n I'9$ 9% n'! v%' $!e 2 USC 173 ;.

judicial order for adjustment of support - cddm001353

Documents

request for judicial notice in support of motion for order...

second order extending d statewide judicial e...second order...

judicial order on released predator mark bedford

order governing judicial review | december 29, 2016 | cv01...

submission order for hiring packets nebraska judicial

order - arizona judicial branch of arizona . commission on...

hoboken zoning board of adjustment city of hoboken … ·...

judicial watch hillary server foia case - order granting...

first judicial district at juneau...

judicial reveiw order denying cdphe license

risk adjustment coding - dregralin.com · cause and effect...

in the thirteenth judicial circuit · pdf filein the...

procedural order governing judicial review of final...

united states judicial panel on multidistrict litigation ......

order of court and now stemergency operations ) plan ) )...

procedural order governing judicial review of final order of...

judicial precedents order

risk adjustment - rmhpcommunity.org · healthcare claims....

order - first judicial district of pennsylvania

zoning board of adjustment city of des …...zoning board of...