july 2004 2009 lecture side lecture by suradet tantrairatn instructor and researcher chapter twelve...

Post on 01-Apr-2015

217 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

July 20042009 Lecture Side

Lecture by

Suradet Tantrairatn

Instructor and Researcher

Chapter Twelve

week3

January 2009

Design of Control System in State Space

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Introduction

This Chapter we will learn about state-space design

methods based on the pole-placement method and the quadratic optimal regulator method.

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Review

First Order:

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Review

Second Order:

Back to review Chapter4 Transient Response Analysis( Ogata Book )

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Pole Placement

Pole Placement ( วิ�ธี�การวิางโพล ) คื�อ ตั้��งข้�อก�าหนดสำ�าหร�บตั้�าแหน�ง

โพลทั้��งหมดข้องระบบวิงปิ!ด และออกแบบตั้�วิคืวิบคื"มทั้�#จะได�ตั้�าแหน�งโพลตั้ามข้�อก�าหนดน��น เง�#อนไข้จ�าเปิ'นข้องระบบหร�อพลานตั้(ทั้�#ทั้�าให�สำามารถทั้�าการเคืล�#อนย้�าย้โพลทั้��งหมดไปิย้�งตั้�าแหน�งทั้�#ตั้�องการได�

ในการออกแบบทั้�#วิไปิจะไม�ได�ตั้�องการให�ระบบม�เสำถ�ย้รภาพอย้�างเด�ย้วิ แตั้�ย้�งตั้�องการสำมรรถนะหร�อผลตั้อบสำนองตั้ามตั้�องการด�วิย้ ด�งน��นการก�าหนดตั้�าแหน�งข้องโพลระบบวิงปิ!ดจ.งม�ใช่�เพ�ย้งแตั้�วิ�าตั้�องการอย้0�บนด�านซ้�าย้ข้องระนาบเช่�งซ้�อนเทั้�าน��น แตั้�อาจจะตั้�องอย้0�ในพ��นทั้�#ทั้�#จะให�ผลตั้อบสำนองทั้�#ด�ด�วิย้ เช่�น ถ�าตั้�าแหน�งโพลอย้0�ใกล�แกนจ�นตั้ภาพมากเก�นไปิ ผลตั้อบสำนองจะม�ล�กษณะแกวิ�ง

ในระบบอ�นด�ล n ทั้�#วิ ๆ ไปิ คืวิามสำ�มพ�นธี(ผลตั้อบสำนองทั้างเวิลาข้องระบบก�บตั้�าแหน�งข้องโพล ม�กม�คืวิามซ้�บซ้�อน จ.งเปิ'นการย้ากทั้�#จะก�าหนดตั้�าแหน�งโพลเพ�#อให�ได�ผลตั้อบสำนองทั้�#ด� ด�งน��นวิ�ธี�การออกแบบน��โดย้ทั้�#วิไปิอาศั�ย้หล�กการข้องระบบทั้�#ม�ลั�กษณะเด่นเป็�นอั�นด่�บสอัง

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Design By Pole Placement

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Design By Pole Placement

(a) Open-loop control system; (b) Closed-loop control sysytem

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Design By Pole Placement

Control signal

The Solution is

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of Matrix K using Transformation Matrix T.

ai are coefficients of the characteristic polynomial

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of Matrix K using Transformation Matrix T. (2)

where

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of Matrix K using Transformation Matrix T. (3)

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of Matrix K using Transformation Matrix T. (4)

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of Matrix K using Transformation Matrix T. (5)

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Summary to Find Matrix K Using Transformation Matrix T

Step1: Check the controllability condition Step2: From the characteristic polynomial for matrix A

Step3: Determine the transformation Matrix T

Step4: Using the desired eigenvalues

Final Step : Calculate K from

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Example

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Example

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of Matrix K Using Direct Substitution Method.

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Example

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of Matrix K Using Ackerman’s Formula.

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of Matrix K Using Ackerman’s Formula. (2)

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of Matrix K Using Ackerman’s Formula. (3)

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of Matrix K Using Ackerman’s Formula. (4)

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Example

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Solving Pole-Placement Problems with MATLAB

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Ackermann’s Formula

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Ackermann’s Formula

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Ackermann’s Formula

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

MATLAB Program (Produce The Feedback Gain Matrix K by Using Ackermann’s Formula)

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

MATLAB Program (Produce The Feedback Gain Matrix K by Using Ackermann’s Formula)

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

MATLAB Program (Produce The Feedback Gain Matrix K by Using Ackermann’s Formula)

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

MATLAB Program (Produce The Feedback Gain Matrix K by Using Ackermann’s Formula)

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Design of Regulator-type Systems by Pole Placement

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

We assume that the moment of inertia of the pendulum about its center of gravity is zero

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

Define state variables

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

In terms of vector-matrix equations.

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

By substituting the given numerical values

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

Use state-feedback control

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

The desired characteristic equation

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

Inverted-pendulum system with state-feedback control

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Mathematical Modeling

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of state-feedback gain matrix K with MATLAB

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of state-feedback gain matrix K with MATLAB

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Determination of state-feedback gain matrix K with MATLAB

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Obtaining System Response To Initial Condition

State equation

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Obtaining System Response To Initial Condition

Control equation

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Obtaining System Response To Initial Condition

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Obtaining System Response To Initial Condition

Substitute the numerical values.

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Obtaining System Response To Initial Condition

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Obtaining System Response To Initial Condition

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Obtaining System Response To Initial Condition

Initial condition

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Obtaining System Response To Initial Condition

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Obtaining System Response To Initial Condition

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Obtaining System Response To Initial Condition

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

MATLAB Program

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

MATLAB Program

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

Response Of Inverted Pendulum System Subjected To Initial Condition

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

© A

IRB

US

UK

LT

D 2

002.

All

righ

ts r

ese

rved

. Con

fide

ntia

l and

pro

prie

tary

do

cum

ent.

Month 200X 2009 Subject Name Automotive Automatic Control Page 2

top related