l41_19760729.pdf
Post on 09-Nov-2015
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
July 29, 1976 L.4.1 CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
SURVEY OF MATURITY STRUCTURE OF OUTSTANDING LARGE DENOMINATION CERTIFICATES OF
DEPOSITS AT LARGE WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
as of
June 30, 1976
Bank ing S e c t i o n D i v i s i o n of R e s e a r c h and S t a t i s t i c s
Board of G o v e r n o r s of t h e F e d e r a l R e s e r v e Sys tem
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE I 4
1 / HAiUHltV DISTRIBUTION u F OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME C E R T I F I C A T E S OF D E P O S I T AT
WEEKLY R E P O R T I N G BANKS
AS OF 3 0 J U N 1 9 7 6
C O E S MATURING I N AMOUNT
( M I L L I O N S OF D O L L A R S !
PERCENTAGE 0 1 S T R I B U T I O N
CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE
SALES S I N C E PREVIOUS MONTH 2 /
( M I L L I O N S OF DOLLARS
1 W JUNE 3 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0
JULY 2 3 , 9 * 6 . 8 3 4 . 0 3 4 . 0 10 , 6 4 4 . 2
AUGUST 1 2 * 6 1 6 . 8 1 7 . 9 5 1 . 9 4 , 1 1 9 . 5
SEPTEMBER 9 , 2 9 1 . 4 1 3 . 2 6 5 . 1 t , 2 8 3 . 2
OCTOBER 5 , 9 0 7 . 2 6 . 4 7 3 . 5 1 , 1 4 5 . 9
NOVEMBER 5 , 2 9 6 . 9 7 . 5 8 1 . 0 1 , 2 4 5 . 4
DECEMBER 5 , 1 0 2 . 5 7 . 2 8 8 . 2 3 , 3 7 7 . 2
1 9 ? ? JANUARY 1 , 6 7 1 . 8 2 . 7 9 0 . 9 2 3 3 . 0
FEBRUARY 1 , 0 1 0 . 7 1 . 4 9 2 . 3 9 3 . 2
MARCH 1 , 1 0 1 . 0 1 . 6 9 3 . 9 1 5 1 . 5
APRIL 1 , 0 9 5 . 8 1 . 6 9 5 . 5 4 0 . 1
MAY 4 5 2 . 5 o 9 6 . 1 7 9 . 0
JUNE 7 2 5 . 3 1 . 0 9 7 . 1 7 3 4 . 2 3 /
OYER 1 2 MONTHS 2 , 1 1 3 . 3 3 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 XXX
TOTAL 7 0 , 5 5 4 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 XXX 2 6 , 1 4 6 . 3
TMEMORANDUM: TAX AND D I V I D E N D M A T U R I T I E S )
SEPTEMBER 1 0 SEPTEMBER 1 5
2 8 6 . 0 1 , 0 5 5 . 9
. 4 1 . 5
XXX XXX
1 / I N C L U D E S CWLY C E R T I F I C A T E S I N DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE I S S U E D BY WEEKLY R E P O R T I N G BANKS.
2 / S F I TECHNICAL APPENDIX A ,
3 / S A L f S OF C C S MA1URING AFTER 1 1 MONTHS. Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 2A
1 / MATURITY D I S T R I B U T I O N OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TINE C E R T I F I C A T E S OF D E P O S I T AT
NEW YORK c m , CHICAGO* AND ALL OTHER WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
AS OF 3 0 JUN 1 9 7 6
U N M I L L I O N S OF DOLLARS)
NEW YORK CITY CHICAGO ALL OTHER WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
C D ' S MATURING I N AMOUNT SALES SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH 2 /
AMOUNT SALES SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH 2 /
AMOUNT SALES S I N C E ^ P R E V I O U S M O N ^ ^ /
LETS sm 3 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0
JULY 6 , 5 9 6 . 9 1 , 9 4 9 . 2 3 , 3 1 0 . 2 1 , 3 0 9 . 5 1 4 , 0 5 9 . 8 7 , 3 8 5 . 4
AUGUST 4 , 4 0 5 . 1 1 , 0 9 7 . 7 1 , 4 2 4 . 5 5 8 1 . 2 6 , 7 8 7 . 2 2 , 4 4 0 . 6
SEPTEMBER 3 , 9 2 0 * 0 1 , 5 7 2 . 5 8 2 4 . 2 5 1 5 . 5 4 , 5 4 7 . 1 2 , 1 9 5 . 1
OCTOBER 2 , 6 9 6 . 7 4 2 8 . 4 4 9 4 . 0 1 1 2 . 2 2 , 7 1 6 . 5 6 0 5 . 4 i I 2 , 4 2 * . ? 5 2 6 . 8 3 6 3 . 0 8 9 . 6 2 , 5 1 0 . 3 6 2 9 . 2 DECEMBER 2 , 2 1 7 . 5 1 , 7 6 9 . 9 3 8 7 . 4 1 4 8 . 8 2 , 4 9 7 . 7 1 , 4 5 8 . 6
* 9 7 7 JANUARY 3 3 0 . * 2 7 . 5 3 6 7 . 7 5 7 . 7 1 , 1 7 3 . 6 1 4 7 . 7
FEBRUARY 2 0 8 . 9 1 4 . 1 1 5 7 . 4 1 . 9 6 4 4 . 5 7 7 . 4
MARCH 2 1 3 . 9 5 2 . 4 1 9 6 . 5 2 2 . 0 6 9 0 . 7 7 7 . 2 ^
2 6 . 7 A P R I L 1 5 3 . 1 3 . 5 3 2 3 . 2 9 . 9 6 1 9 . 5
7 7 . 2 ^
2 6 . 7
MAY 3 6 . 4 4 . 6 2 4 . 0 1 0 . 8 3 9 2 . 1 63 . 6
JUNE 1 3 7 . 5 1 3 7 . 1 / 3 1 4 5 . 5 1 0 6 . 7 / 3 4 4 2 . 4 4 9 0 . 4 / 3
OVER 1 2 MONTHS 4 5 2 . 3 XXX 2 5 6 . 9 XXX 1 , 4 0 4 . 1 XXX
TOTAL * 2 3 , 7 9 4 . 5 7 , 5 8 3 . 7 8 , 2 7 4 . 5 2 , 9 6 5 . 8 3 8 , 4 85 . 5 1 5 , 5 9 7 . 3
NUMBER OF REPORTING BANKS 1 0 1 2 219
1 MEMORANDUM: TAX AND D I V I D E N D M A T U R I T I E S )
SEPTEMBER 1 0 SEPTEMBER I S
1 5 7 . 9 4 4 2 . 2
2 9 . 8 9 5 . 1
9 8 . 3 5 1 8 . 7
1 / INCLUDES ONLY C E R T I F I C A T E S I N DENOMINATION OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE I S S U E D BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
2 / SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX A .
3 / S A L E S OF C D ' S MATURING AFTER 1 1 MONTHS.
* TOTALS MAY NOT ADD DUE TO ROUNDING. Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
* TABLE 2B
1/ MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT AT
NEW YORK C I T Y , CHICAGO, AND ALL OTHER WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
AS OF 30 JUN 1976 AND 26 MAY 1 9 7 6
IPERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION)
NEW YORK CITY CHICAGO ALL OTHER
3 0 JUN 26 MAY 30 JUN 26 MAY 3 0 JUN 26 MAY
06 DAYS 2 / . 0 2 . 5 . 0 2 . 0 . 0 3 . 2
0 1 MONTHS 3 / 2 7 . 7 2 9 . 7 4 0 . 0 2 9 . 1 3 6 . 5 34 . 4
0 2 MONTHS I S . 5 1 9 . 4 1 7 . 2 2 6 . 0 1 7 . 6 1 8 . 2
0 3 MONTHS 1 6 . 5 1 3 . 8 1 0 . 0 1 0 . 9 1 1 . 8 1 1 . 9
0 4 MONTHS 1 1 . 3 9 . 6 6 . 0 . 0 7 . 1 6 . 4
0 5 MONTHS 1 0 . 2 9 . 5 4 . 4 5 . 0 6 . 5 5 . 8
0 6 MONTHS 9 . 3 7 . 9 4 . 7 3 . 5 6 . 5 5 . 1
0 7 MONTHS 1 . 4 1 . 9 4 . 4 3 . 1 3 . 0 2 . 8
0 0 MONTHS . 9 1 . 3 1 . 9 4 . 0 1 . 7 2 . 8
0 9 MONTHS . 9 . 8 2 . 4 2 . 0 1 . 6 1 . 5
10 MONTHS . 6 . 7 3 . 9 2 . 3 1 . 6 1 . 7
11 MONTHS . 2 . 6 . 3 4 . 1 1 . 0 1 . 6
12 MONTHS . 6 . 1 1 . 8 . 2 1 . 1 . 9
OVER 12 MONTHS 1 . 9 1 . 9 3 . 1 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 7
TOTAL * 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0
1 / INCLUDES ONLY CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
2 / NUMBER OF DAYS REMAINING IN SURVEY MONTH. THIS PERIOD VARIES WITH THE NUMBER OF DAYS FOLLOWING THE LAST WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH.
3 / NUMBER OF MONTHS FOLLOWING THE SURVEY MONTH.
* TOTALS MAY NOT ADD DUE TO ROUNDING.
X
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 2C
1 / MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT AT
NEW YORK C I T Y , CHICAGO, AND ALL OTHER WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
AS OF 3 0 JUN 1 9 7 6 AND 26 MAY 1 9 7 6
(CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION)
NEW YORK CITY CHICAGO ALL OTHER
3 0 J UN 26 MAY 30 JUN 26 MAY 3 0 J UN 26 MAY
1 - 6 DAYS 2 / 0 2 . 5 . 0 2 . 0 . 0 3 . 2
0 1 MONTHS 3 / 2 7 . 7 3 2 . 2 4 0 . 0 3 1 . 1 3 6 . 5 3 7 . 6
02 MONTHS 4 6 . 2 5 1 . 6 5 7 . 2 5 7 . 1 5 4 . 1 5 5 . 8
0 3 MONTHS 6 2 . 7 6 5 . 4 6 7 . 2 6 8 . 0 6 5.-9 6 7 . 7
Of MONTHS 7 * . 0 7 5 . 2 7 3 . 2 7 2 . 0 7 3 . 0 7 4 . 1
0 5 MONTHS 6 4 . 2 6 4 . 7 7 7 . 6 7 7 . 0 7 9 . 5 7 9 . 9
0 6 MONTHS 9 3 . 5 9 2 . 6 8 2 . 3 8 0 . 5 8 6 . 0 8 5 . 0
0 7 MONTHS 9 * . 9 9 4 . 5 6 6 . 7 8 3 . 6 6 9 . 0 8 7 . 8
0 6 MONTHS 9 5 . 8 9 5 . 8 BE .6 8 7 . 6 9 0 . 7 9 0 . 6
09 MONTHS 9 6 . 7 9 6 . 6 9 1 . 0 8 9 . 6 9 2 . 5 9 2 . 1
10 MONTHS * 7 . 3 9 7 . 3 9 4 . 9 91 . 9 9 4 . 1 9 3 . 8
11 MONTHS 9 7 . 5 9 7 . 9 9 5 . 2 9 6 . 0 9 5 . 1 95 . 4
12 MONTHS 9 8 . 1 9 8 . 0 9 7 . 0 9 6 . 2 9 6 . 2 9t>.3
ER 12 MONTHS 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0
1 / INCLUDE S ONLY CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
2 / NUMBER OF DAYS REMAINING IN SURVEY MONTH. THIS PERIOD VARIES WITH THE NUMBER OF DAYS FOLLOWING THE LAST WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH.
3 / NUMBER OF MONTHS FOLLOWING THE SURVEY MONTH.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 3A MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES UF DEPOSIT 1 / AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY SIZE OF BANKS 2 /
AS OF 3 0 JUN 1976 CAMOUNTS IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
$5 BILLION AND OVER
C D ' S MATURING IN TOTAL $ 5 0 0
MILLION AND UNDER
$ 5 0 0 MILLION TO
$ 1 BILLION
$1
$ 5
BILLION TO
BILLION TOTAL NEW YORK
CITY
OUTSIDE NEW YORK
CITY
1 9 7 6 JUN 3 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0
JULY 2 3 , 9 6 6 . 9 1 , 1 2 9 . 6 2 , 2 3 9 . 0 6 , 9 2 5 . 4 1 3 , 6 7 2 . 9 6 , 0 8 0 . 0 7 , 5 9 2 . 9
AUGUST 1 2 , b 1 6 . 9 5 2 6 . 3 9 5 1 . 5 3 , 6 5 8 . 8 7 , 4 8 0 . 3 4 , 1 8 7 . 6 3 , 2 9 2 . 7
SEPTEMBER 9 , 2 9 1 . 4 3 9 2 . 7 6 6 1 . 2 2 , 6 3 9 . 6 5 , 5 9 7 . 7 3 , 5 6 6 . 1 2 , 0 3 1 . 6
OCTOBER S , 9 0 7 . 1 2 2 0 . 4 34 6 . 0 1 , 5 6 5 . 9 3 , 7 7 4 . 8 2 , 5 5 9 . 8 1 , 2 1 5 . 0
NOVEMBER 5 , 2 9 6 . 9 1 8 6 . 5 2 4 9 . 6 1 , 0 9 9 . 9 3 , 7 6 2 . 9 2 , 3 5 7 . 6 1 , 4 0 5 . 3 DECEMBER 5 , 1 0 2 . 5 1 6 0 . 7 2 4 8 . 1 1 , 2 9 3 . 1 3 , 4 0 0 . 6 2 , 1 2 7 . 9 1 , 2 7 2 . 7
1 9 7 7 JANUARY 1 , 8 7 1 . 8 8 3 . 5 1 4 3 . 8 4 7 2 . 6 1 , 1 7 1 . 9 3 2 0 . 9 8 5 1 . 0
FEBRUARY 1 , 0 1 0 . 8 4 2 . 5 8 1 . 0 2 70 . 8 6 1 6 . 5 1 7 6 . 5 4 4 0 . 0
MARCH 1 , 1 0 1 . 0 4 5 . 4 7 6 . 9 2 4 4 . 8 7 3 3 . 9 1 9 3 . 0 5 4 0 . 9
APRIL 1 , 0 9 5 . 7 4 9 . 1 9 1 . 2 2 9 2 . 3 6 6 3 . 1 1 4 6 . 4 5 1 6 . 7
MAY 4 5 2 . 4 3 1 . 2 5 2 . 2 1 1 8 . 2 2 5 0 . 8 3 2 . 2 2 1 6 . 6
JUNE 72 5 . 3 4 1 . 4 7 0 . 1 1 9 1 . 0 4 2 2 . 8 1 3 3 . 1 2 8 9 . 7
JULY OR LATER 2 , 1 1 3 . 3 6 2 . 6 1 1 5 . 8 5 6 5 . 9 1 , 3 6 9 . 0 4 4 0 . 9 9 * 6 . 1
TOTAL * 7 0 , 5 5 4 . 0 2 , 9 7 1 . 9 5 , 3 2 6 . 4 1 9 , 3 3 8 . 5 4 2 , 9 1 7 . 2 2 2 , 3 2 2 . 0 20 , 5 9 5 . 2
(MEMORANDUM: TAX AND DIVIDEND MATURITIES) (MEMORANDUM: TAX AND DIVIDEND MATURITIES)
SEPTEMBER 1C 2 8 6 . 0 9 . 3 1 0 . 1 64.2 2 0 2 . 4 1 5 6 . 1 4 6 . 3
SEPTEMBER 1 5 1 , 0 5 5 . 9 3 5 . 3 5 9 . 9 3 0 2 . 5 t>58.2 3 8 4 . 8 2 7 3 . 4
1 MEMORANDUM: NUMBER OF BANKS) 1 MEMORANDUM: NUMBER OF BANKS)
2 * 1 7 9 62 8 3 17 7 10
I Z INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS. 2 / TOTAL ASSETS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON JUNE 3 0 , 1 9 7 5 . * TOTALS MAY NOT ADD DUE TO ROUNDING. Digitized for FRASER
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 3 8 SALES / ! / OF NEGOTIABLE TIME C E R T I F I C A T E S OF D E P O S I T SINCE PREVIOUS MCNTH 2 / AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY S I Z E OF BANKS 3 /
AS OF 3 0 JUN 1 9 7 6 (AMOUNTS I N M I L L I O N S OF DOLLARS)
$ 5 B I L L I O N AND OVER
C D ' S MATURING IN TOTAL $ 5 0 0
M I L L I O N AND UNDER
$ 5 0 0 M I L L I O N TO
$ 1 B I L L I O N
$ 1 B I L L I O N TO
$ 5 B I L L I O N TOTAL NEW YORK
CI TY
OUT S I D E NEW YORK
C I T Y
1 9 3 6 J U N 3 0
JULY 1 0 , 6 4 4 . 2 5 6 9 . 5 1 , 2 3 2 . 9 3 , 3 1 6 . 2 5 , 5 2 5 . 6 1 , 6 1 6 . 7 3 , 9 0 8 . 9
AUGUST 4 , 1 1 9 . 5 1 7 6 . 6 4 1 4 . 2 1 , 4 8 7 . 9 2 , 0 3 6 . 8 1 , 0 1 2 . 5 1 , 0 2 6 . 3
SEPTEMBER 4 , 2 8 3 . 3 2 3 1 . 9 3 7 1 . 4 1 , 3 3 3 . 0 Z , 3 4 7 . 0 1 , 4 3 7 . 2 9 09 . 8
OCTOBER 1 , 1 * 5 . 7 5 5 . 1 9 1 . 5 3 5 7 . 4 6 4 1 . 7 3 6 2 . 7 2 5 9 . 0
NOVEMBER 1 , 2 4 5 . 3 3 8 . 9 6 3 . 9 2 8 1 . 6 8 6 0 . 7 5 1 3 . 6 3 4 7 . 1
DECEMBER 3 , 3 7 7 . 3 1 0 2 . 5 1 5 5 . 2 7 4 2 . d 2 , 3 7 6 . 8 1 , 7 1 0 . 1 6 6 6 . 7
1 9 7 7 JANUARY 2 3 2 . 9 9 . 9 1 9 . 3 9 2 . 9 1 1 0 . 8 2 5 . 6 8 5 . 2
FEBRUARY 9 3 . 3 7 . 5 1 5 . 7 2 2 . 7 4 7 . 4 1 1 . 1 3 6 . 3
MARCH 1 5 1 . 5 4 . 2 1 0 . 6 4 6 . 7 8 9 . 8 4 2 . 6 4 7 . 2
A P R I L 4 0 . 1 5 . 0 5 . 6 1 6 . 5 1 3 . 0 3 . 0
o o
NAY 7 8 . 6 6 . 8 9 . 2 2 7 . 5 3 3 . 3 4 . 1 2 9 . 2
JUNE OR LATER 7 3 4 . 3 5 3 . 8 6 8 . 5 1 7 7 . 8 4 3- , . 2 1 3 2 . 7 3 C 1 . 5
TOTAL $ 2 6 , 1 * 6 . 2 1 , 2 6 5 . 7 2 , 4 5 8 . 2 7 , 9 0 3 . 2 1 4 , 5 1 9 . 1 6 , 8 9 1 . 9 7 , 6 * 7 . 2
1 MEMORANDUM: NUMBER OF BANKS) 1 MEMORANDUM: NUMBER OF BANKS)
2 4 1 7 9 6 2 8 3 17 7 1 0
1 / SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX A . 2 / INCLUDES C E R T I F I C A T E S I N DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE I S S U E D BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS. 3 / TOTAL A S S E T S AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON J U N E 3 0 , 1 9 7 5 . * TOTALS MAY NOT ADD DUE TO ROUNDING.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE SC MATURITY D1STRI6U1ION OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME C E R T I F I C A T E S OF DEPOSIT 1 / AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS EY SIZE OF BANKS 2 /
AS OF 30 JUN 1976 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION
$5 BILLION AND OVFR
C D * S MATURING I N TOTAL
1 9 7 6 J U N 3 0 0 . 0
J U L Y 3 4 . 0
AUGUST 1 7 . 9
S E P T E M B E R 1 3 . 2
OCTOBER 6 . 4
NOVEMBER 7 . 5
DECEMBER 7 . 2
1977 JANUARY 2 . 7 FEBRUARY 1 . 4
MARCH 1 . 6
A P R I L 1 . 6
MAY 0 . 6
J U N E 1 . 0
J U L Y OR LATER 3 . 0
TOTAL * 1 0 0 . 0
* 5 0 0 M I L L I O N
AND UNDER
0.0
3 8 . 0
1 7 . 7
1 3 . 2
7 . 4
6 . 3
5 . 4
2.6 1 . 4
1 . 5
1 . 7
1.0 1 . 4
S 5 0 0 MILLION TO
S I BILLION
0.0 4 2 . 0
1 7 . 9
1 2 . 4
6 . 5
4 . 7
4 . 7
2 . 7
1 . 5
1 . 4
1 . 7
1.0 1 . 3
S I BILLION TO
S5 BILLION
0.0 3 5 . 8
I B . 9
1 3 . 7
6.1
5 . 7
6 . 7
2 . 4
1 . 4
1 . 3
1 . 5
0.6
1.0
TOTAL
0.0
3 1 . 9
1 7 . s
1 3 . 0
6 , 8
8 . 8
7 . 9
2 . 7
1 . 4
1 . 7
1 . 5
O . c
1 .0
SEPTEMBER 1 0
S E P T E M B E R 1 5
0 . 4
1 . 5
2.1 100.0
(MEMORANDUM
0 . 3
1.2
2 . 2 2 . 9 3 . 2
1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0
TAX AND DIVIDEND MATURITIES)
0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5
1 . 1 1 . 6 1 . 5
NEW YORK CITY
0.0
2 7 . 2
18.8
l o . O
1 1 . 5
10.6
9 . 5
1 . 4
0.8 0 . 9
0 . 7
0.1
0 .6
2 . 0
100.0
0 . 7
1 . 7
OUTSIDE NEW YORK
CI TY
0.0
3 6 . 9
16.0
9 . 9
5 . 9
6.8
6.c
t . l
2 . 1
2.6 2 . 5
1.1
1 . 4
-
TABLE 3 0
C O * S M A T U R I N G I N
MATURITY 0 1 S T R 1 B U T LOFL OF OUTSTANDING N E G O T I A B L E TIME C E R T I F I C A T E S OF D E P O S I T 1 / AT WEEKLY R E P O R T I N G BANKS BY S I Z E OF BANKS 2 /
A S OF 3 0 J U N 1 9 7 6 CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE
TOIAL
OR LATER 100.0
$ b B I L L I O N AND OVER
S S O O MILLION
$ 5 0 0 M I L L I O N TO
S I B I L L I O N TO
AND UNDER S I B I L L I O N $ 5 B I L L I O N TOTAL NEW YORK
C I T Y
O U T S I D E NEW YORK
C I T Y
J U N 3 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0
JULY 3 4 . 0 3 8 . 0 4 2 . 0 3 5 . B 3 1 . 9 2 7 . 2 3 6 . 9
AUGUST 5 1 . 5 5 . 7 5 9 . 9 5 4 . 7 4 9 . 3 4 6 . 0 5 2 . 8
OCTOBER 7 3 . 5 7 6 . 3 7 8 . 8 7 6 . 5 7 1 . 1 7 3 . 5 6 8 . 7
NOVEMBER 8 1 . 0 8 2 . 6 8 3 . 5 8 2 . 2 7 9 . 9 6 4 . 1 7 5 . 5
DECEMBER 6 6 . 2 8 8 . 0 8 8 . 2 8 6 . 9 8 7 . 8 9 3 . 6 8 1 . 7
JANUARY 9 0 . 9 9 0 . 8 9 0 . 9 9 1 . 3 9 0 . 5 9 5 . 0 8 5 . 8
FEBRUARY 9 2 . 3 9 2 . 2 9 2 . 4 9 Z . 7 9 1 . 9 9 5 . 6 8 7 . 9
MARCH 9 3 . 4 9 3 . 7 9 3 . 8 9 4 . 0 9 3 . 6 9 6 . 7 9 0 . 5
A P R I L 9 5 . 5 9 5 . 4 9 5 . 5 9 5 . 5 9 5 . 1 9 7 . 4 9 3 . 0
MAY 9 6 . 1 9 6 . 4 9 6 . 5 9 b . 1 9 5 . 7 9 7 . 5 9 t . l
JUNE 9 7 . 1 9 7 . 6 9 7 . 8 9 7 . 1 9 t > . 7 9 6 . 1 9 5 . 5
JULY 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1 / I N C L U D E S C E R T I F I C A T E S I N D E N O M I N A T I O N S OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE I S S U E D BY WEEKLY R E P O R T I N G B A N K S . 2 / TOTAL A S S E T S AS R E P O R T E D I N THE C A I L REPORT OF C O N D I T I O N ON J U N E 3 0 , 1 9 7 5 . * T O T A L S MAY NOT ADD DUE TO R O U N D I N G .
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 3 E
CD* S MATURING I N
1 9 7 6 JUN 3 0
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
1 9 7 7 JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE OR LATER
TOTAL *
SALES / ! / OF NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH 2 / AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY SIZE OF BANKS 3 /
AS OF 3 0 JUN 1 9 7 6 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION
$5 BILLION AND OVER
TOTAL
4 0 . 7
1 5 . 8
1 6 . 4
4 . 4
4 . 8
1 2 . 9
0 . 9
0 . 4
0.6
0.2
0 . 3
2.8
100.0
$ 5 0 0 MILLION
AND UNDER
4 5 . 0
1 4 . 1
1 8 . 3
4 . 4
3 . 1
8 .1
O.fa 0.6
0 . 3
0 . 4
0 . 7
$ 5 0 0 MILLION TO
S I BILLION
5 0 . 2
16.6
1 5 . 1
3 . 7
2 .6
6 . 3
0.8 0.6
0 . 4
0.2 0 . 4
SI BILLION TO
$ 5 BILLION
4 2 . 0
18.8
16 . 9
4 . 5
3 . 6
9 . 4
1.2 0 . 3
0 .6
0.2 0 . 3
TOTAL
4.3
100.0
2.8
100.0
2 4 1
2.2 100.0
(MEMORANDUM: NUMBER OF BANKS)
79 62 83
3 6 . 1
1*. 0 16.2
4.4
5 . 9
16 . 4
0.8 0 . 3
0.6
0.1
0.2
3 . 0
100.0
17
1 / SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX A. 2/ INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS. 3 / TOTAL ASSETS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON JUNE 3 0 , 1 9 7 5 . * TOTALS MAY NOT ADD DUE TO ROUNDING.
NEW YORK CITY
2 3 . 5
1 4 . 7
2 0 . 9
5 . 6
7 . 5
2 4 . 8
0 . 4
0.2
0.6
0.0
0.1
1 . 9
100.0
OUTSIDE NEW YORK
CITY
5 1 . 2
1 3 . 5
1 1 . 9
3 . 4
4 . 6
8.7 1.1 0 . 5
0.6
0.1
0 . 4
4 . 0
100.0
10
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 4A
AVERAGE MATURITY
OF
OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 1 /
AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
AT VARIOUS SURVEY DATES
( I N MONTHS)
DATE OF SURVFY BANK CLASSIFICATION
30 JUN 1 9 7 6
ALL REPORTING BANKS
ISSUING C D ' S
2 6 MAY 1 9 7 6
IBY LOCATION)
2 8 APR 19 76
2 . 9 3 . 0 3 . 0
NEW YORK CITY
CHICAGO
OTHER
UNDER * 5 0 0 MILLION
S500S1*000 MILLION
$ l w 0 0 0 ~ $ 5 t C 0 0 MILLION
OVER $ 5 BILLION
IN NEW YOKK CITY
OUTSIDE NEW YORK CITY
2.8
3 . 0
3 . 0
2 .8
3 . 3
3 . 1
(BY SIZE OF BANK) 2 /
2.8
3 . 5
3 . 1
2 . 7 2 . 6 2 . 6
2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 6
2 . 8 2 . 8 2 . 9
3 . 0 3 . 2 3 . 2
2 . 8 2 . 8 . . 8
3 . 3 3 . 7 3 . 7
1 / INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
2 / TOTAL ASSETS AS REPCjRTED IN THE CALL KEPORT OF CONDITION ON JUNE 3 0 , 1 9 7 5 .
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 4B
AVERAGE MATURITY
OF
NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 1 /
SOLD BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
DURING THE MONTH OF VARIOUS SURVEYS
( IN MONTHS)
DATE OF SURVEY BANK CLASSIFICATION
30 JUN 1976 2 6 MAY 1 9 7 6 2 8 APR 19 76
(BY LOCATION)
ALL REPORTING BANKS
ISSUING CD 'S 2 . 4 2 . 5 2 . 9
NFW YORK CITY 3 . 0 2 . 8 3 . 0
CHICAGO 2 . 2 2 . 0 3 . S
OTHER 2 . 2 2 . * 2 . 6
(BY SIZE OF BANK) 2 /
UNDER $ 5 0 0 MILLION 2 . 4 2 . 1 2 . 4
S 5 0 0 - $ 1 , 0 0 0 MILLION 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 2
$ 1 , 0 0 0 - $ 5 , 0 0 0 MILLION 2 . 2 2 . 0 2 . 5
OVER $ 5 BILLION 2 . 6 2 . 9 3 . 3
IN NEW YORK CITY 3 . 1 2 . 9 3 . 1
OUTSIDE NEW YORK CITY 2 . 2 2 . 8 3 . 6
1 / INCtUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
2 / TOTAL ASSETS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON JUNE 3 0 , 1 9 7 5 .
NOTESEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX B . Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 5A
RATIO OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT V
1 0 TOTAL DEPOSITS
AT VARIOUS SURVEY DATES
(PER CENT)
DATE OF SURVEY
TOTAL ASSETS 2 / U N MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 30 J UN 1976 26 MAY 1976 28 APR 1 9 7 6
ALL BANKS ISSUING C D ' S
UNDER 50C
5 0 0 - 1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 - *>000
OVER 5 0 0 0
IN NEW YORK CITY
OUTSIDE NEW YORK CITY
1 / INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
2 / TOTAL ASSETS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON JUNE 3 0 , 1 9 7 5 .
NOTE- DEPOSITS IN THE DENOMINATOR OF THE RATIO IN THIS TABLE ARE TOTAL DEMAND AND TIME DEPOSITS, INCLUDING INTERBANK AND U . S . GOVERNMENT DEPOSITS.
18.6 1 9 . 2 1 8 . 9
1 2 . 7
1 3 . 7
1 4 . 9
2 3 . 4
2 5 . 5
2 1 . 5
l j . 5
1 4 . 3
1 5 . 5
2 3 . 7
2 7 . 6
20.1
1 3 . 6
1 4 . 9
1 5 . 3
23.0 2 6 . 9
19 . 6
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 5B
RATIO OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT U
TO TOTAL DEPOSITS
AS OF 30 JUN 1 9 7 6
(NUMBER OF BANKS)
TOTAL ASSETS 2 /
I I N MILLIONS OF DOLLARS#
S t OR
L E S S
ALL BANKS ISSUING CD'S 4 7
UNDER 5 0 0 17
5 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 1 5
1 0 0 0 - 5 0 0 0 1 5
OVER 5 0 0 0 0
IN NEW YORK CITY O
OUTSIDE NEW YORK CITY 0
5 TO
l o t
46
10 TO
1 5 t
4 0
2 1
12
13
0
O
0
13
11
13
3
1
2
15 TO
2 0 t
4 4
14
7
2 0
3
O
3
3 0
7
9
11
3
2
1
20 25% AVERAGE CD TO OR TO DEPOSIT
2 5* MORE RATIO (PER CENT!
34
7
8 11
8 4
4
18.8
1 2 . 7
1 3 . 7
1 4 . 9
2 3 . 4
2 5 . 5
2 1 . 5
1 / INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
2 / TOTAL ASSETS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON JUNE 3 0 , 1 9 7 5 .
NOTE- DEPOSITS IN THE DENOMINATOR OF THE RATIO I N THIS TABLE ARE TOTAL DEMAND AND TIME DEPOSITS, INCLUDING INTERBANK AND U . S . GOVERNMENT DEPOSITS.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 5C
PER CENT CHANGE IN OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT / I
2 6 MAY 1 9 7 6 TC 30 JUN 1 9 7 6
I NUMBER OF BANKS)
TOTAL ASSETS 2 /
U N M I L L I O N S OF DOLLARS!
ALL BANKS ISSUING CD 'S
DECLINES OF
CD'S TO l O t OR 5 TO 5% OR ZERO MORE 10% LESS
NO CHANGE
INCREASES OF ISSUED CD'S BUT
5 * OR 5 TO 10% OR HAD NONE OUT STAND-LESS l O t MORE ING ON BASE DATE
4 5
UNDER 5 0 0 0 19
5 0 0 - 1000 C 11
lOOO - 5 0 0 0 0 14
OVER 5 000 0 1
IN NEW YORK CITY 0 1
OUTSIDE NEW YORK CITY 0 0
27
12
t
7
2
1
1
5 0
13
18
17
2
I
0
t
1
1
0
0
0
4 3
13
8
l b
4
2
2
3 2
7
7
1 3
5
1
4
3 6
9
11
1 3
3
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 / INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
2 / TOTAL ASSETS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON JUNE 3 0 , 1 9 7 5 .
NOTE- THE NUMBER OF BANKS IN THIS TABLE DIFFERS FROM THOSE IN MOST OTHER TABLES TO THE EXTENT THAT BANKS THAT HAD OUTSTANDING CD'S ON THE LAST SURVEY REDUCED THEIR OUTSTANDINGS TO ZERO ON THIS SURVEY.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 5D
PER CENT CHANGE IN OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT / I
3 1 MAR 1 9 7 6 TO 30 JUN 1 9 7 6
(NUMBER OF BANKS)
TOTAL DEPOSITS / 2 REDU- DECLINES OF INCREASE OF ISSUED CED CD'S BUT HAD
( I N MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) C D ' S 2 5 * 2 0 1 5 10 5 5% NO 5 1 5 10 1 5 2 0 25% NONE TO OR TO TO TO TO OR OR TO TO TO TO OR OUTSTANDING
ZERO MORE 25% 20% 15% 10% LESS CHANGE LESS 10% 15% 20 % 25% MORE ON BASE DATE
ALL BANKS ISSUING C D ' S 0 25 15 14 3 0 3 7 3 6 5 20 19 18 5 5 10 2
UNDER 5 0 0 0 12 5 5 9 9 12 3 6 6 7 1 1 3 5 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 3 5 3 8 1 0 8 1 7 7 3 0 1 4 2
1 0 0 0 ~ 5 0 0 0 0 9 4 5 12 15 1 2 1 5 5 7 2 3 3 0
OVER 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 4 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0
IN NEW YORK CITY 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
OUTSIDE NEW YORK CITY 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 0 2 C 0 2 0 0 0
1 / INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
2 / TOTAL ASSETS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION CN JUNE 3 0 , 19 7 5 .
NOTE- THE NUMBER OF BANKS IN THIS TABLE DIFFERS FROM THOSE IN MOST OTHER TABLES TO THE EXTENT THAT BANKS THAT HAD OUTSTANDING CD'S ON THE SURVEY THREE MONTHS PRIOR TO THE CURRENT SURVEY, REDUCED THEIR OUTSTANDINGS TO ZERO.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 5E
CHANGE IN OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 1 /
OVER THE MONTH AS A PER CENT OF TOTAL DEPOSITS
AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD
2 6 MAY 1976 TO 30 JUN 1976
(NUMBER OF BANKS)
TOTAL ASSETS 2 / DECLINES OF INCREASES OF
( IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 3 * 2 1 I t NO 1% 1 2 3% AND TO TO AND CHANGE AND TO TO AND OVER 3% 2% LESS LEaS 23 3% OVER
ALL BANKS ISSUING CD'S 9 13 27 7 4 8 62 2 1 13 14
UNDER 500 5 7 8 23 6 20 4 3 3
5 0 0 - 1000 1 0 9 25 1 13 6 4 3
1 0 0 0 - 5 0 0 0 3 5 9 23 1 26 7 4 5
OVER 5 000 0 1 1 3 0 3 4 2 3
IN NEW YORK CITY 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0
OUTSIDE NEW YORK CITY 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 2 3
1 / INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF 5 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
2 / TOTAL ASSETS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON JUNE 3 0 , 1 9 7 5 .
NOTE- DEPOSITS IN THE DENOMINATOR OF IHE RATIO IN TMIS TABLE ARE 101AL DEMAND AND TIME DEPOSITS, INCLUDI INTERBANK AND U . S . GOVERNMENT DEPOSITS.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TAtiLE t A
CD 'S MATURING IN
AVERAGE MATURITY IN MONTHS 2 /
MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 1 / AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
AS OF 3 0 JUN 1976
(AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
ALL D I S -
TRICTS
1976 JUN 3 0 0 . 0
JUL 2 3 9 6 6 . 8
AUG 1 2 6 1 6 . 8
SEP 9 2 9 1 . 6
OCT 5 9 0 7 . 2
NOV 5 2 9 6 . 8
DEC 5 1 C 2 . 5
1 9 7 7 JAN 1 8 7 2 . 0
FEB 1 0 1 1 . 0
MAR 1 1 0 1 . 1
APR 1 0 9 5 . 9
MAY 4 5 2 . 6
JUN 72 5 . 3
JUL OF LATER 1 1 1 3 . 2
TOTAL * 7 0 5 5 4 . 8
BOSTON
0.0
1 0 5 8 . 0
5*#6.1
4 1 1 . 0
2 6 5 . 2
1 1 7 . 1
2 2 2 . 4
6 5 . 3
5 5 . 0
4 2 . 5
22 .6
8 . 9
2 5 . 9
1 1 5 . 7
2 9 5 5 . 7
NEW YORK
PHILA-DELPHIA
0.0
7 4 2 3 . 4
4 7 6 0 . 9
4 1 1 0 . 9
2 7 7 0 . 8
2 4 7 9 . 2
2 2 8 7 . 2
3 4 9 . 3
222.2
2 2 0 . 5
1 6 5 . 3
4 V . 9
1 4 9 . 2
4 6 5 . 3
2 5 4 7 4 . 1
0.0
1 0 6 3 . 7
5 3 4 . 9
3 5 2 . 2
2 7 2 . 2
218 .1
1 6 4 . 2
5 6 . 6
1 9 . 2
4 0 . 6
2 3 . 1
2 3 . 2
5 5 . 5
1 2 6 . 9
2 9 5 0 . 6
CLEVE-LAND
0.0
1 0 4 9 . 7
5 6 6 . 1
3 8 8 . 4
2 1 0 . 3
211 .1
2 4 2 . 4
6 9 . 1
5 2 . 3
5 2 . 9
7 7 . 6
2 6 . 9
3 5 . 3
3 1 5 . 8
3 3 3 7 . 9
2 . 9
NUMBER OF REPORTING BANKS 2 4 1
2.8
16
2 . 7 2 . 9
3 6 10
3 . 6
16
RICH-MOND
0. 0 7 0 9 . 4
3 6 6 . 4
2 6 4 . 7
1 3 7 . 4
1 5 4 . 6
1 4 0 . 8
5 3 . 0
2 0 . 4
1 7 . 0
1 7 . 1
9 . 7
4 0 . 7
3 5 . 0
1 9 6 6 . A
2 . 7
19
ATLANTA
0.0
9 4 9 . 7
5 3 0 . 7
2 9 9 . 1
2 0 6 . 1
2 3 7 . 0
1 7 5 . 7
9 1 . 0
3 2 . 4
5 3 . 9
4 4 . 6
2 4 . 8
3 2 . 6
5 7 . 5
2 7 3 5 . 1
2.8
2 3
C H I -CAGO
0.0
4 2 7 6 . 4
1 6 9 6 . 7
1 1 8 0 . 5
7 6 2 . 5
5 1 8 . 3
5 6 9 . 2
4 4 5 . 0
2 0 7 . 6
2 3 1 . 6
3 5 9 . 2
3 7 . 5
1 6 3 . 1
274 . 5
1 0 9 4 4 . 1
2.8
3 6
S I . LOUIS
0.0
2 5 6 . 7
1 5 6 . 3
1 2 3 . 8
6 3 . 7
6 7 . 4
7 9 . 6
3 6 . 0
1 3 . 0
16.6
16 . 4
6 . 4
1 3 . 4
3 9 . 5
8 9 7 . 0
3 . 3
M1NNE APOLIS
0.0
210.1
80.6 3 8 . 9
1 5 . 1
3 6 . 7
4 0 . 7
1 4 . 9
2 7 . 3
3 . 2
1.8
2.8
2 . 5
1 7 . 5
4 9 2 . 1
2.8
KANSAS CITY DALLAS
SAN FRAN-CISCO
0.0
6 5 0 . 9
2 8 5 . 6
1 6 4 . 6
1 0 5 . 2
7 0 . 5
5 7 . 4
3 9 . 6
1 9 . 2
2 8 . 3
2 9 . 0
20.0 21.0
5 5 . 3
1 5 4 6 . 6
2 . 7
0.0
1 5 3 2 . 5
7 9 4 . 4
5 1 3 . 7
302 . 0
2 0 0 . 3
260.6 126.1
66.2
5 2 . 6
1 1 4 . 4
3 6 . 0
4 3 . 7
1 3 3 . 9
4 1 9 6 . 6
2.8
0.0
4 7 8 2 . 3
2 0 5 6 . 1
1 4 4 3 . 6
9 8 8 . 3
8 2 2 . 3
5 0 4 . 1
2 7 6 . 2
3 3 6 . 6
2 2 4 . 6
20 4 . 5
1 4 2 . 4
4 7 6 . 3
1 3 0 5 8 . 4
11 18 2 3 28
1 / INCLUDES ONLY CERTIFICATES ISSUED IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE BY WEEKLY KFPORTING BANKS.
2 / SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX fc.
* DETAILS MAY NOT ADD TO TOTALS DUL 10 ROUNDING.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 66 1/ 2 /
SALES OF NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
AS OF 3 0 JUN 1 9 7 6
(AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
CD'S MATURING IN ALL D I S -
TRICTS BOSTON NEW YORK
PHILA-DELPHIA
CLEVE-LAND
R I C H -MOND ATLANTA
CHI-CAGO
ST. LOUIS
MINNE-APOLIS
KANSAS CITY DALLAS
" 1 * F R A W CISCO
1976 JUL 1 0 6 4 4 . 2 4 8 7 . 8 2 3 9 0 . 6 4 4 2 . 8 4 1 5 . 1 3 3 4 . 1 4 2 5 . 7 1 6 6 7 . 5 1 0 3 . ^ 1 2 5 . 0 3 7 4 . L 7 3 4 . ** 3 1 2 3 . 6
AUG 4 1 1 9 . 6 2 3 7 . 6 1 2 8 1 . 9 1 9 7 . o 1 6 9 . 5 1 4 3 . 9 1 9 6 . 3 1 6 0 . 6 7 0 . 1 1 7 . 6 1 3 3 . 0 3 3 6 . 1 4 2 . 6 7 2 9 . 0 6 ^ . 3 2 3 . 7 6 5 . 4 3 2 0 . 3 5 6 0 . 7
OCT 1 1 4 5 . 9 4 0 . 8 4 4 6 . 2 6 3 . 4 5 0 . 1 3 2 . 6 4 6 . 3 2 1 3 . 5 1 4 . 0 3 . 9 1 6 . 6 6 1 . 5 1 5 ^ . 8
NOV 1 2 4 5 . 3 2 4 . 0 5 3 5 . 0 7 3 . 0 6 5 . 7 2 6 . 2 7 4 . 3 1 2 0 . 3 2 3 . 1 to. 9 2 0 . 4 2 6 . 0 2 * 8 . 4
DEC 3 3 7 7 . 1 1 1 1 . 5 1 6 1 4 . 8 6 6 . 2 1 4 2 . 1 9 3 . 2 12 5 . 5 2 8 2 . 5 4 7 . 1 2 5 . 5 2 9 . 3 1 5 3 . 5 4 6 5 . 9
1 9 7 7 JAN 2 3 3 . 0 6 . 9 3 1 . 8 2 0 . 6 1 0 . 5 1 4 . 1 2 0 . 6 6 9 . 7 9 . 7 0 . 7 4 . 7 1 7 . 5 2 6 . 2
FEB 9 3 . 2 0 . 3 1 4 . 9 6 . 3 2 0 . 3 5 . 5 9 . 5 6 . 0 1 . 3 0 . 4 4 . 0 6 2 2 . 1
MAR 1 5 1 . 3 2 . 0 5 2 . 9 9 . 0 3 . 2 3 . 2 6 . 1 2 6 . 6 6 . 4 0 . 3 2 . 8 6 . 0 1 APR 4 0 . 1 3 . 4 3 . 9 4 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 1 7 . 7 1 . 0 0 . 3 l . o 1 . 6 1 MAY 7 8 . 9 2 . 9 1 1 . 0 1 . 7 9 . 0 2 . 9 7 . 0 1 2 . 4 2 . L 0 . 9 5 . 0 5 . 1 l t f . 4
JUN OR LATER 7 3 4 . 2 2 1 . 7 1 5 1 . 3 6 0 . 2 3 3 . 4 1 9 . 5 3 2 . 7 12 3 . 3 1 5 . 3 3 . 6 3 4 . 3 4 4 . z 1 9 4 . 5
TOTAL . * 2 6 1 4 5 . 9 1 1 3 8 . 5 8 4 3 5 . 2 1 0 9 6 . 6 1 1 1 2 . 7 79 0 . 6 1 0 6 6 . 9 4 0 5 1 . 3 3 5 7 . 1 2 0 9 . 0 7 1 1 . 5 1 7 1 2 . 9 5 4 4 3 . 4
AVERAGE MATURITY IN MONTHS 3 / 2 . 4 2 . 0 2 . 8 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 3 2 . 5 2 . 2 2 . 9 1 . 9 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 0
1 / SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX A .
2 / INCLUDES ONLY CERTIFICATES ISSUED IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE BY WEEKLY KEPORTING BANKS.
3 / SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX B .
* DETAILS MAY NOT ADD TO TOTALS DUE TO ROUNDING.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 6C
MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 1 / AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
AS OF 30 JUN I t 7 6
(PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION)
C D ' S MATURING IN ALL SAN 0 1 S - NEW PHIL A CLEVE- R I C H - O i l - S T . M1NNE- KANSAS FRAN-
TRICTS BOSTON YORK DELPHIA LAND MOND ATLANTA CAGO LOUIS APOLIS CITY DALLAS CISCO
1 9 7 6 JUN 30 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 C . O 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0
JUL 3 4 . 0 3 5 . 8 2 9 . 1 3 6 . 1 3 1 . 4 3 6 . 1 3 4 . 7 3 9 . 1 2 6 . 6 4 2 . 7 4 2 . 1 3 6 . 5 3t>. 6
AUG 1 7 . 9 1 8 . 5 1 8 . 8 1 8 . 1 1 7 . 6 1 6 . 6 1 9 . 4 1 7 . 3 1 7 . 4 1 6 . 4 1 6 . 5 1 8 . 9 1 5 . 6
SEP 1 3 . 2 1 3 . 9 1 6 . 1 1 1 . 9 1 1 . 6 1 3 . 5 1 0 . V CO
o 1 3 . 6 7 . 9 1 0 . 7 1 2 . 2 OCT 8 . 4 9 . 0 1 0 . 9 9 . 2 6 . 3 7 . 0 7 . 5 7 . 0 7 . 1 3 . 1 6 . 6 7 . 2 6 . 1
NOV 7 . 5 4 . 0 9 . 7 7 . 4 6 . 3 7 . 9 6 . 7 * . 7 7 . 5 7 . 5 4 . 6 *t 6 7 . 6
DEC 7 . 2 7 . 5 9 . 0 5 . 6 7 . 3 7 . 2 6 . 4 5 . 4 8 . 9 6 . 3 3 . 7 6 . 7 o . 3
1 9 7 7 JAN 2 . 7 2 . 2 1 . 4 1 . 9 2 . 7 2 . 7 3 . 3 4 . 1 *t . 2 3 . 0 2 . 6 3 . 0 3 . 9
FEB 1 . 4 1 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 0 1 . 2 1 . 9 1 . 4 i>.5 1 . 2 1 . 6 * . 1
MAR 1 . 6 1 . 4 0 . 9 1 . 4 1 . 6 0 . 9 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 1 0 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 3 2 . 6
APR 1 . 6 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 8 2 . 3 0 . 9 1 . 6 3 . 3 1 . 6 0 . 4 1 . 9 2 . 7 1 . 7
MAY 0 . 6 O . a 0 . 2 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 9 0 . 3 C . V 0 . 6 1 . 3 0 . 9 1 . 6
JUN 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 1 2 . 1 1 1 . 5 1 . 5 0 . 5 1 . 4 1 . 0 1 . 1
JUL OR LATER 3 . 0 3 . 9 1 . 8 t . 3 9 . 5 1 . 8 2 . 1 j . 3 4 . 4 5 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 2 3 g
TOTAL * 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 i o W
%/ INCLUDES ONLY CERTIFICATES ISSUED IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
1 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE bC
MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 1 / AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
AS OF 3 0 JUN 1976
(CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE)
MATURING IN ALL D I S -
TRICTS BOSTON NEW YORK
PHILA-DELPHIA
CLEVE-LAND
RICH-MOND ATLANTA
C H I -CAGO
ST. LOUIS
MINNE APOLIS
KANSAS CITY DALLAS
SAN FRAN-CISCO
JUN 3 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 .0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0
JUL 3 4 . 0 3 5 . 8 C 9 . 1 3 6 . 1 3 1 . 4 3 6 . 1 2 4 . 7 3 9 . 1 2 8 . 8 4 2 . 7 4 2 . 1 3 6 . 5 3 6 . 6
AUG 5 1 . 9 5 4 . 3 4 7 . 9 5 4 . 2 4 9 . 0 5 4 . 7 5 4 . 1 5 6 . 4 4 6 . 2 5 9 . 1 6 0 . 6 5 5 . 4 5 2 . 4
SEP 6 5 . 1 6 8 . 2 6 4 . 0 6 6 . 1 t O. 6 6 a . 2 65 . 0 6 7 . 2 bO . 0 6 7 . 0 7 1 . 3 6 7 . 6 6->.5
OCT 7 3 . 5 7 7 . 2 7 4 . 9 7 5 . 3 66 . 9 7 5 . 2 7 2 . 5 7 4 . 2 6 7 . 1 7 G . 1 7 6 . 1 7 4 . 6 6 9 . 6
NOV 8 1 . 0 8 1 . Z 8 4 . 6 6 2 . 7 7 3 . 2 8 3 . 1 6 1 . 2 7 6 . 9 7 4 . 6 7 7 . 6 8 2 . 7 7 9 . 6 7 7 . 2
DEC 8 6 . 2 6 8 . 7 9 3 . 6 8 6 . 3 8 0 . 5 9 0 . 3 8 7 . 6 8 4 . 3 6 3 . 5 8 5 . 9 6 6 . 4 6 6 . 3 8 3 . 5
JAN 9 0 . 9 9 0 . 9 9 5 . 0 9 0 . 2 6 3 . 2 9 3 . 0 9 0 . 9 6 6 . 4 6 7 . 7 6 6 . 9 6 9 . 0 6 9 . 3 8 9 . 5 FEB 9 2 . 3 9 2 . 6 9 5 . 9 9 0 . 9 6 4 . 8 9 4 . 0 9 2 . 1 9 0 . 3 8 9 . 1 9 4 . 4 9 0 . 2 9 0 . 9
8 9 . 5
MAR 9 3 . 9 9 4 . 2 9 6 . 8 9 2 . 3 86.*$ 9 4 . 9 9 4 . 1 9 / . 4 9 1 . 2 9 5 . 1 9 2 . 0 9 2 . 2 9 2 . 1
APR 9 5 . 5 9 5 . 0 9 7 . 4 9 3 . 1 8 8 . 7 9 5 . 6 9 5 . 7 9 5 . 7 9 3 . 0 9 5 . d 9 3 . 9 9 4 . 9 9 3 . 6
MAY 9 6 . 1 9 5 . 3 9 7 . 6 9 3 . 9 6 9 . 5 9 6 . 3 9 6 . 6 9 6 . 0 9 a . 9 9 6 . 1 9 5 . 2 9 5 . 6 9 5 . 4
JUN 9 7 . 1 9 6 . 2 9 8 . 2 9 5 . 8 9 0 . t 9 6 . 4 97 . 6 9 7 o 9 5 . 4 9 6 . 6 9 6 . 6 9 6 . 6 9 6 . 5
JUL OR lATER 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0
1 / INCLUDES LNLY CERTIFICATES ISSUED IN DENOMINATIONS UF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORI BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TABLE 6E 1 / 2/
SALES OF NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS
BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
AS OF 30 JUN 1976
(PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION)
C D ' S MATURING IN ALL D I S -
TRICTS BOSTON NEW PHI LA-YORK DEL PHI A
CLEVE-LAND
RI CH-MOND ATLANTA
C H I -CAGO
S T . LOUIS
MINNE-APOLIS
KANSAS CITY DALLAS
SAN FRAN-CISCO
1976 JUL 4 0 . 7 4 2 . 8 2 8 . 3 4 0 . 4 3 7 . 3 4 2 . 2 3 9 . 2 4 1 . 7 2 8 . 9 5 9 . 8 5 2 . 6 4 2 . 9 5 7 . 4
AUG 1 5 . 8 2 0 . 9 1 5 . 2 1 6 . 0 1 5 . 2 1 6 . 2 1 8 . 1 1 8 . 8 1 9 . 6 8 . 4 1 6 . 7 1 9 . 6 * SEP 1 6 . 4 1 7 . 5 2 0 . 1 1 2 . 0 1 7 . 4 1 4 . b 1 3 . 1 1 8 . 0 1 7 . 7 1 1 . 3 1 2 . 0 1 8 . 7 1 0 . 7
OCT 4 . 4 3 . 6 5 . 3 5 . 8 4 . 5 4 . 1 4 . 3 5 . 3 3 . 9 1 . 9 2 . 4 3 . 6 2 . 8
NOV 4 . 8 2 . 1 6 . 3 6 . 7 5 . 9 3 . 3 6 . 8 3 . 0 6 . 5 3 . 3 2 . 9 1 . to 4 . 6
DEC 1 2 . 9 9 . 8 2 1 . 5 7 . 9 1 2 . 8 1 1 . 8 11 . 5 7 . 0 1 3 . 2 1 2 . 2 4 . 1 9 . 0 6 . 6
1 9 7 7 JAN 0 . 9 0 . 6 0 . 4 1 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 7 2 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 7 1 . 0 0 . 5
FEB 0 . 4 0 . 0 C . 2 0 . 6 1 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 9 0 . 1 0 . 4 O . j . 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 4
MAR 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 1 1 . 8 0 . 1 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5
APR 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1
MAY 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 8 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 3 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 3
JUN OR LATER 2 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 8 5 . 5 3 . 0 2 . 5 3 . 0 3 . 0 4 . 3 1 . 6 4 . 8 2 . 6
TOTAL * 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 C 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0
1 / SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX A.
2 / INCLUDES ONLY CERTIFICATES ISSUED IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS.
NOTE - SALES IN THIS TABLE ARE NOT ADJUSTED FOR CD'S THAT HAVE MATURED.
* DETAILS MAY NOT ADD TO TuTALS DUE TO ROUNDING.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TECHNICAL APPENDIX A
DERIVATION OF GROSS SALES OF CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
Sales of CD's between survey dates are derived in the following
manner: Outstanding CD's maturing in each month of the previous survey are
subtracted from maturities in the same month of the current survey. Those
CD's maturing in the remaining portion of the month in which the current
survey is taken are ignored. Those CD's maturing after the last individual
month shown in the current survey (i.e. CD's with the longest maturity) are
added to those CD's maturing in the last individual month shown on that
survey in order to derive an outstanding quantity for a time period com-
parable* to the longest maturity CD's shown on the previous survey.
The procedure used produces gross sales of CD's between survey
dates maturing in each of the eleven full months after the currect survey,
and combines sales of CD's maturing in twelve or more months. Some sales
are also lost by the method described above. Sales of CD's between the
survey dates that mature in the remaining days of the calendar month of the .
current survey are ignored. However, since the minimum maturity for time
deposits under current regulations is 30 days, the time period between
monthly survey dates (28 to 34 days) suggests that very few sales are lost
from the series as derived in this manner.
Total derived sales will differ from the change in total out-
standings between survey dates by (1) the amount of CD's that have matured
between surveys and (2) the amount, if any, of sales between survey dates
that mature in the remaining days of the calendar month in which the current
survey is taken.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
TECHNICAL NOTE B CALCULATION OP AVERAGE MATURITIES OF NEGOTIABLE TIMS CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
OUTSTANDINGS
Average maturities of outstanding negotiable time certificates of deposit are calculated on a weighted .average basis All CD's are aeauoed to mature in the middle of the month and those CD's maturing in the survey monthafter the survey date~~are assumed to mature in the middle of the
period between the survey date and the end of the calendar month in which the survey is taken. The weights are the quantity of CD's maturing in each month or fraction thereof as a proportion of total CD*a outstanding and the starting date for calculations is the survey date.
A downward bias in the calculated average maturity developa from the fact that all CD's maturing in more than twelve months after the survey date are lumped together. All of these CD's are assumed to mature in the middle of the twelfth full month after the survey date, regardless of the actual, but unknown, maturity of the CD's maturing in more than twelve full months.
SALES
Average maturity of negotiable time certificates of deposit sold between survey dates are calculated in exactly the same way. That is, they are weighted averages calculated from the survey date with the assumption made that all CD's mature in the middle of the month. Any CD's sold between survey dates and maturing in the period between the current survey date and the end of the calendar month in which the current survey was taken (a maximum of 6 day a) are ignored.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
Technical Note B (continued)
This procedure assumes all CD's sold between survey date# were
issued on the most recent survey date. While it appears more logical to
assume that all CD's were sold at the mid-point between the two surveys,
such an assumption"would tend to reduce comparlblllty between average
maturities of outstandings and of sales as a result of using two different
starting dates for the calculations. If the assumption is made that all CD's
are sold at the mid-point between surveys, the average maturity of salee would
be lengthened relative to the average maturity of outstandings, by, in effect,
using an earlier starting date for sale# than for outstandings.
Salee of CD's maturing in a particular month are often a large
and highly variable proportion of total sales while change# in outstandings
due in any particular month are a small and rather stable proportion of the
*-eve*. total outstandings. As a result, the average maturity of sales is
much more sensitive to month-to-month variation in the maturity structure of
sales than is the case with the outstandings series. Thua. large chhfl in
the calculated average maturity of sales, or situations in which the average
maturity of sales differ sharply from the average maturity of outatandlnea.
should be interpreted with care and references should be made to actual dollar sales by month.
Formulas for calculation of average maturities are available on
request from the Banking Section, Division of Research and Statiatic#, Board of Governor# of the Federal Reserve System.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
top related