lofar offline interference detection

Post on 18-Apr-2022

6 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

LOFAR offline interference detection

André Offringa1

Ger de Bruyn1,2

Saleem Zaroubi1

Michael Biehl3

1Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Groningen2ASTRON

3Faculty of Computing Science, University of Groningen

Contents

● About interference detection algorithms● Results for LOFAR● Perspectives for SKA

About detecting interference

● Motivation for automated detection:– Enormous data sizes in new telescopes

such as LOFAR

– No possibilities for manually “browsing” the data for bad baselines, bad antennae, contaminated frequencies, or any other bad dimension of the cube

About RFI detection (2)

● Many methods for RFI removal:– Blanking before correlation at highest time

resolution

– Spatial filtering before correlation

– Flagging after correlation

– RFI modeling and subtraction before and/or after correlation

● After: e.g. fringe fitting● Before: e.g. cyclostationair filtering, satellite

subtraction

● Most of the methods are complementary

Flagging methods

Approach of automatic (baseline) flaggers:● Estimate the value of a sample using its

neighboring time/frequency samples.

● If this deviates substantially from its real value, flag it.

Flagging methods

Approach of automatic (baseline) flaggers:● Estimate the value of a sample using its

neighboring time/frequency samples.– Median value, polynomial fit, weighted

Gaussian filter

● If this deviates substantially from its real value, flag it.

– By thresholding, line detection or combinatorial thresholding

See: Bhat et al. (2005), Winkel et al. (2006), Offringet al. (2010)

Freq

Time (Offringa et al., MNRAS, 2010, in press)

Flagging methods

● Combinatorial thresholding strategy● Idea:

– Sum samples and use different thresholds

A > threshold1? → FLAG AA+B > threshold2? → FLAG A, BA+B+C > threshold3? → FLAG A, B, CA+B+C+D > threshold4? → FLAG A, B, C, DA+E > threshold2? → FLAG A, EA+E+F > threshold3? → FLAG A, E, FA+E+F+G > threshold4? → FLAG A, E, F, GB > threshold1? → FLAG BB+C > threshold2? → FLAG B, C.......

Method comparison

● Compare methods with the help of test sets and ROC curves

● One of the test sets:

(Offringa et al., MNRAS, 2010, in press)

Without flagging After flagging:

LOFAR results

● Data quality is very good

● Flagging somewhat between 1% to 3%

● No show-stopping RFI

LOFAR results

● We see some in sito RFI, but it is very weak

● Too weak to subtract– Done at the GMRT

● Effects after long time integration not yet known

(Athreya, AJ, 2009)

LOFAR results (2)

● Many different flaggers are needed

Different needs per KSP for flagger sensitivity and flagging strategy:

– EoR needs a very stringent approach

– Pulsars need an approach not based on time smoothness

– For transients the same for frequency

– Other option is to quickly scan for RFI to compress the data immediately after

SKA and RFI

SKA and RFI

● The SKA will also be influenced by RFI:– Satellites, aeroplanes

– Lightning

– In situ RFI

– Car engines, (imperfect) transmitters, electrical fences

– Classes of RFI currently not observed

● ...and more detection requirements... :– Failing hardware and software

SKA and RFI

● We are not sure yet what it takes to flag LOFAR data sufficiently

● >>5002 cross-correlations with 10 x LOFAR time resolution and 50 x LOFAR beams is not trivial, if at all possible in 2020

● The order of the data might be a crucial problem:

– Accurate flagging needs large chunks of the cubes in T/F directions

– Calibration needs chunks in the baseline-direction

SKA and RFI

● If necessary, detectors can always trade off speed for accuracy, e.g.:

– Flag on time/frequency integrated data

– Flag on auto correlations

– Flag on groups of antennae

● But is it wise to build more antennae than we can possible process?

Conclusions

● LOFAR can very well deal with its RFI● For SKA, processing will be a major issue● IO and transport might be problematic● The more antennae, the less accurate you

can deal with RFI.● Carefully watch the pathfinders...

● If anyone wants to automatically flag data... => offringa@astro.rug.nl

top related