m. alfonsi, g. bencivenni, p. de simone, f.murtas, m. poli...
Post on 25-Dec-2019
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
October 26, 2003 10:9 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings fast3gem
OPERATION OF TRIPLE-GEM DETECTORS WITH FAST
GAS MIXTURES
M. ALFONSI, G. BENCIVENNI, P. DE SIMONE, F.MURTAS,
M. POLI LENER
Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - INFN, Frascati, Italy
D. PINCI
Sezione INFN Roma1, INFN, Roma, Italy
W. BONIVENTO, A. CARDINI, C. DEPLANO, D. RASPINO, B. SAITTA
Sezione INFN Cagliari, INFN, Cagliari, Italy
S. BACCARO
ENEA-Casaccia, S.Maria di Galeria, Roma, Italy
Adding CF4 to the standard Ar/CO2 gas mixture allows to substantially improvethe time resolution of triple-GEM detectors.In this paper we discuss further improvements in time resolution obtained bothoptimising the above mentioned ternary gas mixture and using a new gas mixturewith isobutane as quencher, below the flammability limit.Moreover, measurements of discharge probability per incident charged particle witha high intensity pion/proton beam for these gas mixtures are presented.We show that, if the detector were to be used in the harsh environment of theLHCb experiment, for which it was primarily conceived, only the new gas mixturesconsidered in this paper would allow a reasonable working region around nominaloperating voltage. Some results on ageing studies are also reported.
1. Introduction
In a previous paper 1 we discussed the performance of a 10×10 cm2 triple-
GEM 2 detector for high rate charged particle triggering applications. The
experimental tests were performed in the framework of an R&D for the
inner part of the first station of the LHCb muon chambers 3. The results
contained in that paper showed that a considerable gain in time resolution
with respect to previous studies could be obtained modifying the standard
1
October 26, 2003 10:9 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings fast3gem
2
gas mixture Ar/CO2 (70/30) into Ar/CO2/CF4 (60/20/20).
These results were however only about time resolution and did not include
any quantitative study of discharge probability or ageing.
In this publication we present further improvements in time resolution ob-
tained both optimising the above mentioned ternary gas mixture and using
a new gas mixture with isobutane as quencher, below the flammability limit.
We also present measurements of discharge probability per incident charged
particle with a high intensity pion/proton beam; these measurements are
needed to know whether the detector can survive 10 years of operation in
the LHCb experiment or not.
In section 2 we remind our physics requirements and the ideas behind the
choice of gas mixtures and detector configuration. In section 3 the mea-
surement of effective gain and in section 4 efficiency and pad cluster size
maeasurements are discussed. In section 5 we present discharge probability
per incident charged particle measurements.
2. Detector and gas mixture optimisation
We remind the reader here that the efficiency requirements for detector
operation in LHCb, inner region of the first muon station are of 96 % ef-
ficiency in 20 ns time window with 1 × 2.5 cm2 pad size and an average
number of pads over threshold per incident charged particle, that we call
pad cluster size, of less than 1.25 in a 25 ns time window, corresponding to
one LHC bunch crossing time. We consider a muon station as made of two
triple-GEM detectors in OR. Moreover, the detector should survive up to
10 years with a charged particle rate of 180 kHz/cm2.
For the sake of clarity, we report here a schematic drawing of the triple-
GEM detector, Fig. 1, where the naming convention of this paper is also
introduced. The voltage differences across the various GEM foils are called
Ugem1, Ugem2 and Ugem3 and their sum U totgem.
The intrinsic time resolution of a triple-GEM detector for incident charged
particles depends on two factors 1: the resolution on the arrival time of pri-
mary clusters on the first GEM, σt, and the single electron sensitivity, i.e.
the probability of triggering on the signal corresponding to one ionisation
electron. The former is given by σt = 1/nvdrift, where n is the number of
clusters per unit length and vdrift is the electron drift velocity, both terms
depending on the choice of gas mixture; the latter depends on detector
configuration, i.e GEM fields (gas gain), GEM to GEM fields(transparency
October 26, 2003 10:9 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings fast3gem
3
E
E
E
cathode
pads
d
t
i
GEM1GEM2GEM3
d
t
g
g
gi
Figure 1. Cross-section of the triple GEM detector. Ed, Et and Ei are the drift,transfer and induction fields, respectively; gd, gt, and gi are the drift, transferand induction gaps, respectively.
of GEM foils to drifting electrons) and, with fast electronics, on detector
geometry (signal height is proportional to gi size).
The occurence of discharges, i.e. breakdown of gas rigidity, in gas detectors
is correlated with the transition from avalanche to streamer occurring when
the primary avalanche size exceeds few 107 ion-electron pairs 4, the so called
Reather limit. In GEM detectors, due to very small distance between the
two sides of the GEM foil, streamer formation can be easily followed by
a discharge. This effect can be minimised by both adding a quencher to
the gas mixture, whose quantity and type are however limited by detector
ageing, and optimising the detector configuration in order to benefit from
the diffusion effect which spreads the charge over more holes.
The above mentioned requirements lead us to select two new gas mixtures
improving both σt and quenching properties: Ar/CO2/CF4 (45/15/40)
and Ar/CF4/C4H10 (65/28/7). The isobutane content was kept below the
flammability limity of the gas mixture.
Fig. 2 shows the resolution on the arrival time of primary clusters on the
first GEM, σt, vs. electric field as calculated with Magbolz and Heed pro-
grams for the four gas mixtures we tested and shows that σt properties at
low fields are better for the new ones.
3. Measurement of effective gain
Effective gain vs. U totgem measurements were performed with a 5.9 keV X-ray
tube1. Effective gain values were obtained from the ratio of pad current
with high voltage on the GEM foils, to current on the first GEM, with no
high voltage on the GEM foils and are shown in figure 2 (b).
The gain behaviour at a given U totgem value seems to follow the Argon con-
tent of the gas mixture, with the exception of the larger gain of the gas
October 26, 2003 10:9 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings fast3gem
4
Figure 2. (a) Calculated resolution on the arrival time of primary clusters on thefirst GEM vs. electric field for the four gas mixtures tested by our group. (b)Measured effective gain vs. U tot
gem.
mixture with isobutane. The larger gain of gas mixtures with isobutane
is also observed by the authors of 4. Effective gain dependence on U totgem
was obtained from a fit, assuming an exponential behaviour. The fitted
coefficients were 0.02 V−1 for all gas mixtures.
Reliable detector operation in the experiment is only possible if all re-
quirements in terms of efficiency and detector survival can be satisfied for
a certain range of U totgem or effective gain G, in a way that voltage, pressure
or temperature variations do not bring the detector outside this range.
4. Measurements of time performance
To make a comparison of the performances of the different gas mixtures,
efficiency, cluster size and discharge probability are displayed as a function
of gain, after T and P correction.
The detector configuration used in this tests closely followed that of 1,
so did the experimental setup for efficiency measurement, and therefore
they will not be discussed again in this paper. Detectors with gap sizes
3/1/2/1 mm were tested.
Discriminator theshold was set to 2 fC delta input charge equivalent. The
first time among all pads of the chamber is considered as the time of the
event. Fig. 3(a) shows the efficiency vs. gain with two detectors in a OR
configuration after discrimination.
Therefore, the value of effective gain which corresponds to 96% efficiency in
figure 3(a) , defines the start of the operating region of the detector. This
October 26, 2003 10:9 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings fast3gem
5
Figure 3. (a) Measured efficiency vs. gain of two detectors in OR after discrim-ination in a 20 ns time window. (b) Measured pad cluster size vs. effectivegain.
value turns out to be different from gas to gas. The end of the operating
region is defined by the smallest gain value corresponding to maximum
tolerable discharge probability per incident particle, discussed in section 5,
and the maximum tolerable pad cluster size, i.e. 1.25. Pad cluster size
is defined as the number of pads per event which fired the discriminator
in a 3x3 pad region around the first triggered pad of the event and in a
time window of 25 ns. Fig. 3(b) shows the pad cluster size for the three
gas mixtures vs. effective gain. As expected, the pad cluster size depends
on signal height, and since the number of primary ionisation electrons is
similar for the three mixures (see section 2), the pad cluster size is directly
related to the effective gain.
5. Measurements of discharge probability per incident
particle
The measurement was performed at PSI, with a quasi-continuous hadron
beam (300 MHz) mainly composed of pions of 350 MeV/c momentum with
an estimated contamination of 7 % of protons. Discharge counting was
performed detecting current spikes on one of the high voltage channels
feeding the detector. Discharge probability is defined as the ratio between
the observed number of discharges and incident particle number in a given
time.
During the test, the detectors integrated about 5000 discharges each, with
October 26, 2003 10:9 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings fast3gem
6
Figure 4. Measured discharge probability per incident charged particle vs. effec-tive gain
stable performance. No dark current above 100 nA was observed on any
electrode. Taking into account the expected average charged particle rate
in the LHCb experiment, this would correspond to a discharge probability
of 3 · 10−12 in 10 years of running. The effective gain corresponding to this
value of discharge probability per incident charged particles defines the end
of the working region. However, since we did not observe any degradation in
detector performances this is a conservative estimate. Discharge probability
is shown for the three mixtures in figure 4.
6. Aging Studies
To verify if the detector is able to work 10 years at LHCb (integrating a
charge up to 1.6 C/cm2) aging studies were performed. In a local aging
test a small area (1 mm) was highly irradiated with a 5.9 keV x-ray beam
(results are reported in fig 5 (a) with green dots). In a large area test an
area of around 15 cm2 was irradiated with a 300 MHz hadron beam (red
dot in fig 5 (a) reports the normalized current at the end of the test). A
global aging test in which the full detector was irradiated by the photon
emitted by a 60Co source. In this test 3 detector were highly irradiated and
one was exposted to a lower dose.
fig. 5 (a) shows that in the local aging test and in the large area test
no aging effect was found (no decrease in the current) , while in the global
aging test in the chambers highly irradiated the current decrease with the
same slope (-15%/0.2 C). The zoom in fig.5 shows that in the chamber
exposed to a lower dose, after a period in which wasn’t working properly,
October 26, 2003 10:9 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings fast3gem
7
Figure 5. (a) Normalized current vs. integrated charge in all aging studies. (b)Normalized current vs. integrated charge in all aging studies at low integratedcharge.
the current follows the trend of local aging test with no evident aging effect.
The large and local area aging test, and the global aging test suggest
that the triple GEM detector can work 10 years at LHCb. The decrease in
current in the highly irradiated chamber of the global aging test might be
due to the gas flow that in these chmabers wasn’t increase enought respect
to the dose rate.
7. Conclusion
We discussed the performance of 10×10 cm2 triple-GEM detectors with two
new gas mixtures, Ar/CF4/C4H10 (65/28/7) and Ar/CO2/CF4 (45/15/40),
satisfying the requirements in terms of time resolution, pad cluster size and
discharge probability per incident particle corresponding to the harsh envi-
ronment of the inner part of the first station of the LHCb muon chambers.
An operating region of more than 80 V for the triple-GEM detector with
these two gas mixtures, allowing for external temperature and pressure
variation, was found. After the local aging test, large area test and global
aging test al low dose we can conclude that the triple GEM detector can
work properly 10 years at LHCb. Work is in progress to understand the
different trend in the global aging test at hih dose rate.
References
1. G. Bencivenni et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A488 (2002) 493.2. F. Sauli, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A386 (1997) 531.3. LHCb Muon System Technical Design Report, LHCb TDR 4, (2001).4. S. Bachmann et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 294.
top related