map-21/fast act regional performance measures and … · hampton roads transportation planning...

MAP-21/FAST ACT REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

AND TARGETS

Presented by: Keith Nichols, PE

TTAC Agenda Item #13

October 3, 2018

2

• The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) surface transportation legislation established a performance-and outcome-based program.

• As part of this program, MAP-21 (and the FAST Act) require that States and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) prepare and use a set of federally-established performance measures.

• States and MPOs must also set targets and monitor progress for each of these performance measures.

• HRTPO staff will work in cooperation with the TTAC to produce these targets, and the TTAC formed a performance measures working group at the September 2017 meeting.

Background

3

MPO Measures Area Measures Initial MPO

Target Deadline

Safety Fatalities 2/27/18 (HRTPO Board Approval 2/15/18)

Fatality Rate

Serious Injuries

Serious Injury Rate

Bike/Pedestrian Fatalities & Serious Injuries

Transit Transit Asset Management 10/1/18 (HRTPO Board Approval 8/29/18)

Pavement Condition Interstate System pavement in good condition 11/14/18

Interstate System pavement in poor condition

Non-Interstate System NHS pavement in good condition

Non-Interstate System NHS pavement in poor condition

Bridge Condition NHS bridge deck area in good condition 11/14/18 NHS bridge deck area in poor condition

Roadway Performance

Interstate Travel Time Reliability 11/14/18 Non-Interstate NHS Travel Time Reliability

Freight Truck Travel Time Reliability Index 11/14/18

CMAQ N/A for Attainment areas N/A

4

• For target setting, the MPO may:

• Adopt VDOT statewide targets, but report metrics specific to the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA)

• Select unique, MPO specific targets, and report metrics specific to the MPA

• Use a combination of statewide and unique targets

• There are no “penalties” for MPOs for not meeting their performance targets, although it can be addressed during the quadrennial certification review to ensure adequate performance-based planning.

MPO Targets

5

Transit TAM Measures

Asset Type Performance Measure Asset Classes

Rolling Stock % of revenue vehicles within each asset class that have met or

exceeded their useful life benchmark

Buses, ferry boats, light rail vehicles, trolley buses, vans.

Equipment/Service Vehicles

% of vehicles that have met or exceeded their useful life

benchmark

Non-revenue automobiles, trucks, other rubber tire vehicles

Infrastructure % of track segments, signals, and systems with performance

restrictions

Light rail infrastructure

Facilities

% of facilities in each asset class rated under 3.0 on FTA’s TERM

scale

Passenger facilities, parking facilities, maintenance facilities,

administrative facilities

6

• Tier I transit agencies (HRT) must develop and carry out their own TAM plans.

• Tier II transit agencies (WATA and Suffolk Transit) are eligible to participate in group TAM plans.

• WATA and Suffolk Transit chose to use the DRPT statewide targets.

• Regional targets are based on a weighted average of HRT, WATA, and Suffolk Transit targets.

Transit TAM Targets

Asset TypePerformance

MeasureAsset Classes

Bus < 41%

Cutaway Buses < 10%

Ferry Boat < 50%

Light Rail Vehicles 0%

Minibus < 20%

Trolley Buses < 3%

Van < 25%

Non-Revenue/

Service Vehicles < 92%

Trucks & Other

Rubber Tire Vehs< 70%

Infrastructure

% of track segments,

signals, and systems

with performance

restrictions

Light Rail

Infrastructure< 3%

Passenger/Parking < 1%

Maintenance < 10%

Administrative < 10%

HRTPO

Target

Facilities% of facilities in each

asset class rated under

3.0 on FTA’s TERM scale

Rolling Stock

% of revenue vehicles

within each asset class

that have met or

exceeded their useful

life benchmark

Equipment/

Service Vehicles

% of vehicles that have

met or exceeded their

useful life benchmark

7

Transit TAM Measures

8

2040 LRTP

9

2040 LRTP

10

• Benjamin Camras/Troy Eisenberger (CHES) • Mike Hayes (HAM) • Bryan Stilley (NN) • John Stevenson/Rob Brown (NOR) • Carl Jackson (PORT) • LJ Hansen (SUF) • Vacant (VB) • Jamie Jackson/Derrick Snowden (HRT) • Eric Stringfield/Angela Biney (VDOT HR)

• The working group convened on September 26th to recommend

targets for the TTAC to consider.

Working Group

11

• Bridge Condition

• Pavement Condition

• Roadway Performance

• Freight

MPO Measures

12

• Four-Year Targets for:

• % NHS bridge deck area in good condition

• % NHS bridge deck area in poor condition

• Only includes bridges included in the National Bridge Inventory

• Must carry a roadway

• Open to general public

• > 20 feet in length

Bridge Condition

13

Bridge Condition

Bridge Condition is determined by the lowest of the three condition ratings

14

Bridge Condition

Current Bridge Conditions

15

Bridge Condition

16

Bridge Condition

Measure Statewide Current Value

CTB Approved 4-Year Target

HRTPO Current Value

Working Group Recommended 4-Year Target

NHS Bridge Deck Area Good Condition

34.2% 33% 20% 20%

NHS Bridge Deck Area Poor Condition

3.6% < 3.0% 4.0% < 3.0%

17

Bridge Condition

18

• Bridge Condition

• Pavement Condition

• Roadway Performance

• Freight

MPO Measures

19

• Four-Year Targets for:

• % Interstate System pavement in good condition

• % Interstate System pavement in poor condition

• % Non-Interstate System NHS pavement in good condition

• % Non-Interstate System NHS pavement in poor condition

Pavement Condition

20

Pavement Condition

21

Pavement Condition

Measure Statewide Current Value

CTB Approved 4-Year Target

Working Group Recommended

4-Year Target

Interstate System Good Condition

57.8% 45% 45%

Interstate System Poor Condition

0.4% < 3% < 3%

Non-Interstate System NHS Good Condition

33.5% 25% 25%

Non-Interstate System NHS Poor Condition

0.9% < 5% < 5%

22

Pavement Condition

23

• Bridge Condition

• Pavement Condition

• Roadway Performance

• Freight

MPO Measures

24

• Four-Year Targets for:

• Interstate Travel Time Reliability

• Non-Interstate System NHS Travel Time Reliability

Roadway Performance

25

• The metric used is Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR), which is the ratio of the 80th percentile travel time to the mean (50th percentile) travel time over four time horizons.

Roadway Performance

26

Roadway Performance

Four Time Horizons

27

Roadway Performance

LOTTR Calculation Example

28

Roadway Performance

Travel Time Reliability Measure Example

29

Roadway Performance

Existing Travel Time Reliability Measures

Interstate Non-Interstate NHS

30

Roadway Performance

2017 LOTTR Map, Interstates in Hampton Roads MPO, All Time Periods

31

Roadway Performance

2017 LOTTR Map, Non-Interstate NHS in Hampton Roads MPO, All Time Periods

Measure Statewide Current Value

CTB Approved

4-Year Target

HRTPO Current Value

Working Group Recommended

4-Year Target

Interstate Travel Time Reliability

(% reliable miles)

82.6% 82% 86.1% 82%

Non-Interstate NHS Travel Time Reliability

(% reliable miles)

86.8% 82.5% 90.0% 82.5%

32

Roadway Performance

33

• Bridge Condition

• Pavement Condition

• Roadway Performance

• Freight

MPO Measures

34

• Four-Year Target for:

• Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) Index on the Interstate system

Freight

35

• The metric used is Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR), which is the ratio of the 95th percentile travel time for trucks to the mean (50th percentile) travel time for trucks over five time horizons.

Freight

36

Freight

Five Time Horizons

37

Freight

TTTR Calculation Example

Longer Truck Travel Time (95th)

Normal Truck Travel Time (50th) =

# seconds

# seconds = TTTR Ratio

TTTR: Single Segment, Interstate Highway System

Monday – Friday

6 – 10 a.m. TTTR = 63 sec

42 sec = 1.50

10 a.m. – 4 p.m. TTTR = 62 sec

45 sec = 1.38

4 – 8 p.m. TTTR = 85 sec

50 sec = 1.70

Weekends 6 a.m. – 8 p.m. TTTR = 52 sec

40 sec = 1.30

Overnight 8 p.m. – 6 a.m. TTTR = 46 sec

38 sec = 1.21

Maximum TTTR 1.70

38

Freight

Freight Reliability Measure Example

39

Freight

2017 TTTR Map, Hampton Roads VDOT District

2016 2017 2019 2021

Statewide (growth 1.06% TTTR) 1.49 1.50 1.53 1.56

Winchester-Frederick County MPO 1.096 1.096

Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Montgomery Area MPO 1.093 1.091

Bristol MPO 1.107 1.129

Tri Cities Area MPO 1.116 1.142

Richmond Area MPO 1.437 1.447

Staunton-Augusta-Waynesboro MPO 1.106 1.108

Roanoke Valley MPO 1.207 1.227

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board 2.884 2.914

Charlottesville-Albemarle MPO 1.145 1.13

Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization 2.03 2.051

Fredericksburg Area MPO 2.604 2.61

Harrisonburg-Rockingham MPO 1.06 1.061 40

Freight

Freight Reliability Measure Example

Measure Statewide Current Value

CTB Approved

4-Year Target

HRTPO Current Value

Working Group Recommended

4-Year Target

TTTR Index 1.50 1.56 2.05 2.13

41

Freight

42

Recommended Targets

Area Measures Working Group

Recommended Target Basis of Target

Bridge Condition

National Highway System (NHS) bridge deck area in good condition 20% Matches current regional value

NHS bridge deck area in poor condition < 3.0% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Pavement Condition

Interstate System pavement in good condition 45% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Interstate System pavement in poor condition < 3% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Non-Interstate System NHS pavement in good condition 25% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Non-Interstate System NHS pavement in poor condition < 5% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Roadway Performance

Interstate Travel Time Reliability 82% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Non-Interstate NHS Travel Time Reliability 82.5% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Freight Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) Index 2.13

Matches expected statewide growth rate in TTTR

43

• Recommend TPO Board approval of the following targets:

Recommended Action

Area Measures Recommended Target Basis of Target

Bridge Condition

National Highway System (NHS) bridge deck area in good condition 20% Matches current regional value

NHS bridge deck area in poor condition < 3.0% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Pavement Condition

Interstate System pavement in good condition 45% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Interstate System pavement in poor condition < 3% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Non-Interstate System NHS pavement in good condition 25% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Non-Interstate System NHS pavement in poor condition < 5% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Roadway Performance

Interstate Travel Time Reliability 82% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Non-Interstate NHS Travel Time Reliability 82.5% Matches CTB-approved statewide target

Freight Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) Index 2.13

Matches expected statewide growth rate in TTTR

MAP-21/FAST ACT REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

AND TARGETS

Presented by: Keith Nichols, PE

TTAC Agenda Item #13

October 3, 2018