marxist criticism & fredric jameson
Post on 03-Apr-2018
230 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 1/14
Marxist Criticism
& Fredric Jameson“不能没有马克思,没有马克思,没有对马克思的记忆,没有马克思的遗产,也就没有将来;无论如何得有某个马克思,得有他的才华,至少得有他的某
种精神。” ——德里达:《马克
思的幽灵》
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 2/14
Part 1 Marxist Criticism
1.The division of Marxism
1.1 classical Marxism
1.2 early Western Marxism
1.3 late Marxism
Note: It is to be noted that this division, though
chronological in nature, by no means indicates the
later period was to replace the former. They in factco-exist with a complex inter-connection in
between.
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 3/14
1.1 classical Marxism
The classical Marxist criticism flourished chiefly in a period from Marx andEngels to the Second World War. It characterizes itself by an insistence on atleast the following basic tenets: materialism, economic determinism, classstruggle, surplus value, reification, proletarian revolution and communism.Marx and Engels were political philosophers rather than literary critics, but thescant and fragmentary aesthetic comments they had made enabled people after
them to build a theory out of them. Marx, for instance, made the famous“ideology critique” in The Holy Family on Eugène Sue’s novel The Mysteriesof Paris, and he also mentioned the concept of ideology in The German
Ideology. Half a century later Engels elaborated the concept in his letter toFranz Mehring. All this provides a rich resource for an ideological criticism.Marx and Engels were more concerned with the contents rather than the formof the literature, because to them literary study was more politically orientedand content was much more ideologically charged. Literary form, however,did have a place if it served their political purposes. Marx and Engels, for instance, liked the realism in C. Dickens, H. Balzac, and W.M. Thackeray, andLenin praised L. Tolstoy for the “political and social truths” in his novels.
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 4/14
1.2 Early Western Marxism Georg Lukács , perhaps the first Western Marxist. He
denounced, as reductionistic and mechanistic the“vulgar” Marxist version of criticism whereby thefeatures of a cultural text were strictly determined by or interpreted in terms of the economic and social
conditions of its production and by the class status of itsauthor. However, he insisted, more than anybody else,on the traditional Marxist reflectionist theory, evenwhen this theory was under severe attack from theformalists in the fifties. In Art and Objective Truth
(1954), he criticized two fallacies of mimesis, namely,false objectivism for its mechanistic materialism andfalse subjectivism for its idealism. The typical exampleof the former is literary naturalism, while for the latter itis the subject-oriented criticism.
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 5/14
1.2 Early Western Marxism
Mikhail M. Bakhtin
1.2.1 In “Discourse in the Novel” written in the thirtieth,Bakhtin, like Lukács, tried to define the novel as aliterary from in terms of Marxism. The discourse of thenovel , unlike that of poetry which is monological, ischaracterized by its dialogic orientation .
1.2.2 The “dialogized heteroglossia” of the novel isideological in nature, in that sense that the polyphonicvoices represent different social forces contendingwith each other.
1.2.3 “Laughter and Freedom” offers a case of such aheteroglossia of contradictions. Here laughter in theCarnival represents “the voice of the people” in theMiddle Ages as a contending force against theempowered “monolithically serious ecclesiastical,
political establishment.”
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 6/14
1.2 early Western Marxism
Frankfurt School of Marxism
In 1923,“Institute of Social Research” founded in
University of Frankfurt, Germany
Members:Max Hirkheimer, Thoedor Adorno,
Walter Benjamin, Erich Fromm and Herbert
Marcuse, Louis Althussser, Williams ,etc.
A distinctive feature of the Frankfurt School areindependence, interdisciplinarity
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 7/14
1.3 late Marxism
Williams: there were at least three forms of
Marxism: the writings of Karl Marx, the
systems developed by later Marxists out of
these writings, and Marxisms popular at givenhistorical moments.
Fredric Jameson: there were two Marxisms,
one being the Marxian System developed by
Karl Marx himself, and the other being its later development of various kind
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 8/14
Part 2 Fredric Jameson
Fredric R. Jameson (born in 1934 inCleveland, Ohio) is one of today'smost important and most influentialcultural theorists. He has done more
for the contextual study of culturethan any other living scholar. Over the past four decades, he hasdeveloped a richly nuanced theory of how modern culture - in particular,
literature, painting, cinema, andarchitecture - relates to social andeconomic developments.
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 9/14
Publications of F. Jameson: Books
F. Jameson. The Modernist Papers. Verso, 2007.
Jameson on Jameson. edited by I. Buchanan Duke University Press, 2007.
F. Jameson. A Singular Modernity . Verso Press, 2002. The Cultural Turn. London: Verso Press, 1998.
Brecht and Method . London: Verso Press, 1998.
Seeds of Time. Columbia University Press, 1994.
Theory of Culture. Rikkyo University, 1994. (Lectures at Rikkyo University)
The Geopolitical Aesthetic, or, Cinema and Space in the World System. Inidiana University Pressand BFI Publishsing, 1992.
Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press, 1990.
Signatures of the Visible. Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc., 1990.
Late Marxism: Adorno, or, the Persistence of the Dialectic . London: Verso Press, 1990.
F. Jameson. The Ideology of Theory, Essays 1971-1986 . Vol. 1 Situations of Theory, Vol. 2 TheSyntax of History University of Minnesota Press, 1988.
F. Jameson. Postmodernism & Cultural Theories. 1987. (Houxiandaizhuyi he Wenhualilun (Lecturesin China) (Xi'an: Shanxi Teacher's University) Reprinted in journals in Taiwan & Hong Kong 1988Reprinted in Taiwan with new preface by Tang Xiaobing 1989)
F. Jameson. The Political Unconscious. Cornell University Press, 1981.
F. Jameson. Fables of Aggression: Wyndham Lewis, The Modernist as Fascist . University of California Press, 1979.
F. Jameson. The Prison-House of Language. Princeton University Press, 1972. (Reprinted inJapanese 1989 Reprinted in Korean 1989)
F. Jameson. Marxism and Form: Twentieth Century Dialectical Theories of Literature. PrincetonUniversity Press, 1971.
F. Jameson. Sartre: The Origins of a Style. Yale University Press, 1961. (Reissued 1984 (ColumbiaUniversity Press))
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 10/14
Jameson restored to literary study the historical
responsibility by re-emphasizing the reflective and
transformative functions of literature at a time in
Western history when these functions were badlyneeded. Meanwhile he discredited the traditional
Marxist generic approach to literature, because
post-industrial capitalism had to a large extent
destroyed man’s sense of history so that it wasdifficult to experience historical reality as an
integrated unity.
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 11/14
The Political Unconscious, the most important work for the earlyJameson perhaps, forcefully reveals that every reading andinterpretation is inevitably political and ideological. HereJameson rewrites the Marxian concept of “ideology” into that of
“ideologeme”, the smallest semantic unit in the dialogues amongcontending social classes (Jameson 1981:76). By focusing on thecritical evaluation of one class on another, Jameson drawsMarxism from actual reality to textual analysis. This“textualization of history” is better seen in “meta-commentary”,
the most important Jamesonian concept in his thirty years of Marxist theoretical praxis. It suggests “not a head-on, directsolution or resolution, but a commentary on the every conditionof the problem itself”
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 12/14
Conclusion
It is to be noted that at every historical moment when Marxismseemed in trouble, Marxist criticism would gain a newdevelopment. The early 1920s saw the heyday of “anthropological” Marxism; 1930s witnessed a strong leftist
literary criticism in the West; and Mc-Carthyism went hand inhand with the strengthening of Western Marxism. Marxism isonce again severely challenged in the last years of the twentiethcentury beginning with the ice age of Reagan-Thatcherism, and itwill never be the “true but superfluous,” simply because
Marxism provides the best analysis on the contradictions of capitalism, “to the ways that it can not help producing wealth and
poverty at a stroke, as material conditions of one another”(Eagleton & Milne 1996:6).
7/29/2019 Marxist Criticism �& Fredric Jameson
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marxist-criticism-fredric-jameson 13/14
Questions for discussion
1.What’s your comment on Marxist criticism
in China nowadays?
2.有人认为,马克思主义的文艺批评在当下
整个文学批评中的领域中处于夹缝状态,你是否同意这一看法?为什么?
top related