measuring the output of health in the united states workshop on measurement of non-market output in...

Post on 17-Jan-2016

213 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Measuring the Output of Health in the United StatesWorkshop on Measurement of Non-Market Output in Education and Health

Michael S. ChristianU.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

October 4, 2006

2www.bea.gov

Two Projects in Health Economics

Home and volunteer production

Direct volume measurement

3www.bea.gov

Direct Volume Measurement

Real health care services measured in U.S. GDP accounts by price deflation CPI, PPI, input price indexes Based on prices of procedures

Direct volume measurement is an interesting alternative

4www.bea.gov

Inpatient Hospital Services (1)

Volume of inpatient hospital services Simple count of discharges Fisher index of discharges by condition Fisher index adjusted by survival rate

Measuring by condition measures some cost savings as price decreases Substitution to less expensive

procedures

5www.bea.gov

Inpatient Hospital Services (2)

Survival rate adjustment adapted from Dawson et al (2006)

Two sources on volume, survival rates Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS)

National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS)

Fisher weights are mean charges by condition from NIS

6www.bea.gov

Inpatient Hospital Services (3)

Annual volume growth, 1993-2003

NIS NHDS

Simple count 1.1% 1.2%

Fisher index 1.3% 1.6%

Survival adjustment 2.1% 2.5%

7www.bea.gov

NIS Inpatient Discharges

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003

Survival adjusted

Fisher index

Simple count

8www.bea.gov

NHDS Inpatient Discharges

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003

Survival adjusted

Fisher index

Simple count

9www.bea.gov

Aggregate Survival Adjustment

95

100

105

110

115

1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003

NIS

NHDS

10www.bea.gov

Inpatient Hospital Services (4)

Large effects from survival adjustment

Indexes only account for cost-saving substitutions within inpatient services Ignores potentially important

substitutions across service categories Aizcorbe and Nestoriak (2006)

top related