microsatellites at very low altitude

15 Aug 20061 Proprietary of Rafael - Armament Development Authority Ltd

20th Annual Conference on Small Satellites, 2006

20th Annual Conference on Small SatellitesAugust 14-17, 2006

SSC06-II-3

Microsatellites at Very Low Altitude

Dr. Hezi Atir, Dr. David Mishne

Space Systems Directorate, Rafael Ltd.

The Triad of the Presentation

Venµs TechnologicalMission

Hall EffectThruster

Microsatellites at Very Low AltitudeMicrosatellites at Very Low Altitude

Low Altitude DefinitionWhere drag is significant and has to be considered (in orbit maintenance and other mission tasks)Affected by the cross section area Individual per architecture and mission.

Altitude vs. Cross Section Area5 10 15 20 25

0 1 2 3 4

Cross section (m2)

Kg hydrazine/yearKg hydrazine/year

Low Altitude Imaging MissionsLow altitude imaging missions benefit the low cost of smaller and less complex payload compared to higher altitude missions with similar performance Additional subsystems (i.e. communication), as well as the whole satellite become less expensive. The same applies to the launch cost

However, several issues should be considered as well in order to justify a low altitude mission compared with a higher altitude one.

20th Annual Conference on Small Satellites, 2006 Low Altitude Advantages for

Imaging MissionPayload size drastically reducedImpact on payload, satellite and launch cost

200 300 400 500 60015

Satellite Hight, km

Ground Resolution Distance = 1 mWavelength = 0.7 micrometer

Payload Size Vs Height

GSDhD λ22.1

Typical Imaging Missions

Low Alt. Imaging Missions

Altitude (km)

D(cm)h= Altitude

GSD=Ground Sampling Distance

λ=Wavelength

Drag ConsiderationsLow altitude requires frequent orbit maintenance

300 350 400 450 5000

Altitude, km

XenonIsp = 1350 sec

HydrazineIsp = 220 sec

Area = 0.8 m2

Mission = 3 YearsSolar max. conditions

220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 4000

Altitude, km

XenonIsp = 1350 sec

HydrazineIsp = 220 sec

Area = 0.2 m2

Mission = 3 YearsSolar max. conditions

Fuel Required to Compensate for Drag

Hydrazine Propulsion vs. Electric Propulsion

A microsatellite with high quality payload is usually intended for long mission durations.

250 300 350 400

Altitude, km

mAtf ∆>∗∗− *)1(ξ

ξ = Hydrazine / Xenon fuel consumptionf = Xenon required / (year * area) (kg/y*m2)t = Mission duration (years)A = Cross section area (m2)∆m = ∆ (empty mass) of EPS (kg)

A=0.5m2

∆m=15kgElectric Propulsion Zone

Hydrazine Propulsion Zone

Thrust Level

Orbit maintenance should not interfere with the mission → propulsion duty cycle should be short Also, short periods of very high drag due to extreme solar activity are expectedTherefore, thrust should be much higher (5-10 times) than the drag

Attitude Dynamics - 1

Moment due to drag:

Constant + attitude dependent

( ) ( )θρρ ,0 MMM drag +=

Density Pitch angle

Attitude Dynamics - 2

( ) ( ) ( )θθρρθ ggMMMI ++= ,0&&

Pitch dynamics:

Non-attitude dependent drag moment

Gravity gradient moment

Attitude-dependent drag moment

Linearized dynamics:

( ) ( )ρθρθ θ 0MMI =+&&

Attitude Dynamics - 3( ) ( )ρθρθ θ 0MMI =+&&

The density is periodic (due to day/night cycle), with basic frequency equal to the mean motion n.

A good design approach:

Provide adequate aerodynamic stability such that the natural frequency of the pitch dynamics, , is much higher (at least twice) than the mean motion n.

Orbit ControlThe orbit control law has to compensate for the exerted drag. Thus the satellite should have some autonomy in the orbit control Orbit determination becomes more complex both because of the unknown drag and because of the frequent thrust activations. The GPS system can be used for this taskSatellite autonomy should be included also in the mission planning (because of the orbit determination process)

Power Considerations

Electric propulsion system requires extra powerFor thrust level of 15mN, with efficiency of 40%, the system requires about 300wRequired solar panels area is about 1.5m2, and the additional weight is 6kg.

Coverage ConsiderationsSmaller field of regard (reachable area)Need more satellites or more time to cover a given area of interest

Communication ConsiderationsRequire less power and smaller componentsShorter real time data communication range

200 250 300 350 400800

Satellite Altitude, km

Elevation = 10 deg

GRS Antenna Elevation = 0 deg

Elevation = 5 deg

Hall EffectThruster

A key ingredient for low altitude

orbit maintenance

A key ingredient for low altitude

orbit maintenance

The HET- 300W Thruster

A small Hall effect thruster is developed, suitable to microsatellitesWill be tested aboard the Venus satellite

HET General PropertiesThruster mass – 1.5 kg

Thruster dimensions 169X119X91mm

HET PerformanceHET Performance

Nominal thrust: 15-33 mN

Nominal specific impulse: 1300-1650 sec

Input power (operating): 300 – 600 watts

Thruster ModelThrust Vs. Anode Power Isp Vs. Anode Power

200 300 400 500 600

Power(watts)

200 300 400 500 600

Power(watts)

cathode constant mass flow of 0.1 mg/sec

HET SystemTotal HET system dry weight (with 2 thrusters) – 20 kg

FilterPressure

Regulator

PPU/TSU

XenonTank

HETGimbalsXFC

PPU/TSU- Power Processing Unit/ Thruster Selecting XFC- Xenon Flow Controller HET – Hall Effect Thruster PT – Pressure Transducer PV – Pyro Valve - - - - Control and Electric Line Fuel Line

Orbit Maintenance

Example: Sun-synchronous orbit IHET operation zones

Two activations of two different thrusters provide symmetrical orbit maintenance Eclipse

Venµs TechnologicalMission

A test bed for low altitude imaging

mission

A test bed for low altitude imaging

mission

Venµs ProgramVegetation and Environment New µSatellite

Dual missions: – Scientific Mission: A research demonstrator mission

for the GMES program (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security), dedicated to monitoring vegetation and water quality – using a Multi-Spectralcamera

Ben Gurion University

Venµs ProgramVegetation and Environment New µSatellite– Technological Mission: Validation of the Israeli Hall

Effect Thruster (IHET) and demonstration of its mission enhancement capabilities:

• Orbit maintenance, • LEO to LEO orbit transfer• Enabling imaging mission in a high drag

environment.

Ben Gurion University

The VENµS Mission PhasesPhase 1: Scientific mission (hyperspectral imaging at 720km) – 2 yearsPhase 2: Descent to low altitude (410km) using Hall thruster (3 months)Phase 3: Demonstration of combined scientific mission and orbit maintenance at low altitude

Technological Mission Rationale

Validation and verification of the IHET systemDemonstration of imaging mission enhancement capabilities: Orbit transfer and orbit maintenance with high drag compensation requirements

Venus technological mission is an emulation of imaging mission at very low altitude

The Orbit

Low OrbitHigh Orbit

Circular, sun-synchronous

Circular, sun-synchronousOrbit Type

410 km720 kmAltitude

2 days (31 orbits)2 days (29 orbits)Revisit Time

13 km27.5 kmSwath Width

2.9 m5.3 mResolutionConsiderableNegligibleDrag

The VENµS Technological MissionImaging orbits in Yellow, IHET orbits in blue

Phase 3 Orbit Maintenance IHET activations are performed in the IHET allocated orbits, while the scientific mission continues in the imaging allocated orbits.

IHET activation every 4th orbit, to allow orbit maintenance during solar max conditions

Imaging orbits are fixed over Israel and Europe, as planned during Phase 1

IHET allocated orbits are constant and are repeated every satellite Earth repeating cycle (31 orbits): – 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 31

VM3 simulation results - 1

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450-0.2

0.25Changes in mean semi major axis [km]

orbits since Epoch

[15mN 4:4:30,31] 27days

Change in Mean Semi Major Axis [km]

in 28 Days

Same as referencesatellite with no drag

ConclusionsLow altitude imaging missions can be performed with microsatellitesAdvantages: resolution, costDisadvantages: coverage, communication rangeThe configuration should be properly designed: low cross section, proper dynamic stability, adequate solar panel areaElectrical propulsion provides long-term orbit maintenance, without compromising the missionTest bed – Venus (2009). The technological mission will demonstrate the feasibility of using HET for orbit control and of carrying out undisturbed imaging mission, similar to what should be required from a microsatellite at very low altitude

microsatellites at very low altitude

Documents

design and performance calculations of a propeller for very...

usefulness of microsatellites for positioning the tunisian...

soviet missiles and general game markerssoviet missiles and...

propulsion system for very high altitude subsonic unmanned...

review microsatellites and their genomic distribution,...

isolation, characterization and mapping of microsatellites

altitude training systems | altitude tents, …...high...

evolution and applications of pine microsatellites

variability and differentiation of microsatellites in the

2001-1504 a docking system for microsatellites based...

microsatellites as ews/fli response elements in ewing’s...

diseÑo de un panel de marcadores microsatellites … ·...

the use of microsatellites in the study of social

microsatellites within genes structure, function and...

minisatellites and microsatellites – similar names but...

microsatellites to enhance characterization, conservation

minisatellites and microsatellites â€“ similar names...

microsatellites reveal a strong subdivision of genetic...

potential propulsion system for microsatellites propulsion...

prokaryote microsatellites